|
Jin Kun Zhang1, Jin Lun Sun2, Hai Bin Chen1,
Yang Zeng1 and Yao Jun Qu1
1Cencer
Pathology Laboratory, Shantou University Medical College,
Shantou 515031, Guangdong Province, China
2Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College
Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
Prof. Jin Kun Zhang, graduated from Nanjing Railway Medical Colloge
in 1965, professor of histology and embryology, graduate advisor,
majoring in immunocyte and antitumor immunity, having the second and
third awards of science
and technology progression of Railway Ministry and Jiangsu Province,
having 60 papers published.
Supported by Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education
Office of Guangdong Province, No. 19952901
Correspondence to: Prof. Jin Kun Zhang, Cancer Pathology
Laboratory, Shantou University Medical College, 22 Xinlinglu,
Shantou 515031, Guangdong Province, China
Telephone:
0086-754-8900443, Fax. 0086-754-8557562
Email. Jkzhang @mailserv.stu.edu.cn
Received: 2000-04-03 Accepted: 2000-06-25
Subject
headings: dendritic cells; granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor; tumor necrosis factor; anti-hepatoma cell
activities; in vitro; peripheral blood
Zhang JK, Sun JL, Chen HB, Zeng Y, Qu YJ. Influence of granulocyte-macrophage
colony stimulating factor and tumor necrosis factor on anti-hepatoma
activities of human dendritic cells.World J Gastroentero,
2000;6(5):718-720
INTRODUCTION
Dendritic cells (DCs) play a key regulatory role in antitumor
immunity, especial
ly in its immune accessory role via MHC-Ⅰ
molecules[1-5]. We have re
cently reported that DCs were able to enhance the killing activity
of Lymphokine
and PHA activated killer (LPAK) cells in vitro[6-8].
In the presen
t st
udy, we evaluated the effects of GM-CSF and TNF upon antitumor
activities of fr
eshly isolated dendritic
Cells in human peripheral blood (DC-0) and those cells cultivated
for 36 hours
in vitro (DC-36 ). To perform such an evaluation, we compared
killing effe
cts of LPAK cells with addtional DC-0 or DC-36 on hepatoma cell line
(BEL-740
2) under regulation of GM-CSF or TNF. This study provided some basic
data for f
urther antitumor research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tumor cell line
Human hepatoma cell line BEL-7402 was purchased from
experimental center of Sun
Yat-Sen University of Medical Sciences.
Isolation of DCs
According to our previous method[9], peripheral
blood mononuclear cells
(PBMNC) from healthy volunteers were prepared by using
Ficoll-Hypaque (ρ=1077g/L)
centrifugation method. Interface cells were
collected and washed three times to remove platelets. Discontinuous
Percoll density gradient centrifugation (Percoll: Pharmacia, Sweden)
was employed, and then interface cells between 35% and 50% were
collected which were called as preliminary enrichment of DCs and
divided into two shares. One share (DC-0) was
panned immediately; other one (DC-36) further cultured in PRMI-1640
with 100mL/L inactivated fetal calf serum (100mL/L FCS PRMI-1640) at
37℃
in a full humidified 50mL/L CO2 atmosphere for 36 hours,
and panned. The non-adherent fractions of two shares as DC-0 and
DC-36 were washed
and collected for the experiments.
Preparation of LPAK cells[9]
The PBMNCs were prepared in the same procedure as
above, cultured 2×109/
L- population with the final concentration of rhIL-2 1000ku/L and
PHA 20mg/L in 100mL/L FCS PRMI-1640 at 37℃
in a full humidified
50mL/L CO2 atmosphere for 7 days. Half volume of the
solution was replaced by fresh culture medium at the fourth day.
Anti-tumor experiment
The anti-tumor experiments were divided into two groups and
each contained
five experimental subgroups. Two ratios of effect (LPAK) to target
(BEL-7402)
(5∶1
and 10∶1)
were used in all groups. ①
DC-0 group: d group: BEL-7402 (8×107/L)
+ LPAK + DC-0 (8×106/L);
g1 group: d group + GM-CSF (500ku/L); g2 group: d group +
GM-CSF(100ku/L); t1 group: d group + TNF (5000ku/L); t2 group: d
group + TNF(500ku/L); ②
DC-36 group: each experimental group was the same as that in DC-0
group except DC-36 in
pla
ce of DC-0 in the same concentration. These experimental groups were
called D group, G1 group, G2 group, T1 group and T2 group
respectively. In addition, L
groups as the corresponding control groups, BEL-7402 + LPAK ,
experimental con
t
rol group only consisted of BEL-7402, its population was 8×107/L.
Culture
medium control group only contained 100mL/L FCS-PRMI-1640 with the
supernatant of LPAK cells at a concentration of 50μL/culture
well. All of these groups were cultured in 96-well-culture plates
and each group had 3 wells at 37℃
in a full humidified 50mL/L CO2 atmosphere for 48 hours.
Cytotoxity assay was detected
by using neural red uptake method.
Cytotoxicity assay (neural red uptake method)[10]
0.1mL 0.3mL/L neural red solution was added in each
well for ano
ther 1 hour of culture. Following three washings with phosphate
buffered saline
(PBS), 0.1mL HCl-ethanol solution was added in each well. The
absorpti
on value (A value) of each well was immediately read by BIO-RAD
3550-UV type automatic ELISA reader at 570nm wavelength. The formula
of cytotoxicity is as follows:
|
(1-
|
Experimental
group A - medium control group A
|
)×100%
|
|
Control
group A - medium control group A
|
The
experimental results were analyzed through analysis of variance by
using GB-STAT statistic software. The experiment repeated four times
at the same condition.
RESULTS
Influence of DC-0 and DC-36 on cytotoxity activity of LPAK
cells-The cytotoxic activity of L group, d group and D group was
enhanced when their ratios of effect to target increased (P<0.01).
Their cytotoxic activi
ty were D group >
d group >
L group (P<0.01)
respectively while in the same ratio of effect to target (Figure 1).
Influence of GM-CSF on DC-0 and DC-36 in helping LPAK cells
killing
effect
When there were two ratios of effect to target, cytotoxic
activity of g1 gro
up and g2 group were obviously higher than d group (P<0.01),
meantime,
cytotoxic activity of G1 group and G2 group were greatly higher than
D group (P<0.01).
However, the difference between g1 group and g2 group was not
distinct (P>0.05),
also there were no difference between G1 group
and G2 group (P>0.05).
But there were obviously different between g1
group and G1 group (P<0.01),
at the same time, the difference between
g2 group and G2 group were distinct (P<0.01)
(Figure 2).
Influence of TNF on DC-0 and DC-36 in helping LPAK cells
killing effect
While there were two ratios of effect to target, cytotoxic
activity of t1 gr
oup or t2 group was evidently higher than that of d group (P<0.01),
meantime, cytotoxic activity of T1 group or T2 group was markedly
higher than
that of D group (P<0.01).
However, the differences between t1 and t2 g
roup, and between T1 and T2 group were distinct (P<0.01).
Furthermore, there were difference between t1 and T1 group (P<0.01),
at the same time, between t2 and T2 group (P<0.01)
(Figure 3).
Figure 1(PDF)
Influence of DC-0 and DC-36 on LPAK cells
in killing BEL-7402 cells in vitro.
Figure 2(PDF)
Influence of GM-CSF on DC-0 and DC-36 in
helping LPAK cells killing activity in vitro.
Figure 3(PDF)
Influence of TNF on DC-0 and DC-36 in hel
ping LPAK cells killing activity in vitro.
DISCUSSION
In recent years,it is considered that mature DCs in human
peripheral blood have
high stimulating function, which efficiently presents tumor-peptide
epitopes leading to induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) to produce
stronger specific antitumor immune response[11-14]. LPAK
cells after 7-day induction chiefly express similar phenotype with
the CD16-, CD8+, CD3+
CTL subtype[15-18]. In our experiments, cytotoxic
activity in D group
was obviously higher than in d group, which demonstrated that the
proportion of mature DCs in DC-36 group was higher than those in
DC-0
group and DC-36 group could stimulate LPAK cells to exert stronger
antitumor immune response. This effect suggested that a lot of
precursor cells of DCs and
immature DCs in freshly isolated DCs could differentiate into mature
DCs after 36h cultivation, which coincided with Young's
opinion[19].In human peripheral blood, however, not all
the precursor cells and immature DCs are able to automatically
differentiate into mature DCs in vitro. It is GM-CSF that
promotes the differentiation, maturation and activation of DCs. GM-CSF
can not only initiate and promote development of DCs from MHC Ⅱ-,
MHC Ⅱ+
precursors and immature DCs, but also upregulated CD86-
expressio
n on DCs, which make DCs to have activating and controlling
antitumor immune
function[20-24]. Cytotoxic activity difference between G2
(g2) group
and G1 (g1) group were not distinct, this
finding illustrated that maturation and activation of DCs did not
result from one factor but from combinatio
n of multiple factors. In addition, the different time required in
different developing stage of DCs populations must be considered.
Although developing
time in DC-36 group was longer than that in DC-0 group, not all DCs
in DC-36 group differentiated into mature DCs. Therefore, increasing
GM-CSF concentr
ation alone was senseless. This phenomenon may be helpful in further
study of antitumor immunity and clinical research.
In
the case of TNF addition, cytotoxic activity was increased greatly,
this find
ing attributed to three roles of TNF: 1, TNF is able to serve as the
first signal, which affects DCs development in their early stage or
whole stage, leading to upregulate the GM-CSF receptor level of DCs[21].
The supernatant of LPAK cells with minor quantity of cell growth
factors such as TNF was
added into culture medium to afford synergetic effect with GM-CSF;
2, TNF upregulates expression of CD80,CD83, CD86
and MHC-Ⅱ
in a short period[25,26].
Because these molecules are crucial for
efficient antigen presenting, they promote the differentiation,
development and activation of DCs. 3, TNF itself can kill tumor
cells directly[27-32]
. Compared with two t groups, cytotoxic activity of T1
and t 1 groups were higher than that of T2 and t2
groups, which showed that in DC-36 groups there was plenty of time
for immature DCs to evolve into mature DCs after
the addition of TNF. Furthermore, T1 (t1)
group had higher cytotoxic activi
ty than T2 (t2) group, which was further
increased when TNF dosage was raised. This phenomenon may attribute
to antitumor effect of TNF itself and the synergetic effect between
LPAK cells and TNF.
In conclusion, as compared with uncultured
DC-0, cultured DC-36 from freshly
isolated DCs had greater cooperative effect with GM-CSF or TNF.
Moreover, they enable DCs to fulfill stronger antitumor effect.
REFERENCES
1 Girolomoni G, Ricciardi Castagnoli
P.Dendritic cells hold promi se for immunotherapy.Immunol Today,
1997;18:102-104
2 Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and
the control of immunity. Nature,1998;392:245-252
3 Austyn JM. Dendritic cells.Curr Opin
Hematol,1998;5:3-15
4 Liu SC, Yuan SZ. Relationship between
infiltration of dendritic cells, pericancerous lymphocytic reaction
and prognosis
in colorectal carclinomas. Xin Xiaohuabingxue
Zazhi,1997;5:156-157
5 Hu JY, Wang S, Zhu JG, Zhou GH, Sun QB.
Expression of B7 costimulation molecu les by colorectal cancer cells
reduces
tumorigenicity and induces anti tumor
immunity.World J Gastroentero,1999;5:147-151
6 Zhang JK, Chen HB, Sun JL, Zhou YQ. Effect of
dendritic cells on LPAK cells induced at different times in killing
hepatoma
cells.Shijie Huaren Xiaohua
Zazhi,1999;7:673-675
7 Sun JL, Zhang JK, Chen HB, Cheng JD, Qiu YQ.
Promoting effects of dendritic cells on LPAK cells killing human
hepatoma
cells.Zhongguo Zhongliu Linchuang Yu
Kangfu,1998;5:16-18
8 Chen HB, Zhang JK, Huang ZL, Sun JL, Zhou YQ.
Effects of cytokines on dendritic cells against human hepatoma cell
line.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1999;7:191-193
9 Zhang JK, Chen HB, Wang J, Sun JL. Separating
method of dendritic cells. Jiepou Kexue Jinzhan,1998;4: 272-273
10 Zhu MS, Xu XY, Ding SB. Induction of LAK cells and
detection of their activity.The basis of LAK cells and their clinic
antitumor app lication. The first
edition.Nanjing,Science & Technology Press of Jiangs u
Province,1993:48-67
11 Li MS, Yuan AL, Zhang WD, Liu SD, Lu AM, Zhou DY. Dendritic
cells in vitro induce efficient and special anti tumor
immune response.Shijie
Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1999;7:161-163
12 Li MS, Yuan AL, Zhang WD, Chen XQ, Tian XH, Piao YJ. Immune
response induced by dendritic cells induce apoptosis
and inhibit
proliferation of tumor cells.Shijie Huaren Xiaohua
Zazhi,2000;8:56-58
13 Xiao LF, Luo LQ, Zou Y, Huang SL. Study of the phenotype of
PBLs activated by CD28/.CD80 and CD2/.CD58 and acting
with hepatoma cells and the restricted
usage of TCR Vβ
gene subfamily.Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,
1999;7:1044-1046
14 Zhai SH, Liu JB, Zhu P, Wang YH. CD54, CD80, CD86 and HLA
ABC expressions in liver cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,
2000;8:292-295
15 Huang SL, Xiao LF, Luo LQ, Chen HQ. Phenotype analysis and
restricted usage of TCR Vβ
genes subfamily in mAb
costimulated T cells after incubated with
hepatocellular carcinoma cell line.Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1998;6:10
33-1035
16 Tang ZY. Advances in clinical research of hepatocellular
carcinoma in China.Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1998;6:1013-1016
17 Chen Q, Ye YB, Chen Z.Activation of killer cells with
soluble gastric cancer antigen combined with anti CD-3 McAb.
World J Gastroentero, 1999;5:179-180
18 Zhang JK, Sun JL, Chen HB, Zhou YQ. Ultrastructural
comparison of apoptosis of human hepatoma cells and LAK cells.
Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1998;6:877-879
19 Young JW, Steinman RM. The hematopoietic development of
dendritic cells: a distinct pathway for myeloid
differentiation. Stem
Cells,1996;14:376-387
20 Stingl G, Bergstresser PR. Dendritic cells: a major story
unfolds.Immunol Today,1995;16:330-333
21 Santiago Schwarz F, Divaris N, Kay C, Carsons SE.
Mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor granulocyte macrophage colony
stimulating factor induced de ndritic cell
development.Blood,1993;82:3019-3028
22 Cao X, Zhang W, Wang J, Zhang M, Huang X, Hamada H, Chen W.
Therapy of established tumour with a hybrid cellular
vaccine
generated by using granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor
genetically modified dendritic cells.
Immunology,1999;97:616-625
23 Chiodoni C, Paglia P, Stoppacciaro A, Rodolfo M, Parenza M,
Colombo MP. Dendritic cells infiltrating tumors
cotransduced with
granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and CD40
ligand genes take up and
present endogenous tumor
associated antigens, and prime naive mice for a cytotoxic T
lymphocyte response.J Exp
Med,1999;190:125-133
24 Zou QY, Li RB, Zheng PL, Yang LP, Chen YZ, Kong XP. Effect
of embryo hepatic extracts on proliferation and
differentiation of hepatoma
BEL 7402 cells.Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1999;7:243-245
25 Morse MA, Zhou LJ, Tedder TF, Lyerly HK, Smith C.
Generation of dendritic cells in vitro from peripheral blood
mononuclear cells
with granulocyt emacrophage colony stimulating factor, interleukin
4, and tumor necrosis factor-α
for use in cancer immunotherapy.Ann
Surg,1997;226:6-16
26 Austyn JM. New insights into the mobilization and
phagocytic activity of dendritic cells. J Exp Med,1996;183:1287-1292
27 Liang WJ, Huang ZY, Ding YQ, Zhang WD. Lovo cell line
apoptosis induced by cycloheximide combined with TNFα.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1999;7:326-328
28 Yan BG, Yang ZC, Huang YS, Liu ZY, Fu QF, He BB, Li A.
Effect of delayed rapid fluid resuscitation on liver function
in
early stage
postburn.Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1999;7:573-575
29 Wang YF, Wu XN, Wu Q, Zhang XQ, Chen XF, Zhou XH, Wen WQ,
Chen WY. Biological significance of serum soluble
tumor necrosis
factor receptor Ⅰ
in hepatoma patients.China Natl J New Gastroenterol,1996;2:89-91
30 Zhang GQ, Yu H, Zhou XQ,Liao D, Xie Q, Wang B. TNF-α
induced apoptosis and necrosis of mice hepatocytes.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,
2000;8:303-306
31 Wang JY, Wang XL, Liu P. Detection of serum TNF-α,
IFN-γ,
IL-6 and IL-8 in patients with hepatitis B.
World J Gastroentero,1999;5:38-40
32 Wu MC. Progress in surgical treatment of primary
hepatocellular carcinoma.Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi,1998;6:921-923
| |