Nicole C Tsim, Adam E Frampton, Nagy A Habib, Long R Jiao, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Division of Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital campus, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
Author contributions: All authors generated the ideas and contributed to the writing of this manuscript.
Supported by NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme
Correspondence to: Long R Jiao, MD, FRCS, Reader and Consultant HPB Surgeon, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Division of Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital campus, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom. firstname.lastname@example.org
Telephone: +44-20-83833937 Fax: +44-20-83833212
Received: March 7, 2009 Revised: December 20, 2009
Accepted: December 27, 2009
Published online: February 28, 2010
Primary liver cancer is amongst the commonest tumors worldwide, particularly in parts of the developing world, and is increasing in incidence. Over the past three decades, surgical hepatic resection has evolved from a high risk, resource intensive procedure with limited application, to a safe and commonly performed operation with a range of indications. This article reviews the approach to surgical resection for malignancies such as hepatocellular cancer, metastatic liver deposits and neuroendocrine tumors. Survival data after resection is also reviewed, as well as indications for curative resection.
© 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
Key words: Liver cancer; Surgical resection; Indications; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Colorectal liver metastases; Neuroendocrine tumors; Non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine
Peer reviewer: Dr. Fabio Marra, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 85, I-50134 Florence, Italy
Tsim NC, Frampton AE, Habib NA, Jiao LR. Surgical treatment for liver cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(8): 927-933 Available from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i8/927.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.927
Over the past 25 years, hepatic resection has evolved from a high risk, resource intensive procedure with limited application, to a safe and commonly performed operation with broad indications. We have seen a dramatic improvement in perioperative outcome, including reductions in mortality, blood loss, transfusion rates, and hospital stay. These improved perioperative results are largely responsible for the emergence of hepatic resection as a viable and effective treatment option for selected patients with liver tumors. Continued advances in imaging technology, along with a heightened awareness of the clinical and tumor-related variables that dictate outcome, have allowed better preoperative assessment of disease extent and improved patient selection. Advances in other areas, such as minimally invasive and ablative techniques, have increased the treatment options and have had some impact on the approach to patients with liver tumors; however resection remains the most effective therapy. The current status of partial hepatectomy is not the result of any randomised trial demonstrating greater efficacy over another therapy and recurrence rates remain high. Further improvements in survival will require more effective systemic agents and as better adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies emerge, the results of resection are likely to improve. The indications for its application will then perhaps extend to patients currently considered to have unresectable disease.
PRIMARY HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
Worldwide, primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most frequently encountered solid organ tumors, responsible for approximately 250 000 new cases annually. Previously considered uncommon in western countries, the incidence and mortality related to HCC is increasing, due to the increasing incidence of hepatitis C virus infection. The treatment of HCC, unlike other hepatic malignancies, is often complicated by the coexistence of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, the presence of which frequently limit treatment options. The only curative treatments are liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT). Improvements in operative technique and postoperative care now mean that a 10% mortality rate for the resection of cirrhotic livers, with up to 30% to 50% 5 years survival rates are to be expected.
Indications and decision making for surgical resection
When HCC arises in non-cirrhotic liver, it is often diagnosed when the tumor becomes large and symptomatic. In the absence of diffuse bilobar disease, or extra-hepatic metastases, aggressive surgical management is indicated. In this situation, removal of the tumor can be considered as these patients are usually in good general condition and surgical resection tends to involve only tumor mass rather than functional hepatic parenchyma. Although their survival rates are lower than patients with small uninodular tumors, resection is safe and they can expect a 5-year survival rate of up to 39%[2,3].
Most HCCs however occur in patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis. This often results in important changes in portal haemodynamics and a reduction in the functional liver parenchyma. The Child-Pugh classification is the most useful tool in evaluating cirrhotic patients with impaired liver function. Other sophisticated techniques for determining hepatic reserve, for example the plasma retention rate of indocyanine green at 15 min (ICG15), preoperative portal pressure assessment, and 3-dimensional-CT reconstruction of the liver, can be used in deciding whether to proceed with surgery.
Resection of HCC is only considered in Child-Pugh A patients. However, Child-Pugh is only used in cirrhosis and liver damage at resection can vary widely from periportal fibrosis to extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. Therefore the operating surgeon must modify their technique using as many preoperative investigation results as possible before proceeding. A decision algorithm combining the presence or absence of ascites, total serum bilirubin levels and ICG retention at 15 min has been proposed by Makuuchi et al (Figure 1). Patients with ICG15s of 20%-30% and more than 30% can only be subjected to one segmentectomy or limited resection, respectively.
Other modalities like hepatic venous pressure gradient have also been proposed. Patients with a gradient below 10 mmHg are eligible for resection and those above 10 mmHg are referred for non-operative management. Factors such as tumor size, the depth and distance of the tumor from the major vessels or the presence of intra-hepatic metastases should also be taken into consideration. Patients with large tumors require careful selection. In clinical practice all patients benefit most from multidisciplinary discussion.
LR for HCC in a cirrhotic liver is contraindicated in the presence of severe liver functional impairment such as ascites, jaundice, Child-Pugh B and C, and liver atrophy. In these cases, there is an increased risk of liver decompensation or failure in the postoperative period. Other factors that preclude resection are the presence of portal vein thrombosis (reflecting extensive disease), lymph node metastases, extra-hepatic localizations and intra-hepatic diffuse disease. All these situations render any treatment palliative. The use of laparoscopic ultrasound as a preoperative assessment tool has further reduced LR rates by as much as 63%. Table 1 summarizes the current indications for curative resection of HCC.
Results after surgical resection
The choice of treatment modality [e.g. hepatic resection, LT, or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)] can influence patient survival and this in turn is governed by the size and distribution of lesions. Improved patient selection leads to optimal survival rates for each subgroup of patients with HCC. The available literature is broadly divided into small (≤ 5 cm) or 3 or less tumors (≤ 3 cm) and large (≥ 5 cm) tumors, all with differing survival rates. Large multicentre series involving Asia, Europe, USA and France[3,12,13], have demonstrated 3-, 5- and 10-year hepatic resection survival rates of 38%-64%, 36%-41%, and 14%, respectively. Individual centres have published series of 5-year survival rates of 40%-50%[1,14-19], and 10-year survival rates of 8%-17%[16,20,21]. Table 2 shows the survival data for patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC from large published series. When resecting early HCC, Poon et al achieved a 70% 5-year survival rate and a 60% 5-year recurrence rate. Furthermore, when this cohort of patients experienced recurrence, 79% of them were eligible for salvage transplantation. It is important to note the perioperative mortality rates in hepatectomy patients range between 0.9%-6.4% and recurrence rates between 30%-55% (intra-hepatic recurrence being the most likely site)[3,13-16,20,23].
Microscopic vascular invasion, fibrosis and underlying cirrhosis have been consistently shown to be independent risk factors for decreased overall long-term survival in multivariate analysis[3,13-16,21,24,25]. Multiplicity and size of tumors (> 5 cm) are also negative predictors of prognosis. Margin positivity is associated with local recurrence[1,26], however the absolute width of the margin is less important[27,28]. Poon et al  also demonstrated in their paper that recurrence is most likely disseminated by both the portal venous system for intra-hepatic metastases and multicentric carcinogenesis for multi-segmental metastases, while proportionally less recurrence occurs locally. Therefore the authors propose that the presence of venous invasion and satellite nodules, factors that are incorporated in the pathological tumor-node-metastasis staging system, are more important predictors of recurrence irrespective of the margin status. A surgeon’s technique and the extent of tissue dissection has been shown to indirectly influence survival, as blood transfusion perioperatively predicts poor prognosis in multivariate analysis[18,24,29]. With regards to percutaneous RFA, the preliminary results from a recent nationwide study involving 7185 patients from multiple centres in Japan showed that surgical resection was a significant negative factor for recurrence as compared with RFA, however there was no difference in the overall survival rates.
LT can have the benefit of being curative and treating any underlying cirrhosis, however there are many contraindications to transplantation, as well as a worldwide shortage of suitable allografts. Comparing orthotopic LT to LR in cirrhotic patients with small (≤ 3 cm) uninodular or binodular metastasis, the 3-year disease-free survival rate without recurrence is significantly better in the transplant group (83% vs 18%). Mazzaferro et al first published their results in 1996 where the 4-year survival rates post-transplant in selected patients with isolated small tumors (≤ 5 cm) or two to three nodules ≤ 3 cm were up to 75%. Since their landmark publication, LT is universally accepted as the first line treatment for patients who fulfil the Milan criteria.
The use of LR in the presence of cirrhosis is limited because of significant morbidity, which could be related to the laparotomy itself, and high recurrence rates. However, LT is also limited due to the shortage of organ donors and the resultant risk of tumor progression with increased waiting times. Controversy still remains over the treatment of patients with preserved liver function who could tolerate LT or resection. Therefore the use of primary resection followed by salvage transplantation (if required) for intrahepatic HCC recurrence has been proposed as an acceptable approach in such patients[34,35]. Some authors recommend the use of other neoadjuvant antitumoral procedures during the waiting time to LT, such as transarterial chemoembolization, percutaneous RFA or percutaneous ethanol injection. Whilst effective, they have the disadvantage of not being able to perform a full pathological examination of a surgical specimen, which allows assessment of prognostic factors of HCC (i.e. microvascular invasion, satellite nodules, tumor differentiation and molecular markers of recurrence), thereby further helping the transplant decision-making process.
Colorectal liver metastases (CLM)
Stage Ⅳ colorectal carcinoma is by far the most common indication for hepatic resection in Western countries. However no single consensus exists on the indications for surgical resection. Surgery is the treatment of choice in patients with colorectal cancer, but over half of all patients develop liver metastases. It has been postulated that because haematogenous spread usually occurs in a stepwise fashion, initially to the liver, with subsequent intra-hepatic spread via the portal vein and further spread to the systemic circulation, surgical resection of isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer may be curative. The natural history of colorectal cancer is variable, with a median survival without treatment of only 8 mo. Patients with isolated metastases have a better prognosis than those with more extensive metastatic disease. However few patients with liver only metastases survive for 5 years. Around 20%-30% of these are potentially resectable and the selection criteria for surgery are constantly changing[37,38]. Chemotherapy is palliative when used alone, but can prolong survival in inoperable disease. Used in combination with surgery it may prolong time to recurrence after resection or downsize to resectability in patients previously judged inoperable. With regards to percutaneous RFA, a recent systematic review by Stang et al found that RFA of unresectable CLM is a useful adjunct to surgery and/or chemotherapy and can prolong time without toxicity and survival.
Surgical resection of hepatic metastases can be undertaken safely in the majority of patients and the median postoperative 30 d mortality is 2.8%. The most common reported causes of postoperative death include hepatic failure, postoperative haemorrhage and sepsis.
The outcome of resection of colorectal liver metastasis is encouraging, with postoperative mortality in large series ranging from 0.2%-3.5%[26,41-45]. The 1-year overall survival rate is 89%-97%[26,42,46]; while the 5-year survival rate ranges between 15%-50%[26,41,45,47-49]. Five years disease free survival rates are on average 19% in radically resected patients. Some studies with longer follow-up periods report a 10-year overall survival rate of 17%-33%[14,44,45]. The rate of complication in individual studies is more variable, ranging from 3%-17%[42,45]. The recurrence rate with 5-year period of follow-up is consistent around 62%-74%[44,50].
The factors which are predictive of poor prognosis include poor tumor differentiation[44,45,50], increasing size and number of metastases[26,42,44,50], Dukes’ staging, presence of extra-hepatic metastasis (other than resectable pulmonary metastasis), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and positive nodal status. Fong et al summarised the above with the Clinical Risk Score which includes 5 risk factors (size of metastasis > 5 cm, extra-hepatic metastasis, disease-free interval between primary tumor to diagnosis of metastasis, multiple metastasis and CEA level greater than 200 ng/mL). A score of 5 is predictive of poor prognosis, whilst patients with 0-2 are more likely to have favourable outcomes. Gomez et al also recently demonstrated in their paper that increased inflammatory markers and number of blood transfusions perioperatively are related to the early development of recurrence. Table 2 shows the survival data for patients who underwent hepatic resection for CLM from published large series.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NET)
Cytoreductive therapy is effective in the management of metastatic NET to the liver, independent of their functioning status. In functioning tumors, clinical endocrinopathies are relieved in most patients and this response usually lasts for several months. Major morbidity and mortality are not greater than the average complication rate for resection for non-neuroendocrine metastatic tumors at major centres; therefore surgical outcomes appear to justify operative intervention. Patients whose primary tumor can be controlled, whose metastases outside the liver are limited, and who have a good performance status are candidates for resection. Directed anatomic and non-anatomic hepatic resections and RFA therapy can effectively reduce the amount of active disease, thereby improving hormone control and patient survival, with very low morbidity and mortality in comparison to other tumor types. A full symptomatic response in up to 90% patients with a median overall survival of 48 mo adds many months of symptom-free survival to the lives of most patients. In many patients undergoing a major hepatic resection, concurrent resection of the primary tumor is also performed. Resection in selected patients is not more complicated or risky than resection for other metastatic tumors. In addition, endocrinopathies do not increase anaesthetic or operative risk in selected populations. The best post-operative results are the product of managing these patients over time, becoming familiar with their clinical syndromes and ensuring the early detection of both local recurrence and the development of resistant disease.
After complete removal of the primary tumor, LT seems to be very attractive as a means of eradicating metastatic NET. Unfortunately, there is very sparse evidence for any benefit of LT over LR. Current indications for LT include those with unresectable disease, no extrahepatic or resectable extrahepatic metastatic spread, progressive hepatic metastases, refractory symptoms to medical therapy or interventional procedures, and deposits exhibiting Ki-67 levels < 10%[52,53]. It has also been suggested that LT should be reserved for patients with non-carcinoid (i.e. non-serotonin secreting) tumors, as the overall survival may be better than LR alone. In a recent article by Frilling et al, the 5-year tumor free survival was 48.3% amongst the 16 Type Ⅲ (disseminated metastatic spread) patients that they transplanted. They concluded that LT for metastatic NET achieves excellent long-term palliation for highly selected patients. Current methods to detect the spread of NET disease that were not readily available in the past, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and indium-111 pentetreotide (Octreoscan), may decrease the application of LT and allow for a better selection of candidates. The option of LT is still open for improvement and is dependent on organ availability and better staging of the disease.
Metastases from NET are hypervascular thus favouring the application of MRI as the single imaging method. MRI not only evaluates the location and characteristics of the lesions, but also determines their relationship with major vessels and bile ducts. Spiral CT scan has also been used extensively in the past with acceptable results. Indium-111 pentetreotide functions on the basis of somatostatin receptors present in these tumors, but its use has not been established definitely in the work-up of these patients. The best use of indium-111 pentetreotide is in the evaluation of disease beyond the primary and liver locations, for example to exclude bone metastases. Its use therefore will likely affect the preoperative work-up of candidates for operative management.
In general, surgery is appropriate for patients with metastatic NET for the following two reasons: (1) many of them still have the primary tumor in place and resection should be undertaken to avoid acute complications and (2) the addition of adjunctive ablative therapies to surgical resection accomplishes the control of ≥ 90% of the bulk of the tumor. It is important to note that even when complete resections are performed the recurrence rates for metastatic NET are extremely high (76% vs 91% for incomplete resection at 5 years); overall 5-year recurrence rates are up to 88%. In practical terms, patients with metastatic NET are seldom cured. The best hope physicians can offer these patients is an extended survival period with minimal endocrine symptoms and decreased requirements of somatostatin analogues.
Non-neuroendocrine, non-colorectal liver metastases (NCNN)
The role of metastasectomy for colorectal and neuroendocrine liver secondaries is well established. Significant palliation and survival have been reported after aggressive surgical resection. The indication for the surgical resection of liver secondaries from NCNN tumors is less well defined. In the past, patients with metastatic liver disease were not considered curable and their life expectancy was limited. However, progress in chemotherapy has spurred the development of surgical strategies to cope with patients presenting with liver secondaries from other primary tumors. Diversity of tumor types and a wide variation in available adjuvant treatment schedules makes it difficult to draw conclusions from the published data, but LRs have been performed for metastatic spread from gastrointestinal stromal tumor, renal, lung, thyroid, parotid haemangiopericytoma, ovarian, cervical, Ampulla of Vater, pancreatic and melanoma primaries to name a few. Survival is directly related to the nature of the primary tumor. Reports to date suggest no survival advantage in resection of liver metastases from oesophageal, stomach, small intestine or pancreas. Indeed, 3 and 5 years survival rates for resected metastatic breast tumors are 53.9% and 24.6%, genitourinary tumors 50.4% and 37.8%, and leiomyosarcoma 63% and 36%, respectively[56-58].
Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for primary and secondary liver tumors. With the recent increased use of newer surgical techniques, for example laparoscopic LR using RFA for the transection of the liver parenchyma, morbidity and mortality rates from this surgery have improved. Patients with HCC meeting the local criteria for transplantation should be considered for this. Alternatively, if LT is not an easily accessible option or the patient is ineligible for transplantation, then hepatic resection and/or other antitumor treatments should be considered. The use of cytoreductive surgery in metastatic NET may successfully control symptoms and prolong survival. For patients with CLM, hepatic resection remains the best treatment option. The results for the resection of NCNN metastases are not as encouraging and are dependent on the tumor of origin.
1 Paquet KJ, Gad HA, Lazar A, Koussouris P, Mercado MA, Heine WD, Jachman-Jahn V, Ruppert W. Analysis of factors affecting outcome after hepatectomy of patients with liver cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg 1998; 164: 513-519 PubMed DOI
3 Ng KK, Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Lauwers GY, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J, Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Curley SA, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Fan ST, Poon RT. Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional database. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12: 364-373 PubMed DOI
5 Wakabayashi H, Ishimura K, Izuishi K, Karasawa Y, Maeta H. Evaluation of liver function for hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver with damaged parenchyma. J Surg Res 2004; 116: 248-252 PubMed DOI
6 Bruix J, Castells A, Bosch J, Feu F, Fuster J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Visa J, Bru C, Rodés J. Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 1018-1022 PubMed DOI
7 Radtke A, Nadalin S, Sotiropoulos GC, Molmenti EP, Schroeder T, Valentin-Gamazo C, Lang H, Bockhorn M, Peitgen HO, Broelsch CE, Malagó M. Computer-assisted operative planning in adult living donor liver transplantation: a new way to resolve the dilemma of the middle hepatic vein. World J Surg 2007; 31: 175-185 PubMed DOI
10 Ikai I, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto N, Terajima H, Hatano E, Shimahara Y, Yamaoka Y. Results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma invading major portal and/or hepatic veins. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2003; 12: 65-75, ix PubMed DOI
12 Esnaola NF, Mirza N, Lauwers GY, Ikai I, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J, Yamaoka Y, Curley SA, Ellis LM, Nagorney DM, Vauthey JN. Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated in the United States, France, and Japan. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 711-719 PubMed DOI
13 Wayne JD, Lauwers GY, Ikai I, Doherty DA, Belghiti J, Yamaoka Y, Regimbeau JM, Nagorney DM, Do KA, Ellis LM, Curley SA, Pollock RE, Vauthey JN. Preoperative predictors of survival after resection of small hepatocellular carcinomas. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 722-730; discussion 730-731 PubMed DOI
15 Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 216-222 PubMed DOI
17 Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, Del Gaudio M, Gardini A, Cescon M, Varotti G, Cetta F, Cavallari A. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for intrahepatic recurrence. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 536-543 PubMed DOI
19 Grazi GL, Ercolani G, Pierangeli F, Del Gaudio M, Cescon M, Cavallari A, Mazziotti A. Improved results of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis give the procedure added value. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 71-78 PubMed DOI
20 Belghiti J, Regimbeau JM, Durand F, Kianmanesh AR, Dondero F, Terris B, Sauvanet A, Farges O, Degos F. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience on 328 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 41-46 PubMed
21 Vauthey JN, Lauwers GY, Esnaola NF, Do KA, Belghiti J, Mirza N, Curley SA, Ellis LM, Regimbeau JM, Rashid A, Cleary KR, Nagorney DM. Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1527-1536 PubMed DOI
22 Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function: implications for a strategy of salvage transplantation. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 373-382 PubMed DOI
23 Torzilli G, Donadon M, Marconi M, Palmisano A, Del Fabbro D, Spinelli A, Botea F, Montorsi M. Hepatectomy for stage B and stage C hepatocellular carcinoma in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification: results of a prospective analysis. Arch Surg 2008; 143: 1082-1090 PubMed DOI
24 Zhang XF, Meng B, Qi X, Yu L, Liu C, Liu XM, Wang B, Pan CE, Lv Y. Prognostic factors after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: surgeon's role in survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 622-628 PubMed DOI
25 Borie F, Bouvier AM, Herrero A, Faivre J, Launoy G, Delafosse P, Velten M, Buemi A, Peng J, Grosclaude P, Trétarre B. Treatment and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a population based study in France. J Surg Oncol 2008; 98: 505-509 PubMed DOI
26 Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 309-318; discussion 318-321 PubMed DOI
27 Kosuge T, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S. Long-term results after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: experience of 480 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 1993; 40: 328-332 PubMed
28 Fuster J, García-Valdecasas JC, Grande L, Tabet J, Bruix J, Anglada T, Taurá P, Lacy AM, González X, Vilana R, Bru C, Solé M, Visa J. Hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Results of surgical treatment in a European series. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 297-302 PubMed DOI
30 Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kokudo N, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, Kudo M, Kojiro M, Nakanuma Y, Takayasu K, Monden M, Matsuyama Y, Ikai I. Surgical resection vs. percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report of the Japanese nationwide survey. J Hepatol 2008; 49: 589-594 PubMed DOI
32 Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, Montalto F, Ammatuna M, Morabito A, Gennari L. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 693-699 PubMed DOI
33 Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Chang S, Van Nhieu JT, Loriau J, Karoui M, Duvoux C, Dhumeaux D, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 499-506 PubMed DOI
34 Lee KK, Kim DG, Moon IS, Lee MD, Park JH. Liver transplantation versus liver resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2010; 101: 47-53 PubMed
35 Facciuto ME, Koneru B, Rocca JP, Wolf DC, Kim-Schluger L, Visintainer P, Klein KM, Chun H, Marvin M, Rozenblit G, Rodriguez-Davalos M, Sheiner PA. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria. Results of liver resection, salvage transplantation, and primary liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 1383-1391 PubMed DOI
39 Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, Bechstein WO, Primrose JN, Walpole ET, Finch-Jones M, Jaeck D, Mirza D, Parks RW, Collette L, Praet M, Bethe U, Van Cutsem E, Scheithauer W, Gruenberger T. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 1007-1016 PubMed DOI
40 Stang A, Fischbach R, Teichmann W, Bokemeyer C, Braumann D. A systematic review on the clinical benefit and role of radiofrequency ablation as treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 1748-1756 PubMed DOI
41 Jaeck D, Bachellier P, Guiguet M, Boudjema K, Vaillant JC, Balladur P, Nordlinger B. Long-term survival following resection of colorectal hepatic metastases. Association Française de Chirurgie. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 977-980 PubMed DOI
43 Lindnér P, Cahlin C, Friman S, Hafström L, Rizell M, Olausson M. [Treatment of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. More patients can benefit from the treatment!] Lakartidningen 2003; 100: 2684-2688 PubMed
44 Aoki T, Umekita N, Tanaka S, Noda K, Warabi M, Kitamura M. Prognostic value of concomitant resection of extrahepatic disease in patients with liver metastases of colorectal origin. Surgery 2008; 143: 706-714 PubMed DOI
45 Arru M, Aldrighetti L, Castoldi R, Di Palo S, Orsenigo E, Stella M, Pulitanň C, Gavazzi F, Ferla G, Di Carlo V, Staudacher C. Analysis of prognostic factors influencing long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Surg 2008; 32: 93-103 PubMed DOI
46 Fuks D, Cook MC, Bréhant O, Henegar A, Dumont F, Chatelain D, Yzet T, Mulieri G, Joly JP, Nguyen-Khac E, Dupas JL, Mauvais F, Verhaeghe P, Regimbeau JM. Colorectal carcinoma with potentially resectable metastases: factors associated with the failure of curative schedule. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008; 32: 390-400 PubMed DOI
47 Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection: decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005; 12: 16-22 PubMed DOI
48 Adam R, de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Aloia TA, Delvart V, Azoulay D, Bismuth H, Castaing D. Is hepatic resection justified after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and lymph node involvement? J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3672-3680 PubMed DOI
50 Gomez D, Morris-Stiff G, Wyatt J, Toogood GJ, Lodge JP, Prasad KR. Surgical technique and systemic inflammation influences long-term disease-free survival following hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis. J Surg Oncol 2008; 98: 371-376 PubMed DOI
52 van Vilsteren FG, Baskin-Bey ES, Nagorney DM, Sanderson SO, Kremers WK, Rosen CB, Gores GJ, Hobday TJ. Liver transplantation for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cancers: Defining selection criteria to improve survival. Liver Transpl 2006; 12: 448-456 PubMed DOI
53 Frilling A, Li J, Malamutmann E, Schmid KW, Bockisch A, Broelsch CE. Treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours in relation to the extent of hepatic disease. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 175-184 PubMed DOI
54 Sřreide JA. Treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours in relation to the extent of hepatic disease (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 175-184). Br J Surg 2009; 96: 823; author reply 823-824 PubMed DOI
55 Sarmiento JM, Heywood G, Rubin J, Ilstrup DM, Nagorney DM, Que FG. Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine metastases to the liver: a plea for resection to increase survival. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 29-37 PubMed
57 Ercolani G, Grazi GL, Ravaioli M, Ramacciato G, Cescon M, Varotti G, Del Gaudio M, Vetrone G, Pinna AD. The role of liver resections for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine metastases: experience with 142 observed cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12: 459-466 PubMed DOI
59 Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, Tomimatsu M, Okazaki N, Hasegawa H, Nakajima Y, Ohnishi K. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985; 56: 918-928 PubMed DOI
60 Kato T, Yasui K, Hirai T, Kanemitsu Y, Mori T, Sugihara K, Mochizuki H, Yamamoto J. Therapeutic results for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer with special reference to effectiveness of hepatectomy: analysis of prognostic factors for 763 cases recorded at 18 institutions. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: S22-S31 PubMed
S- Editor Tian L L- Editor O’Neill M E- Editor Zheng XM