|
|
|||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|||
|
Jaap Jacob Kloek, Deha Erdogan, Olivier Robert Busch, Dirk Joan Gouma, Thomas Mathijs van Gulik, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands Otto Marinus van Delden, Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands Fibo Jan ten Kate, Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands Erik Anthoni Rauws, Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands Author contributions: Kloek JJ, van Delden OM, Erdogan D, Rauws EA, ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Gouma DJ and van Gulik TM designed the research; Kloek JJ, van Delden OM, ten Kate FJ, Rauws EA, Busch OR, Gouma DJ performed research; Kloek JJ, van Delden OM and Erdogan D, and van Gulik TM analyzed the data; and Kloek JJ, van Delden OM, Erdogan D, and van Gulik TM wrote the paper. Correspondence to: Thomas Mathijs van Gulik, MD, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands. t.m.vangulik@amc.uva.nl Telephone: +31-20-5665572 Fax: +31-20-6976621 Received: May 20, 2008 Revised: June 30, 2008 Accepted: July 6, 2008 Published online: August 28, 2008
Abstract AIM: To identify the criteria for the differentiation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) from benign strictures. METHODS: A total of 68 patients underwent resection of lesions suspicious for HCCA between 1998 and 2006. The results of laboratory investigations, imaging studies and brush cytology were collected. These findings were analyzed to obtain the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Histological examination of the resected specimens confirmed HCCA in 58 patients (85%, group Ⅰ) whereas 10 patients (15%, group Ⅱ) were diagnosed to have benign strictures. The most common presenting symptom was obstructive jaundice in 77% patients (79% group Ⅰ vs 60% group Ⅱ, P = 0.23). Laboratory findings showed greater elevation of transaminase levels in group Ⅰ compared to group Ⅱ. The various imaging modalities showed vascular involvement exclusively in the malignant group (36%, P < 0.05). Brush cytology was positive for malignant cells in only 50% patients in group Ⅰ whereas none in group Ⅱ showed malignant cells. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in imaging techniques, 10 patients (15%) with a presumptive diagnosis of HCCA were ultimately found to have benign strictures. Except for vascular involvement which was associated significantly with malignancy, there were no conclusive features of malignancy on regular imaging modalities. This uncertainty should be taken into account when patients with a suspicious lesion at the liver hilum are considered for resection.
© 2008 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.
Key words: Biliary stricture; Hilar cholangiocarcinoma; Benign; Radiological; Vascular involvement
Peer reviewer: Georgios Papachristou, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, UPMC Presbyterian, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh PA 15213, United States
Kloek JJ, van Delden OM, Erdogan D, ten Kate FJ, Rauws EA, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Differentiation of malignant and benign proximal bile duct strictures: The diagnostic dilemma. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(32): 5032-5038 Available from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/14/5032.asp DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.5032
INTRODUCTION Hilar resection en bloc with liver resection is the only curative treatment option for patients with carcinoma at the hepatic duct confluence. Although mortality rates associated with partial hepatectomy have decreased markedly in the past decades, postoperative morbidity is considerable and can exceed 50 percent[1-4]. Undertaking partial hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) becomes even more a subject of discussion when histopathology of the resected specimen shows benign disease. A variety of benign lesions at the liver hilum can mimic malignancy. In particular, inflammatory lesions may present with the same clinical and radiological features as a malignant tumor. In the past decade, imaging techniques have improved and the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of HCCA usually comprised of ultra-sonography (US), contrast enhanced multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC). In experienced hands, colour Doppler US is very useful in assessing proximal biliary extension of the tumor and vascular invasion, but has limited value in distinguishing HCCA from inflammatory lesions[5]. Contrast enhanced CT and MR imaging (MRI) provide important information regarding resectability and vascular involvement[6-8]. Furthermore, these cross-sectional imaging modalities are accurate in detecting a tumor mass and signs of lymphadenopathy, although both features may also be present in benign diseases. Cholangiography in combination with brush cytology has a low sensitivity, and although the specificity is higher, it is not 100% since longstanding stenting of the biliary duct may give rise to false positive cytology results[9]. Overall, an extensive work-up with multiple imaging techniques may improve the differentiation between malignant and benign proximal bile duct strictures. Several studies have noted that approximately 14% to 25% of patients resected for presumed HCCA prove to have a benign lesion at histopathology[10-14]. A recent study attempted to identify potential criteria for distinguishing patients with HCCA from those with an alternative diagnosis[15]. However, the non-HCCA patients in this series comprised of benign and malignant diseases (for instance gallbladder cancer), which makes any conclusions difficult to interpret. In a previous series of 132 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for suspicious HCCA at our center from 1983 to 1998, 15% (20/132) of the patients had benign lesions[16]. In the present study, which covers a more recent period during which improved imaging techniques were used, the rate of mis-diagnosed benign lesions was re-examined and the diagnostic features of benign and malignant lesions was compared. The aim of the study was to identify criteria that can differentiate HCCA from benign proximal bile duct strictures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 1998 and December 2006, a total of 143 patients underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy for staging of HCCA, and 13 patients underwent laparotomy without diagnostic laparoscopy. Unresectable disease was found in 36 patients undergoing laparoscopy, and in the majority of these cases the diagnosis was confirmed by histology (Figure 1). Another 52 patients were found to have unresectable disease during subsequent laparotomy which was confirmed by histology. Finally, 68 consecutive patients underwent resection and are the subject of the present study (Figure 1). These patients had hilar resection with complete lymphadenectomy of the hepato-duodenal ligament usually en bloc with (extended) hemi-hepatectomy including resection of the caudate lobe and left or right portal vein[17]. Although in the majority of the patients included in the study, the initial diagnostic evaluation was performed at the referring hospital, imaging studies such as US, CT and MRC were usually repeated in our center. The medical data of patients obtained from these hospitals and from our center included demographic features, relevant medical history, presenting symptoms, laboratory investigations, results of imaging studies (including cholangiography, CT, MRC, duplex US), radiological and endoscopic interventions including placement of a stent, brush cytology and intra-operative findings. The results of biliary brush cytology obtained during antegrade percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) were categorized as follows: highly suspicious for adenocarcinoma, atypical cells/inconclusive, and no malignant cells. Data from imaging studies were collected for staging purposes. The data recorded from these studies included: the presence of a mass lesion, proximal extent of the tumor within the biliary tree according to the Bismuth-Corlette classification system, vascular involvement (hepatic artery, portal vein), liver lobe atrophy, and lymphadenopathy. Ultrasonography, CT and MRI were used to detect a mass lesion, to determine the size of the lesion and the level of the biliary obstruction. Findings on PTC and/or ERCP showing an irregular and eccentric stenosis and/or a blunt end rather than a smooth tapering narrowing of the duct were considered more suggestive of a malignant lesion. Vascular invasion on colour Doppler US was defined as an increase in flow compatible with stenosis or absence of flow compatible with occlusion. Furthermore, on contrast enhanced CT, presence of vascular stenosis or occlusion of the portal vein and encasement of the artery were indicative of vascular involvement. The final histological diagnosis was correlated with the preoperative clinical and laboratory findings as well as with the radiological data in an effort to identify criteria which may be useful for the differentiation of HCCA (group Ⅰ, 58 patients) from benign proximal bile duct stricture (group Ⅱ, 10 patients). The resected specimens of the benign lesions were re-assessed by a single pathologist, specialized in hepatobiliary pathology (FJ. tK.). The results obtained are expressed as the mean (SEM). The differences between categorical variables were evaluated by chi-square analysis, while Student’s t test was used for all comparisons among continuous variables. A two-tailed P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate significant differences. All statistics were carried out using the SPSS Base 12.0 for Windows Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS®, Chicago, IL).
RESULTS The demographic features, presenting symptoms, and preoperative laboratory findings are shown in Table 1. The mean age and male-female gender ratio were equal in the two study groups. Although 9 patients (groups combined) had a prior cholecystectomy, none of the patients had a complicated procedure with bile duct stricture. In the group with benign lesions, one patient had history of alcohol abuse and related chronic pancreatitis, and another patient had history of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis). In the malignant group, one patient had history of alcohol abuse and one patient had Crohn’s colitis with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to the clinical presentation. Jaundice was present in 79% of the patients in group Ⅰ and 60% of group Ⅱ. Abdominal pain, usually located in the right upper abdomen or in the epigastric region was mostly vague and nonpersistent. Weight loss was observed in both groups with a median loss of 6.4 kg in group Ⅰ (range 2-16) and 7.3 kg (range 2-10) in group Ⅱ. No differences were observed in the results of the laboratory tests, except for serum transaminase levels which showed higher levels in group Ⅰ compared to group Ⅱ (P < 0.05, Table 1). Assessment of tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) was not performed routinely. The majority of patients underwent imaging studies, and interventions such as ERCP, PTC and diagnostic laparoscopy (Table 2). The mean number of imaging procedures was 3.3 per patient in both groups. CT scan was performed most frequently, with an overall rate of 96%. Sixty patients (88%) underwent colour Doppler US, while MRI was performed in 21 patients (31%). Cholangiography (either ERCP or PTC) was performed in 63 patients (93%). Forty-seven patients underwent ERCP and 15 patients underwent PTC with at least one bile duct stent or drainage tube inserted. Five patients underwent both ERCP and PTC to achieve biliary decompression. Examination of brush cytology, shown in Table 2, showed malignant cells in 50% of patients in group Ⅰ, whereas none in group Ⅱ showed malignant cells (P < 0.05). Furthermore, brush cytology in 9 patients in the malignant group proved false negative. Atypical cells were found in 6 and 2 patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, respectively. The findings obtained with the imaging studies are shown in Table 3. A mass lesion at the hepatic duct confluence was seen in 56 patients (97%) in group Ⅰ and 8 patients (80%) in group Ⅱ. The presence and size of a mass could not distinguish between benign or malignant disease. The extent of bile duct involvement classified according to the Bismuth-Corlette system was similar in the two groups. Vascular involvement was observed only in patients with malignant disease (P < 0.05), although lobar atrophy was not more frequent in the malignant group. Lobar atrophy was present in one patient in the benign group, probably caused by segmental biliary obstruction. Moreover, the presence of enlarged lymph nodes (> 1 cm, short axis diameter) could not differentiate the two groups. After taking into consideration the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging studies, prior interventions and brush cytology, all 68 patients were diagnosed to have a lesion suspicious of HCCA. During surgical exploration, frozen sections were obtained of suspicious lymph nodes, tissue suspicious of tumor infiltrating the vessel walls, and the resection margins to ensure radical resection in all patients except one (Table 3). The frozen section examination confirmed malignancy in 35% of the patients in group Ⅰ, and no false positive results were obtained in group Ⅱ (P < 0.05). A palpable, suspicious hilar tumor was found in 5 patients (50%) in the benign group and in 51 patients (88%) in the malignant group. Eventually, 70% of all patients underwent hilar resection, in combination with partial liver resection; the prevalence of local bile duct excision was equally divided between the two groups. Histological analysis of the resected specimens showed a benign bile duct stricture in 10 patients, diagnosed as chronic fibrosing lesion, erosive inflammation, sclerosing cholangitis or autoimmune cholangitis (IgG4-related) (Table 4). In the remaining 58 resection specimens, histology confirmed HCCA.
DISCUSSION Cholangiocarcinoma and benign, inflammatory lesions of the biliary tract may have a similar clinical presentation. Differentiating the two conditions is complex because on the one hand, HCCA is frequently associated with secondary inflammatory changes, and on the other hand, conditions such as PSC predispose to malignancy of the bile ducts (with a reported prevalence of 30%)[18]. A combination of different imaging modalities is usually employed in the diagnosis of hilar bile duct lesions[8]. However, to date, no single investigation has been found to reliably differentiate HCCA from benign proximal bile duct strictures. In the present study, the rate of patients (15%) with benign lesions misdiagnosed as malignancy was similar to the rate (15%) observed in a previous study performed at our center a decade earlier (1983-1997)[16]. Despite considerable improvements in imaging techniques (contrast enhanced multi-slice CT and MRC), and an increase in the number of imaging procedures (a mean of 3 modalities in comparison to 2 in the previous study), patients still required unnecessary extensive resections, for achieving adequate biliary drainage. Case series from other groups worldwide, have noted comparable rates of benign lesions in resections performed for presumed HCCA (Table 5). Our observations confirm the findings of these studies and emphasize the difficulty in differentiating benign from malignant lesions at the liver hilum, despite use of state-of-the-art imaging modalities. Clinical features alone cannot differentiate HCCA from benign proximal bile duct strictures. With regard to laboratory tests, plasma transaminase values were significantly elevated in the malignant group compared to patients with benign hilar lesions. Although raised transaminase values may occur in patients with benign proximal bile duct strictures (usually in conjunction with cholangitis), our results show that this is an uncommon finding. Other laboratory tests failed to identify patients with a malignancy. The diagnostic value of tumor markers such as CA 19-9 and CEA in biliary cancer has been extensively studied. One study showed 100% sensitivity using a combination of CA 19-9 and CEA[19], but these results could not be confirmed by other workers[9,10]. Another, potentially useful test is serum IgG4. Recently, IgG4-related lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing disease was observed in patients with strictures of the pancreatic duct mimicking carcinoma[20]. In a study from our center, it was shown that IgG4-related sclerosing disease also occurs in patients with benign proximal bile duct strictures[21]. In the present series, two of the ten patients with benign proximal bile duct strictures showed infiltration by IgG4-plasma cells with histological features suggestive of an autoimmune disorder. Serum levels of IgG4 have potential to differentiate benign disease from HCCA, although the diagnostic value of this marker and the role of immunomodulatory drugs requires further investigation[22]. The findings obtained with the different imaging studies revealed that only one feature, i.e. vascular involvement, was significantly different between the benign and malignant groups. Even a mass lesion was not able to differentiate between the two groups. Furthermore, in contrast to the report by Are and co-workers[15], we did not find any difference between the benign and malignant groups with respect to either the level of obstruction or the extent of lesion. Moreover, there was no difference in rate of liver lobe atrophy. Portal vein occlusion of one side of the liver typically gives rise to ipsilateral lobar atrophy and compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral lobe. However, it is possible to develop lobar atrophy without portal vein occlusion. In benign disease, lobar atrophy can develop secondary to longstanding cholestasis. In a series of 162 patients with intrahepatic cholelithiasis, lobe atrophy was observed in 7% of the patients[23]. Overall, the finding of lobar atrophy is uncommon with benign disease and should be considered as a manifestation of vascular involvement and therefore of malignancy. Occlusion of the portal vein obviously suggests malignancy, however two cases have been reported of a benign inflammatory pseudotumor mimicking HCCA with vascular involvement[24,25]. Therefore, although uncommon, even vascular involvement may be seen in benign lesions at the liver hilum. Brush cytology of a biliary stricture is often undertaken during ERCP or PTC. Unfortunately, the diagnostic yield is poor with sensitivity rates around 50%[9,26]. Moreover, the specificity is not 100% since longstanding stenting of the biliary duct induces chronic inflammation, which makes it difficult to differentiate benign from malignant cells, resulting in false positive results[9]. The present study showed similar rates which is consistent with previous studies. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been increasingly used to facilitate the identification of neoplastic cells in cytologic specimens[27]. In one study, 20% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma missed by conventional cytology were identified by FISH without affecting the specificity[28]. Several studies have evaluated the diagnostic yield of endoscopic US fine needle aspiration in patients with biliary strictures[29-32]. In one of the studies, the sensitivity and specificity of biopsy were 89% and 100%, respectively[30]. Moreover, the planned surgical approach was changed in 27 of 44 patients. Therefore, biopsy from either the mass or the surrounding malignant-appearing lymph nodes appears to have a higher sensitivity than ERCP or PTC with brush cytology. More recently, techniques such as intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) and cholangioscopy have been used to obtain direct biopsy specimens. IDUS with biopsy increased the accuracy of ERCP from 58%-60% to 83%-90% in distinguishing benign and malignant strictures[33]. These diagnostic modalities appear very promising in differentiating benign and malignant biliary lesions, although they are highly expert-dependent and are still not widely available. In one-half of the patients diagnosed to have a benign lesion at the liver hilum, the intra-operative findings were consistent with a malignant tumor (i.e. positive frozen section diagnosis and/or evident palpable mass). Furthermore, 7 patients in the malignant group were not found to have a suspicious lesion during laparotomy. Thus, even at surgery it is difficult to determine the nature of a hilar lesion, and resection is the only way to rule out malignancy. In conclusion, despite improvements in the quality and increase in the number of imaging studies, 10 out of 68 (15%) patients with presumed HCCA, were misdiagnosed. Vascular involvement showed a significant association with malignant lesions. However, there was no feature on imaging studies or laboratory tests that reliably distinguished HCCA from benign proximal bile duct lesions. Therefore, differentiation of benign from malignant lesions at the liver hilum remains difficult and this should be taken into account when considering resection in patients with suspicious hilar lesions.
COMMENTS Background The main etiology of proximal bile duct stricture is hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, the differentiation of benign and malignant strictures is difficult which has obvious important consequences for management. Extensive work-up including multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography may help improve the diagnostic dilemma. Research frontiers The differentiation of benign and malignant lesions at the liver hilum remains a diagnostic dilemma despite improvements in the quality and increase in the number of imaging techniques. Novel diagnostic and imaging techniques are discussed, although none have shown a high rate of accuracy. The most promising diagnostic modality appears to be intraductal ultrasound in combination with cholangioscopic biopsy. Innovations and breakthroughs The authors observed that vascular involvement had a significant association with malignant lesions. No other feature on imaging studies or laboratory tests was able to reliably distinguish HCCA from benign proximal bile duct lesions. Applications Vascular involvement emerged as the most important diagnostic feature. Terminology Vascular invasion on colour Doppler ultrasonography was defined as an increase in the portal and/or hepatic arterial flow compatible with stenosis, or absence of flow compatible with occlusion. Furthermore, on contrast enhanced computed tomography a vascular stenosis or occlusion was considered as vascular involvement. Peer review This is a retrospective study of 68 patients with suspicion of cholangio-carcinoma. Fifteen percent of patients were found to have benign strictures after resection. The authors concluded that despite the use of sophisticated diagnostic tests and imaging studies, differentiation of malignant from benign hilar lesions remains a dilemma.
REFERENCES 1 Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Gonen M, Burke EC, Bodniewicz BS J, Youssef BA M, Klimstra D, Blumgart LH. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 507-517; 2 Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U, Caca K, Uhlmann D, Schoppmeyer K, Tannapfel A, Wittekind C, Mossner J, Hauss J, Wiedmann M. Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1/r2 resection. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 230-239 PubMed DOI 3 Dinant S, Gerhards MF, Rauws EA, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor). Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 872-880 PubMed DOI 4 Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, Noie T, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Makuuchi M. Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 73-83 5 Looser C, Stain SC, Baer HU, Triller J, Blumgart LH. Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasound and duplex sonography: a comparison with angiography and operative findings. Br J Radiol 1992; 65: 871-877 PubMed 6 Masselli G, Gualdi G. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning. Abdom Imaging 2008; 7 Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW, Park SW, Lee JK, Kim JS, Lee JH, Kim KA, Kim AY, Kim PN, Lee MG, Ha HK. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 2004; 233: 8 Domagk D, Wessling J, Conrad B, Fischbach R, Schleicher C, Bocker W, Senninger N, Heinecke A, Heindel W, Domschke W, Kucharzik T. Which imaging modalities should be used for biliary strictures of unknown aetiology? Gut 2007; 56: 9 Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin R, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thillainayagam AV,Thomas HC,Thursz MR,Wasan H. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document. Gut 2002; 51 Suppl 6: VI1-VI9 10 Nakayama A, Imamura H, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S. Proximal bile duct stricture disguised as malignant neoplasm. Surgery 1999; 125: 514-521 DOI 11 Singh SS, Sharma R, Pal S, Sahni P, Kanti CT. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstructions using laboratory and radiological investigations: A prospective study. HPB (Oxford) 2007; 9: 373-382 DOI 12 Knoefel WT, Prenzel KL, Peiper M, Hosch SB, Gundlach M, Eisenberger CF, Strate T, Scheunemann P, Rogiers X, Izbicki JR. Klatskin tumors and Klatskin mimicking lesions of the biliary tree. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29: 658-661 PubMed 13 Khalili K, Metser U, Wilson SR. Hilar biliary obstruction: preliminary results with Levovist-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 687-693 14 Binkley CE, Eckhauser FE, Colletti LM. Unusual causes of benign biliary strictures with cholangiographic features of cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 676-681 PubMed DOI 15 Are C, Gonen M, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Jarnagin WR. Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction. Surgery 2006; 140: 756-763 PubMed DOI 16 Gerhards MF, Vos P, van Gulik TM, Rauws EA, Bosma A, Gouma DJ. Incidence of benign lesions in patients resected for suspicious hilar obstruction. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 48-51 PubMed DOI 17 Van Gulik TM, Dinant S, Busch OR, Rauws EA, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Original article: New surgical approaches to the Klatskin tumour. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26 Suppl 2: 127-132 PubMed DOI 18 Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1655-1667 PubMed DOI 19 Siqueira E, Schoen RE, Silverman W, Martin J, Rabinovitz M, Weissfeld JL, Abu-Elmaagd K, Madariaga JR, Slivka A. Detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 40-47 20 Hamano H, Kawa S, Horiuchi A, Unno H, Furuya N, Akamatsu T, Fukushima M, Nikaido T, Nakayama K, Usuda N, Kiyosawa K. High serum IgG4 concentrations in patients with sclerosing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 732-738 21 Erdogan D, Kloek JJ, ten Kate FJ, Rauws EA, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis in patients resected for presumed malignant bile duct strictures. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 727-734 PubMed 22 Ghazale A, Chari ST, Zhang L, Smyrk TC, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Clain JE, Pearson RK, Petersen BT, Vege SS, Lindor K, Farnell MB. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis: clinical profile and response to therapy. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 706-715 PubMed DOI 23 Chen HH, Zhang WH, Wang SS, Caruana JA. Twenty-two year experience with the diagnosis and treatment of intrahepatic calculi. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984; 159: 519-524 PubMked 24 Kai K, Matsuyama S, Ohtsuka T, Kitahara K, Mori D, Miyazaki K. Multiple inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver, mimicking cholangiocarcinoma with tumor embolus in the hepatic vein: report of a case. Surg Today 2007; 37: 530- 25. Broughan TA, Fischer WL, Tuthill RJ. Vascular invasion by hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor. A clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1993; 71: 2934-2940 PubMed DOI 26 Joyce AM, Kochman ML. Update on biliary endoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2005; 21: 354-358 PubMed DOI 27 Halling KC, Kipp BR. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 1137-1144 28 Moreno Luna LE, Kipp B, Halling KC, Sebo TJ, Kremers WK, Roberts LR, Barr Fritcher EG, Levy MJ, Gores GJ. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1064-1072 29 Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Jhala NC, Eltoum IE, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, Syed SA, Vickers SM, Mel Wilcox C. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 30 Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Knoefel WT, Rogiers X, Swain P, Thonke F, Bobrowski C, Topalidis T, Soehendra N. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 45-51 PubMed DOI 31 DeWitt J, Misra VL, Leblanc JK, McHenry L, Sherman S. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 325-333 PubMed DOI 32 Gleeson FC, Rajan E, Levy MJ, Clain JE, Topazian MD, Harewood GC, Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Rosen CB, Gores GJ. EUS-guided FNA of regional lymph nodes in patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 33 Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna E, Battezzati P, Stevens P. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 715-721 PubMed DOI 34 Hadjis NS, Collier NA, Blumgart LH. Malignant masquerade at the hilum of the liver. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 659-661 35 Wetter LA, Ring EJ, Pellegrini CA, Way LW. Differential diagnosis of sclerosing cholangiocarcinomas of the common hepatic duct (Klatskin tumors). Am J Surg 1991; 161: 57-62; discussion 62-63 PubMed DOI 36 Verbeek PC, van Leeuwen DJ, de Wit LT, Reeders JW, Smits NJ, Bosma A, Huibregtse K, van der Heyde MN. Benign fibrosing disease at the hepatic confluence mimicking Klatskin tumors. Surgery 1992; 112: 866-871 PubMed 37 Koea J, Holden A, Chau K, McCall J. Differential diagnosis of stenosing lesions at the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 2004; 38 Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Darvishian F, Klimstra DS, DeMatteo R, Fong Y, D'Angelica M, Jarnagin WR. Clinical and pathologic features of proximal biliary strictures masquerading as hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 39 Uhlmann D, Wiedmann M, Schmidt F, Kluge R, Tannapfel A, Berr F, Hauss J, Witzigmann H. Management and outcome in patients with Klatskin-mimicking lesions of the biliary tree. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 1144-1150 PubMed DOI
S- Editor Li DL L- Editor Anand BS E- Editor Lin YP
| |||
| |||||||||
|
|
PubMed