Search Article Keyword  
PubMed Submission Abstarct PDF Cited  Click Count: 2092 DownLoad Count: 445 

ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R  World J Gastroenterol  2000 ;Feb 6(1):79-83

Protective effect of early enteral feeding on postburn impairment of liver function and its mechanism in rats

Li Zhu1, Zhong-Cheng Yang1, Ao Li1 and De-Chang Cheng2


Li Zhu1, Zhong-Cheng Yang1, Ao Li1 and De-Chang Cheng2, 1Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
2Critical Care Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical science (CAMS),
Beijing 100730, China
Dr. Li Zhu, male, born on 1958-02-03 in Nanyang City, Henan Province, Han nationality, graduated from Third Military Medical University as a doctor-d egree postgraduate in 1996 and now working in PUMCH as a postdoctoral research f ellow, majoring in Traumatic Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, having 17 paper s published.
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.39290700.
Correspondence to:
Dr. Li Zhu, Institute of Burn Research, Sout hwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Telephone: +86-10-65233768, +86-10-65142049
Email. zhuli58
263.net
Received: 1999-07-21 Accepted: 1999-10-10

Subject headings early enteral feeding; liver; postburn impa irments

Zhu L, Yang ZC, Li A, Cheng DC. Protective effect of early enteral feeding on postburn impairment of liver function and its mechanism in rats. World J Gastroentero,2000;6(1):79-83

Abstract
AIM: To study the protective effect of early enteral feeding (EEF) on the postburn impairment of liver function and its mechanism.

METHODS: Wistar rats with 30% of total body surface area (TBSA) full-thickness burn were employed. The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of gastric intramucosal pH, endotoxin levels in portal vein, water content s of hepatic tissue, blood concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), plasma activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and asparate amin otransferase (AST), as well as the blood contents of total (TB) and direct bilir ubin (DB), total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) were serially determined within 48h postburn.

RESULTS: EEF could significantly improve gastric mucosal acidos is, reduce portal vein endotoxin level and water content of hepatic tissue, as w ell as plasma concentrations of TNF-α at all timepoints after seve re burns (P
0.01); postburn elevation of the plasma activities of ALT, AST and the contents of TB, DB were effectively prevented, whereas the plasma conce ntrations of TP and ALB were markedly increased 24h and 48h posturn in EEF group compared with that of the burn without EEF group (P0.01).

CONCLUSION: EEF has significant beneficial effects on the impro vement of hepatic function in rats after severe burn, and is probably related wi th an increase in splanchnic blood flow, reduction of the absorption of gut-ori gin endotoxin and the consequent release of inflammatory mediators.

INTRODUCTION
Acute impairement of hepatic function is one of the most common serious complica tions after severe burns with an extremely high incidence
1,2; however, its prevention and treatment have not yet been effectively improved so far. In recent years, abundant researches have suggested that the posttrauma translocati on of gut-origin endotoxin may lead to remote organ injury, and is also the maj or contributor to the hepatic dysfunction3-5. Meanwhile, it has become increasingly apparent that early enteral feeding (EEF) in various pathological conditions may produce multiple beneficial effects, including the stimulation of splanchnic and hepatic circulation, maintenance of gut mucosal integrity, prevention of intramucosal acidosis and permeability disturbances, and alleviation of the translocation of gut-origin bacteria and endot xin6-10. We therefore presume that EEF might be possible to improve hepatic function in severe burns, which up to now has been seldom documented. Thus, the present study is designed to verify this hypothesis, and in an attempt to seek ways to improve further the treatment of severely injured patients. This is no doubt of both theoretical and practical importance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Healthy adult wistar rats of either sex, weighing 220g±30g, were employed in the study. They were housed in individual metabolic cages in a temperature conditioned room (22
-24) with a 12h light-dark cycle, al lowed access to standard rat chow (provided by Experimental Animal Center, Third Military Medical University) and water ad libium, and acclimatized to the surro undings for 7 days prior to the experiments.

Operative procedure
All animals were weighed and anesthetized with 1% pentobarbital sodium (30mg/kg, ip). After laparotomy, a polyeth ylene catheter (1.5mm in diameter) for enteral feeding was inserted into duodenum on the anterior wall 1.5cm from pylorus via a puncture hole made by a metal needle. The catheter was appropriately fixed, tunneled under the ski n and exited through the nape skin. Animals were housed and fed as descri bed above after operation.

Burn injury and resuscitation
After a recovery period of 24 h, the animals inserted with feeding tube were anesthetized, dorsal hair sha ved and then placed in a wooden template designed to expose 30% of the total bod y surface area (TBSA), and then immersed in water at 92
for 20 seconds, which resulted in a clearly demarcated full-thickness burn. One hour after burn injur y, the animals were resuscitated with 10mL of warm 0.9% NaCl (normal sali ne solution, 37) given by intraperitoneal injection. Control animals were simi larly anesthetized and shaved but not burned.

Feeding and experimental protocol
Nutrient liquid for feeding was prepared before use as one with a caloric value of 2.1KJ/mL by mixing nutritional powder (ENSURE, USA) with appropriate amount of warm boiled water. According to different feeding regimens, animals were randomly divided in to three groups:
EEF group. Enteral feeding was initiated 1h postburn in burn ed animals via feeding tube with a total calorie of 202KJ·Kg-1·24h-1; the nu trient liquid required for 24 hours was administered evenly at 6 timepoints. Burn group. The animals were treated exactly the same as EEF group, except that the nutrient liquid was substituted by equal amount of saline. Control group . Only the feeding tube was inserted, whereas no tube feeding and burn were conducted.The animals in this group were allowed access to standard rat chow, nutrient l iquid and water ad libium. Timepoints for different measurements and assays in a ll groups were made at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 48th h postburn, except for the determination of liver tissue water content, which was performed at the 12th h after thermal injury. For plasma assays, rats were sacrificed by decapitation at each timepoint and heparinised blood was collected in separate tubes, spun a t 3000g for 10min, and the plasma frozen at -20 until analysis.

Measurements
The gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) was determined with an indirect method as previously described
11 with minor modificat ion. Briefly, animals were anesthetized and given cimetidine (15mg) intraperit oneally 1h prior to each timepoint, and then a polyethylene catheter was i nserted into gastric lumen through pylorus via a puncture hole on the anterior w all of duodenum made by a metal needle after a midline laparotomy. An amount of 2.5mL normal saline was injected into gastric lumen though the catheter and aspirated out to get rid of intragastric residues, and then 1.5mL normal saline was injected and retained in the gastric lumen. After an equilibration interval of 60mi n, 1mL of saline solution were aspirated and Pco2 determined using the b lood gas analyzer. A simultaneously obtained arterial blood sample was used for determining the HCO3-. pHi was then calculated as:
pHi=6.1+log(
HCO3-/Pco2×0.03)
      The multifunction-biochemical analyzer Beckman Synchron CX-7 was used for perf orming performing liver function tests. The plasma activities of alanine aminotr ansferase (ALT), asparate aminotransferase (AST), as well as the blood contents of total (TB) and direct bilirubin (DB), total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) we re determined at each timepoint.
      Portal plasma endotoxin levels were assayed with the limulus-amoebocyte-lysate test (LAL)
12. In brief, plasma samples were diluted tenfold with pyro gen-free water and heated to 75 for 5min to inactivate the plasma inhibitor. The samples were incubated with LAL at 37 for 33min. The chromogenic substrate was added and the samples incubated for another 3min. Acetic acid stopped the reaction. The optical density was read at 545nm and endotoxin concentration was expressed as Eu/mL.
      Radioimmunoassay of TNF-α levels in systemic circulation was c onducted according to the instructions with kits from Dong Ya Research Institut e of Immuno-technology.
      Liver tissue water contents were determined with a method as reported in a previous study13with minor modification. Eight Liver tissue samples for each group were harvested at 12h postburn, weighed, put in oven at 90 for 24h, and then weighed again. The liver tissue water contents were calculat ed as:
Liver tissue water contents=(wet weight-dry weight/wet weight)×100%

Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean±standard e rror of the mean. Experimental results were analyzed by analysis of variance and t tests for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was determined at P
0.05.

RESULTS
Postburn EEF has beneficial effects on the hepatic functions as demonstrated by the significantly reduced plasma activities of ALT, AST and the blood contents of TB and DB, whereas the plasma concentrations of TP and ALB were markedly increased 24h and 48h posturn in the EEF group compared with that of the burn group without EEF as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
 Gastric mucosal acidosis was significantly improved in EEF group animals as indicated by the elevation of gastric pHi at most of the postburn timepoints, however, gastric pHi in the burn group sustained in lower levels until 48h postburn (Table 3).
      Table 4 displays the changes in portal endotoxin levels after severe burns. Three hours postburn, endotoxin concentration significantly increased in the burn group and reached a peak in 6h; another increase appeared after 24h and persisted until 48h postburn. However, the portal endotoxin levels in ani mals that received EEF markedly decreased at nearly all timepoints postburn comp ared with that of the burn group.
      The data for plasma TNF-α levels are shown in Table 5. In acco rdance with other observations, EEF could also significantly reduce TNF-α levels in the systemic circulation at most postburn timepoints as c ompared with that of burn animals.
      The hepatic tissue water contents in the three experimental groups were 71.17% ±0.60%, 73.01%±0.52% and 70.18%±0.52% respectively. Evidently, the liver tissue water content in the EEF group was significantly lower than that in the burn group without EEF 12h postburn (P0.01).

Table 1
The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of plasma ALT, AST activities and TB, DB contents (mean±SD)

Group (samples)

Postburn hours

3

6

12

24

48

EEF (40)

 

 

 

 

 

ALT(mmol·s-1/L)

1.21±0.07b,d

1.54±0.14b,d

1.75±0.17b,d

1.39±0.09b,d

1.09±0.09b,d

AST(mmol·s-1/L)

8.58±0.64b,d

11.47±0.81b,d

14.30±1.04b,d

9.75±0.80b,d

7.24±0.65b,d

TB(mmol/L)

16.85±2.01a,d

14.97±2.36d

12.90±2.01a,d

10.82±1.71b,d

6.59±1.61b

DB(mmol/L)

7.72±1.90d

4.68±1.46b,d

2.42±0.78b

1.72±0.36b

1.74±1.09b

Burn (40)

 

 

 

 

 

ALT(mmol·s-1/L)

2.06±0.13d

2.90±0.19d

3.19±0.23d

2.99±0.17d

2.21±0.14d

AST(mmol·s-1/L)

12.20±0.77d

18.77±0.84d

23.13±1.14d

16.18±0.94d

12.56±1.00d

TB(mmol/L)

19.26±2.97d

16.98±2.11d

15.08±2.37d

18.32±2.69d

10.82±1.97d

DB(mmol/L)

8.26±2.17d

9.77±2.02d

5.50±1.32d

7.10±1.43d

3.54±0.94d

Control (40)

 

 

 

 

 

ALT(mmol·s-1/L)

0.61±0.09

0.57±0.07

0.63±0.08

0058±0.07

0.64±0.10

AST(mmol·s-1/L)

1.55±0.10

1.64±0.09

1.60±0.10

1.71±0.11

1.58±0.10

TB(mmol/L)

5.63±1.41

6.04±1.27

5.81±1.62

6.17±1.02

5.76±1.38

DB(mmol/L)

1.62±0.56

1.46±0.39

1.55±0.42

1.73±0.41

1.53±0.47

aP0.05, bP0.01 vs burn group; dP0.01 vs control.
Table 2 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of plasma total p rotein and albumin levels (c/g·L-1, mean±SD)

Group (samples)

Postburn hours

3

6

12

24

48

EEF (40)

 

 

 

 

 

Total protein

43.10±2.31d

42.49±3.00d

47.61±4.39c

58.33±2.93b

62.36±4.18b,d

Albumin

19.32±1.34d

19.49±1.63a,d

22.76±2.19d

25.70±2.40b

26.77±1.25b

Burn (40)

 

 

 

 

 

Total protein

43.54±2.51d

44.79±2.03d

44.80±3.63d

48.84±4.30d

52.77±1.45

Albumin

19.78±2.11d

20.99±1.23d

21.54±1.72d

21.84±1.84c

22.50±0.83d

Control (40)

 

 

 

 

 

Total protein

53.67±2.43

57.41±1.83

52.55±2.62

55.76±3.18

53.92±2.88

Albumin

25.38±1.62

25.72±1.38

26.08±1.72

24.46±1.33

25.64±1.43

aP0.05, bP0.01 vs burn group; cP0.05, dP0.01 vs control.
Table 3 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of gastric intram ucosal pH (mean±SD)

Group (samples)

Samples

Postburn hours

3

6

12

24

48

EEF

50

7.119±0.078a,b

6.943±0.089a,b

7.074±0.037a,b

7.285±0.098a

7.257±0.077a,b

Burn

50

7.017±0.037b

6.826±0.049b

6.802±0.080b

6.949±0.082b

7.074±0.041b

Control

50

7.321±0.054

7.296±0.067

7.296±0.067

7.306±0.069

7.348±0.074

aP0.01 vs burn group; bP0.01 vs control.
Table 4 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of portal endotox in level (Eu/mL, mean±SD)

Group (samples)

Samples

Postburn hours

3

6

12

24

48

EEF

40

0.683±0.072a,b

0.797±0.085a,b

0.542±0.078a,b

0.725±0.061a,b

0.461±0.049a,b

Burn

40

1.394±0.126b

1.518±0.173b

1.124±0.133b

1.627±0.215b

1.168±0.188b

Control

40

0.206±0.032

0.195±0.043

0.189±0.049

0.204±0.037

0.215±0.051

aP0.01 vs burn group; bP0.01 vs control.
Table 5 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of plasma TNF-α level (ng/mL, mean±SD)

Group (samples)

Samples

Postburn hours

3

6

12

24

48

EEF

40

1.48±0.38a,b

2.57±0.45a,b

2.36±0.47a,b

1.92±0.26a,b

1.68±0.45a,b

Burn

40

1.92±0.19b

4.49±0.47b

3.51±0.45b

4.07±0.71b

3.24±0.61b

Control

40

0.83±0.08

0.78±0.11

0.83±0.12

0.81±0.09

0.81±0.09

aP0.01 vs burn group; bP0.01 vs control.

DISCUSSION
Nutritional support plays an important role in the management of critically ill patients for preventing and treating multiple organ failure
14. However, the concept of the administration of enteral nutrition very early after injury is relatively new8. More than a decade ago, Moore et al15 reported that immediate postoperative feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy was safe and feasible; and that early nutritional support could decrease the incidence of septic complications in the severely injured patient. In a subsequent study, Mochizuki et al16showed that immediate enteral feeding in burned guinea pigs was associated with a decrease in the hypermetabolic state. They demonstrated that early enteral feeding could suppress the expected rise in glucagon, cortisol and norepinephrine after major burn injury, compared with delayed enteral feeding. Since then results of a number of clinical and animal studies were reported, showing that very early enteral feeding could preserve the gut barrier function, diminish hypermetabolic response, maintain caloric intake, reduce infective complications and significantly shorten hospital stay following injury6,7,16-18. Unfortunately, most of these studies paid more atte ntion merely to its trophic and metabolic effects, whereas the other benefits su ch as its role played in the protection of splanchnic functions were greatly neg lected. In the present study, we showed that postburn EEF could result in a lowe ring of plasma ALT, AST activities and TB, DB contents, as well as a rapid resto ration of plasma TP and ALB level that have significantly decreased after severe burns. These clearly meant that early enteral feeding could effectively improve hepatic dysfunction caused by burn injury. A previous study showed that circula ting levels of bile acids could be a sensitive and specific indicator of liver f unction, an elevation of serum bile acid levels indicating a deterioration in liver function19. In a rat model of hemorrhagic shock, Zaloga et al19found enteral administration of a peptide-based diet early after h emorrhagic shock, could significantly prevent the elevation of circulating bile acid levels, whereas a 3.6 times of serum bile acid level above baseline was no ted in animals with same amount of enteral saline therapy. In a similar rat model, Bortenschlager et al20also observed that enteral nutrient s significantly decreased liver injury. After hemorrhagic shock, AST in saline controls and enterally fed animals increased from 246U/L±17U/L to 1605U/L±593U/L and from 283U/L±39U/ to 551U/L±94U/L respectively; ALT increased from 60U/L±4U/L to 726U/L±355U/L in controls and 61U/L±6U/L to 161U/L±38U/L in enterally fed animals. These results further indicated that EEF could protect animals from liver injury in various forms of injury.
      The mechanisms of EEF in improving postburn liver function so far have not been fully clarified yet. It has been noted that in severe trauma including burns, th e loss of a large amount of body fluids and the release of stress hormones cause a sharp reduction of blood flow to many organs, especially the gastrointestinal tract. Reduced intestinal blood flow then leads to translocation of bacteria an d/or their toxic products through the gut mucosa. Subsequent bacteria and/or toxi n-induced persistent and excessive release of cytokines (i.e. tumor necrosis fa ctor, interleukins) from hepatic macrophages and complement activation may initi ate progressive multiple organ failure and even cause death
21-23. In acc ordance with this theory, many studies suggested that the hepatic ischemia and endotoxemia occurred in various pathological conditions and were the major contributors to liver dysfunction3-5,24. However, Zaloga25also proposed that deprivation of exogenous nutrients for a certain period of time, via a mechanism of substrate lack and tissue antioxidant system depletion, could also compromise organ function.
      Postprandial gut hyperemia is a local vascular response to the presence of foodstuff in the lumen, an important physiological phenomenon for food digestion and absorption. Even though in some pathological conditions, this phenomenon still exists. In burned guinea pigs, Inoue et al26using radiolabeled microspheres demonstrated that during initial 24h of enteral feeding, blood f low to the jejunum and cecum was higher in the fed group than in the control. Pu rcell et al27,28studied oleic-acid-induced lung injury in dogs mechanically ventilated with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) which limi ted hepatic blood flow and oxygen delivery, and found that in such dog receiving EEF there were a significant increase in hepatic blood flow and oxygen delivery, witha highest increase in portal blood flow. In a dog model of splanchnic ischemia induced with endotoxin, Eleftheriadis et al29,30 reported that after early enteral feeding, portal vein, hepatic and superior mesenteric artery blood flow; hepatic and intestinal microcirculation; hepatic tissue PO2 and energy charge; and intestinal intramucosal pH, which were all reduced in the early septic condition, were significantly increased. In present study, we showed that postburn EEF could effectively restore reduced gastric intramucosal pH, decrease endotoxin concentrations in portal vein and TNF-α levels in systemic circulation, and alleviate liver tissue edema, as compared with saline feeding burn controls. All above indicate that in addition to provide nutrients, posttrauma EEF exerts its protective effect on liver function most likely via a mechanism of postprandial hyperemia to improve gut blood flow and splanchnic ischemic status, and to maintain gut mucosal integrity, which may block the vicious circle of mutual activation between the translocation of gut origin bacteria with their toxic products and the release of inflammatory mediators31, thereby reducing hypoxic and inflammatory tissue damage.
      The fact that EEF may improve postburn hepatic function is of both theoretically and practically importance. Although the results from animal study can not be a pplied directly to humans, the data from this study might provide valuable clues to the further improvement of prevention and treatment of post-tramatic multip le organ dysfunction syndrome. Now, EEF should not be considered merely as a sim ble nutritional support. Further investigations are needed to demonstrate whether or not the results from this animal experiment can apply to clinical settings.

REFERENCES
1    Li A, Huang YS, Zhang N, Li W, Li GR, Xie Y. The analysis of 64320 burn patients.Jiefangjun Yixue Zazhi,1995;20:3-9
2    Liu XS, Yang ZC, Luo ZH, Huang WH, Li A. A preliminary exploration of the relationship between tumour necrosis factor 
      (TNF) and monocytic in vitro production of interleukin1 (IL-1) and internal organ dysfunction in severely burned
      patients.Burns,1995;21:29-33
3    Liu YS, Yan LS. Experimental study on injurious effect of burn combined with endotoxemia on the liver and its 
      significance. Zhonghua Zhengxing Shaoshang Waike Zazhi,1994;10:142-145
4    Turnage RH, Guice KS, Oldham KT. Endotoxemia and remote organ injury following intestinal reperfusion.
      J Surg Res,1994;56:571-578
5    Essani NA, Fisher MA, Farhood A, Manning AM, Smith CW, Jaeschke H. Cytokine-induced upregulation of hepatic 
      intercellular adhesion molecule-1 messenger RNA expression and its role in the pathophysiology of murine endotoxin 
      shock and acute liver failure.Hepatology,1995;21:1632-1639
6    Zhu L, Yang ZC. Protective effects of early enteral feeding on the functions of abdominal vicera posttrauma.
      Guowai Yixue Waikexue Fence,1997;21:134-137
7    Wang SL, Li A, You ZY, Yu B, Wang FJ, Zhao Y, Tang CG, Wang P, Tao LH. Several issues of early enteral feeding 
      (nutrition) in burns. Jiefangjun Yixue Zazhi, 1998;23:88-91
8    Alexander JW. Is early enteral feeding of benefit. Intensive Care Med, 1999;25:129-130
9    Kompan L, Krem ar B, Gad ijev E, Pro ek M. Effects of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability and the 
      development of multiple organ failure after multiple injury.Intensive Care Med, 1999;25:157-161
10  Eleftheriadis E. Role of enteral nutrition-induced splanchnic hyperemia in ameliorating splanchnic ischemia.
      Nutrition, 1999;15:247-248
11  Noc M, Weil MH, Sun SJ, Gazmuri RJ, Tang W, Pakula JL. Comparison of gastric luminal and gastric wall PCO2 during
      hemorrhagic shock.CircShock,1993;40:194-199
12  Buttenschoen K, Berger D, Hiki N, Strecker W, Seidelmann M, Beger HG. Plasma concentrations of endotoxin and
      antiendotoxin antibodies in patients with multiple injuries: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Surg, 1996;162:853-860
13  Jiang DJ, Tao JY, Xu SY. Inhibitory effects of clonidine on edema formation after thermal injury in mice and rats.
      Zhongguo Yaoli Xuebao, 1989;10:540-542
14  Bengmark S, Gianotti L. Nutritional support to prevent and treat multiple organ failure.World J Surg,1996;20:474-481
15  Moore EE, Jones TN. Nutritional assessment and preliminary report on early support of the trauma patient.
      J Am Coll Nutr,1983;2:45-54
16  Mochizuki H, Trocki O, Dominioni L, Brackett KA, Joffe SN, Alexander JW. Mechanism of prevention of postburn
      hypermetabolism and catabolism by early enteral feeding.Ann Surg,1984;200:297-310
17  Chiarelli A, Enzi G, Casadei A, Baggio B, Valerio A, Mazzoleni F. Very early nutrition supplementation in burned patients.
      Am J Clin Nutr, 1990;51:1035-1039
18  McQuiggan MM, Marvin RG, McKinley BA, Moore FA. Enteral feeding following major torso trauma: from theory to 
      practice. New Horiz,1999;7:131-146
19  Zaloga GP, Knowles R, Black KW, Prielipp R. Total parenteral nutrition increases mortality after hemorrhage.
      Crit Care Med,1991;19:54-59
20  Bortenschlager L, Roberts PR, Black KW, Zaloga GP. Enteral feeding minimizes liver injury during hemorrhagic
      shock.Shock,1994;2:351-354
21  Zhu L, Yang ZC, Li A. Effects of early enteral feeding on splanchnic organs
resuscitation in shock stage of postburn.
      Zhoughua Chuangshang Zazhi, 1998;14:31-34
22  Vincent JL. Prevention and therapy of multiple organ failure. World J Surg,1996;20:465-470
23  Pastores SM, Katz DP, Kvetan V. Splanchnic ischemia and gut mucosal injury in sepsis and the multiple organ dysfunction
      syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol, 1996;91:1697-1710
24  Turnage RH, Kadesky KM, Myers SI, Guice KS, Oldham KT. Hepatic hypoperfusion after intestinal reperfusion.
      Surgery, 1996;119:151-160
25  Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutritional support improves outcome: Hypothesis or fact. Crit Care Med,1999;27:259-261
26  Inoue S, Lukes S, Alexander JW, Trocki O, Silberstein EB. Increased gut blood flow with early enteral feeding in burned
      guinea pigs.J Burn Care Rehabil, 1989;10:300-308
27  Purcell PN, Branson RD, Hurst JM, Davis K, Johnson DJ. Gut feeding and hepatic hemodynamics during PEEP ventilation 
      for acute lung injury. J Surg Res, 1992;53:335-341
28  Purcell PN, Davis K, Branson RD, Johnson DJ. Continuous duodenal feeding restores gut blood flow and increases gut
      oxygen utilization during PEEP ventilation for lung injury.Am J Surg,1993;165:188-194
29  Eleftheriadis E, Kotzampassi K, Heliadis S, Papageorgiou G, dimitriadou A. The influence of enteral nutrition on hepatic
      oxygenation and bioenergy status during sepsis.Intensive Care Med, 1996;22(Suppl 3):S307
30  Kazamias P, Kotzampassi K, Koufogiannis D, Eleftheriadis E. Influence of enteral nutrition-induced splanchnic hyperemia 
      on the septic origin of splanchnic ischemia. World J Surg, 1998;22:6-11
31  Gianotti L, Alexander JW, Nelson JL, Fukushima R, Pyles T, Chalk CL. Role of early enteral feeding and acute starvation 
      on postburn bacterial translocation
and host defense: prospective, randomized trials.Crit Care Med, 1994;22:265-272 

 

Reviews Add
more>>


Related Articles:
more>>