Search Article Keyword:  

 PubMed Submission Abstract PDF  Cover Contents Editorial Board Count: 1903 Download Count: 549 

ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R  World J Gastroenterol  2009 April 7; 15(13): 1548-1553


Efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis

Roja Rahimi, Shekoufeh Nikfar, Ali Rezaie, Mohammad Abdollahi

Roja Rahimi, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran

Shekoufeh Nikfar, Food & Drug Affairs, and Food & Drug Laboratory Research Center, Ministry of Health & Medical Education, Tehran 1314715311, Iran

Ali Rezaie, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2V2, Canada

Mohammad Abdollahi, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran

Author contributions: Rahimi R collected data and drafted the manuscript; Nikfar S conducted meta-analysis, reviewed data and the manuscript; Rezaie A completed searches and reviewed the manuscript; Abdollahi M supervised whole study and edited the manuscript.

Supported by National Science Foundation, Tehran

Correspondence to: Mohammad Abdollahi, Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran.

Telephone: +98-21-66959104  Fax: + 98-21-66959104

Received: December 3, 2008  Revised: February 23, 2009

Accepted: March 2, 2009

Published online: April 7, 2009



We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as a therapeutic option for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. For the years 1966 until September 2008, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TCAs in the management of IBS. Seven randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials met our criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. TCAs used in the treatment arm of these trials included amitriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, doxepin and trimipramine. The pooled relative risk for clinical improvement with TCA therapy was 1.93 (95% CI: 1.44 to 2.6, P < 0.0001). Effect size of TCAs versus placebo for mean change in abdominal pain score among the two studies was -44.15 (95% CI: -53.27 to -35.04, P < 0.0001). It is concluded that low dose TCAs exhibit clinically and statistically significant control of IBS symptoms.


© 2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.


Key words: Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Tricyclic antidepressants; Irritable bowel syndrome; Efficacy; Clinical response; Abdominal pain


Peer reviewers: Ian D Wallace, MD, Shakespeare Specialist Group, 181 Shakespeare Rd, Milford, Auckland 1309, New Zealand; Yoshiharu Motoo, MD, PhD, FACP, FACG, Professor and Chairman, Department of Medical Oncology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan


Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rezaie A, Abdollahi M. Efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(13): 1548-1553  Available from: URL:  DOI:



IBS is a prevalent functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by chronic or recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort associated with altered bowel habits[1]. Up to 20% of the North American population are affected by IBS[2]. A community-based study carried out in Birmingham, UK estimated the prevalence of IBS to be 10.5%[3]. IBS is commonly diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 45 years and affects women twice as often as men[3,4]. IBS places a significant burden on health economy in terms of using more health care services even for non-gastrointestinal symptoms comparing to general population[5].

    Environmental factors (psychological disturbances and stress), genetic links, recent infection, bacterial overgrowth, food intolerance, altered bowel motility and/or secretion, visceral hypersensitivity, altered central nervous system sensory processing, disturbed autonomic nervous system regulation, and serotonin dysregulation are all proposed as possible etiological factors for IBS[2-4,6,7].



In addition to non-pharmacological strategies such as diet and psychotherapy, various pharmacological agents are used for the management of IBS including bulking agents, antidiarrheal agents, laxatives, antispasmodics, antidepressants, serotonergic agonists or antagonists, antibiotics and probiotics[8-12]. The rationale of using antidepressants in IBS is that these agents may alter pain perception by a central modulation of visceral afferents, treat comorbid psychologic symptoms, and alter GI transit. Different classes of antidepressants likely act by different combinations of mechanisms[1]. Two classes of antidepressants frequently used for the treatment of IBS are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and TCAs. In a meta-analysis done in 2007[8], the efficacy of SSRIs in IBS was reported. In the present paper, the efficacy of TCAs in IBS has been reviewed by meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials.



PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies investigated the efficacy of TCAs in IBS. Data were collected for the years 1966 to 2008 (up to September). The search terms were: “tricyclic antidepressants”, “amitriptyline”, “amoxapine”, “clomipramine”, “desipramine”, “dothiepin”, “doxepine”, “imipramine”, “iprindole”, “lofepramine”, “nortriptyline”, “opipramol”, “protriptyline”, or “trimipramine” and “irritable bowel”, “functional bowel diseases” or “irritable colon”. Search was restricted to English literature. Reference lists of the retrieved articles were also reviewed for additional applicable studies.

    All controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TCAs in patients with IBS were considered. “Global improvement of symptoms” and “adequate relief of pain and discomfort” were the key outcomes of interest for assessment of efficacy. We evaluated all published studies as well as abstracts presented at meetings. Three reviewers independently examined the title and abstract of each article to eliminate duplicates, reviews, case studies, and uncontrolled trials. Trials were disqualified if they were not placebo-controlled or their outcomes did not consider efficacy. Reviewers independently extracted data on patients’ characteristics, therapeutic regimens, dosage, trial duration, and outcome measures. Disagreements, if any, were resolved by consensus.

    Jadad score, which evaluates studies based on their description of randomization, blinding, and dropouts (withdrawals), was used to assess the methodological quality of the trials[13]. The quality scale ranges from 0 to 5 points with a low quality report of score 2 or less and a high quality report of score at least 3.

    Data from selected studies were extracted into 2 × 2 tables. All included studies were weighted and pooled. Data analysis was done using StatsDirect (2.7.2). Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel and effect size (weighted mean difference) meta-analysis was performed using Mulrow-Oxman method. The Cochran Q test was used to test heterogeneity. The event rate in the experimental (intervention) group against the event rate in the control group was calculated using L'Abbe plot as an aid to explore the heterogeneity of effect estimates. In case of homogeneity, fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis; otherwise random effect model was applied. In addition to Kendall’s t test[14], funnel plots were used as an indicator for publication bias[15].



The electronic searches yielded 694 items; 191 from PubMed, 10 from Cochrane Central, 168 from Web of Science, and 325 from Scopus. Of these, 15 trials were scrutinized in full text and 7 trials[16-22] were included in the analysis (Figure 1). Of these 7 studies, 6[16-21] obtained a Jadad score of 3 or more and the remaining one[22] gained a Jadad score of 2 (Table 1). Regarding the Cochran Q test for heterogeneity, it was found that this study did not cause heterogeneity in our meta-analysis and thus, it was not excluded. Patients’ characteristics, IBS subtype, TCA subclass, dosage, duration of treatment/follow up for each study are reported in Table 2. All subtypes of IBS (diarrhea-predominant, constipation-predominant and alternating) were incorporated in the included studies. This meta-analysis included 257 IBS patients randomized to receive either TCA or placebo. The efficacy of various TCAs has been investigated including amitriptyline (3 trials), imipramine (1 trial), desipramine (1 trial), doxepin (1 trial) and trimipramine (1 trial). Duration of treatment/follow up ranged between 4 and 12 wk. Definition of clinical response and mean change in abdominal pain score in each study are reported in Table 3.

    Cochrane Q test suggested that the studies are homogeneous (P = 0.3284, Figure 2B) therefore, a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Regression of normalized effect versus precision for all included studies for clinical response among TCAs vs placebo therapy was 2.40 (95% CI: -1.14 to 5.95, P = 0.14). Funnel plot was suggestive of publication bias (Figure 2C); however, Kendall’s t test was not indicative of such a bias (tau = 0.05, P > 0.9999). Pooled RR for clinical response in 7 trials[16-22] was 1.93 (95% CI: 1.34 to 2.6, P < 0.0001, Figure 2A).

    Studies that considered abdominal pain score as an outcome showed homogeneity using Cochrane Q test (P = 0.61). Regression of normalized effect vs precision for all included studies for mean change in abdominal pain score could not be calculated because of too few strata.

    Using a fixed effect model, effect size of TCAs versus placebo for mean change in abdominal pain score among the two studies[17,21] was -44.15 (95% CI: -53.27 to -35.04, P < 0.0001, Figure 3).



Visceral hypersensitivity and dysregulation of central pain perception in the brain-gut axis is considered to play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of IBS. IBS patients have a lower sensory threshold to colonic and rectal balloon distention and electrical stimulation[23]; therefore, beneficial effects of antidepressants can be explained by partial increment in central pain threshold. Other mechanisms by which antidepressants might express their effect include anticholinergic effects, regulation of GI transit and peripheral antineuropathic effects[24,25]. The results from the current meta-analysis show that TCAs induce clinical response and reduce abdominal pain score in patients with IBS.

    Other meta-analysis studies that considered the effects of antidepressants in functional gastrointestinal diseases have essential differences with the present study: O'Malley et al[26] pooled all functional diseases including IBS, functional dyspepsia, headache, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue. Jackson et al[27] included all the functional gastrointestinal disorders and found a statistically significant effect for TCAs (OR 4.2; 95% CI: 2.3 to 7.9). Quartero et al[8] included 4 studies for “global improvement of symptoms” and 2 studies for “abdominal pain” and demonstrated no benefit for antidepressants. Lesbros-Pantoflickova et al[28] demonstrated a favorable effect for antidepressants (OR 2.6; 95% CI: 1.9 to 3.5). Studies with visual analogue outcome[29] and functional dyspepsia patients were included in their analysis. None of these reviews meta-analyzed the newer evidence that has surfaced in the literature[16-18].

    Unfortunately, conduction of a randomized controlled trial in the field of antidepressants and IBS is challenging. High placebo response in IBS affects study trials and the stigma of antidepressants disturbs the compliance rate. Randomization is elusive as TCAs have immediate noticeable side effects for patients. As mentioned in Table 1, the majority of trials are of a medium quality. A well-designed trial has been conducted by Drossman et al[30] although not included in our study because of the recruitment of all functional bowel disorders. Drossman et al[30] conducted a large randomized 12-wk placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of desipramine in treating moderate to severe IBS (80% of the patients), functional constipation and functional chronic abdominal pain. Desipramine was shown to have statistically significant benefit over placebo in the per protocol analysis after non-compliant and drop-out patients were excluded (responder rate 73% vs 49%). 11% of the patients were proven to be non-adherent with non-detectable blood levels. This underlines the fact that previous studies might have underestimated the effect of antidepressants by the inclusion of non-adherent cases.

    The choice of antidepressants in IBS patients remains controversial. Head to head trials comparing different classes or subclass formulations of antidepressants are lacking in the literature. In a recent meta-analysis[9], we concluded that on current evidence, SSRIs do not improve abdominal pain, abdominal bloating or other IBS symptoms. Three studies have compared the effects of TCAs with SSRIs and all together they depict a non-conclusive picture[17,31,32]. Talley et al[17] compared imipramine with citalopram during a 12-wk trial. Clinical response was seen in 56% of imipramine group, 47% of citalopram group and 56% of placebo arm. Neither imipramine nor citalopram siginificantly improved global IBS endpoints over placebo. Forootan et al[31] compared the effects of nortriptyline, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine. The results demonstrated improvement of abdominal pain, flatulence, and general performance in all subgroups. Amitriptyline and nortriptyline improved frequency of defecation in both diarrhea- and constipation-predominant IBS, while fluoxetine improved GI transit of constipation- predominant IBS. Differential effects of amitriptyline and fluoxetine on anorectal motility and visceral perception were assessed by Siproudhis et al[32] and the results demonstrated that both antidepressants similarly relax the internal anal sphincter, but only amitriptyline relaxed the external anal sphincter.

    Generally, management of IBS requires lower doses of TCAs compared to doses used to treat depression; reflecting the fact that modulation of the brain-gut axis rather than treating concomitant depression is the target in IBS patients. Myren et al[29] in a large 8-wk trial demonstrated no dose-related response with various dosing regimens of trimipramine.



This review has some limitations. Funnel plot is suggestive of publication bias with lack of negative small RCTs. However, a firm conclusion about bias is elusive to reach as the asymmetry of the funnel plot is minimal and Kendall’s T is not suggestive of publication bias. In addition funnel plots can show asymmetry for various reasons other than publication bias[33]. Paucity of small negative or neutral studies has been brought to attention in other functional disorders[26] which might encompass IBS as well. Therefore, our pooled OR might be an overestimate of the true effect. Some other limitations that can be numbered for this meta-analysis are usage of various TCA formulations and doses, dissimilar duration of treatment, and different diagnostic criteria for IBS.

    TCAs exhibit clinically and statistically significant control of IBS symptoms; however, given their abundant side effects they should be reserved for moderate to severe cases. Subjects should be started on subtherapeutic doses for depression and choice of drug should be tailored for each individual. We suggest using TCAs with the least anticholinergic effects (i.e. doxepin and desipramine) for elderly patients or constipation-predominant IBS and imipramine or amitriptyline for diarrhea-predominant IBS and patients with insomnia. Larger comparative trials with strict surveillance on compliance are needed to elaborate the role of antidepressants in standard practice.

    In addition, new evidence suggests that IBS is very similar to IBD in pathogenesis but different in severity. Recent meta-analyses have indicated the benefit of antibiotics, probiotics, and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents[34-42] in IBD and thus the effects of these drugs on IBS remain to be elucidated in the future.



1      Videlock EJ, Chang L. Irritable bowel syndrome: current approach to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment.

        Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007; 36: 665-685, x   PubMed    DOI

2      Evidence-based position statement on the management of irritable bowel syndrome in North America. Am J

        Gastroenterol 2002; 97: S1-S5   PubMed    DOI

3      Wilson S, Roberts L, Roalfe A, Bridge P, Singh S. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome: a community survey. Br J Gen

        Pract 2004; 54: 495-502   PubMed    DOI

4      Croghan A, Heitkemper MM. Recognizing and managing patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Am Acad Nurse Pract

        2005; 17: 51-59   PubMed    DOI

5      Longstreth GF, Wilson A, Knight K, Wong J, Chiou CF, Barghout V, Frech F, Ofman JJ. Irritable bowel syndrome, health

        care use, and costs: a U.S. managed care perspective. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 600-607   PubMed    DOI

6      Bommelaer G, Dorval E, Denis P, Czernichow P, Frexinos J, Pelc A, Slama A, El Hasnaoui A. Prevalence of irritable

        bowel syndrome in the French population according to the Rome I criteria. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2002; 26: 1118-1123  


7      Foxx-Orenstein A. IBS--review and what's new. MedGenMed 2006; 8: 20   PubMed

8      Quartero AO, Meineche-Schmidt V, Muris J, Rubin G, de Wit N. Bulking agents, antispasmodic and antidepressant

        medication for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; CD003460   PubMed

9      Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the management of irritable bowel

        syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Med Sci 2008; 4: 71-76

10    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Efficacy and tolerability of alosetron for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in

        women and men: a meta-analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials. Clin Ther 2008; 30: 884-

        901   PubMed    DOI

11    Fumi AL, Trexler K. Rifaximin treatment for symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Ann Pharmacother 2008; 42: 408-

        412   PubMed    DOI

12    Nikfar S, Rahimi R, Rahimi F, Derakhshani S, Abdollahi M. Efficacy of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-

        analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1775-1780   PubMed    DOI

13    Jadad A. Randomised controlled trials: a user's duide. London: BMJ Books, 1998

14    Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50:

        1088-1101   PubMed    DOI

15    Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315:

        629-634   PubMed

16    Vahedi H, Merat S, Momtahen S, Kazzazi AS, Ghaffari N, Olfati G, Malekzadeh R. Clinical trial: the effect of amitriptyline

        in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 678-684   PubMed

17    Talley NJ, Kellow JE, Boyce P, Tennant C, Huskic S, Jones M. Antidepressant therapy (imipramine and citalopram) for

        irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 108-115  

        PubMed    DOI

18    Morgan V, Pickens D, Gautam S, Kessler R, Mertz H. Amitriptyline reduces rectal pain related activation of the anterior

        cingulate cortex in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2005; 54: 601-607   PubMed    DOI

19    Rajagopalan M, Kurian G, John J. Symptom relief with amitriptyline in the irritable bowel syndrome. J Gastroenterol

        Hepatol 1998; 13: 738-741   PubMed    DOI

20    Vij JG, Jiloha RG, Kumar N, Madhu SV, Malika V, Anand BS. Effect of antidepressant drug (doxepin) on irritable bowel

        syndrome patients. Indian J Psychiatry 1991; 33: 243-246

21    Greenbaum DS, Mayle JE, Vanegeren LE, Jerome JA, Mayor JW, Greenbaum RB, Matson RW, Stein GE, Dean HA,

        Halvorsen NA. Effects of desipramine on irritable bowel syndrome compared with atropine and placebo. Dig Dis Sci

        1987; 32: 257-266   PubMed    DOI

22    Tripathi BM, Misra NP, Gupta AK. Evaluation of tricyclic compound (trimipramine) vis-a-vis placebo in irritable bowel

        syndrome. (Double blind randomised study). J Assoc Physicians India 1983; 31: 201-203   PubMed

23    Truong TT, Naliboff BD, Chang L. Novel techniques to study visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. Curr

        Gastroenterol Rep 2008; 10: 369-378   PubMed    DOI

24    Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Bradesi S. Review article: modulation of the brain-gut axis as a therapeutic approach in

        gastrointestinal disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 919-933   PubMed    DOI

25    Gorelick AB, Koshy SS, Hooper FG, Bennett TC, Chey WD, Hasler WL. Differential effects of amitriptyline on perception

        of somatic and visceral stimulation in healthy humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 275: G460-G466   PubMed

26    O'Malley PG, Jackson JL, Santoro J, Tomkins G, Balden E, Kroenke K. Antidepressant therapy for unexplained symptoms

        and symptom syndromes. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 980-990   PubMed

27    Jackson JL, O'Malley PG, Tomkins G, Balden E, Santoro J, Kroenke K. Treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders

        with antidepressant medications: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2000; 108: 65-72   PubMed    DOI

28    Lesbros-Pantoflickova D, Michetti P, Fried M, Beglinger C, Blum AL. Meta-analysis: The treatment of irritable bowel

        syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 1253-1269   PubMed    DOI

29    Myren J, Løvland B, Larssen SE, Larsen S. A double-blind study of the effect of trimipramine in patients with the irritable

        bowel syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; 19: 835-843   PubMed

30    Drossman DA, Toner BB, Whitehead WE, Diamant NE, Dalton CB, Duncan S, Emmott S, Proffitt V, Akman D, Frusciante

        K, Le T, Meyer K, Bradshaw B, Mikula K, Morris CB, Blackman CJ, Hu Y, Jia H, Li JZ, Koch GG, Bangdiwala SI. Cognitive-

        behavioral therapy versus education and desipramine versus placebo for moderate to severe functional bowel disorders.

        Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 19-31   PubMed    DOI

31    Forootan H, Taheri A, Hooshangi H, Mohammadi HR. Effects of Fluoxetine, Nortriptyline and Amitriptyline in IBS

        patients. Feyz Kashan Univ Med Sci Health Serv 2002; 21: 49-55

32    Siproudhis L, Dinasquet M, Sébille V, Reymann JM, Bellissant E. Differential effects of two types of antidepressants,

        amitriptyline and fluoxetine, on anorectal motility and visceral perception. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 689-695  

        PubMed    DOI

33    Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic

        reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 882-893   PubMed    DOI

34    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rezaie A, Abdollahi M. A meta-analysis of the benefit of probiotics in maintaining remission of

        human ulcerative colitis: evidence for prevention of disease relapse and maintenance of remission. Arch Med Sci 2008;

        4: 185-190

35    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rahimi F, Elahi B, Derakhshani S, Vafaie M, Abdollahi M. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of

        probiotics for maintenance of remission and prevention of clinical and endoscopic relapse in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci

        2008; 53: 2524-2531   PubMed    DOI

36    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Meta-analysis technique confirms the effectiveness of anti-TNF-alpha in the

        management of active ulcerative colitis when administered in combination with corticosteroids. Med Sci Monit 2007; 13:

        PI13-PI18   PubMed

37    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rezaie A, Abdollahi M. A meta-analysis of antibiotic therapy for active ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci

        2007; 52: 2920-2925   PubMed    DOI

38    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Do anti-tumor necrosis factors induce response and remission in patients with acute

        refractory Crohn's disease? A systematic meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Biomed Pharmacother 2007; 61: 75-

        80   PubMed    DOI

39    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rezaie A, Abdollahi M. A meta-analysis of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in patients with active

        Crohn's disease. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 1983-1988   PubMed    DOI

40    Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Efficacy and tolerability of Hypericum perforatum in major depressive disorder in

        comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry

        2009; 33: 118-127   PubMed    DOI

41    Elahi B, Nikfar S, Derakhshani S, Vafaie M, Abdollahi M. On the benefit of probiotics in the management of pouchitis in

        patients underwent ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53:

        1278-1284   PubMed    DOI

42    Derakhshani S, Pakzad M, Vafaie M, Tehrani-Tarighat S, Abdollahi M. A report of 112 cases of solitary rectal ulcer

        syndrome from Iran. Cent Eur J Med 2009; 4: 49-53   DOI

S- Editor  Cheng JX    L- Editor  Logan S    E- Editor  Lin YP







Reviews Add

Related Articles: