|
Li
Zhu1, Zhong-Cheng Yang1, Ao Li1 and
De-Chang Cheng2, 1Institute of Burn
Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University,
Chongqing 400038, China
2Critical Care Department, Peking Union Medical College
Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical science (CAMS),
Beijing 100730, China
Dr. Li Zhu, male, born on 1958-02-03 in Nanyang City, Henan
Province, Han nationality, graduated from Third Military Medical
University as a doctor-d egree postgraduate in 1996 and now working
in PUMCH as a postdoctoral research f ellow, majoring in Traumatic
Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, having 17 paper s published.
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China, No.39290700.
Correspondence to: Dr. Li Zhu, Institute of Burn Research, Sout
hwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038,
China
Telephone:
+86-10-65233768, +86-10-65142049
Email. zhuli58@263.net
Received:
1999-07-21
Accepted: 1999-10-10
Subject
headings early
enteral feeding; liver; postburn impa irments
Zhu
L, Yang ZC, Li A, Cheng DC. Protective effect of early enteral
feeding on postburn impairment of liver function and its mechanism
in rats. World J Gastroentero,2000;6(1):79-83
Abstract
AIM: To study the protective
effect of early enteral feeding (EEF) on the postburn impairment of
liver function and its mechanism.
METHODS: Wistar rats with 30% of total body surface area (TBSA)
full-thickness burn were employed. The effects of EEF on the
postburn changes of gastric intramucosal pH, endotoxin levels in
portal vein, water content s of hepatic tissue, blood concentrations
of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), plasma activities of alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) and asparate amin otransferase (AST), as well
as the blood contents of total (TB) and direct bilir ubin (DB),
total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) were serially determined within
48h postburn.
RESULTS: EEF could significantly improve gastric mucosal
acidos is, reduce portal vein endotoxin level and water content of
hepatic tissue, as w ell as plasma concentrations of TNF-α at
all timepoints after seve re burns (P<0.01);
postburn elevation of the plasma activities of ALT, AST and the
contents of TB, DB were effectively prevented, whereas the plasma
conce ntrations of TP and ALB were markedly increased 24h and 48h
posturn in EEF group compared with that of the burn without EEF
group (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: EEF has significant beneficial effects on the
impro vement of hepatic function in rats after severe burn, and is
probably related wi th an increase in splanchnic blood flow,
reduction of the absorption of gut-ori gin endotoxin and the
consequent release of inflammatory mediators.
INTRODUCTION
Acute impairement of hepatic function is one of the most common
serious complica tions after severe burns with an extremely high
incidence[1,2];
however, its prevention and treatment have not yet been effectively
improved so far. In recent years, abundant researches have suggested
that the posttrauma translocati on of gut-origin endotoxin may lead
to remote organ injury, and is also the maj or contributor to the
hepatic dysfunction[3-5].
Meanwhile, it has become increasingly apparent that early enteral
feeding (EEF) in various pathological conditions may produce
multiple beneficial effects, including the stimulation of splanchnic
and hepatic circulation, maintenance of gut mucosal integrity,
prevention of intramucosal acidosis and permeability disturbances,
and alleviation of the translocation of gut-origin bacteria and
endot xin[6-10].
We therefore presume that EEF might be possible to improve hepatic
function in severe burns, which up to now has been seldom
documented. Thus, the present study is designed to verify this
hypothesis, and in an attempt to seek ways to improve further the
treatment of severely injured patients. This is no doubt of both
theoretical and practical importance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Healthy adult wistar rats of either sex, weighing 220g±30g,
were employed in the study. They were housed in individual metabolic
cages in a temperature conditioned room (22℃-24℃)
with a 12h light-dark cycle, al lowed access to standard rat chow
(provided by Experimental Animal Center, Third Military Medical
University) and water ad libium, and acclimatized to the surro
undings for 7 days prior to the experiments.
Operative procedure
All animals were weighed and anesthetized with 1%
pentobarbital sodium (30mg/kg, ip). After laparotomy, a polyeth
ylene catheter (1.5mm in diameter) for enteral feeding was inserted
into duodenum on the anterior wall 1.5cm from pylorus via a puncture
hole made by a metal needle. The catheter was appropriately fixed,
tunneled under the ski n and exited through the nape skin. Animals
were housed and fed as descri bed above after operation.
Burn injury and resuscitation
After a recovery period of 24 h, the animals inserted with
feeding tube were anesthetized, dorsal hair sha ved and then placed
in a wooden template designed to expose 30% of the total bod y
surface area (TBSA), and then immersed in water at 92℃
for 20 seconds, which resulted in a clearly demarcated
full-thickness burn. One hour after burn injur y, the animals were
resuscitated with 10mL of warm 0.9% NaCl (normal sali ne solution,
37℃)
given by intraperitoneal injection. Control animals were simi larly
anesthetized and shaved but not burned.
Feeding and experimental protocol
Nutrient liquid for feeding was prepared before use as one
with a caloric value of 2.1KJ/mL by mixing nutritional powder
(ENSURE, USA) with appropriate amount of warm boiled water.
According to different feeding regimens, animals were randomly
divided in to three groups: ①
EEF group. Enteral feeding was initiated 1h postburn in burn ed
animals via feeding tube with a total calorie of 202KJ·Kg-1·24h-1;
the nu trient liquid required for 24 hours was administered evenly
at 6 timepoints. ②
Burn group. The animals were treated exactly the same as EEF group,
except that the nutrient liquid was substituted by equal amount of
saline. ③
Control group . Only the feeding tube was inserted, whereas no tube
feeding and burn were conducted.The animals in this group were
allowed access to standard rat chow, nutrient l iquid and water ad
libium. Timepoints for different measurements and assays in a ll
groups were made at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 48th h postburn,
except for the determination of liver tissue water content, which
was performed at the 12th h after thermal injury. For plasma assays,
rats were sacrificed by decapitation at each timepoint and
heparinised blood was collected in separate tubes, spun a t 3000g
for 10min, and the plasma frozen at -20℃
until analysis.
Measurements
The gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) was determined with an indirect
method as previously described[11]
with minor modificat ion.
Briefly, animals were anesthetized and given cimetidine (15mg)
intraperit oneally 1h prior to each timepoint, and then a
polyethylene catheter was i nserted into gastric lumen through
pylorus via a puncture hole on the anterior w all of duodenum made
by a metal needle after a midline laparotomy. An amount of 2.5mL
normal saline was injected into gastric lumen though the catheter
and aspirated out to get rid of intragastric residues, and then
1.5mL normal saline was injected and retained in the gastric lumen.
After an equilibration interval of 60mi n, 1mL of saline solution
were aspirated and Pco2 determined using the b lood gas
analyzer. A simultaneously obtained arterial blood sample was used
for determining the [HCO3-].
pHi was then calculated as:
pHi=6.1+log([HCO3-]/[Pco2×0.03])
The
multifunction-biochemical analyzer Beckman Synchron CX-7 was used
for perf orming performing liver function tests. The plasma
activities of alanine aminotr ansferase (ALT), asparate
aminotransferase (AST), as well as the blood contents of total (TB)
and direct bilirubin (DB), total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) we
re determined at each timepoint.
Portal
plasma endotoxin levels were assayed with the limulus-amoebocyte-lysate
test (LAL)[12].
In brief, plasma samples were diluted tenfold with pyro gen-free
water and heated to 75℃
for 5min to inactivate the plasma inhibitor. The samples were
incubated with LAL at 37℃
for 33min. The chromogenic substrate was added and the samples
incubated for another 3min. Acetic acid stopped the reaction. The
optical density was read at 545nm and endotoxin concentration was
expressed as Eu/mL.
Radioimmunoassay
of TNF-α levels in systemic circulation was c onducted
according to the instructions with kits from Dong Ya Research
Institut e of Immuno-technology.
Liver
tissue water contents were determined with a method as reported in a
previous study[13]with
minor modification. Eight Liver tissue samples for each group were
harvested at 12h postburn, weighed, put in oven at 90℃
for 24h, and then weighed again. The liver tissue water contents
were calculat ed as:
Liver tissue water contents=(wet weight-dry weight/wet weight)×100%
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean±standard e rror of the mean.
Experimental results were analyzed by analysis of variance and t
tests for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was
determined at P<0.05.
RESULTS
Postburn EEF has beneficial effects on the hepatic functions as
demonstrated by the significantly reduced plasma activities of ALT,
AST and the blood contents of TB and DB, whereas the plasma
concentrations of TP and ALB were markedly increased 24h and 48h
posturn in the EEF group compared with that of the burn group
without EEF as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Gastric
mucosal acidosis was significantly improved in EEF group animals as
indicated by the elevation of gastric pHi at most of the postburn
timepoints, however, gastric pHi in the burn group sustained in
lower levels until 48h postburn (Table 3).
Table
4 displays the changes in portal endotoxin levels after severe
burns. Three hours postburn, endotoxin concentration significantly
increased in the burn group and reached a peak in 6h; another
increase appeared after 24h and persisted until 48h postburn.
However, the portal endotoxin levels in ani mals that received EEF
markedly decreased at nearly all timepoints postburn comp ared with
that of the burn group.
The
data for plasma TNF-α levels are shown in Table 5. In acco
rdance with other observations, EEF could also significantly reduce
TNF-α levels in the systemic circulation at most postburn
timepoints as c ompared with that of burn animals.
The
hepatic tissue water contents in the three experimental groups were
71.17% ±0.60%, 73.01%±0.52% and 70.18%±0.52% respectively.
Evidently, the liver tissue water content in the EEF group was
significantly lower than that in the burn group without EEF 12h
postburn (P<0.01).
Table 1 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of plasma
ALT, AST activities and TB, DB contents (mean±SD)
|
Group
(samples)
|
Postburn
hours
|
|
3
|
6
|
12
|
24
|
48
|
|
EEF
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALT(mmol·s-1/L)
|
1.21±0.07b,d
|
1.54±0.14b,d
|
1.75±0.17b,d
|
1.39±0.09b,d
|
1.09±0.09b,d
|
|
AST(mmol·s-1/L)
|
8.58±0.64b,d
|
11.47±0.81b,d
|
14.30±1.04b,d
|
9.75±0.80b,d
|
7.24±0.65b,d
|
|
TB(mmol/L)
|
16.85±2.01a,d
|
14.97±2.36d
|
12.90±2.01a,d
|
10.82±1.71b,d
|
6.59±1.61b
|
|
DB(mmol/L)
|
7.72±1.90d
|
4.68±1.46b,d
|
2.42±0.78b
|
1.72±0.36b
|
1.74±1.09b
|
|
Burn
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALT(mmol·s-1/L)
|
2.06±0.13d
|
2.90±0.19d
|
3.19±0.23d
|
2.99±0.17d
|
2.21±0.14d
|
|
AST(mmol·s-1/L)
|
12.20±0.77d
|
18.77±0.84d
|
23.13±1.14d
|
16.18±0.94d
|
12.56±1.00d
|
|
TB(mmol/L)
|
19.26±2.97d
|
16.98±2.11d
|
15.08±2.37d
|
18.32±2.69d
|
10.82±1.97d
|
|
DB(mmol/L)
|
8.26±2.17d
|
9.77±2.02d
|
5.50±1.32d
|
7.10±1.43d
|
3.54±0.94d
|
|
Control
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALT(mmol·s-1/L)
|
0.61±0.09
|
0.57±0.07
|
0.63±0.08
|
0058±0.07
|
0.64±0.10
|
|
AST(mmol·s-1/L)
|
1.55±0.10
|
1.64±0.09
|
1.60±0.10
|
1.71±0.11
|
1.58±0.10
|
|
TB(mmol/L)
|
5.63±1.41
|
6.04±1.27
|
5.81±1.62
|
6.17±1.02
|
5.76±1.38
|
|
DB(mmol/L)
|
1.62±0.56
|
1.46±0.39
|
1.55±0.42
|
1.73±0.41
|
1.53±0.47
|
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01
vs burn group; dP<0.01
vs control.
Table 2 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of plasma
total p rotein and albumin levels (c/g·L-1, mean±SD)
|
Group
(samples)
|
Postburn
hours
|
|
3
|
6
|
12
|
24
|
48
|
|
EEF
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
protein
|
43.10±2.31d
|
42.49±3.00d
|
47.61±4.39c
|
58.33±2.93b
|
62.36±4.18b,d
|
|
Albumin
|
19.32±1.34d
|
19.49±1.63a,d
|
22.76±2.19d
|
25.70±2.40b
|
26.77±1.25b
|
|
Burn
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
protein
|
43.54±2.51d
|
44.79±2.03d
|
44.80±3.63d
|
48.84±4.30d
|
52.77±1.45
|
|
Albumin
|
19.78±2.11d
|
20.99±1.23d
|
21.54±1.72d
|
21.84±1.84c
|
22.50±0.83d
|
|
Control
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
protein
|
53.67±2.43
|
57.41±1.83
|
52.55±2.62
|
55.76±3.18
|
53.92±2.88
|
|
Albumin
|
25.38±1.62
|
25.72±1.38
|
26.08±1.72
|
24.46±1.33
|
25.64±1.43
|
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01
vs burn group; cP<0.05,
dP<0.01
vs control.
Table 3 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of gastric
intram ucosal pH (mean±SD)
|
Group
(samples)
|
Samples
|
Postburn
hours
|
|
3
|
6
|
12
|
24
|
48
|
|
EEF
|
50
|
7.119±0.078a,b
|
6.943±0.089a,b
|
7.074±0.037a,b
|
7.285±0.098a
|
7.257±0.077a,b
|
|
Burn
|
50
|
7.017±0.037b
|
6.826±0.049b
|
6.802±0.080b
|
6.949±0.082b
|
7.074±0.041b
|
|
Control
|
50
|
7.321±0.054
|
7.296±0.067
|
7.296±0.067
|
7.306±0.069
|
7.348±0.074
|
aP<0.01
vs burn group; bP<0.01
vs control.
Table 4 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of portal
endotox in level (Eu/mL, mean±SD)
|
Group
(samples)
|
Samples
|
Postburn
hours
|
|
3
|
6
|
12
|
24
|
48
|
|
EEF
|
40
|
0.683±0.072a,b
|
0.797±0.085a,b
|
0.542±0.078a,b
|
0.725±0.061a,b
|
0.461±0.049a,b
|
|
Burn
|
40
|
1.394±0.126b
|
1.518±0.173b
|
1.124±0.133b
|
1.627±0.215b
|
1.168±0.188b
|
|
Control
|
40
|
0.206±0.032
|
0.195±0.043
|
0.189±0.049
|
0.204±0.037
|
0.215±0.051
|
aP<0.01
vs burn group; bP<0.01
vs control.
Table 5 The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of plasma
TNF-α level (ng/mL, mean±SD)
|
Group
(samples)
|
Samples
|
Postburn
hours
|
|
3
|
6
|
12
|
24
|
48
|
|
EEF
|
40
|
1.48±0.38a,b
|
2.57±0.45a,b
|
2.36±0.47a,b
|
1.92±0.26a,b
|
1.68±0.45a,b
|
|
Burn
|
40
|
1.92±0.19b
|
4.49±0.47b
|
3.51±0.45b
|
4.07±0.71b
|
3.24±0.61b
|
|
Control
|
40
|
0.83±0.08
|
0.78±0.11
|
0.83±0.12
|
0.81±0.09
|
0.81±0.09
|
aP<0.01
vs burn group; bP<0.01
vs control.
DISCUSSION
Nutritional support plays an important role in the management of
critically ill patients for preventing and treating multiple organ
failure[14].
However, the concept of the administration of enteral nutrition very
early after injury is relatively new[8].
More than a decade ago, Moore et al[15]
reported that immediate
postoperative feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy was safe and
feasible; and that early nutritional support could decrease the
incidence of septic complications in the severely injured patient.
In a subsequent study, Mochizuki et al[16]showed
that immediate enteral feeding in burned guinea pigs was associated
with a decrease in the hypermetabolic state. They demonstrated that
early enteral feeding could suppress the expected rise in glucagon,
cortisol and norepinephrine after major burn injury, compared with
delayed enteral feeding. Since then results of a number of clinical
and animal studies were reported, showing that very early enteral
feeding could preserve the gut barrier function, diminish
hypermetabolic response, maintain caloric intake, reduce infective
complications and significantly shorten hospital stay following
injury[6,7,16-18].
Unfortunately, most of these studies paid more atte ntion merely to
its trophic and metabolic effects, whereas the other benefits su ch
as its role played in the protection of splanchnic functions were
greatly neg lected. In the present study, we showed that postburn
EEF could result in a lowe ring of plasma ALT, AST activities and
TB, DB contents, as well as a rapid resto ration of plasma TP and
ALB level that have significantly decreased after severe burns.
These clearly meant that early enteral feeding could effectively
improve hepatic dysfunction caused by burn injury. A previous study
showed that circula ting levels of bile acids could be a sensitive
and specific indicator of liver f unction, an elevation of serum
bile acid levels indicating a deterioration in liver function[19].
In a rat model of hemorrhagic shock, Zaloga et al[19]found
enteral administration of a peptide-based diet early after h
emorrhagic shock, could significantly prevent the elevation of
circulating bile acid levels, whereas a 3.6 times of serum bile acid
level above baseline was no ted in animals with same amount of
enteral saline therapy. In a similar rat model, Bortenschlager et
al[20]also
observed that enteral nutrient s significantly decreased liver
injury. After hemorrhagic shock, AST in saline controls and
enterally fed animals increased from 246U/L±17U/L to 1605U/L±593U/L
and from 283U/L±39U/ to 551U/L±94U/L respectively; ALT increased
from 60U/L±4U/L to 726U/L±355U/L in controls and 61U/L±6U/L to
161U/L±38U/L in enterally fed animals. These results further
indicated that EEF could protect animals from liver injury in
various forms of injury.
The
mechanisms of EEF in improving postburn liver function so far have
not been fully clarified yet. It has been noted that in severe
trauma including burns, th e loss of a large amount of body fluids
and the release of stress hormones cause a sharp reduction of blood
flow to many organs, especially the gastrointestinal tract. Reduced
intestinal blood flow then leads to translocation of bacteria an
d/or their toxic products through the gut mucosa. Subsequent
bacteria and/or toxi n-induced persistent and excessive release of
cytokines (i.e. tumor necrosis fa ctor, interleukins) from hepatic
macrophages and complement activation may initi ate progressive
multiple organ failure and even cause death[21-23].
In acc ordance with this theory, many studies suggested that the
hepatic ischemia and endotoxemia occurred in various pathological
conditions and were the major contributors to liver dysfunction[3-5,24].
However, Zaloga[25]also
proposed that deprivation of exogenous nutrients for a certain
period of time, via a mechanism of substrate lack and tissue
antioxidant system depletion, could also compromise organ function.
Postprandial
gut hyperemia is a local vascular response to the presence of
foodstuff in the lumen, an important physiological phenomenon for
food digestion and absorption. Even though in some pathological
conditions, this phenomenon still exists. In burned guinea pigs,
Inoue et al[26]using
radiolabeled microspheres demonstrated that during initial 24h of
enteral feeding, blood f low to the jejunum and cecum was higher in
the fed group than in the control. Pu rcell et al[27,28]studied
oleic-acid-induced lung injury in dogs mechanically ventilated with
positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) which limi ted hepatic blood
flow and oxygen delivery, and found that in such dog receiving EEF
there were a significant increase in hepatic blood flow and oxygen
delivery, witha highest increase in portal blood flow. In a dog
model of splanchnic ischemia induced with endotoxin, Eleftheriadis et
al[29,30]
reported that after early
enteral feeding, portal vein, hepatic and superior mesenteric artery
blood flow; hepatic and intestinal microcirculation; hepatic tissue
PO2 and energy charge; and intestinal intramucosal pH,
which were all reduced in the early septic condition, were
significantly increased. In present study, we showed that postburn
EEF could effectively restore reduced gastric intramucosal pH,
decrease endotoxin concentrations in portal vein and TNF-α
levels in systemic circulation, and alleviate liver tissue edema, as
compared with saline feeding burn controls. All above indicate that
in addition to provide nutrients, posttrauma EEF exerts its
protective effect on liver function most likely via a mechanism of
postprandial hyperemia to improve gut blood flow and splanchnic
ischemic status, and to maintain gut mucosal integrity, which may
block the vicious circle of mutual activation between the
translocation of gut origin bacteria with their toxic products and
the release of inflammatory mediators[31],
thereby reducing hypoxic and inflammatory tissue damage.
The
fact that EEF may improve postburn hepatic function is of both
theoretically and practically importance. Although the results from
animal study can not be a pplied directly to humans, the data from
this study might provide valuable clues to the further improvement
of prevention and treatment of post-tramatic multip le organ
dysfunction syndrome. Now, EEF should not be considered merely as a
sim ble nutritional support. Further investigations are needed to
demonstrate whether or not the results from this animal experiment
can apply to clinical settings.
REFERENCES
1 Li A, Huang YS,
Zhang N, Li W, Li GR, Xie Y. The analysis of 64320 burn
patients.Jiefangjun Yixue Zazhi,1995;20:3-9
2 Liu XS, Yang ZC, Luo ZH, Huang WH, Li A. A
preliminary exploration of the relationship between tumour necrosis
factor
(TNF) and
monocytic in vitro production of interleukin1 (IL-1) and internal
organ dysfunction in severely burned
patients.Burns,1995;21:29-33
3 Liu YS, Yan LS. Experimental study on injurious
effect of burn combined with endotoxemia on the liver and its
significance. Zhonghua
Zhengxing Shaoshang Waike Zazhi,1994;10:142-145
4 Turnage RH, Guice KS, Oldham KT. Endotoxemia and
remote organ injury following intestinal reperfusion.
J
Surg Res,1994;56:571-578
5 Essani NA, Fisher MA, Farhood A, Manning AM,
Smith CW, Jaeschke H. Cytokine-induced upregulation of hepatic
intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 messenger RNA expression and its role in the
pathophysiology of murine endotoxin
shock
and acute liver
failure.Hepatology,1995;21:1632-1639
6 Zhu L, Yang ZC. Protective effects of early
enteral feeding on the functions of abdominal vicera posttrauma.
Guowai
Yixue Waikexue Fence,1997;21:134-137
7 Wang SL, Li A, You ZY, Yu B, Wang FJ, Zhao Y,
Tang CG, Wang P, Tao LH. Several issues of early enteral
feeding
(nutrition) in
burns. Jiefangjun Yixue Zazhi, 1998;23:88-91
8 Alexander JW. Is early enteral feeding of
benefit. Intensive Care Med, 1999;25:129-130
9 Kompan L, Krem ar B, Gad ijev E, Pro ek M.
Effects of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability and
the
development of
multiple organ failure after multiple injury.Intensive Care Med,
1999;25:157-161
10 Eleftheriadis E. Role of enteral nutrition-induced
splanchnic hyperemia in ameliorating splanchnic ischemia.
Nutrition,
1999;15:247-248
11 Noc M, Weil MH, Sun SJ, Gazmuri RJ, Tang W, Pakula JL.
Comparison of gastric luminal and gastric wall PCO2 during
hemorrhagic
shock.CircShock,1993;40:194-199
12 Buttenschoen K, Berger D, Hiki N, Strecker W, Seidelmann M,
Beger HG. Plasma concentrations of endotoxin and
antiendotoxin
antibodies in patients with multiple injuries: a prospective
clinical study. Eur J Surg, 1996;162:853-860
13 Jiang DJ, Tao JY, Xu SY. Inhibitory effects of clonidine on
edema formation after thermal injury in mice and rats.
Zhongguo Yaoli
Xuebao, 1989;10:540-542
14 Bengmark S, Gianotti L. Nutritional support to prevent and
treat multiple organ failure.World J Surg,1996;20:474-481
15 Moore EE, Jones TN. Nutritional assessment and preliminary
report on early support of the trauma patient.
J
Am Coll Nutr,1983;2:45-54
16 Mochizuki H, Trocki O, Dominioni L, Brackett KA, Joffe SN,
Alexander JW. Mechanism of prevention of postburn
hypermetabolism
and catabolism by early enteral feeding.Ann Surg,1984;200:297-310
17 Chiarelli A, Enzi G, Casadei A, Baggio B, Valerio A,
Mazzoleni F. Very early nutrition supplementation in burned
patients.
Am
J Clin Nutr, 1990;51:1035-1039
18 McQuiggan MM, Marvin RG, McKinley BA, Moore FA. Enteral
feeding following major torso trauma: from theory to
practice. New
Horiz,1999;7:131-146
19 Zaloga GP, Knowles R, Black KW, Prielipp R. Total
parenteral nutrition increases mortality after hemorrhage.
Crit
Care Med,1991;19:54-59
20 Bortenschlager L, Roberts PR, Black KW, Zaloga GP. Enteral
feeding minimizes liver injury during hemorrhagic
shock.Shock,1994;2:351-354
21 Zhu L, Yang ZC, Li A. Effects of early enteral feeding on
splanchnic organs′resuscitation
in shock stage of postburn.
Zhoughua Chuangshang Zazhi,
1998;14:31-34
22 Vincent JL. Prevention and therapy of multiple organ
failure. World J Surg,1996;20:465-470
23 Pastores SM, Katz DP, Kvetan V. Splanchnic ischemia and gut
mucosal injury in sepsis and the multiple organ dysfunction
syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol,
1996;91:1697-1710
24 Turnage RH, Kadesky KM, Myers SI, Guice KS, Oldham KT.
Hepatic hypoperfusion after intestinal reperfusion.
Surgery, 1996;119:151-160
25 Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutritional support improves
outcome: Hypothesis or fact. Crit Care Med,1999;27:259-261
26 Inoue S, Lukes S, Alexander JW, Trocki O, Silberstein EB.
Increased gut blood flow with early enteral feeding in burned
guinea pigs.J Burn Care Rehabil,
1989;10:300-308
27 Purcell PN, Branson RD, Hurst JM, Davis K, Johnson DJ. Gut
feeding and hepatic hemodynamics during PEEP ventilation
for acute
lung injury. J Surg Res, 1992;53:335-341
28 Purcell PN, Davis K, Branson RD, Johnson DJ. Continuous
duodenal feeding restores gut blood flow and increases gut
oxygen
utilization during PEEP ventilation for lung injury.Am J
Surg,1993;165:188-194
29 Eleftheriadis E, Kotzampassi K, Heliadis S, Papageorgiou G,
dimitriadou A. The influence of enteral nutrition on hepatic
oxygenation
and bioenergy status during sepsis.Intensive Care Med, 1996;22(Suppl
3):S307
30 Kazamias P, Kotzampassi K, Koufogiannis D, Eleftheriadis E.
Influence of enteral nutrition-induced splanchnic hyperemia
on the
septic origin of splanchnic ischemia. World J Surg, 1998;22:6-11
31 Gianotti L, Alexander JW, Nelson JL, Fukushima R, Pyles T,
Chalk CL. Role of early enteral feeding and acute starvation
on postburn
bacterial translocation and
host defense: prospective, randomized trials.Crit Care Med,
1994;22:265-272
| |