|
|
|||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Andreas Manouras, Emmanuel E Lagoudianakis, Dimitrios Dardamanis, Dimitrios K Tsekouras, Haridimos Markogiannakis, Michael Genetzakis, Nikolaos Pararas, Artemisia Papadima, Christos Triantafillou, Vagelogiannis Katergiannakis, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocrateion Hospital, Athens Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece Correspondence to: Andreas Manouras, MD, PhD, Associate Professor in General Surgery, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocrateion Hospital, Athens Medical School, University of Athens, Q. Sophias 114, Athens 11527, Greece. amanouras@hippocratio.gr Telephone: +30-697-7304422 Fax: +30-210-7707574 Received: 2007-03-03 Accepted: 2007-04-11
Abstract Intussusception in adults is rare. The clinical picture of intussusception in adults is subtle and the diagnosis is, therefore, elusive. The presence of a structural abnormality in the great majority of the adult cases mandates high clinical suspicion. Gastrointestinal lipomas are rare benign tumors and intussusception due to a gastrointestinal lipoma constitutes an infrequent clinical entity. The present report describes a case of jejunojejunal intussusception in an adult with a history of severe episodes of hematochezia and colicky upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis was suspected preoperatively but computed tomography scan could not rule out malignancy. Exploratory laparotomy revealed jejunojejunal intussusception secondary to a lipoma which was successfully treated with segmental intestinal resection.
© 2007 WJG. All rights reserved.
Key words: Intussusception; Small bowel; Gastro-intestinal lipoma; Jejunal tumor
Manouras A, Lagoudianakis EE, Dardamanis D, Tsekouras DK, Markogiannakis H, Genetzakis M, Pararas N, Papadima A, Triantafillou C, Katergiannakis V. Lipoma induced jejunojejunal intussusception. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(26): 3641-3644
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/13/3641.asp
INTRODUCTION Since its first description in 1674[1], intussusception is considered a disease of infancy and early childhood and is the leading cause of acute abdomen in this age group, second only to appendicitis[2]. However, in approximately 5% of cases, it may also be encountered in adulthood accounting for 1% of adult intestinal obstructions[3,4]. Structural lesions are responsible for the majority of the cases in adults with only a minority being idiopathic in contrast to childhood intussusception[5]. In addition, the possibility of malignancy as the causative lesion should be considered in adult intussusception mandating surgical exploration in the majority of cases[6]. Adult patients with intussusception may present with acute abdominal pain necessitating surgical consultation (acute abdomen) but intermittent bowel obstruction with negative clinical and radiological findings is the usual case scenario[7]. The diagnosis can be elusive for a long period and is frequently established during laparotomy for the obstructive symptoms. Neoplasia, both benign and malignant, is the leading cause of intestinal intussusception in adults[6]. Lipomas of the small intestine are rare benign tumors with no malignant potential, most commonly encountered incidentally, since they are usually asymptomatic. Symptomatic lipoma manifestations are hemorrhage or intestinal obstruction[8]. Due to their intramural location, lipomas can also serve as the leading point for intussusception. We report on a case of an adult patient that presented to our department for investigation of recent episodes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and colicky abdominal pain. The causative lesion proved to be a jejunojejunal intussusception due to a lipoma. A review of the literature is also performed regarding this rare association revealing the diagnostic and therapeutic debates that exist.
CASE REPORT A 55-year-old man was admitted to our department with a 3-mo history of intermittent rectal bleeding. During this period, he had two episodes of hematochezia and acute abdominal pain located in the upper abdomen. During the first episode, physical and endoscopic (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy) examination revealed no pathology. The patient had no past history of peptic ulcer disease, alteration in bowel habits, melena or weight loss. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures including barium enema, abdominal computed tomography (CT), angiography, and serum tumor markers were normal. A decrease of hemoglobin levels from 14 to 12 g/dL was noted. He received no blood transfusion and was discharged. During the second episode, hemoglobin was 8.8 g/dL and the pain had become constant. Repetition of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy revealed no special findings. On the contrary, CT scan showed marked small bowel wall thickening and also detected a leading point with fat density (Figure 1). Small intestinal intussusception caused by a lipoma was considered to be a probable diagnosis. Abdominal conventional radiographs showed dilation of the jejunum and enteroclysis demonstrated an obstructing lesion (Figure 1). At laparotomy, 40 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz, a jejunojejunal intussusception was identified. Manual reduction of the intussusception was performed. Palpation of an intraluminal mass forced us to make an enterotomy incision that revealed a 4 cm × 4 cm pedunculated lipoma (Figure 2). The presence of irreversible ischemia in a small portion of the intussusceptum necessitated segmental resection and primary anastomosis. Pathologic examination of the lesion confirmed our clinical impression of a lipoma. The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. At 3 years following surgery he is free of symptoms without any evidence of recurrence.
DISCUSSION Intussusception in adulthood is unusual, with an incidence of approximately 2-3 cases per population of 1 000 000 per year[9]. There are distinctive features of adult intussusception compared to the childhood cases in causes, presentation and management. Although childhood intussusception is considered idiopathic in 90% of cases, a demonstrable mechanical cause can be revealed in adult intussusception in over 90% of cases[3,5]. Moreover, the majority of intussusceptions in pediatric patients are seen during the first year of life and have no demonstrable structural cause while cases occurring later than the 5th year of life commonly have a causative lesion such as polyps, lymphoma, Meckel’s diverticulum, or Henloch-Schoenlein porpura[10]. Neoplasms are the most frequent causes of adult intussusception. The site of the intussusception is associated with the possibility of malignancy with colocolonic intussusception reported having a neoplasia as the lead point in 69% of cases and malignancy in 70% of them[6]. In the small bowel, neoplasia is also the leading causative lesion (57%) but malignancy is less frequent (30%)[6]. Adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant lesion in the colon whereas metastatic melanoma accounts for the majority of the malignant cases in the small bowel. Rarely, adenocarcinoma, lymphoma and leiomyosarcoma have been reported to be the leading point of small bowel intussusception[3,4]. Benign lesions acting as lead points of intussusceptions are most commonly pedunculated such as polyps, adenomatous in colon or Peutz-Jeghers in the small bowel, and lipomas. Less common aetiologies include postoperative factors (adhesions, suture lines, intestinal tubes) as well as Meckel’s diverticulum, celiac sprue, HIV infection and intramural hematoma[3,4]. Lipomas of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are encountered with decreasing order of frequency in the colon (65%-75%), small intestine (20%-25%), stomach, and esophagus. They are the second most common benign small bowel tumors, leiomyomas being the most frequent. Their usual location in the small intestine is ileum (50%) while jejunum is the least common. The peak age of incidence is in the 6th-7th decades of life and it appears that females are more prone to lipomas. Malignant degeneration has never been reported. GIT lipomas originate in the submucosa in 90% of cases and usually are solitary (85%-90%) with variable size ranging from 1 to 30 cm. In general, they form an intramural, discrete, smooth or lobulated, round or ovoid, soft mass covered by intact mucosa but occasionally they protrude subserosally. Although usually asymptomatic, they can give rise to symptoms related to their size and location. Lesions less than 1 cm are considered incapable of producing symptoms, while 75% of those greater than 4 cm are symptomatic. The symptoms of lipomas are the result of intussusception (16%-19% of lipoma-associated surgery), intestinal obstruction (occlusion of lumen by a large protruding lesion, retrograde prolapse of a polypoid lipoma of duodenum into pylorus, volvulus of the small intestine due to subserosal lipoma) and hemorrhage due to ulceration of the overlying mucosa caused by direct pressure from the lipoma or due to intussusception per se[8,11,12]. The unique features of adult intussusception compared to childhood type also involve symptomatology apart from aetiology. In contrast to the acute presentation of childhood intussusception, the adult type usually has a subacute or chronic onset. Fewer than 20% of cases present acutely with complete bowel obstruction. A palpable abdominal mass is present in only 7% to 42% of cases[4,11,12] . Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required. Long standing colicky abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, distention and GIT bleeding are common but nonspecific. The diagnosis is often made at the time of laparotomy, since the presenting symptoms and signs are commonly non-diagnostic. According to the literature, only 32% to 50% of cases are diagnosed preoperatively, despite the evolution of imaging methods[3-5,13,14]. Imaging studies aid the diagnostic process. Plain abdominal films are non-specific and commonly demonstrate the presence of multiple air-fluid levels suggestive of mechanical obstruction. Rarely, a mass lesion or intraluminal air trapped between the walls of the intussusceptum and intussuscipiens (air crescent sign) can be shown in the plain abdominal radiograph but both findings lack specificity and sensitivity to diagnose intussusception[15]. Barium meal or enema may demonstrate the intussusception with the characteristic finding of the coiled spring appearance while the stretched spring sign has been associated with vascular compromise[16]. Barium examinations are restricted to the work up of a patient with subtle findings and should be avoided in the acute setting due to the risk of bowel rupture and barium peritonitis. Ultrasound is usually the first modality to be recruited. It may evaluate acute abdominal complaints and bowel obstruction in both children and adults in the emergency room. Intussusception can be diagnosed based on the findings of the “target-like” sign, the “doughnut” sign when the transducer is oriented transversely to the intussusception, the “trident” sign when the transducer is positioned longitudinally, and the “pseudo kidney” sign when it is visualized obliquely [17-19]. Ultrasound has the advantages of being a fast and real time examination and, with the use of the color Doppler capabilities; it can be helpful in the determination of vascular obstruction. However, it is operator-dependent and the presence of distended bowel decreases the ability to demonstrate the site of the obstruction. Computed tomography is the imaging method of choice for diagnosing intussusception[12]. Intussusception, on CT scans, appears as one of the following: (1) a mass lesion, representing a thickened segment of bowel, (2) a crescent-like, eccentric low-attenuation fatty mass, representing entrapped mesenteric fat, (3) a rim of contrast material encircling the intussusceptum, representing coating of the opposing bowel walls of the intussusceptum and intussuscipiens, (4) air bubbles peripheral to the upper part of the intussusception, which, like contrast material, may enter between the opposing bowel walls, and (5) a leading mass[12,20,21]. Furthermore, CT can give indirect signs of bowel ischemia such as the presence of intraperitoneal fluid and the status of fluid or gas collection in the intestinal wall. Although CT diagnosis of intussusception is relatively straightforward in the majority of cases, negative findings do not preclude intussusception. The sensitivity of CT scan to correctly diagnose intussusception has been reported from 71.4%-87.5% while its specificity in adults has been reported to be 100% as verified by the subsequent surgery [21-24]. However, particular caution should be instituted in the cases of incidentally discovered intussusception in an otherwise asymptomatic patient during abdominal CT examination. Follow up examinations rather than surgery should be employed in such cases as long as no lead point can be identified and the intussusception is less than 3.5 cm long[25,26]. A diagnostic technique that may be used, depending on the nature of symptoms, is capsule endoscopy. Although obstructive symptoms are contradictory to capsule endoscopy, this new modality for the evaluation of the small bowel could be very helpful in cases with long standing abdominal pain and negative radiologic examination, either CT or barium studies, to exclude the possibility of malignancy. Intussusception in capsule endoscopy has been reported to appear as a mass lesion of the small bowel[27,28]. The evaluation of incidentally discovered intussusception in adults for the presence of a structural lead point could be another indication for capsule endoscopy[29]. Moreover, enteroscopy with the push enteroscope can examine approximately 70-150 cm of the small bowel and double balloon enteroscopy can examine the full length of the small bowel both antegrade and retrograde[30]. Those techniques are advantageous over capsule endoscopy in that a biopsy specimen can be acquired from any lesion discovered and even endoscopic polypectomy is feasible through the working channel of these scopes [31]. The treatment plan for adult intussusception consists of segmental resection and primary restoration of the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract, given the high incidence of structural causes and the 6% to 30% malignant nature of the lesions in adults[3-7,12-16]. However, the extent of resection and whether or not the intussusception should be initially reduced remain controversial. The dangers of transperitoneal, vascular, and intraluminal seeding after exposing and handling friable and edematous malignant tissues has led many surgeons to advocate en bloc resection of the lesion. Others argue that routine en bloc resection might result in unnecessarily extensive bowel resection. All surgeons agree, though, that reduction should not be attempted if there are signs of irreversible bowel ischemia, inflammation or when malignancy is being suspected[1,13,31,32]. Intussusceptions of the duodenum or rectum are possible exceptions to en-block resection because reduction could result in preservation of the duodenum and avoidance of abdominoperineal resection, respectively. We believe that reduction could also be tried safely in cases where diagnosis of a benign lesion has been reached preoperatively. In our case, CT density measurement had shown that the lead point was consistent with a lipoma of the small bowel. Although reduction was successful and enterotomy verified the CT findings, resection was deemed mandatory due to ischemia of a small portion of the small bowel wall that failed to reverse.
REFERENCES
1 de Moulin D. Paul Barbette, M.D.: a
seventeenth-century Amsterdam author of best-selling textbooks.
Bull Hist Med 2 Akcay MN, Polat M, Cadirci M, Gencer B. Tumor-induced ileo-ileal invagination in adults. Am Surg 1994; 60: 980-981
3 Eisen LK, Cunningham JD, Aufses AH Jr.
Intussusception in adults: institutional review. J Am Coll Surg
1999; 188: 390- 4 Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 134-138 PubMed 5 Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM. The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 88-94
6 Felix EL, Cohen MH, Bernstein AD,
Schwartz JH. Adult intussusception; case report of recurrent
intussusception and
7 Weilbaecher D, Bolin JA, Hearn D, Ogden
W 2nd. Intussusception in adults. Review of 160 cases. Am J Surg
1971;
8 Zografos G, Tsekouras DK, Lagoudianakis
EE, Karantzikos G. Small intestinal lipoma as a cause of massive 9 Brayton D, Norris WJ. Intussusception in adults. Am J Surg 1954; 88: 32-43 PubMed 10 McCollough M, Sharieff GQ. Abdominal pain in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006; 53: 107-137, vi PubMed
11 Thompson WM. Imaging and findings of
lipomas of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol
2005; 184: 1163-
12 Huang BY, Warshauer
DM. Adult intussusception: diagnosis and clinical relevance.
Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:
13 Barussaud M, Regenet
N, Briennon X, de Kerviler B, Pessaux P, Kohneh-Sharhi N, Lehur PA,
Hamy A, Leborgne J, le 14 Haas EM, Etter EL, Ellis S, Taylor TV. Adult intussusception. Am J Surg 2003; 186: 75-76 PubMed
15 White SJ, Blane CE.
Intussusception: additional observations on the plain radiograph.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139:
16 Gourtsoyiannis NC,
Papakonstantinou O, Bays D, Malamas M. Adult enteric intussusception:
additional observations on 17 Boyle MJ, Arkell LJ, Williams JT. Ultrasonic diagnosis of adult intussusception. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 617-618
18 Alessi V, Salerno G.
The "hay-fork" sign in the ultrasono-graphic diagnosis of
intussusception. Gastrointest Radiol 1985; 19 Anderson DR. The pseudokidney sign. Radiology 1999; 211: 395-397 PubMed
20 Gayer G, Zissin R,
Apter S, Papa M, Hertz M. Pictorial review: adult intussusception-a
CT diagnosis. Br J Radiol 2002;
21 Gayer G, Apter S,
Hofmann C, Nass S, Amitai M, Zissin R, Hertz M. Intussusception in
adults: CT diagnosis. Clin Radiol
22 Erkan N, Haciyanli M, Yildirim M, Sayhan
H, Vardar E, Polat AF. Intussusception in adults: an unusual and
challenging 23 Zubaidi A, Al-Saif F, Silverman R. Adult intussusception: a retrospective review. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1546-1551
24 Barbiera F, Cusma S, Di Giacomo D,
Finazzo M, Lo Casto A, Pardo S. Adult intestinal intussusception:
comparison
25 Jain P, Heap SW. Intussusception of the
small bowel discovered incidentally by computed tomography.
Australas Radiol
26 Lvoff N, Breiman RS, Coakley FV, Lu Y,
Warren RS. Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult
small-bowel
27 Culliford A, Daly J, Diamond B, Rubin M,
Green PH. The value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with
28 Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK,
Fleischer DE. Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule
endoscopy with
29 Keroack MD, Peralta R, Abramson SD,
Misdraji J. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital.
Weekly
30 Sun B, Rajan E, Cheng S, Shen R, Zhang
C, Zhang S, Wu Y, Zhong J. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact
of double-
31 Hadithi M, Heine GD, Jacobs MA, van
Bodegraven AA, Mulder CJ. A prospective study comparing video
capsule
32 Chiang TH, Chang CY, Huang KW, Liou JM,
Lin JT, Wang HP. Jejunojejunal intussusception secondary to a
jejunal lipoma
33 Akcay MN, Aydinli B, Gursan N, Balik AA,
Onbas O, Ozturk G. Intussusception in an adult patient with mild
intermittent
S- Editor Zhu LH L- Editor Alpini GD E- Editor Ma WH
|
|
|
|
|
PubMed