|
Yu
Qiang Chen1, Wen Hu Guo2, Zheng Ming Chen3, Lei
Shi3 and Yan Xu Chen2
1Department
of General Surgery, Chinese PLA 174th Hospital, Xiamen 361003,
Fujian Province, China
2Department of General Surgery, Chinese PLA Fuzhou
General Hospital of Nanjing Command Area, Fuzhou 351003, Fujian
Province, China
3State Lab for Tumor Cell Engineering of Xiamen
University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China
Dr. Yu Qiang Chen, Ph.D, graduated from Xiamen University in 1998,
now working as a doctor in chief in Chinese PLA 174th Hospital,
having 10 papers published.
Correspondence to: Dr. Yu Qiang Chen, Department of General
Surg ery, Chinese PLA 174th Hospital, Xiamen 361003, Fujian
Province, China
Telephone:
0086-592-2040931, Fax. 0086-592-2040931
Email. chenyq@public.xm.fj.cn
Received: 2000-01-05 Accepted: 2000-02-21
Subject
headings: gastrectomy;
pylorus; G-cell; gastrin: pept ic ulcer/surgery
Chen
YQ, Guo WH, Chen ZM, Shi L, Chen YX. Effect of gastrectomy on G-cell
density and functional activity
in dogs.
World J Gastroentero, 2000;6(3):419-420
INTRODUCTION
Billroth gastrectomy has some advantages of inhibiting acid
secretion, low ulcer recurrence and low mortality. However,
postoperative complications, such as dumping syndrome and reflux
gastritis, often occurred as a result of pylorectomy[1].
To minimize these complications, pylorus-preserving gastrecto my
(PPG) had been performed for gastric ulcer with satisfied clinical
results. P ositive correlation was not found between ulcer
recurrence and serum gastrin lev el[2].
In this study, we performed distal partial gastrectomy with Billr
oth Ⅱ
anastomosis (DPG-BⅡ),
pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) and highly seclective vagotomy
(HSV) on dogs and investigated the relationship between dif ferent
antrum disposal and gastric acid secrection, serum gastrin level and
G-cell density and functional activity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eighteen hybrid adult dogs, with body weight ranging from 10kg
to 20kg , mean weight 13.9kg, were randomly divided into 3 groups,
and underwent PPG, DPG-BⅡ
or HSV respectively. In PPG group, antrum was strictly retain ed
within 1.5cm-2.0cm and stomach was resected about 40%. DPG-BⅡ,
in which stomach was resected about 75%, and HSV were routinely
done. After laparotomy biopsy was taken at antrum 2cm beyond the
pyloric sphincter, the first segmental duodenum and jejunum 4cm
beyond Treitz ligamenta, 3mo after operation, biopsies were done
again around the original biopsy sites. Gastric acid secretion was
analyzed using neut ralization method (subcutaneous injection of
tetra-gastrin 4μg/kg).
Fasting and postprandial serum gastrin levels were measured by
radioimmunoassay. The G cell density and its functional activity
were determined by immunohistochemical assay using an antigastrin
antibody (Zymedco) at a dilution of 1∶200
in PBS. G cell density was measured according to the method of
Creutzfeldt[3],
in which G cell functional activity was divided into 4 grades, as
follows: 1+, brown-red cyto plasm, without granule; 2+, minute brown
granules, occupied within 1/3 cyto plasm area; 3+, brown granule or
clusters occupied, 1/3-2/3 cytopl asm area; 4+, brown black granules
or clusters, above 2/3 cyto plasm area .
RESULTS
Effects of different operative procedures on gastric acid
secretion
In DPG-BⅡ,
PPG and HSV groups, preoperative basal acid output (BAO) was
1.80mmol/h, 2.25mmol/h and 2.19mmol/h; maximal ac id output (MAO)
was 5.19mmol/h, 4.49mmol/h and 5.30mmol/ h, respectively; 3mo after
operation, BAO decreased to 0.48mmol/h, 0.98mmol/h and 0.97mmol/h;
while MAO decreased to 1.04mmol/h, 1.76mmol/h and 1.29mmol/h,
respectively. Gastric acid secretion was significantly suppressed by
56%-80%, which sho wed that all of the three operations can
effectively inhibit gastric acid secret ion in dogs (Table 1).
Effects of different operative procedure on serum gastrin
level
Pre and post-operative fasting and postprandial serum
gastrin levels of DPG-BⅡ,
PPG and HSV groups are shown in Table 2. In DPG-BⅡ,
post-operative fasting and postprandial serum gastrin levels were
significantly decre ased (P<0.05),
the inhibiting rate was 49.7% and 48.4% respectively ; while in PPG,
serum gastrin levels were slightly decreased with an inhibiting rate
of 25.9% and 24.4%; in HSV, post-operative serum gastrin levels were
increased by 65.2% and 54.1%, respectively.
Effects of different operative procedure on G cell density and
functional activity
Postoperatively, G cell density increased in all sites
checked. The increasing rate in duodenum was about 75.0% and 50.0%
in antrum or residual antrum (Table 3). The increase in jejunum had
no statistical significance. Stained by immunohistochemical method,
G cell was stained in brown color and there were brown-black
granules in cytoplasm, which were the product s of gastrin acted
with its antibody and presented as the index of activity of G cell.
If 1+ and 2+ grade cell was taken as normal- or hypofunction, while
3+ and 4+ as hyperfunction, the number of grade 3+ and 4+ G cells as
a whole constituted 44% and 60% of the total G cells examined in pre
and post-operative spe cimens respectively, and particularly in
duodenum the corresponding postoperativ e date was 63%. It reveals
that no matter what procedure of gastrectomy was perf ormed, the
post-operative G cell functional activity, especially in duodenum wa
s enhanced with statistical significance (Table 4).
Table 1 Effects of different operative procedures on gastric
acid secretion
|
Operation
|
Group
|
Preoperation
(mmol/h)
|
Postoperation(mmol/h)
|
Inhibiting
rate (%)
|
|
DPG-BⅡ
|
BAO
|
1.80±0.25
|
0.48±0.20b
|
73.7
|
|
|
MAO
|
5.19±0.56
|
1.04±0.19b
|
80.0
|
|
PPG
|
BAO
|
2.25±0.27
|
0.98±0.26a
|
56.4
|
|
|
MAO
|
4.49±0.34
|
1.76±0.19b
|
60.7
|
|
HSV
|
BAO
|
2.19±0.21
|
0.97±0.26a
|
55.9
|
|
|
MAO
|
5.30±0.14
|
1.29±0.47b
|
75.7
|
aP<0.05;
bP<0.01,
vs preoperation.
Table 2 Effects of different operative procedure on serum
gastrin level
|
Operation
|
Group
|
Pre-operation(ng/L)
|
Post-operation(ng/L)
|
Changing
rate(%)
|
|
DPG-BⅡ
|
fasting
|
179±104
|
90±117a
|
↓49.7
|
|
|
postprandial
|
181±86
|
94±39a
|
↓48.8
|
|
PPG
|
fasting
|
190±153
|
144±63
|
↓25.9
|
|
|
postprandial
|
239±115
|
180±47
|
↓24.4
|
|
HSV
|
fasting
|
100±10
|
166±75
|
↑65.2
|
|
|
postprandial
|
103±48
|
186±63
|
↑54.1
|
aP<0.05,
vs preoperation.
Table 3 Effects of different operative procedure on G cell
density
|
Operation
|
Site
|
Preoperation(cell/field)
|
Postoperation(cell/field)
|
Incerasing
rate(%)
|
|
DPG-BⅡ
|
Duodenum
|
23.1±5.0
|
41.3±4.9b
|
78.9
|
|
|
Jejunum
|
1.1±1.1
|
3.2±3.0
|
190.4
|
|
PPG
|
Antrum
|
66.2±2.1
|
103.3±18.8a
|
56.0
|
|
|
Duodenum
|
15.6±5.3
|
27.1±3.6a
|
74.3
|
|
|
Jejunum
|
1.0±4.2
|
1.1±1.9
|
11.0
|
|
HSV
|
Antrum
|
69.8±23.2
|
103.3±19.3b
|
47.6
|
|
|
Duodenum
|
33.7±15.1
|
60.1±21.5
|
78.5
|
|
|
Jejunum
|
5.5±3.3
|
17.3±9.2
|
218.3
|
aP<0.05;
bP<0.01,
vs preoperation.
Table 4 Effects of different operations on G cell function
|
Operation
|
Site
|
Group
|
1+
|
2+
|
3+
|
4+
|
|
DPG-BⅡ
|
Duodenum
|
Preoperation
|
21
|
142
|
106
|
29
|
|
|
|
Postoperation
|
24
|
73
|
157
|
46b
|
|
PPG
|
Antrum
|
Preoperation
|
32
|
136
|
71
|
61
|
|
|
|
Postoperation
|
23
|
115
|
64
|
98a
|
|
|
Duodenum
|
Preoperation
|
50
|
124
|
81
|
45
|
|
|
|
Postoperation
|
24
|
93
|
117
|
68b
|
|
HSV
|
Antrum
|
Preoperation
|
55
|
105
|
84
|
56
|
|
|
|
Postoperation
|
38
|
94
|
73
|
95a
|
|
|
Duodenum
|
Preoperation
|
67
|
107
|
74
|
52
|
|
|
|
Postoperation
|
24
|
99
|
81
|
96b
|
aP<0.05;
bP<0.01,
vs preoperation.
DISCUSSION
According to the theory “no
acid, no ulcer”,
anti-acid secretion has been the dominant measure in treating peptic
ulcer. For suppressing acid secretion, how to treat the antrum has
been a much controversial question in general surger y[4].
Total antrum excision would make the serum gastrin level and gastr
ic acid output lowered, which was accompanied with relatively lower
ulcer recurr ence; on the other hand, damage of sphincter function
resulted in dumping symdro me, reflux gastritis, dyspepsia and even
carcinogenesis of residual stomach [1].
Under this condition PPG was presented, which not only removed the
ulce r lesion and suppressed gastric acid secretion, but also
preserved the sphincter function[5].
Our results showed that all the three proce dures can effectively
inhibit gastric acid secretion in spite of the different p
ostoperative serum gastrin levels. Clinically, similar results were
observed tha t absolute serum gastrin value of patients were all
kept within normal limits, regardless their gastrin level decreased
or increased after DPG-BⅡ,
PPG or HSV[2].
This implied that different disposal of antrum did not obviously
affect the inhibition of gastric acid secretion.
Gastric
acid secretion is a complex physiological process, which was
regulated by several factors, such as vagus nerve, G cell, parital
cell and its receptor, some alimentary endocrine substances, gastric
mucosal blood supply[6].
Of them any change may inhibit the gastric and secretion and keep it
at lower ou tput level. In addition to regulating acid secretion,
gastrin has important effe cts on nourishment of gastric mucosa and
pancreas[7].
Our results showed that there were many G cells in duodenum and
jejunum besides antrum. After operation, the number of G cells in
the nongastric tissue increased and their function enhanced, this
was not only associated with the gastric acid deplation, but also
was demanded by other physiological effects. Therefore it is
evidently impossible and unnecessary to eliminate gastrin from serum
by operation of peptic ulcer. To some extent, hypergastrinemia
subsequent to treatment of peptic ulcer, such as HSV and antiacid
drugs, is the main determinant of ulcer healing[8].
It is the key point that how to keep the whole function of
sphincter. Fukushima et al[5]has
discovered that the length of preserved antrum was closely related
to the residual stomach function. In our study, the length of
preserved antrum was strictly limited within 1.5cm to 2.0cm,
vomiting, decline of food intake and loss of body weight were not
found postoperatively in the animals which suggested that the
function of sphincter had been fairly maintained.
REFERENCES
1 Tersmette AC,Giardiello FM,Tytgat
GN,Offerhaus GJ.Carcinogenesis after remote peptic ulcer surgery:
the long-term
prognosis
of partial gastrectomy.Scand J Gastroenterol,1995;212(Suppl
1):96-99
2 Sasaki I, Fukushima K, Naito H, Matsuno S,
Shiratori T, Maki T. Long-term results of pylorus-preserving
gastrectomy
for
gastric ulcer. Tohoku J Exp Med, 1992;168:539-548
3 Creutzfeldt W,Arnold R,Creutzfeldt C, Track NS.
Mucosal gastrin concentration, molecular forms of gastrin,
number
and
ultrastructure of G-cells in patients with duodenal
ulcer.Gut,1976;17:745-754
4 Brody FJ, Trad KS. Comparison of acid reduction
in antiulcer operations. Surg Endosc, 1997;11:123-125
5 Fukushima K, Sasaki I, Naito H, Funayama Y,
Kamiyama Y, Takahashi M, Matsuno S. Long-term follow-up study
after
pylorus
preserving gastrectomy for gastric ulcer.Nippon Geka Gakkai
Zasshi, 1991;92:401-410
6 Vakhrushev IaM, Ivanov LA. Changes in gastric
secretory function in peptic ulcer patients after gastric resection.
Terapevt
Arkh,1991;63:14-16
7 Halter F, Wilder Smith CH. Gastrin: friend or
foe of peptic ulcer? J Clin Gastroenterol,1991;13(Suppl 1):S75-82
8 Jones DB, Howden CW, Burget DW, Kerr GD, Hunt RH.
Acid suppression in duodenal ulcer: a meta-analysis to define
optimal
dosing with antisecretory drugs. Gut, 1987;28:1120-1127
| |