|
Ji
Ye Zhu, Xi Sheng Leng, Dong Wang and Ru Yu Du
Department of General Surgery, People′s
Hospital, Beijing Medical Unive
rsity, Beijing 100044, China
Dr. Ji Ye Zhu, Male, born on 1962-07-20 in Shanghai, graduated from
B
eijing Medical University as a postgraduate in 1991, now associate
professor of
general surgery, majoring hepatobilliary surgery, having 25 papers
published.
Project supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation and Minist
ry of Public Health of China, No.39500141
Correspondence to: Dr. Ji Ye Zhu,
Department of General Surgery
, People′s
Hospital, Beijing Medical University, Beijing 100044, China
Telephone:
+86-10-68314422 Ext.3500, Fax.+86-10-68318386
Received:
1999-04-15
Accepted: 1999-08-09
Subject
headings: hypertension,
portal; liver cirrhosis; somatostatin;
hemodynamics
Zhu
JY, Leng XS, Wang D, Du RY. Effects of somatostatin on splanchnic
hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. World J
Gastroentero,
2000;6(1):143-144
INTRODUCTION
Esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) is one of the most common
complications of cirrhosis with portal hypertension. In recent
years, great progress has been made in medicinal treatment.
Somatostatin has been widely used in clinics, for it can effectively
lower the portal venous pressure (PVP) with little side effect. The
aim of this study is to assess the effect of somatostatin on portal
venous pressue and splanchnic hemodynamics in patients with liver
cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
The study subjects were 20 cirrhotic patients with portal
hypertension, including 12 men and 8 women. Their mean age was 46.6±13.4
years. All patients had a history of hepatitis B with positive HbsAg
and were pathologically diagnosed as having liver cirrhosis.
Methods
All patients were asked to fast and lie supine for 12 hours before
somatostatin infusion. The inner diameter and blood velocity of the
portal, left hepatic, mid
dle hepatic and right hepatic veins were measured. Using ACUSON 128×P/10
color
Doppler ultrasonography. A continuous infusion of somatostatin was
then administ
ered via the peripheral vein at a rate of 250μg/h. The
measurement was
repeated after an hour. The blood flow was calculated according to
the formula Q=60πr-2V. The πr-2 in the formula is the
sectional area (cm2) of the vein, V represents the mean
value of maximum blood velocity (cm/sec) and Q is blood flow (mL/min).
Seven days after the operation, portal venous pressure, blood
pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured in 15 of the 20
patients who had undergone right gastroepiploic venous
catheterization. The measurement was taken before infusion of
somatostatin and after 1 and 1.5 hours. Students′t
test was u
sed to compare the data collected before and after the treatment.
RESULTS
Portal venous pressure was measured via the catheter in the
right gastroepiploic vein of the 15 portal hypertensive patients at
0, 1.0, and 1.5 hour after somatostatin administration. The portal
venous pressure decreased from 20.8±2.0mmHg (0h) to 18.2mmHg±2.0mmHg
(1h) and 18.0mmHg±2.0
mmHg (1.5h), respectively, the differences being statistically
significant
(P<0.01).
However, the difference between 1h and 1.5h was insignificant (P>0.05).
The infusion of somatostatin did not affect the s
ystolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic pressure (DAP) and HR
(Table 1).
Table 1 Effect of somatostatin on PVP, BP and HR
|
|
n
|
0h
|
1h
|
1.5h
|
|
PVP(mmHg)
|
15
|
20.8±2.0
|
18.2±2.0b
|
18.0±2.0b
|
|
SAP(mmHg)
|
15
|
130.0±14.0
|
134.1±12.0
|
132.0±16.0
|
|
DAP(mmHg)
|
15
|
82.0±9.2
|
84.0±14.0
|
83.1±14.0
|
|
HR(beat/sec)
|
15
|
81.2±7.3
|
79.1±6.2
|
80.7±6.9
|
bP<0.01
as compared to 0h.
The hepatopetal flow was
measured by color Doppler ultrasonography in all the 20 patients.
The sectional area of portal vein decreased by 7.28% after the
infusion of somatostatin but the difference being insignificant (P>0.05).
The average value of portal vein maximum blood velocity decreased by
18.96% from 19.72±7.75cm/sec to 15.98±7.26cm/sec, and the average
total portal vein blood flow was decreased by 19.72% from
1643.21mL/min±757.25mL/min to 1319.49mL/min±622.39mL/min after the
infusion, the dif
ference being very significant (P<0.01).
In
19 of the 20 patients, the total sectional area and the total blood
flow of the three hepatic veins were calculated after somatostatin
infusion. The former increased from 0.72cm2±0.21cm2
to 0.76cm2±0.24cm2, and the latter increased
from 1786.22mL/min±923.37mL/m
in to 1836.17mL/min±844.24mL/min. The changes were no
t significant (P>0.05).
DISCUSSION
It has been shown that humoral substances play important roles
in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Due to liver function
damage and the shunt of collateral circulation, changes occurred in
the blood levels of these vasoactive humoral substances and some of
them can regulate the portal venous pressure by interfering with
blood vessel resistance or blood flow of the portal vein[1].
The medicinal therapy is somewhat based on this hypothesis.
Somatostatin,
one of the peptide hormones originating from neural-ectoderm, is
able to inhibit the release of some hormones in vivo and
lower the portal venous pressure by changing splanchnic blood flow.
Treatment of variceal hemorrhage with somatostatin in portal
hypertension has been successful according to many recent reports[2,3].
Seven days after the 8mm H-graft portacaval shunts (HGPCS), we
measured the portal venous pressure via the catheter in the right
gastroepiploic vein before and after the infusion of somatostatin
and found that somatostatin could lower the portal venous pressure
by 2.6mmHg-2.7mmHg. There was no significant difference in the
portal venous pressure 1 or 1.5 hours after the administration. The
results indicated that continuous infusion of somatostatin could
decrease the portal venous pressure. At the same time, there was no
significant changes in BP or HR. We concluded that somatostatin had
fewer side effects than other drugs used to lower the portal venous
pressure and had little influence on systemic hemodynamics. It
appears that somatostatin can be used clinically to treat bleeding
from esophageal varices of portal hypertension.
In
order to find out the mechanism of how somatostatin lowers the
portal venous pressure, we measured the sectional area and maximum
blood velocity, and flow through the portal, left hepatic, middle
hepatic and right hepatic veins using color Doppler ultrasonography
before and after somatostatin administration. The color Doppler
flowmetry in the study of portal hypertensive hemodynamics proved to
be an accurate, simple, non-invasive and easily repeated method[4].
Michel[5]reported
that there existed consistent results by both the pulsed Doppler and
electromagnetic flowmetry methods in measuring the portal vein blood
flow (r=0.918). Under these fixed conditions, the data has shed
light on the changes in the portal venous blood flow in a same
patient observed by a same examiner[4-6].
Our study indicates that the inner diameter changed slig
htly and that the sectional area of the portal vein decreased by
7.28% with no
significant difference after the infusion, suggesting that
somatostatin itself c
an not directly constrict the portal vein. Our study also indicates
that the maximum blood velocity and the maximum portal vein blood
flow decreased significantly by 18.96% and 19.72% respectively after
the use of somatostatin. This suggests that somatostatin can lower
portal venous pressure by reducing blood velocity and blood flow,
which was commonly found in other reports[7].
However, how somatostatin reduces portal vein blood flow remains
unclear. Glucagon is reported to be able to increase blood flow and
portal venous pressure[8]while
inhibiting the effect of somatostatin in reducing portal vein blood
flow[9].
This suggests that somatostatin inhibits the release of glucagon.
Somatostatin was also reported to be able to inhibit the
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and lessen Na+
retention[10,11].
We also discovered that the summation of the three hepatic venous
sectional areas and blood flow through these areas increased
slightly without any significant differences. In conclusion, the
role of somatostatin in slanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients
with portal hypertension should be further investigated.
REFERENCES
1 Li XN, Huang CT,
Wang XH, Leng XS, Du RY. Changes of blood humoral substances in
experimental cirrhosis and their
effects
on portal hemodynamics.Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi,1990;103:970-977
2 Walker S. Vasoconstrictor therapy in bleeding
esophageal varices.Hepato_gastroenterol,1990;37:538-543
3 Shields R, Jenkins SA, Baxter JN, Kingsnorth AN,
Ellenbogen S, Makin CA, Gilmore I,Morris AI, Ashby D, West CR.
A
prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of
somatostatin with injection sclerotherapy in the
control
of bleeding oesophageal varices.J Hepatol,1992;16:128-137
4 Zhang XF, Xia ZL, Xu FT, Wang MD, Gu RY, Shi TM,
Cai AL, Liu SJ. Preliminary study on hemodynamics in post
hepatitic cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension (PCPH)using
doppler ultrasound.Zhonghua Waike
Zazhi,1993;31:213-216
5 Dauzat M, Layrargues GP. Portal vein blood flow
measurements using pulsed doppler and electromagnetic flowmetry
in dogs:
a comparative study.Gastroenterology,1989;96:913-919
6 Lebrec D. Methods to evaluate portal
hypertension.Gastroenterol Clin North Am,1992;21:41-59
7 Hori N, Okanoue T, Sawa Y, Mori T, Kashima K.
Effect of a somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995) on hemodynamics
and
glucagon secretion in cirrhotic rats. Gastroenterol
Jpn,1993;28:276-283
8 Leng XS, Huang CT, Du RY.The effects of
histamine, noradrenaline, dopamine and glucagon on hepatic
hemodynamics.
Beijing Yixueyuan
Xuebao,1982;14:1-4
9 Pizcueta MP, Garcia Pagan JC, Fernandez M,
Casamitjana R, Bosch J, Rodes J. Glucagon hinders the effects of
somatostatin on portal
hypertension: a study in rats with partial portal vein
ligation.Gastroenterology,
1991;101:1710-1715
10 Henriksen JH. Renal effects of drugs used in the treatment
of portal hypertension.Hepatology,1993;18:688-695
11 Albillos A, Colombato LA, Lee FY, Groszmann RJ. Octreotide
ameliorates vasodilatation and Na+ retention in portal
hypertensive rats. Gastroenterology,
1993;104:575-579
| |