|
|
|||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Fen-Yu Ren, Dong-Ming Piao, Xi-Xu Piao, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji 133000, Jilin Province, China Correspondence to: Fen-Yu Ren, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji 133000, Jilin Province, China. fenyu65@yahoo.com.cn Telephone: +86-433-2660061 Fax: +86-433-2513610 Received: 2007-03-28 Accepted: 2007-04-11
Abstract AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) in hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had not received a nucleoside analogue and who had failed in lamivudine (LVD) therapy.
METHODS:
Sixty-one patients were divided into three groups. Forty-two
patients who had not received a nucleoside analogue were randomized
into two groups: group A (n = 21) received LVD 100 mg/d and group B
RESULTS: Significantly more patients in group B (52.1% and 71.4%) had undetectable HBV DNA levels than in groups A (35.8% and 38%; P < 0.0001) and C (10.6% and 21.1%, P < 0.0001) at wk 24 and 48, respectively. At wk 48, ALT levels were normalized in more patients in group B (85.7%) than in groups A (76.2%) and C (74%).
CONCLUSION: ETV had a significantly higher response rate than LVD in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB who had not previously received a nucleoside analogue; ETV can effectively inhibit the replication of HBV DNA and normalize the levels of ALT in refractory CHB patients treated with LVD; and ETV is safe in clinical application.
© 2007 WJG. All rights reserved.
Key words: Entecavir; Lamivudine; Lamivudine refractory; Chronic hepatitis B, HBV DNA
Ren FY, Piao DM, Piao XX. A one-year trial of ETV in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(31): 4264-4267
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/13/4264.asp
INTRODUCTION More than 400 million people worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV)[1]. Suppression of HBV replication is a principal goal of long-term hepatitis B therapy[2]. Lamivudine (LVD) is the first potentially non-cytotoxic oral nucleoside analogue approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Studies of long-term LVD treatment in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B have found that maintenance of virologic suppression is associated with improved histologic findings in the liver[3,4]. However, prolonged treatment of chronic HBV infection with LVD is frequently associated with the development of mutations in the HBV polymerase gene conferring resistance to LVD[5-7]. The emergence of LVD resistance may result in a rebound in viral load, ALT elevation and progression of hepatic disease[8-11]. Preclinical and phase Ⅲ studies suggested ETV is a novel hepatitis B antiviral agent with potent antiviral activity against the HBV and LVD-resistant HBV[12-14]. 'The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ETV in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and compare the ETV and LVD therapy in patients treated with a nucleoside analogue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients
This trial
involves 61 adult patients from Yan Ban area in Jilin Province with
HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B enrolled between February 2006 to
March 2006 who received antiviral agents with activity against
hepatitis B, or LVD. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study
followed the study of HBeAg-positive patients reported by Chang
et al[12]. The patients aged between 19 and 68 years
and had HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver
function: a total serum bilirubin level of 2.5 mg per deciliter
(42.8 mmol/L)or
less; a prothrombin time not more than three seconds longer than
normal or a ratio not greater than 1.5; a serum albumin level of at
least 3.0 g per deciliter; and no histrory of variceal bleeding or
hepatic encephalopathy. Eligible patients also had detectable
hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for at least 24 wk before
screening, evidence of HBV DNA by any commercial assay at least 4 wk
before screening, and a serum alanine aminotransferase level
1.3-10.0 times that of the upper limit of normal at screening.
Exclusion criteria included co-infection with hepatitis C, D, or the
human immunodeficiency virus, the presence of other of liver
diseases; use of interferon, thymosin, antiviral agents with
activity against hepatitis B within 24 wk before randomization;
prior LVD therapy lasting more than The study was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the local regulatory bodies. All patients provided written informed consent.
Treatment protocols and study design The 61 patients were divided into three groups. Forty-two patients who had not received a nucleoside analogue were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 21) received LVD 100 mg/d and group B (n = 21) received ETV 0.5 mg/d. The remaing 19 refratory patients treated with LVD served as group C (n = 19), who switched to ETV 1.0 mg/d. HBV DNA levels were measured by PCR analysis at wk 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48. ALT, HBV serology and safety assessments were also conducted. All patients were treated for 48 wk.
Efficacy measures At 24 wk and/or 48 wk, the reduction in HBV DNA level and the proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion (HBeAg loss and the appearance of HBe antibody), and normalization of ALT were evaluated. Serum HBV DNA was measured using the PCR analysis. Liver function tests were performed by standard methods.
Safety analysis Measures of safety included adverse events, hematologic measurement, chemical measurement, vital signs, and deaths. The severity of adverse events was graded based on a three-point scale (mild, moderate, and severe), and causality was determined by the investigator. The safety was assessed throughout the treatment. Hepatitis flares during treatment were defined with elevation of the alanine aminotransferase level by more than twice the baseline level and more than 10 times the upper normal limit.
Statistical analysis Baseline characteristics of the patients were presented as means ± SE. Statistical analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat procedure. The Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences in proportion between treatment groups. Continuous data were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis test and Mann-Whithey test. A two-tailed P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS Study population All treatments were well matched with regard to baseline characteristics (Table 1). Of the 61 patients, 60 completed the treatment, while the remaining one drop out the study, and one group A patient withdrew at 32 wk.
Virological response At wk 24, significantly more patients in group B (52.1%) had undetectable HBV DNA levels than in groups A (35.8%; P < 0.0001) and C (10.6%, P < 0.0001). HBV DNA was negative at wk 48 in 8 (38%) patients treated with LVD (group A) and in 15 (71.4%) patients treated with ETV 0.5 mg/d (group B), and 4 (21.1%) patients switched to ETV 1.0 mg/d (group C). HBV DNA became negative at wk 12, 4 and 12, respectively in the three groups. Significantly more patients in group B had undetectable HBV DNA levels (71.4%) by PCR analysis than in group A (38%; P < 0.0001) (Figure 1). HBV DNA levels in group B fell throughout the treatment (Figure 2). The mean reduction in the serum HBV DNA levels at wk 48 was also greater in group B (5.9 log copies/mL) than in groups A (4.2 log copies/mL, P < 0.001) and C (4.3 log copies/mL). At wk 48, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion in group B (15%) was similar to group A (18%); and it was 6% in group C.
Biochemical response At wk 48, significantly more patients achieved normalization of ALT levels in group B (85.7%) than in groups A (76.2%) and C (74%). A mild flare-up without bilirubin alteration was observed only in one group A patient (Figure 3).
Safety The frequency of adverse events during treatment was similar among the three groups. The most frequent adverse events were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, cough, pyrexia, upper abdominal pain, fatigue, and diarrhea, most of which were of mild-to-moderate severety. No hepatocellular carcinoma, liver decompensation of death was recorded (Table 2). One virologic rebound due to resistance occurred in group C.
DISCUSSION Therapeutic options against hepatitis B virus remain a major clinical challenge. The goal of teatment is HBV DNA suppression, normalization of ALT levels and reduction in liver necroinflammation. Currently, Nucleoside analogs such as LVD, ADV and ETV are well tolerated and lower and normalize the serum HBV DNA and ALT levels[3,4,12-18]. However, the efficacy and safety profile of LVD, ADV and ETV had different clinical situations in the treatment of hepatitis B.
In this
study, ETV was associated with suppression of viral replication in
patients who had undetectable levels of HBV DNA 48 wk after the
start of treatment and with the magnitude of reduction in the level
of HBV DNA. ALT levels became normal in more patients after
treatment with ETV than with LVD, which was in agreement with a
previous study of patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B[12].
Although this suggests that ETV may be more effective than LVD in
preventing adverse clinical outcomes among patients with HBeAg-positive
chronic hepatitis B, a longer surveillance is necessary. In patients
with LVD-refractory HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, we found
that the switching to ETV can effectively inhibit the raplication of
HBV DNA and normalize the levels of ALT. These results were in
agreement with previous studies reported by Sherman M et al,
and Chang TT The tolerability and safety profiles of ETV therapy for patients who had not previously received a nucleoside analogue and for patients who switched to ETV were similar to those reported in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB, and there were no unexpected adverse effects[12-15]. On the basis of its extensive use in both chronic hepatitis B and HIV infection, LVD is established as a well-tolerated antiviral agent. However, continued surveillance is necessary to confirm its long-term safety. Liaw et al[19] showed that for patients with HBeAg-negative or HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B who had cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis, treatment with LVD slows the progression of liver disease, presumably by suppressing the viral replication and decreasing the resultant necroinflammatory response. ETV, The response rates of ETV were significantly higher than LVD in patients who had not previously received a nucleoside analogue, which demonstrated benefit as a primary therapy for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. The advent of more potent antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B offers the potential to control HBV DNA replication and to arrest or halt the progression of liver disease.
REFERENCES 1 Lai CL, Ratziu V, Yuen MF, Poynard T. Viral hepatitis B. Lancet 2003; 362: 2089-2094 PubMed 2 Liaw YF, Leung N, Guan R, Lau GK, Merican I. Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: an update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18: 239-245 PubMed 3 Lai CL, Chien RN, Leung NW, Chang TT, Guan R, Tai DI, Ng KY, Wu PC, Dent JC, Barber J, Stephenson SL, Gray DF. A one-year trial of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B. Asia Hepatitis Lamivudine Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 61-68 PubMed 4 Dienstag JL, Schiff ER, Wright TL, Perrillo RP, Hann HW, Goodman Z, Crowther L, Condreay LD, Woessner M, Rubin M, Brown NA. Lamivudine as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis B in the United States. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1256-1263 PubMed 5 Lau DT, Khokhar MF, Doo E, Ghany MG, Herion D, Park Y, Kleiner DE, Schmid P, Condreay LD, Gauthier J, Kuhns MC, Liang TJ, Hoofnagle JH. Long-term therapy of chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine. Hepatology 2000; 32: 828-834 PubMed 6 Liaw YF, Leung NW, Chang TT, Guan R, Tai DI, Ng KY, Chien RN, Dent J, Roman L, Edmundson S, Lai CL. Effects of extended lamivudine therapy in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. Asia Hepatitis Lamivudine Study Group. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 172-180 PubMed 7 Chang TT, Lai CL, Chien RN, Guan R, Lim SG, Lee CM, Ng KY, Nicholls GJ, Dent JC, Leung NW. Four years of lamivudine treatment in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19: 1276-1282 PubMed 8 Liaw YF. Impact of YMDD mutations during lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Antivir Chem Chemother 2001; 12 Suppl 1: 67-71 PubMed 9 Liaw YF, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Tsai SL, Chu CM. Acute exacerbation and hepatitis B virus clearance after emergence of YMDD motif mutation during lamivudine therapy. Hepatology 1999; 30: 567-572 PubMed 10 Dienstag JL, Goldin RD, Heathcote EJ, Hann HW, Woessner M, Stephenson SL, Gardner S, Gray DF, Schiff ER. Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 105-117 PubMed 11 Mutimer D. Hepatitis B virus infection: resistance to antiviral agents. J Clin Virol 2001; 21: 239-242 PubMed 12 Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, Gadano A, Sollano J, Chao YC, Lok AS, Han KH, Goodman Z, Zhu J, Cross A, DeHertogh D, Wilber R, Colonno R, Apelian D. A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1001-1010 PubMed 13 Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, Chang TT, Cheinquer H, Goodman Z, DeHertogh D, Wilber R, Zink RC, Cross A, Colonno R, Fernandes L. Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1011-1020 PubMed 14 Sherman M, Yurdaydin C, Sollano J, Silva M, Liaw YF, Cianciara J, Boron-Kaczmarska A, Martin P, Goodman Z, Colonno R, Cross A, Denisky G, Kreter B, Hindes R. Entecavir for treatment of lamivudine-refractory, HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 2039-2049 PubMed 15 Chang TT, Gish RG, Hadziyannis SJ, Cianciara J, Rizzetto M, Schiff ER, Pastore G, Bacon BR, Poynard T, Joshi S, Klesczewski KS, Thiry A, Rose RE, Colonno RJ, Hindes RG. A dose-ranging study of the efficacy and tolerability of entecavir in Lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1198-1209 PubMed 16 Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, Tong MJ, Sievert W, Shiffman ML, Jeffers L, Goodman Z, Wulfsohn MS, Xiong S, Fry J, Brosgart CL. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 808-816 PubMed 17 Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, Chang TT, Kitis G, Rizzetto M, Marcellin P, Lim SG, Goodman Z, Wulfsohn MS, Xiong S, Fry J, Brosgart CL. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 800-807 PubMed 18 Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, Chang TT, Kitis G, Rizzetto M, Marcellin P, Lim SG, Goodman Z, Ma J, Arterburn S, Xiong S, Currie G, Brosgart CL. Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2673-2681 PubMed 19 Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, Farrell G, Lee CZ, Yuen H, Tanwandee T, Tao QM, Shue K, Keene ON, Dixon JS, Gray DF, Sabbat J. Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1521-1531 PubMed
S- Editor Liu Y L- Editor Ma JY E- Editor Liu Y
|
|
|
|
|
PubMed