|
|
|||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
You-Ming Ding, Bin Wang, Wei-Xing Wang, Ping Wang, Ji-Shen Yan, Department of Hepatobiliary & Laparoscopic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China Correspondence to: Bin Wang, Department of Hepatobiliary & Laparoscopic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Jiefang Road 238#, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China. wb7112@sina.com Telephone: +86-27-88041911-2212 Received: May 24, 2007 Revised: August 25, 2007
Abstract AIM: To investigate the anatomic variations in the cystic artery by laparoscopy, and to provide a new classification system for the guidance of laparoscopic surgeons.
METHODS:
Six hundred patients treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy from
June 2005 to May 2006 were studied retrospectively. The laparoscope
of 30˚
RESULTS: Laparoscopy has revealed there are many anatomic variations of the cystic artery that occur frequently. Based on our experience with 600 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, we present a new classification of anatomic variations of the cystic artery, which can be divided into three groups: (1) Calot’s triangle type, found in 513 patients (85.5%); (2) outside Calot’s triangle, found in 78 patients (13%); (3) compound type, observed in 9 patients (1.5%).
CONCLUSION: Our classification of the anatomic variations of the cystic artery will be useful for decreasing uncontrollable cystic artery hemorrhage, and avoiding extrahepatic bile duct injury.
© 2007 WJG. All rights reserved.
Key words: Cystic artery; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Bile duct injury; Calot’s triangle
Ding YM, Wang B, Wang WX, Wang P, Yan JS. New classification of the anatomic variations of the cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(42): 5629-5634
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/13/5629.asp
INTRODUCTION Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the last two decades, minimally invasive surgery has evolved through advances in videoscopic technology, instrumentation, and surgical techniques[1-14]. Currently, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely accepted as the gold standard in the treatment of cholelithiasis[15-18]. This new technique was initially associated with a significant increase in morbidity, and in particular, in iatrogenic biliary injury and arterial hemorrhage[19-30], perhaps due to a lack of knowledge of the laparoscopic anatomy of the gallbladder pedicle. Therefore, the laparoscopic surgeon has to deal with the new anatomical views and must be aware of the possible arterial and biliary variants. A good knowledge of Calot’s triangle is important for conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Calot’s triangle is an important imaginary referent area for biliary surgery. In 1981, Rocko drew attention to possible variations in the region of Calot’s triangle bordered by the cystic duct, common hepatic duct, and lower edge of the liver[31]. In 1992, Hugh suggested Calot’s triangle should be renamed the hepatobiliary triangle, with the small cystic artery branches supplying the cystic duct being called Calot’s arteries[32]. Cystic artery bleeding is a troublesome complication during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which increases the rate of conversion to open surgery. If surgery is performed incorrectly, injury to the extrahepatic bile duct or intra-abdominal organs is inevitable. The reported incidence of conversion to open surgery because of blood vessel injuries is approximately 0%-1.9% during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[33], and its mortality is about 0.02%[34]. Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy demands a good knowledge of the anatomy of the cystic artery and its variations. The cystic artery has many possible origins, with the right hepatic artery being the most common[35]. The anatomy with respect to the cystic artery between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy is different. We investigated the appearance of the cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and proposed a new classification system for the cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, according to our practical experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Between June 2005 and May 2006, we undertook a retrospective evaluation of 600 non-emergency patients, 232 men and 368 women, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for different gallbladder diseases, including 530 with cholecystitis and gallstones, and 70 with gallbladder polyps. All of the patients were examined with ultrasound before surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out under general anesthesia using the four ports technique. The information of Calot’s triangle and distribution of cystic artery on endoscopic visualization was recorded respectively. A laparoscope (Stryker, USA) at 30˚ tilt angle was used. The anatomical structures were viewed on a three-dimensional video monitor.
RESULTS Based on our laparoscopic observations, we classified cystic artery anatomy into three groups.
Group Ⅰ GroupⅠrepresents the Calot’s triangle type, in which the cystic artery passes through Calot’s triangle. The anatomic location of the cystic artery can be found ahead or behind of the cystic duct, and in hepatoduodenal ligament, under laparoscopic observation. This is the most common type and has been reported in about 80%-96% of cases in previous studies[35,36]. We observed this type in 513 of the 600 patients (85.5%). GroupⅠ is further subdivided into two subtypes, as follows.
Classical single cystic artery: The cystic artery originates from the right hepatic artery within Calot’s triangle. When approaching the gallbladder, the artery is divided into deep and superficial branches at the neck of the gallbladder. The superficial branch proceeds along the left side of the gallbladder. The deep branch runs through the connective tissues between the gallbladder and liver parenchyma. The deep branch gives rise to tiny branches to supply the gallbladder, which anastomose with the superficial branches. This type of cystic artery is laterally positioned from the cystic duct within Calot’s triangle during open cholecystectomy, whereas during laparoscopic cholecystectomy it is just behind and slightly deeper than the cystic duct. According to the literature, this type is found in 70%-80% of cases[32,35]. In our study it was recorded in 440 of 600 patients (73.3%) (Figure 1). Suzuki et al has reported a special example of this type. A single cystic artery originates from the right hepatic artery and then hooks around the cystic duct from behind and reappears at the peritoneal surface near the neck of the gallbladder. They named this the cystic artery syndrome[37]. We did not find any examples of this type in our study.
Double cystic artery: The cystic artery also originates from the right hepatic artery, while it divides into the anterior and posterior branches at their cystic artery origin. Congenital absence of the deep branch signifies the existence of another cystic artery, which is occasionally detected by subsequent bleeding control. The posterior cystic artery is very delicate in some cases and is often cut by electrocoagulation during dissection. A double cystic artery has previously been found in 15%-25% of patients[32]. During our laparoscopic cholecystectomy we recorded 73 patients (12.2%) with double cystic artery (Figure 2).
Group Ⅱ Cystic artery approaches the gallbladder outside Calot’s triangle and cannot be observed within the triangle by laparoscopy during dissection. We found 78 patients (13%) in group Ⅱ during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This group includes the following four subgroups.
Cystic artery originating from gastroduodenal artery: This type of cystic artery is also called low-lying cystic artery, which does not pass through Calot’s triangle but approaches the gallbladder beyond it. In conventional open cholecystectomy it is seen as inferior to the cystic duct, while it usually localizes superficially and anterior to the cystic duct from a laparoscopic viewpoint. Its terminal segment as it approaches the gallbladder is important for laparoscopic surgeons. Because it not only must be manipulated at first, but it is also susceptible to injury and hemorrhage during dissection of the peritoneal folds that connect the hepatoduodenal ligament to Hartman’s pouch of the gallbladder or to the cystic duct. This anatomic variation was found in 45 patients (7.5%) in our study (Figure 3).
Cystic artery originating from the variant right hepatic artery: Anatomic variation of the right hepatic artery usually originates from the superior mesenteric artery or aorta[32,38]. It enters Calot’s triangle behind the portal vein, and runs parallel to the cystic duct on its passage through the triangle. It can be completely covered by the cystic duct of the gallbladder[32]. We found a very interesting type of right hepatic artery variant. This artery has a long course, approaching the gallbladder deep at its neck, and then passing between the gallbladder and liver parenchyma, extending along the deep right side of the gallbladder, and finally entering the liver parenchyma near the right-lateral side of the gallbladder fundus. It yields multiple small branches to supply the gallbladder at its body, and it is often completely covered by the gallbladder. We should be cautious of this right hepatic artery variation. From the laparoscopic viewpoint it looks like a single large artery. This anatomic variation was found in 18 patients (3%) in our study (Figure 4). Variant right hepatic artery has been shown to have a prevalence of approximate 4%-15%[37,39].
Cystic artery originating directly from the liver parenchyma: This cystic artery pierces the hepatic parenchyma approaching the bladder from the gallbladder bed. It usually situates in the right lateral of the border of gallbladder body and bottom. However, a few are situated in the center of the gallbladder bed or situated left lateral of gallbladder bottom. No other arteries are found within Calot’s triangle. This anatomic variation of the cystic artery is not observed until bleeding and is caused by dissection of the gallbladder fundus. It is difficult to explore and requires careful dissection. We found it in 15 patients (2.5%) (Figure 5).
Cystic artery originating from the left hepatic artery:The cystic artery occasionally originates from the left hepatic artery, passes through the liver parenchyma, and reaches the middle of the gallbladder body, at which point it bifurcates into ascending and descending branches. This has a prevalence of 1%[39]. However, we did not find this type of variant cystic artery.
Group Ⅲ This group has more than one blood supply. We named it the compound cystic artery type. The cystic arteries exist not only in Calot’s triangle, but also outside it. We found that nine patients (1.5%) belonged to this group. Five of these patients (0.8%) had a normal single cystic artery in Calot’s triangle, and an artery extending along the cystic duct but posterior to it, and some small arteries that passed immediately from the liver parenchyma to the gallbladder. Three of the nine patients (0.5%) had another cystic artery superficial to the cystic duct in addition to the normal cystic artery. Finally, one patient (0.17%) had multiple cystic arteries, including the double cystic artery in Calot’s triangle, and one of the arteries crossed anterior to the common bile duct, while another was situated on the right side of the border of the gallbladder body and fundus.
DISCUSSION Anatomic variations in and around Calot’s triangle are frequent (biliary tree, cystic artery)[40,41], and we found them in 20%-50% of patients. Therefore, careful blunt dissection of Calot’s triangle is necessary for both conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Since the introduction of laparoscopic gallbladder surgery, surgeons have been very interested in gallbladder vascularization. A great number of papers on this issue have been published[42-45], although some vagueness still exists, because of the diversity of data and classification. There have been relatively few reports on the laparoscopic anatomy of the hepatobiliary triangle, especially of the cystic artery. It is important for every laparoscopic surgeon to be familiar with the anatomic variations in the extrahepatic biliary tree and those of the arterial supply of the gallbladder. The possible anatomic position and variations of the cystic artery are difficult to establish before surgery. They were only identified during disconnection of Calot’s triangle and the gallbladder. The laparoscopic anatomy of the cystic artery can be considered as a precondition for performing safe laparoscopic procedures. The variations of cystic artery often make surgeons recognize an error, causing them to abscise incorrectly and, subsequently, leading to a hemorrhage. When hemorrhage cannot be controlled, conversion to open cholecystectomy is inevitable. The position of the cystic artery appears differently during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy for the following reasons. (1) Under laparoscopy, as the gallbladder fundus is pulled, the liver is moved upward, thereby opening the subhepatic space. (2) By pulling Hartman’s pouch downward, the anterior aspect of Calot’s triangle is presented. On the contrary, by pulling Hartman’s pouch upward, the posterior aspect of Calot’s triangle is clearly exposed. (3) Better transparency and visualization under laparoscopy facilitates recognition of cystic artery variation by the surgeon. Previous studies have contained fewer reports on the laparoscopic classification of the cystic artery. Some have divided the cystic artery into low-lying cystic artery and cystic artery originating from variant right hepatic artery. Balija classified cystic artery variations into two groups. GroupⅠcomprises five variations of the cystic artery within the hepatobiliary triangle: (a) normal position; (b) frontal cystic artery; (c) backside; (d) multiple; and (e) short cystic artery that arises from an aberrant right hepatic artery. Group Ⅱ consists of variations of the cystic artery that approaches the gallbladder beyond the hepatobiliary triangle: (a) low-lying; (b) transhepatic; and (c) recurrent cystic artery[36]. Ignjatovic has divided the cystic artery into three types in minimally invasive surgical procedures: type 1 shows normal anatomy; type 2 more than one artery in Calot’s triangle; and type 3 no artery in Calot’s triangle[46]. However, none of the above classifications satisfies the practical needs of laparoscopic surgery. Based on our experience, the anatomic variations of the cystic artery can be classified into three groups. GroupⅠshowed the cystic artery passing within Calot’s triangle. It included two types: (1) single cystic artery, found in 440 patients (73.3%); and (2) double cystic artery, observed in 73 patients (12.2%). Group Ⅱ showed the cystic artery situated outside Calot’s triangle. This group included four variations: (1) cystic artery originating from the gastroduodenal artery, found in 45 patients (7.5%); (2) cystic artery originating from the variant right hepatic artery, found in 18 patients (3%); (3) cystic artery directly arising from the liver parenchyma, observed in 15 patients (2.5%); and (4) cystic artery originating from the left hepatic artery. Group Ⅲ had a compound appearance, with the variant cystic artery situated not only within Calot’s triangle, but also outside it. This classification of cystic artery can help surgeons understand the cystic artery more thoroughly, and may be more practical to use in real operations. Variations in the cystic artery are miscellaneous, and we must be cautious during the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our laparoscopic classification of the cystic artery is very useful for dissection of Calot’s triangle, reduces uncontrollable cystic artery hemorrhage, and may be advantageous for avoiding extrahepatic bile duct injury.
COMMENTS Background Uncontrolled bleeding from the cystic artery and its branches is a serious problem that may increase the risk of intraoperative injury to vital vascular and biliary structures. Anatomic variations of the cystic artery are frequent and can differ in origin, position and number. We investigated 600 cases treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and analyzed the anatomic structure of the cystic arteries under laparoscopic observation. The cystic artery variations were classified into three groups: (1) Calot’s triangle, (2) outside Calot’s triangle, and (3) compound type. These will be helpful to laparoscopic surgeons.
Research frontiers Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely accepted as the gold standard in the treatment of gallstone disease. However, the incidence of bile duct injury caused by this procedure is more than that caused by conventional cholecystectomy. The main areas of research in laparoscopic cholecystectomy are as follows: (1) biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; (2) anatomic characteristics of the cystic artery; (3) intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; (4) cholecystectomy techniques.
Innovations and breakthroughs There are few reports concerning classification of the cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Some authors have classified it into two groups: GroupⅠcomprises variations of the cystic artery within the hepatobiliary triangle; and Group Ⅱ comprises variations of the cystic artery that approach the gallbladder beyond the hepatobiliary triangle. Other authors have divided cystic artery variations into three types: type 1, normal anatomy; type 2, more than one artery in Calot’s triangle; and type 3, no artery in Calot’s triangle. We present a new classification of cystic artery variations based on three groups. Group I shows the cystic artery passing within the Calot’s triangle. This includes two types: (1) single cystic artery, and (2) double cystic artery. Group Ⅱ shows the cystic artery situated outside Calot’s triangle. This group includes four variations: (1) cystic artery originating from the gastroduodenal artery; (2) cystic artery originating from the variant right hepatic artery; (3) cystic artery arising directly from the liver parenchyma; (4) cystic artery originating from the left hepatic artery. Group Ⅲ shows the cystic artery is compound in nature; the variant cystic artery was situated not only within Calot’s triangle, but also outside it. Furthermore, we found a new variant right hepatic artery (Figure 4), which has not been reported before.
Peer review The authors introduce a new classification of cystic artery variations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Their system is different from those reported previously. The new system divides the anatomic variations of the cystic artery into three groups according to the position of the cystic artery relative to Calot’s triangle, as seen by laparoscopy. The classification system should be useful to laparoscopic surgeons, and help reduce incidences of bile duct injury and intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
REFERENCES 1 Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 32-36 PubMed 2 Catani M, Guerricchio R, De Milito R, Capitano S, Chiaretti M, Guerricchio A, Manili G, Simi M. "Low- pressure" laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high risk patients (ASA III and IV): our experience. Chir Ital 2004; 56: 71-80 PubMed 3 Reardon PR, Kamelgard JI, Applebaum B, Rossman L, Brunicardi FC. Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases. World J Surg 1999; 23: 128-131; discussion 131-132 PubMed 4 Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Doi T, Kawachi K. Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy--the first 20 cases: is it an alternative to conventional LC? Eur J Surg 1998; 164: 623-625; discussion 626 PubMed 5 Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 2006; 136: 172-178 PubMed 6 Luketich JD, Fernando HC, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, Grondin SC, Schauer PR. Results of a randomized trial of HERMES-assisted versus non-HERMES-assisted laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1264-1266 PubMed 7 Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 6-16 PubMed 8 Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1091 PubMed 9 Ali MR, Bhaskerrao B, Wolfe BM. Robot-assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 468- 472 PubMed 10 Welter FH. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a never-ending success story? MMW Fortschr Med 2006; 148: 38-39 PubMed 11 Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC. Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 844-853 PubMed 12 Mori T, Ikeda Y, Okamoto K, Sakata K, Ideguchi K, Nakagawa K, Yasumitsu T. A new technique for two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 589-591 PubMed 13 Lichten JB, Reid JJ, Zahalsky MP, Friedman RL. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 867-872 PubMed 14 Gadacz TR. Update on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including a clinical pathway. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80: 1127- 1149 PubMed 15 Tebala GD, Innocenti P, Ciani R, Zumbo A, Fonsi GB, Bellini P, De Chiara F, Fittipaldi D, Hadjiamiri H, Lamaro S, Marinoni R. Identification of gallbladder pedicle anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chir Ital 2004; 56: 389- 396 PubMed 16 Kamitani S, Tsutamoto Y, Hanasawa K, Tani T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis with "inferior" cystic artery: a case report. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 5232-5234 PubMed 17 Tebala GD. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection without cystic duct and artery clipping. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 718-720 PubMed 18 Huscher CG, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 442-451 PubMed 19 De Silva WM, Sivananthan S, De Silva D, Fernando N. Biliary tract injury during cholecystectomy: a retrospective descriptive review of clinical features, treatment and outcome. Ceylon Med J 2006; 51: 132-136 PubMed 20 Targarona EM, Marco C, Balague C, Rodriguez J, Cugat E, Hoyuela C, Veloso E, Trias M. How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs. A comparison between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 322-326 PubMed 21 Z'graggen K, Aronsky D, Maurer CA, Klaiber C, Baer HU. Acute postoperative pancreatitis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of the Prospective Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery Study. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 1026-1030; discussion 1031 PubMed 22 El-Banna M, Abdel-Atty M, El-Meteini M, Aly S. Management of laparoscopic-related bowel injuries. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 779-782 PubMed 23 Hjelmqvist B. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as recorded in the Swedish laparoscopy registry. Eur J Surg Suppl 2000: 18-21 PubMed 24 Lillemoe KD, Petrofski JA, Choti MA, Venbrux AC, Cameron JL. Isolated right segmental hepatic duct injury: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 168-177 PubMed 25 Sawaya DE Jr, Johnson LW, Sittig K, McDonald JC, Zibari GB. Iatrogenic and noniatrogenic extrahepatic biliary tract injuries: a multi-institutional review. Am Surg 2001; 67: 473-477 PubMed 26 Thompson MH, Benger JR. Cholecystectomy, conversion and complications. HPB Surg 2000; 11: 373-378 PubMed 27 Taylor B. Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Ontario: does ICD-9 coding indicate true incidence? CMAJ 1998; 158: 481-485 28 Sarker SK, Chang A, Vincent C, Darzi SA. Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 238-244 29 McKenzie S, Schwartz R. The management of bile duct injuries occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Curr Surg 2006; 63: 20-23 30 Doganay M, Kama NA, Reis E, Kologlu M, Atli M, Gozalan U. Management of main bile duct injuries that occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 216 PubMed 31 Rocko JM, Di Gioia JM. Calot's triangle revisited. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 153: 410-414 PubMed 32 Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Li B. Laparoscopic anatomy of the cystic artery. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 593-595 PubMed 33 Thompson JE Jr, Bock R, Lowe DK, Moody WE 3rd. Vena cava injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6: 221-223 PubMed 34 Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 9-14 PubMed 35 Chen TH, Shyu JF, Chen CH, Ma KH, Wu CW, Lui WY, Liu JC. Variations of the cystic artery in Chinese adults. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 154-157 PubMed 36 Balija M, Huis M, Stulhofer M, Nikolic V. Contribution to the nomenclature of variations of the cystic artery. Chirurg 2001; 72: 154-158 PubMed 37 Suzuki M, Akaishi S, Rikiyama T, Naitoh T, Rahman MM, Matsuno S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Calot's triangle, and variations in cystic arterial supply. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 141-144 PubMed 38 Scott-Conner CE, Hall TJ. Variant arterial anatomy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 590-592 PubMed 39 Balija M, Huis M, Nikolic V, Stulhofer M. Laparoscopic visualization of the cystic artery anatomy. World J Surg 1999; 23: 703-707; discussion 707 PubMed 40 Cimmino PT, Bocchetti T, Izzo L. Anatomo-surgical considerations in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. G Chir 1992; 13: 149-151 PubMed 41 Larobina M, Nottle PD. Extrahepatic biliary anatomy at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is aberrant anatomy important? ANZ J Surg 2005; 75: 392-395 PubMed 42 Loukas M, Fergurson A, Louis RG Jr, Colborn GL. Multiple variations of the hepatobiliary vasculature including double cystic arteries, accessory left hepatic artery and hepatosplenic trunk: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28: 525- 528 PubMed 43 Mlakar B, Gadzijev EM, Ravnik D, Hribernik M. Anatomical variations of the cystic artery. Eur J Morphol 2003; 41: 31- 34 PubMed 44 Futara G, Ali A, Kinfu Y. Variations of the hepatic and cystic arteries among Ethiopians. Ethiop Med J 2001; 39: 133- 142 PubMed 45 Balija M, Huis M, Stulhofer M, Nikolic V. Contribution to the nomenclature of variations of the cystic artery. Chirurg 2001; 72: 154-158 PubMed 46 Ignjatovic D, Zivanovic V, Vasic G, Kovacevic-Mcilwaine I. Cystic artery anatomy characteristics in minimally invasive surgical procedures. Acta Chir Iugosl 2006; 53: 63-66 PubMed
S-Editor Liu Y L- Editor Kerr C E- Editor Wang HF
|
|
|
|
|
PubMed