| P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China | World J Gastroenterol 1998 ; 4(3):242-245 |
| Email: wcjd@public.bta.net.cn | WJG ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/ R |
| http:// www.wjgnet.com | Copyright © 1998 by The WJG Press |
Relationship
between enteric microecologic dysbiosis and bacterial translocation in acute
necrotizing pancreatitis
Subject
headings pancreatitis; bacterial translocation; intestines;
lipopolysaccharide/blood;
amylase/blood; bifidobacterium; lactobacillus
Wu CT, Li ZL, Xiong DX.Relationship between enteric microecologic dysbiosis and
bacterial translocation in acute necrotizing pancreatitis.World J Gastroentero,
1998;4(3):242-245
Abstract
AIM To investigate the potential role of intestinal microflora
barrier in the
pathogenesis of pancreatic infection.
METHODS Fifteen dogs were colonized with a strain of E.coli JM109 bearing
ampicillin resistance plasmid PUC18. The animals were divided into two groups.
In experimental group (n=8), acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) was induced by
injection of 0.5ml/kg of sodium tarocholate with 3000U/kg trypsin into the
pancreatic duct. The control group (n=7) underwent laparotomy only. All animals
were sacrificed 7 days later. Mucosal and luminal microflora of intestine were
analyzed quantitatively, and various organs were harvested for culturing, blood
samples were obtained for determination of serum amylase activities and plasma
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) concentrations.
RESULTS In the experimental group, the number of E.coli in the intestine
was much higher than those of the controls, while bifidobacterium and
lactobacillus were
decreased significantly (Jejunum, 1.75±0.95
vs 2.35±0.79, P<0.05; 1.13±0.8
vs 1.83±0.64, P<0.05; ileum,
2.89±0.86 vs 3.87±1.05, P<0.05; 1.78±0.79 vs 3.79±1.11, P<0.01;cecum, 2.70±0.88 vs 4.89±0.87, P<001; 2.81±0.73 vs 3.24±0.84, P<0.05. Content of
Cecum, 3.06±0.87 vs 5.15±1.44,
P<0.01;
2.67±0.61
vs 4.25±0.81, P<0.01), resulting
in reversal of bifido-bacterium/E.coli ratio as compared with the control group
(jejunum,0.51±0.76
vs 1.23±0.53, P<0.05;
ileum, 0.62±0.68 vs 1.16±0.32,
P<0.05;
cecum,0.46±0.44 vs 1.03±0.64, P<0.05). In
addition, intestinal bacteria were isolated from organs of all animals
in the experimental group, and JM109 was also detected in most cases. Positive
blood culture was 75.0% and 62.5% on day 1 and 2 after induction of ANP,
respectively, but no bacterium was found in the controls. As compared with the
control group, blood LPS levels and serum amylase activities increased 1-3 times
and 3-8 times respectively.
CONCLUSION Microecological disturbance could occur in ANP, and overgrowth
of intestinal gram-negative bacteria may lead to translocation to the pancreas
and other
organs, becoming the source of pancreatic and peripancreatic infection.
INTRODUCTION
Secondary pancreatic and peripancreatic infection is a common severe
complication in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) and responsible for 80% of
death due to this disease. The pathogenesis of pancreatic infection has not been
clear completely. Pathogens isolated from infected pancreas were similar with
common intestinal flora, providing indirect evidence of gut origin of pancreatic
infection.
The microecological disturbances of
intestine might play an important role in the development of pancreatic
infection following ANP. The purpose of this study was to determine if
indigenous enteric flora were a primary source of pancreatic infection, and to
reveal the relationship between enteric microecologic
dysbiosis and bacterial translocation in ANP in dogs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Adult mongrel dogs weighing 13kg to 18kg
were observed for at least 1 week,
prior to the experiment, stools were cultured with eosin methylene blue agar
containing ampicillin (100ng/L).
Animals without resistant bacteria in stool culture entered the experiment and
received 20000IU
gentamicin
orally for 2 days to suppress the indigenous enteric flora. E.coli JM109 bearing ampicillinresistance
plasmid PUC18 (approximately 109 colonyforming units)
administered with food. For the rest of the experiment, drinking water was
supplemented with 100ng/L
ampicillin. Stool
samples were cultured with eosin methylene blue agar (supplemented with 100ng/L ampicillin), Colonization was considered established when culture
was positive for 3 successive days. Fifteen dogs were then randomly divided
into two groups: ANP group (n=8)
and control group (n=7), and laparotomy was performed under general anesthesia (i.v.
thiopentalsodium). In ANP group, pancreatitis was induced by injection of 0.5ml/kg
sodium taurocholate with 3000IU/kg trypsin into the pancreatic duct under
pressure of7.8kPa. The dogs in the control group received laparotomy
only.
Before the operation and on days 1,
2, 4 and 7 postoperatively, blood samples were
obtained for determination of serum amylase activities (iodiumstarch method)
and plasma LPS concentrations (LAL test), and blood was cultured for aerobic and
anaerobic bacteria on each postoperative day. All dogs were killed on the 7th
day after operation. Under strict aseptic conditions, specimens of tissues from
mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney and lung
were harvested, weighed, and homogenized. Ten μl
of each homogenate
was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. All bacteria isolated
from organs were cultured in luriabertani
(LB) supplemented with 100ng/L ampicillin for 24 hours. Positive germs were initially identified
as resistant bacteria. Final identification of those strains was accomplished by
confirming the presence of plasmid PUC18. Plasmid DNA was purified by an
alkaline lysis method and subjected to restriction digestion with
endonuclease EcoR1 (Sigma Corp.) in 37℃
water for 1 hour. Ten μl
DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis through horizontal 0.8%
agarose gel, stained with ethidum bromide and photographed under ultraviolet
lamp in 590nm.
Jejunum, cecum, ileum and content of cecum
were harvested, weighed and homogenized
in 5ml physiological
saline. Homogenate (0.5ml) was serially
diluted (10 times), and 10μl
dilution was plated on selective
media for E.coli, enterococci,
bacteroids, bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, respectively, and incubated at 37℃
for 24-48 hours, aerobically
or anaerobically for 48 hours, positive specimens were subcultured and
the bacteria identified by standard procedures.
Sections of cecum and pancreas were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin and examined
under light microscopy.
Data
were analyed by Student′s t test, and results were expressed as x-±s. Differences were considered significant when P<0.05).
RESULTS
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Laboratory tests showed significant hyperamylasemia on days 1, 2, 4 and 7 after operation
in dogs with pancreatitis (Table
1).
The pancreas in ANP group appeared
enlarged and swollen with visible grey or black areas. Histologic examination
revealed severe hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (Figure
1). In
the control group, no abnormalities were found both macroscopically and histologically
(Figure
2).
Intestinal morphology
Cecal mucosa were severely damaged in dogs with pancreatitis. The surface
epithelium was denuded on the top of the villi, and there was an extensive
neutrophilic granulocyte infiltration of the lamina propria. No pathologic changes
were noticed in the controls.
Figure 1
Light micrography showing severe hemorrhage
in pancreas of ANP. HE×100
Figure 2
Light micrography of a normal pancreas. HE×100
Intestinal microflora
The population levels of E.coli
in the mucosa of jejunum, ileum, cecum and in
the cecal content were increased significantly in ANP dogs on day 7 postoperatively
(P<0.05
or P<0.01,
Table 2), while
bifidobacteria and
lactobacilli were decreased obviously. The ratio of bifidobacterium/E.coli (B/E) was reversed (P<0.05,
Table 3).
Bacterial translocation
Blood and tissue cultures were negative except for 2 episodes of bacterial
translocation to MLN in the control group and were positive in the ANP group,
bacterial
translocation was found in MLN (100%), pancreas (87.5%),
liver (87.5%),
lung (75%), kidney (75%) and spleen (50%). The isolation rate of E.coli JM109
was 75% in pancreas, 50% in the liver and lung. Blood positive cultures were
seen mainly on the first (75%) and second (62.5%)
postoperative day, and JM109 was found in more than 60% of cases.
LPS concentration
The LPS concentrations in ANP group were elevated significantly as compared with
those of the control group in each postoperative day (P<0.05
or P<0.01, Table 4).
Table 1
Activity of plasma amylase (U/L)
| Group | Preoperation | d1 | d2 | d4 | d7 |
| Control | 796.61±82.41 | 816.56±57.82 | 787.26±78.66 | 807.68±89.56 | 778.59±80.95 |
| ANP | 825.50±82.94 | 7363.25±1383.26b | 7060.75±1135.65b | 4590.25±1312.44b | 2783.75±893.42b |
bP<0.01,
compared with the control group.
Table 2
Population levels of
mucosal and luminal flora (CFUlogn/g, x-±s)
| Content | Group | E.coli | Enterococcus | Bacteroid | Bifidobacterium | Lactobacillus |
| Jejunum |
Control | 1.91±0.49 | 1.69±0.79 | 2.23±0.92 | 2.35±0.79 | 1.83±0.64 |
| ANP | 3.42±0.93b | 0b | 3.75±0.77a | 1.75±0.95a | 1.13±0.80 | |
| Ileum |
Control | 3.51±0.84 | 2.05±0.44 | 3.61±1.06 | 3.87±1.05 | 3.79±1.11 |
| ANP | 5.80±1.27b | 1.17±0.95a | 4.35±0.98a | 2.89±0.86a | 1.78±0.79b | |
| Cecum |
Control | 4.74±0.93 | 2.61±0.77 | 3.54±0.99 | 4.89±0.87 | 3.24±0.84 |
| ANP | 5.88±1.18a | 1.27±1.04a | 4.01±1.10 | 2.70±0.88b | 2.81±0.73a | |
| Contentof
cecum |
Control | 4.86±0.64 | 3.50±0.85 | 4.81±0.95 | 5.15±1.44 | 4.25±0.81 |
| ANP | 7.43±1.19b | 2.27±1.49a | 4.72±1.13 | 3.06±0.89b | 2.67±0.61b |
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01
compared with the control group.
Table 3
Ratio of bifidobacterium/E.coli
(B/E)
| Group | Jejunum | Ileum | Cerum |
| Control | 1.23±0.53 | 1.16±0.82 | 1.03±0.64 |
| ANP | 0.51±0.76a | 0.62±0.68a | 0.16±0.44a |
aP<0.05
compared with the control group.
Table 4
Changes of plasma LPS (Eu/ml)
| Group | d1 | d2 | d4 | d7 |
| Control | 0.068±0.005 | 0.074±0.008 | 0.064±0.009 | 0.066±0.007 |
| ANP | 0.217±0.085b | 0.346±0.127b | 0.268±0.054b | 0.107±0.064a |
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01,
compared with the control group.
Plasmid DNA analysis
The strain of ampicillinresistant E.coli was isolated in all dogs with pancreatitis.
All ampicillinresistant E.coli isolated from different organs
had identical antibiograms and contained plasmid DNA that appeared identical as
shown by plasmid electrophoresis profile, indcating that they were
the same strains.
DISCUSSION
Numerous studies have revealed that intestinal microecologic dystiosis may lead
to decreased colonization resistance of the gut, which plays an important role in
the pathogenesis of enterogenous infection. Runkel found that gramnegative germs
overgrew in cecal mucosa 24-48
hours after onset of pancreatitis, suggesting
that microecological disturbance of intestine was an important factor for
sepsis following pancreatitis[3].
Kazantsev used plasmid labeled E.coli (kanamycinresistant) to confirm that intestinal bacteria could translocate
to pancreas in pancreatitis, but he could not explain the relationship between
bacterial translocation and enteric microecologic dysbiosis[4].
The present study showed that
the enteric microecologic disturbance did take place
following pancreatitis. The population levels of E.coli
were increased
significantly, while the bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were decreased
obviously. So the main manifestation of the disturbance of enteric flora were
overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens including aerobic bacteria and facultative
anaerobes, and reduction of anaerobic bacteria such as bifidobacteria
and lactobacilli, as reported earlier by Gianotti[5]et
al. Blood
and organ culture further showed that bacteria translocated to organs and
blood in all animals with pancreatitis, and to pancreas in 87.5%
of cases, 75% of them were E.coli JM109 colonized previously in the gut. These results provided
substantial evidence that the gut was the primary source of pancreatic infection,
and the translocation of the enteric overgrowing gramnegative
germs in the gut, were the main pathogens of pancreatic infection.
The enteric microecologic
dysbiosis following ANP might be explained by the overgrowth
of gramnegative germs (mainly E.coli)
and their inhibitory effect on
the growth of dominant bacteria in gut such as bifidobacteria, resulting in the
decreased colonization resistance and the immunity of host. This disturbance might
lead to colonization of potential opportunistic pathogens and increase the
chance of bacterial translocation. The intestinal epithelium was also injured
by enteric ischemia and ischemiareperfusion
in ANP. In such circumstances,
enteric bacteria which attached to and colonized on the surface of intestinal
epithelium, could penetrate the mucosal barrier and translocate to MLN, other
organs and blood, and caused infection in the pancreas which was seriously
damaged by inflamation, hemorrhage and necrosis. The overgrowth of E.coli may also produce a large amount of LPS, becoming the source of endotoxemia
following pancreatitis.
In conclusion, our data demonstrated
that the enteric microecologic dysbiosis played an important role in the
pathogenesis of infection complicating ANP. Taking effective measures to reduce
the microecological disturbance and to protect the gut barrier function should
be an important principle to prevent infection
secondary to acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
Trauma
Center, The 304th Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100037, China.
Dr. Wu ChengTang, male, born
on 1967-08-10 in Beihai City, Guangxi
Autonomous Region, Han nationality, graduated from the Beijing PLA Medical
College as a postgraduate in 1996. Now he is working in Nanfang Hospital as an
attending surgeon, First Military Medical University, having 10
papers published.
*Supported by a grant from
the foundation for specialized key scientific projects of the People′s
Liberation Army.
Correspondence to Dr. Wu Cheng
Tang, Department of General Surgery,
Nanfang Hospital, First Millitary Medical University, Guangzhou 510515,
China.
Tel. +86·20·87705577 ext 3124
Received 1997-12-06