|
Man-Ying
Xu, Hui-Ming Lu, Shu-Zhen Wang, Wen-Yan Shi, Xin-Chun Wang, Dong-Xiao Yang,
Chun-Xiao Yang, Li-Zhuang Yang, 1Department
of Physiology, 2Department of Scientific Research, 3Second
Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
Man-Ying
Xu,
female, born on May 22, 1943 in Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province,
Han nationality, graduated from Harbin Medical University in 1968,
now professor of physiology, majoring mechanisms of morphine
analgesia and antagonism to morphine analgesia, having more than 60
papers published.
*Supported by the Scientific Technological Foundation of Provincial
Education Committee of Heilongjiang in China, No.95.8.
Correspondence to: Prof. Man-Ying
Xu,
Department of Physiology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086,
Heilongjiang Province, China.
Telephone:
+86-451-6667498
Received: 1998-07-06
Subject
headings: duodenum; devazepide; morphine; electrophysiology;
cholecystokinin octapeptide
Xu
MY, Lu HM, Wang SZ, Shi WY, Wang XC, Yang DX, Yang CX, Yang
LZ.Effect of devazepide reversed antagonism of CCK-8 against
morphine on electrical and mechanical activities of rat duodenum in
vitro.World J Gastroenterol, 1998;4(6):524-526
Abstract
AIM: To study the antagonism of cholecystokinin octapeptide
(CCK-8) against the effect of morphine and its mechanism.
METHODS: The method of simultaneously recording the
electrical and mechanical activities of rat duodenum in vitro was
adopted.
RESULTS: Acetylcholine (ACh) could increase the amplitude and
the number of the spike potential (SPA and SPN of rat duodenum in
vitro, followed by the increase of the duodenal contraction
amplitudes (CA), showing a positive correlation. Morphine, on the
contrary, inhibited the potentiation of ACh, showing a negative
correlation. CCK-8 could antagonize the effects of morphine, i.e. th
SPA and SPN were increased again, followed by the increase of CA. On
the basis of the above, CCK-A receptor antagonist Devazepide could
reverse the antagonism of CCK-8 to the effect of morphine.
CONCLUSION: CCK-8 could antagonize the effect of morphine
which inhibited the potentiation of ACh on the duodenal activities
in vitro. Furthermore, it was inferred that the antagonistic effect
of CCK-8 on morphine was mainly mediated by CCK-A receptor.
INTRODUCTION
Cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) is a typical brain-gut peptide.
Many data show that CCK-8 has been the strongest endogenous anti-opioid
substance up to now. Faris pointed out that CCK-8 could block
morphine analgesia in the rat tail flick test[1].
Han[2]
and
Xu[3]
reported
respectively that CCK-8 antagonized the analgesic effects of
morphine and electroacupuncture (EA), and played an important role
in the induction of morphine tolerance and EA tolerance using the
behavioral changes and electrophysiological methods. Zetler
indicated that morphine and opioid peptides antagonized the
hyperfunction of contraction of guinea pig ileum in vitro
induced by CCK-8 like peptide[4].
Valeri proved that endogenous opioid peptides could antagonize the
effects of CCK-8, in the similar experiment[5].
But few report about the anti-opioid effect of CCK-8 on the duodenum
in vitro was found.
In
this experiment, the method of simultaneously recording the
electrical and mechanical activities of rat duodenum in vitro was
adopted so as to inquire into the antagonism of CCK-8 to the effect
of morphine and its mechanism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental animals
Twenty-five Wistar rats (Grade Ⅱ,
or ♀,
195g-295g, Animal Department of Provincial Tumour Institute in
Heilongjiang, certification No. 09-2-1 conferred by Medical
Experimental Animal Management Committee of Heilongjiang Province).
Experimental animals
Tyrode′s
solution (made by ourselves); Acetylcholine (ACh, 300nmol/L,
Shanghai Third Reagent Factory, China); morphine hydrochloridum
(330nmol/L, Shenyang First Pharmaceutical Factory, China); CCK-8
(0.7nmol/L, Squibb, USA); Devazepide
(10nmol/L, Merck Sharp and Dohme Researched Laboratories, USA).
Experimental method
A rat was given peritoneal anaesthesia with 20% urethan (5ml/kg),
the peritoneum was opened and one or two segments of 2cm duodenum
were cut off under pylorus. The duodenal segments were put into a
bathtube containing 50ml Tyrode′s
solution which was 38℃
and saturated with oxygen. Then the bathtube was maintained at 38℃
in CS-501 superthermostat. One end of duodenal segment was fixed
with resting load of 5g and the other end was connected with a LZ-1
tension transducer according to longitudinal axis of jejunum. Thus
contractions of duodenal smooth muscle were recorded. The electrical
activities of duodenum were led out by silver adsorptive electrode.
Through bioelectrical amplifier, the electrical activities,
mechanical contraction and time scale were simultaneously recorded
by ST-41 multipurpose polygraph. The parameters were modulated as
follows: time constant 0.3 second, high frequency wave filter 30Hz,
electrical gain 3, mechanical gain 4, recording paper velocity 5mm/s[6].
Firstly,
normal electrical and mechanical activities of every segment of
duodenum was simultaneously recorded. Then ACh 200μl was
injected quickly into the bathtube by a microinjector. Sixty seconds
after the injection of ACh, morphine hydrochloridum 50μl was
administered. At 120 seconds and 240 seconds, 40μl CCK-8 and 20μl
Devazepide were added respectively.
Statistical analysis
Each value was expressed as mean±SD.
All data were analyzed with paired t test.
RESULTS
CCK-8 antagonized the inhibition of morphine to the effect of ACh-Before
the injection of ACh, the amplitudes and numbers of the spike
potential (SPA and SPN) of 44 duodenal segments and their
corresponding contraction amplitudes (CA) respectively averaged 0.70±0.04mV,
2.41±0.13 and 16.58mm±0.65mm. At 60 seconds after the injection of
ACh, the SPA, SPN and corresponding CA increased to 0.97mV±0.05mV,
2.46±0.11 and 24.50mm±0.99mm, respectively. At this time, morphine
was administered. The SPA, SPN and CA decreased to 0.63mV±0.04mV,
2.38±0.08 and 14.73mm±0.69mm respectively at 60 seconds after the
injection of morphine. At 120 seconds after adding CCK-8, the SPA,
SPN and CA increased to 0.84mV±0.04mV, 3.29±0.09 and 22.77mm±0.68mm,
respectively. Moreover, all of them showed significant differences (P<0.01)
when the latter was compared with the corresponding item of the
former (Figure 1).
Devazepide reversed the antagonism of CCK-8 to the effect of
morphine
Figure 2 showed the electrical and mechanical change curves of one
segment of duodenum simultaneously recorded by multipurpose
polygraph. It indicated that the SPA and SPN of the duodenal segment
were increased, followed by the increase of the CA after the
injection of ACh, showing the enhancement of duodenal activities.
Whereas the SPA, SPN and corresponding CA were reduced when morphine
was administrated, showing that morphine inhibited the excitatory
effects of ACh. At this moment, the injection of CCK-8 increased the
SPA, SPN as well as CA, suggesting an antagonism of morphine effect
by CCK-8. On the basis of the above, after CCK-A receptor antagonist
Devazepide was administrated, the SPA and SPN were decreased again,
accompanied by the reduction of CA. It showed that Devazepide
reversed the anti-morphine effect of CCK-8. Moreover, every
contraction wave occured after the beginning of spike potential over
the slow potential and the ratio between slow potential and
contraction wave was 1∶1.
The
statistical analytical results of 22 duodenal segments are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1 Anti-morphine effect of CCK-8 reversed by Devazepide
|
Items
|
Control
n=22
(0s)
|
Ach
300nmol/L
(60s)
|
Morphine
330nmol/L (120s)
|
CCK-8
0.7nmol/L
(240s)
|
Devazepide
10nmol/L (325s)
|
|
SPA(mV)
|
0.70±0.07
|
0.94±0.09b
|
0.59±0.06d
|
0.81±0.07f
|
0.54±0.05h
|
|
SPN
|
2.71±0.23
|
3.88±0.15b
|
2.71±0.09d
|
3.52±0.13f
|
2.66±0.18h
|
|
CA(mm)
|
16.40±1.00
|
24.44±1.63b
|
13.54±1.04d
|
22.73±1.00f
|
13.67±0.66h
|
bP<0.01
(ACh vs control); dP<0.01
(morphine vs ACh); fP<0.01
(CCK-8 vs morphine); hP<0.01
(Devazepide vs CCK-8).
Figure 1(PDF)
Elimination
of inhibited effect of morphine on ACh by CCK-8.bP<0.01
(ACh vs control);dP<0.01
(morphine vs ACh); fP<0.01
(CCK-8 vs morphine).
Figure 2(PDF)
Anti-morphine effect of CCK-8 reversed by Devazepide.A: electrical
activity; B: mechanical contraction; ↓:
drug injection; Time scale: 1s.
DISCUSSION
CCK-8 was the first brain-gut peptide found in human. CCK-8 existed
in brain and peripheral tissues of animals and human[7].
Previous works indicated that an antagonistic interaction might
occur between CCK and opioid peptides. Our experimental results
demonstrated that CCK-8 per second did not show any effect, but
could selectively antagonize the effects of morphine which inhibited
the potentiation of ACh to rat duodenum in vitro with the
electrical and mechanical activities. The conclusion was similar to
those previous reports[4,5].
Recent
receptor binding studies have confirmed the existence of 2 distinct
CCK receptor subtypes, i.e. CCK-A and CCK-B receptor were present in
both brain and peripheral tissues[8].
Devazepide was considerably more potent in inhibiting CCK binding to
peripheral-type receptor (CCK-A) than to brain-type receptor (CCK-B)[9].
This results showed that Devazepide could reverse the antagonism of
CCK-8 to the effect of morphine, therefore it was inferred that CCK-A
receptor participates in the anti morphine effect of CCK-8.
To
sum up, our present work firstly demonstrated that CCK-8 could
antagonize the elimination of morphine on the potentiations of ACh
to duodenal activities, and these effects were mediated by CCK-A
receptor. It is suggested that CCK-like peptides and opioid
substances together with cholinergic system could regulate the
gastrointestinal activities, and provided a new experimental basis
for further research in the clinical treatment of the intestinal
motility disturbances.
REFERENCES
1 Faris PL, Komisaruk BR, Watkins LR, Mayer DJ.
Evidence for the neuropeptide cholecystokinin as an antagonist of
opiate
analgesia.
Science, 1983;219(4582):310-312
2 Han JS, Ding XZ, Fan SG. Is cholecystokinin
octapeptide (CCK-8) a candidate for endogenous anti-opioid
substrates?
Neuropeptides,
1985;5(4-6):399-402
3 Xu MY, Sun MZ, Zhang LM, Han JS. CCK antagonizes
morphine action on activities of pain-related neurons in nucleus
parafascicularis.
China J Physiol Sci,1992;8(1):6-12
4 Zetler G. Antagonism of cholecystokinin-like
peptides by opioid peptides, morphine or tetrodotoxin.Eur J
Pharmacol,
1979;60(1):67-77
5 Valeri P, Morrone LA, Pimpinella G, Romanelli L.
Some pharmacological characteristics of the guinea pig ileum opioid
system activated
by cholecystokinin. Neuropharmacol, 1990;29(3):231-236
6 Yang XP, Xu MY, Ni J, Wang SZ, Bian SL, Gu CR.
Electrical change and mechanical contraction of rat jejunum in vitro
and
their
relationship. J Harbin Med Univ, 1994;28(2):87-90
7 Vanderhaeghen JJ, Signeau JC, Gepts W. New
peptide in the vertebrate CNS reacting with antigastrin
antibodies.Nature,
1975;257(5495):604-606
8 Hill DR, Campbell NJ, Shaw TM, Woodruff GN.
Autoradiographic localization and biochemical characterization
of
peripheral
type CCK receptors in
rat CNS using highly selective nonpeptide CCK antagonists.J Neurosci,
1987;7(9):2967-2976
9 Chang RS, Lotti VJ. Biochemical and
pharmacological characterization of an extremely potent and
selective
nonpeptide
cholecystokinin antagonist.Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA,1986;83(13):4923-4926
| |