|
Zu Hu
Huang1, Hui Zhuang2, Shan Lu3, Ren Hua
Guo1, Guo
Min Xu2, Jie Cai1 and Wan Fu Zhu2
1Department
of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing
Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
2Faculty of Microbiology, Beijing University, Beijing
100000, China
3University of Massachusetts Medical Center
Dr. Zu Hu Huang, graduated from Nanjing Medical University in 1982
and earned his Master Degree of Medicine from NMU in 1988, trained
in molecular biology and virology in Australia and United States,
now Professor and Director of Department of Infectious Diseases,
specialized in clinical molecular biology for diagnosis and
treatment of viral hepatitis, having 35 papers published.
Project supported by the grant from Science Foundation of Ministry
of Health of China, No.96-1-347.
Correspondence to: Zu Hu Huang, The First Affiliated Hospital
of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029,
Jiangsu Province, China
Telephone:
0086-25-3737024, Fax.
0086-25-3724440
Received: 2000-08-08 Accepted: 2000-10-29
Subject
headings: hepatitis
B virus; DNA vaccine; hepatitis B core antigens; nucleic acid
vaccine; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; macaca mulatta
Huang
ZH, Zhuang H, Lu S, Guo RH, Xu GM, Cai J, Zhu WF. Humoral and
cellular immunogenecity of DNA vaccine based on hepatitis B core
gene in rhesus monkeys. World J Gastroenterol, 2001;7(1):102-106
INTRODUCTION
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most common etiologic agent for
infectious liver diseases. It is estimated that there are more than
250 million chronic HBV carriers in the world today and there is a
significant association among persistent infection, liver cirrhosis
and hepatocellular carcinoma[1-3].
The control of HBV infections is thought to be mediated by both
humoral and cellular immune responses involving neutralizing
antibodies as well as class Ⅰ
and class Ⅱ
major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restricted T- cells[4,5].
Among the HBV antigens, a number of studies have highlighted the
importance of the human immune response against the HBcAg and HBeAg
during HBV infections. During acute HBV infection, cytotoxicity T
lymphocyte (CTL) specific for HBcAg and HBeAg can be detected in the
circulation of the infected host. In contrast, in chronic HBV
infection, HBcAg and HBeAg specific CTL and T-helper cell activity
are not readily detected. The cumulated data suggest that CTL
activity may play an important role in resolving HBV infection[6-11].
DNA
mediated immunization has been shown to be an novel method to induce
both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against many
different antigens including HBV antigens[12,13].
We have demonstrated that the DNA vaccine based on HBV core gene has
strong humoral and cellular immunogenecity in different species of
mice[14,15].
In our experiments, we have further investigated the immunogenecity
of this DNA vaccine in rhesus monkeys. The results show that the DNA
vaccine of HBV core gene can prime obvious antigen specific antibody
and cell mediated immune responses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of DNA vaccine of HBV core gene
The control plasmid (pJW4303) and DNA vaccine of HBV core gene
(pJW4303/HBc) were propagated by a large amount of culture of the
transformed E.coli strain of HB101. Plasmid DNA was purified
with QIAGEN Plasmid Mega Kit (QIAGEN, Germany).
Rhesus monkeys
Four rhesus monkeys (2 male, 2 female, 3 years of age) were
purchased from Special Animal Breeding and Raising Center, Xingye,
Henan Province, China and maintained at the animal house in Beijing
Medical University. The monkeys were divided into experimental group
and control group (2 monkeys in each group).
Protocols of DNA immunization
The monkeys in the experimental group were immunized with plasmid
pJW4303/HBc and that in the control group were immunized with
plasmid pJW4303. The plasmids were dissolved in normal saline to a
final concentration of 1g/L. Each time one monkey received 4 site
intramuscular injections with a total volume of 2mL plasmid solution
containing 2mg plasmid
DNA. Three boosts with same dose were given at an interval of 2
months. The monkeys’ sera before and after immunizations were
collected and stored at -30℃
.
Detection of anti-HBc antibody
Anti-HBc antibodies in monkeys'
sera were first detected by
Abbott Imx System (Abbott, USA) according to the manufacturer's
instructions and end-point titers of anti HBc antibody were then
detected by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The
procedures were as follows: ①
The 96 well microplates were coated with recombinant HBcAg
(1mg/L)
and blocked with PBS containing 10% FCS. ②
Three-fold dilutions of monkeys'
sera ( 1∶50,
1∶150,
1∶450
…… 1∶984150)
were added to triplicate wells. ③
HRP labeled rabbit anti-human IgG (Sino-American Biotechnology Co.)
at the dilution of 1∶3000
was used as second antibody. ④
The substrate solution (TMB) was then added to each well and
reaction was stopped by 2M H2SO4. ⑤
The absorbence value was measured at wavelength of 450nm by
an ELISA reader. Microplate washings were performed between each
step with PBST solution. The end point of anti-HBc titer was defined
as the highest serum dilution that resulted in an absorbence value
two times that of non immune or control serum.
Detection of IgG subclasses of anti-HBc
Subclasses of anti-HBc antibodies were detected in the sera of the
monkeys positive for anti HBc. The procedures were similar to the
ELISA method mentioned above for detecting anti-HBc, except that
serum was diluted to 1∶30.
1∶500
diluted sheep anti human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 (Nordic
Immunological Laboratories, Tilburg, the Netherlands) were used as
the second antibody, and 1∶5000
diluted HRP labeled rabbit anti sheep IgG (Jackson Immuno-Research
Laboratories Inc, PA, USA) was used as the third antibody.
Detection of IFN-γ and IL-4 in PBMC culture supernatant
The procedures were as follows: ①
PBMCs were separated from heparinized monkey blood by Ficoll
gradient sedimentation method. ②
PBMCs were resuspended with RPMI-1640 containing 10% FCS to a final
concentration of 2×106 cells/mL. ③
PBMC suspension 250μL (5×105 cells) was added to triplicate wells in a
24 well cell culture plate, and recombinant human IL-2 (500U/well)
was added as well. ④
Except for control wells, PBMCs in each triplicate wells were
restimulated with recombinant HBcAg at different doses of 5μg/well,
10μg/well and 12.5μg/well . ⑤
After 48h incubation
under the condition of 37℃,
5% CO2, the supernatant was collected from each well and
stored at once at -70℃.
⑥
IFN-γ and IL-4 concentrations were detected by the ELISA kits (
Jinmei Biotechnology Co., Shenzheng, China).
PBMC proliferation assay
The procedures were similar to that for detecting IFN-γ and
IL-4 in PBMC culture supernatant, except that ①
PBMCs were incubated for 72h; ②
0.5μCi 3H-TdR was added to each well and followed by
another 4h incubation; PBMCs were then collected onto filter
membrane which were then backed 2h at
80℃;
and the radioactivity (CPM) was determined by a beta-scintillation
counter (Beckman). The PBMC proliferation activity was expressed by
Stimulation Index (SI), which was calculated according to the
following formula: (SI=CPM of HBcAg stimulated well/CPM of non HBcAg
stimulated well). SI value greater than 2 was generally considered
as having antigen specific PBMC proliferation.
RESULTS
Anti-HBc IgG and its end-point titer in monkey’s sera
The results of anti-HBc IgG
and its end-point titer
in monkey’s sera are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Anti-HBc in sera of experimental and control monkeys
|
Monkey
No.
|
Group
|
Anti-HBc
antibody
|
End-point
|
|
0
month
|
2
month
|
4
month
|
6
month
|
8
month
|
|
1
|
Experimental
|
Na
|
Pb
|
N/Dc
|
N/D
|
N/D
|
1∶36
450
|
|
2
|
Experimental
|
N
|
N
|
P
|
P
|
P
|
1∶109
350
|
|
3
|
Control
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
1∶150
|
|
4
|
Control
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
1∶150
|
aN:
negative
b P: positive (in Abbott Imx System, the detected value
less than 1.00 was considered positive for anti HBc).
c not detected because of death.
Subclasses of anti-HBc IgG in sera of experimental group of
rhesus monkeys
Subclasses of anti-HBc IgG (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4) were detected
in the experimental monkeys (No.1 and No.2), which were found to be
positive for anti-HBc in the previous tests. The results are shown
in Table 2.
Table 2 Subclasses of anti-HBc IgG and IgG1/IgG2 ratio in
rhesus monkeys’sera
|
Monkey
No.
|
IgG1
|
IgG2
|
IgG3
|
IgG4
|
IgG1/IgG2
|
|
1
|
0.61+0.01a
|
1.02+0.08
|
0.32+0.02
|
0.12+0.01
|
0.60
|
|
2
|
0.61+0.04
|
1.05+0.04
|
0.40+0.01
|
0.18+0.03
|
0.58
|
a
The values indicated x-±s of triplicate wells.
IFN-γ and IL-4 levels in culture supernatant of PBMCs
stimulated with recombinant HBcAg
IFN-γ and IL-4 levels were detected in monkey No.2
(experimental group) and monkey No.3 (control group). Monkey No.1
and No.4 died before this test was performed. The results are shown
in Table 3.
Table 3 IFN-γ and IL-4 values in culture supernatant of
PBMCs
|
Monkey
No.
|
Group
|
IFN-γ
(ng/L)
|
IL-4
(ng/L)
|
|
2
|
Experimental
|
15.63
|
6.25
|
|
3
|
Control
|
<3.13
|
6.25
|
HBcAg
specific PBMCs proliferation activity in experimental and control
groups of rhesus monkeys
HBcAg specific PBMCs proliferation activities were measured in
monkey No.2 and No.3 by the time of 12 months after first
immunization. The results are listed in Table 4.
Table 4 HBcAg specific PBMC proliferation activity*
|
Monkey
No.
|
Group
|
HBcAg
dose for stimulation (μg/well)
|
|
0
|
5
|
10
|
12.5
|
|
2
|
Experimental
|
354.4±64.5
|
984.9±105.4a
(2.74)
|
1364.9±47.9a(3.83)
|
890±155.6a
(2.12)
|
|
3
|
Control
|
198.4±3.9
|
274.5±33.2
(1.37)
|
261.5±28.2
(1.32)
|
250±70.0
(1.24)
|
*The
values in the table refer to CPM (x-±s from each triplicate well),
the values in the brackets indicate stimulation index (SI).
aP<0.05
vs control monkey.
DISCUSSION
DNA-mediated immunization refers to the induction of an immune
response to antigen expressed in vivo subsequent to the
introduction of DNA carrying the protein coding sequences and the
regulatory elements needed to express them[16,17].
An important feature of DNA-based immunization is the in situ production
of the expressed protein(s), mimicking a viral infection. The
endogenous synthesis should allow presentation of antigens by class Ⅰ
molecules of MHC, resulting in the induction of CD8+ cytotoxic T
lymphocytes (CTL)[18].
There have been several experimented reports in which recombinant
plasmid DNA was used to induce immune responses to particular
pathogens, including malaria[19],
herpes simplex virus (HSV)[20],
influenza A[21],
rabies virus[22],
simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)[23],
human immunodeficiency virus type Ⅰ
(HIV)[24]
and
hepatitis B virus (HBV)[25-32].
In our
earlier work, the HBV core gene fragment, which was modified to
assure the high level expression of HBcAg[33],
was successfully cloned into the plasmid pJW4303, the vector
containing CMV immediate early promotor. This recombinant plasmid
was named pJW4303/HBc. The DNA immunization using pJW4303/HBc among
Balb/c (H2d) and C57BL/6 (H2b) mice showed
that this recombinant could induce strong humoral (antibody) and
cellular (CTL) immune responses[34].
When
evaluating the immunogenecity and safety of potential DNA vaccine
for eventual use in humans, the nonhuman primate models should be
considered. The best nonhuman primate candidate would be those
closest to humans on a phylogenetic basis. However, cost and other
considerations may preclude studies in hominoid species, such as
chimpanzee, orang utans, gorillas, and gibbons. Based on the cost
and availability, nonhominoid primate species including rhesus
monkeys, represent the alternative candidate nonhuman primate
species for pre-clinical immunogenecity studies[35,36].
Townsend
et al[37]
observed the specific immune
responses in mouse and rhesus monkeys after genetic immunization
with retrovirus vectors expressing different forms of the hepatitis
B virus core and e antigens. Their results showed that intramuscular
injections with 108 CFU of the the LHBc-Neo retrovirus
vector into rhesus monkeys induced HBc/eAg specific antibody
production and CD8+ CTLs. The CTL response is long lasting, and
being detectable as late as 16 weeks after immunization.
We
used the plasmid as the vector to carry HBV core gene for DNA
immunization in rhesus monkeys, which was different from the
observation above the reason for that is that the safety of the
vector for retrovirus vector was integratable to the host genome.
In our experiments, all 4 monkeys were negative for anti-HBc
before DNA immunization. After intramuscular immunization of
pJW4303/HBc and pJW4303, the monkeys in the experimental group all
developed anti-HBc antibody while the monkeys in the control group
all negative for this antibody, indicating that this DNA vaccine
could induce antigen specific humoral response in rhesus monkeys. We
also found that the monkeys in the experimental group could show
different antibody response profiles. Monkey No.1 became positive
for anti-HBc (1∶36450)
after the first immunization while monkey No.2 was not negative for
anti HBc until the second immunization and the antibody titer became
higher (1∶103950)
as late as the total four immunizations were accomplished. This
different antibody production profiles might indicate the individual
difference in response to DNA immunization.
In
human and other hominoid primates, the serum IgG exhibited four
subclasses, i.e. , IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4. The relative
concentrations of these IgG subclasses were 60%-70% for IgG1,
15%-20% for IgG2, 5%-10% for IgG3, and 1%-7% for IgG4. When looked
into the antigen specific IgG antibodies the concentration of IgG1
and IgG2 and its ratio IgG1/IgG2 could reflect the response profiles
of helper T cells (T-H1 type or T-H2 type) to some extent. Generally
speaking, IgG1/IgG2<1
or IgG1/IgG2>1
reflected T-H1 type or T-H2 type immune responses. The previous data
showed that T-H1 type response was beneficial for the clearance or
eradication of chronic infected viruses while the T-H2 type-
response was usually correlated to the exacerbation of
immunopathogenic damage of host tissues[38].
Feltquate et al had found that intramuscular immunization of
DNA vaccines was prone to induce T-H1 type of immune response,
thereby facilitating the recovery of the host from chronic viral
infection[39].
Our results also demonstrated that two monkeys intramuscularly
immunized with HBV core DNA vaccine all exhibited T-H1 type of
immune response based on the fact that their IgG1/IgG2 ratios were
all less than 1 (0.60 and 0.58, respectively).
The
profiles of cytokine production were another indicators of helper T
cell responses[40-44].
IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α and GM-CSF were usually considered as
T-H1 type cytokines, while IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 were T-H2 type
cytokines. IFN-γ and IL-4 were chosen in this experiment to
observe helper T cell responses after DNA immunization of HBV core
gene in rhesus monkeys. IFN-γ level was significantly higher in
the culture supernatant of PBMC from the monkeys immunized with HBV
core DNA vaccine than that from monkeys injected only with control
plasmid (15.63ng/L vs <3.13ng/L).
At the same time, IL-4 levels in both monkeys with injections of
pJW4303/HBc or PJW4303 were similar (6.25ng/L vs 6.25ng/L). The
results indicated IFN γ prominent cytokine profile in the
monkey immunized with HBV core DNA vaccine. This result combined
with the result of IgG1/IgG2 ratios mentioned above further
confirmed the T-H1 type immune responses in the monkeys of the
experimental group.
Cell-mediated
immune response is critical for the termination of chronic HBV
infections[45-47].
Antigen specific lymphocyte proliferation assay is an alternative
for the CTL assay to evaluate the cell-mediated immune response[48].
In this experiment, the HBcAg specific PBMC proliferation activity
was seen in the monkey immunized with pJW4303/HBc but not in the
monkey injected with pJW4303 (P<0.05).
After stimulation with three different doses of HBcAg, the
stimulation index (SI) was all >2
in the experimental monkeys but all <2
in the control monkeys, which strongly indicated that DNA vaccine of
pJW4303/HBc could induce antigen specific cell mediated immune
response in rhesus monkeys.
Sallberg
et al reported that DNA immunization of HBV core gene using
retrovirus as vector could markedly decrease the HBV DNA level in
the sera of experimental chimpanzees, and even induce the
seroconversion of HBeAg to anti-HBe[49].
Our results showed that using plasmid as vector the DNA vaccine
could also stimulate the immune responses in nonhuman primate rhesus
monkeys, which was obviously helpful and beneficial for the host to
inhibit and eventually eradicate chronically infected virus,
including hepatitis B virus. As the designer vaccines for the 21st
century, DNA vaccines demonstrated its feasibility of inducing
specific cellular immunity in humans[50].
We believed that DNA vaccine of HBV core gene may become a potential
therapeutics for the treatment of chronic HBV infection in humans in
the near future.
REFERENCES
1 Chan HL, Ghany MG, Lok ASF. Hepatitis B. Schiff
s diseases of the liver. 8th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven
Publishers,
1999:757-784
2 Gerlich WH, Thomssen R.The viruses of hepatitis.
In: 2nd ed. Bircher J, Benhamou JP, McIntyre N, eds. Oxford
textbook
of
clinical hepatology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1999:828-954
3 Wang XL,
Guo H, Li ZZ, Jia SY, Zhang ZR, Liu H. Hemodynamic study of HBV
carriers. World J Gastroenterol,
1998;4(Suppl
2):85
4 Milich
DR. Immune response to the hepatitis B virus: infection, animal
models, vaccination. Viral Hepat Rev,
1997;3:63-103
5 Bertoletti
A, Southwood S, Chesnut R, Sette A, Falco M, Ferrara GB, Penna A,
Boni C, Fiaccadori F, Ferrari C. Molecular
features
of the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid T-cell epitope 18-27:
interaction with HLA and T-cell receptor.
Hepatology,
1997;26:1027-1034
6 Lee WM.
Hepatitis B virus infection. N Engl J Med, 1997;337:1733-1745
7 Ferrari
C, Penna A, Bertoletti A, Valli A, Antoni AD, Giuberti T, Cavalli A,
Petit MA, Fiaccadori F. Cellular immune
response
to hepatitis B virus-encoded
antigens in acute and chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Immunol,
1990;145:3442-3449
8 Bertoletti
A, Ferrari C, Fiaccadori F, Penna A, Margolskee R, Schlicht HJ,
Fowler P, Guilhot S, Chisari FV. HLA class
I-restricted
human cytotoxic T cells recognize endogenously synthesized
hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid antigen.
Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991;88:10445-10449
9 Penna
A,Chisari FV,Bertoletti A, Missale G, Fowler P, Giuberti T,
Fiaccadori F, Ferrari C. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes
recognize
an HLA-A2-restricted epitope within the hepatitis B virus
nucleocapsid antigen. J Exp Med,
1991;174:1565-1570
10 Tsai SL, Chen PJ, Lai MY, Yang PM, Sung JL, Huang JH, Hwang
LH, Chang TH, Chen DS. Acute exacerbations of chronic
type
B hepatitis are accompanied by increased T cell responses to
hepatitis B core and e antigens. J Clin Invest,
1992;89:87-96
11 Lau GKK.
Immunological approaches to the breakdown of hepatitis B viral
persistence. World J Gastroenterol,
1998;4(Suppl
2):32
12 Robinson HL.Nucleic
acid vaccines: an overview. Vaccine,1997;15:785-787
13 Zhao LS, Qin S, Zhou
TY, Tang H, Liu L, Lei BJ. DNA-based vaccination induces humoral and
cellular immune
responses
against hepatitis B virus surface antigen in mice without
activation of C-myc. World J
Gastroenterol,2000;6:239-243
14 Huang ZH, Lu S, Liu
N, Wang SX. Specific immune responses in H-2d mice after
DNA immunization of HBV
core
gene. Zhonghua Ganzangbing Zazhi,1999;7:107-109
15 Huang ZH, Lu S, Liu
N, Wang SX. Specific cellular and humoral immune responses in H-2b
mice induced by DNA
immunization
of HBV core gene. Zhonghua Chuanranbing Zazhi,
1999;17:104-107
16 Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, Chong W, Acsadi G, Jani A,
Felgner PL. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle
in
vivo. Science,
1990;247:1465-1468
17 Tang DC, Devit M, Johnston SA. Genetic immunization is a
simple method for eliciting an immune response. Nature,
1992;356:152-154
18 McDonnell WM, Askari
FK. Molecular medicine DNA vaccines. N Engl J Med, 1996;334:42-45
19 Hoffman SL, Doolan
DL, Sedegah M, Wang R, Scheller LF, Kumar A, Weiss WR, Le TP,
Klinman DM, Hobart P,
Norman
JA, Hedstrom RC. Toward
clinical trials of DNA vaccines against malaria. Immunol Cell Biol,
1997;75:376-381
20 Manickan E, Rouse
RJD, Yu Z, Wire WS,Rouse BT. Genetic immunization against herpes
simplex virus: protection is
mediated
by CD4+ T lymphocytes.J Immunol, 1995;155:259-265
21 Justewicz DM, Morin
MJ, Robinson HL, Webster RG. Antibody-forming cell response to virus
challenge in mice
immunized
with DNA encoding the
influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Virol, 1995;69:7712-7717
22 Xiang ZQ, Spitalnik
S, Tran M, Wunner WH,Cheng J, Ertl HCJ. Vaccination with a plasmid
vector carrying the rabies
virus
glycoprotein gene induces protective immunity against rabies
virus. Virology, 1994;199:132-140
23 Yasutomi Y, Robinson
HL, Lu S, Mustafa F, Lekutis C, Arthos J, Mullins JI, Voss G, Manson
K, Wyand M, Letvin NL.
Simian
immunodeficiency virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte induction
through DNA vaccination of rhesus
monkeys.
J Virol, 1996;70:678-681
24 Lu S, Santoro JC,
Fuller DH, Haynes JR, Robinson HL. Use of DNAs expressing HIV-1 env
and noninfectious HIV-1
particles
to raise antibody responses
in mice. Virology, 1995;209:147-154
25 Davis HL, McCluskie
MJ, Gerin JL, Purcell RH.DNA vaccine for hepatitis B: evidence for
immunogenicity in chimpanzees
and
comparison with other vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
1996;93:7213-7218
26 Davis HL, Millan CLB,
Mancini M, McCluskie MJ, Hadchouel M, Comanita L, Tiollais P, Whalen
RG, Michel ML. DNA-based
immunization
against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in normal and HBsAg-transgenic
mice.Vaccine,
1997;15:849-852
27 Schirmbeck R, Böhm
W, Ando K, Chisari FV, Reimann J. Nucleic acid va ccination primes
hepatitis B virus surface
antigena-specific
cytotoxic T lymphocytes in nonresponder mice. J Virol,
1995;69:5929-5934
28 Michel ML, Davis HL,
Schleef M, Mancini M, Tiollais P, Whalen RG. DNA-mediated
immunization to the hepatitis B
surface
antigen in mice: Aspects of
the humoral response mimic hepatitis B viral infection in humans.
Proc Natl Acad
Sci
USA, 1995;92:5307-5311
29 Mancini M, Hadchouel
M, Davis HL, Whalen RG, Tiollais P, Michel ML.DNA- mediated
immunization in a transgenic
mouse
model of the hepatitis B
surface antigen chronic carrier state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
1996;93:12496-12501
30 Sllberg M, Townsend
K, Chen M, O dea J, Banks T, Jolly DJ, Chang SM, Lee WT, Milich DR.
Characterization of humoral
and
CD4a+ cellular responses after genetic immunization with
retroviral vectors expressing different forms of the
hepatitis
B virus core and e antigens. J Virol, 1997;71:5295-5303
31 Kuhröber
A, Wild J, Pudollek HP, Chisari FV, Reimann J. DNA vaccination with
plasmids encoding the intracellular
(HBcAg)
or secreted (HBeAg) form of the core protein of hepatitis B
virus primes T cell responses to two overlapping
Kaba-
and Kada-restricted epitopes. Inter Immunol, 1997;9:1203-1212
32 Geissler M, Tokushige K, Chante CC, Zurawski VR Jr, Wands
JR. Cellular and humoral immune response to hepatitis B
virus
structural proteins in mice after DNA-based immunization.
Gastroenterology, 1997;112:1307-1320
33 Ye YA, Zhan MY. High
efficient expression in E.coli of hepatitis B virus core gene after
5 end modification. Bingdu
Xuebao,
1988;4:312-318
34 Huang ZH, Lu S, Liu
N, Wang SX, Li J, Tang BY.Humoral and cellular immunogenecity of
genetic vaccine on core gene
of
hepatitis B virus in mice.
Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi, 1999;79:456-459
35 Kennedy RC, Shearer
MH, Hildebrand W.Nonhuman primate models to evaluate vaccine safety
and immunogenicity.
Vaccine,
1997;15:903-908
36 Liu MA, McClements
W, Ulmer JB, Shiver J, Donnelly J. Immunization of non-human
primates with DNA vaccines.
Vaccine,
1997;15:909-912
37 Townsend K, Sällberg
M, O dea, J, Banks T, Driver D, Sauter S, Chang SM, Jolly DJ, Mento
SJ, Milich DR, Lee
WTL.
Characterization of CD8+ cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte responses
after genetic immunization with retrovirus
vectors
expressing different forms of the hepatitis B virus core and
e antigens. J Virol, 1997;71:3365-3374
38 Scott P, Kaufmann
SHE. The role of T-cell subsets and cytokines in the regulation of
infection. Immunol Today,
1991;12:346-348
39 Feltquate DM, Heaney
S, Webster RG, Robinson HL.Different T. Helper cell types and
antibody isotypes generated by
saline
and gene gun DNA immunization.J Immunol, 1997;158:2278-2284
40 Actor JK, Shirai M,
Kullberg MC, Buller RML, Sher A, Berzofsky JA. Helminth infection
results in decreased virus-specific
CD8a+
cytotoxic T-cell and Th1 cytokine responses as well as delayed virus
clearance. Proc Natl Acad
Sci
USA, 1993;90:948-952
41 Clerici M, Hakim FT,
Venzon DJ, Blatt S, Hendrix CW, Wynn TA, Shearer GM.Changes in
interleukin-2 and interleukin-4
production
in asymptomatic, human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive
individuals. J Clin Invest, 1993;91:759-765
42 Milich DR, Wolf SF,
Hughes JL, Jones JE. Interleukin 12 suppresses autoantibody
production by reversing helper T-cell
phenotype
in hepatitis B e antigen transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
1995;92:6847-6851
43 Milich DR, Peterson
DL, Schödel
F, Jones JE, Hughes JL. Preferential recognition of hepatitis B
nucleocapsid antigens
by
Th1 or Th2 cells is epitopeand major histocompatibility complex
dependent. J Virol, 1995;69:2776-2785
44 Geissler M, Gesien
A, Tokushige K, Wands JR. Enhancement of cellular and humoral immune
responses to hepatitis
C
virus core protein using
DNA-based vaccines augmented with cytokine-expressing plasmids.
J
Immunol,1997;158:1231-1237
45 Lee HG, Lim JS, Lee
KY, Choi YK, Choe IS, Chung TW, Kim K. Peptide-Specific CTL
induction in HBV-seropositive PBMC
by
stimulation with peptides in vitro: novel epitopes identified from
chronic carriers. Virus Res, 1997;50:185-194
46 Jung MC, Diepolder HM, Spengler U, Wierenga EA, Zachoval R,
Hoffmann RM, Eichenlaub D, Frosner G, Will H,
Pape
GR. Activation of a
heterogeneous hepatitis B core and e antigen-specific CD4+
T-cell population during
seroconversion
to antia-HBe and anti-HBs in
hepatitis B virus infection. J Virol,1995;69:3358-3368
47 Mondelli M, Vergani
GM, Alberti A, Vergani D, Portmann B, Eddleston ALWF, Williams R.
Specificity of T lymphocyte
cytotoxicity
to autologous hepatocytes in chronic hepatitis B virus
infection: evidence that T cells are directed
against
HBV core antigen expressed on hepatocytes. J
Immunol,1982;129:2773-2778
48 Löhr HF, Weber W,
Schlaak J, Goergen B, Büschenfelde KHMZ, Gerken G. Proliferative
response of CD4a+ T cells and
hepatitis
B virus clearance in chronic hepatitis with or without
hepatitis B e-minus hepatitis B virus mutants. Hepatology,
1995;22:61-68
49 Sällberg
M, Hughes J, Javadian A, Ronlov G, Hultgren C, Townsend K, Anderson
CG, O'Dea J, Alfonso J, Eason R,
Murthy
KK, Jolly DJ, Chang SM, Mento
SJ, Milich D, Lee WT. Genetic immunization of chimpanzees
chronically infected
with
the hepatitis B virus, using a recombinant retroviral vector
encoding the hepatitis B virus core antigen. Hum Gene
Ther,
1998;9:1719-1729
50 Seder RA, Gurunathan S. DNA vaccines- designer vaccines for
the 21st century. N Engl J Med, 1999;341:277-278
| |