|
Ting-Ting Li,
Li-Na Zhao, Zhi-Guo Liu, Ying Han, Dai-Ming Fan, Institute of
Gastroenterology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth
Military Medical University, Xi抋n
710032, Shaanxi Province, China
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China, No.30400016, the Elite Program of FMMU, No.4138A4324 and the
Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973
Program), No. 2004CB518702
Co-first-authors: Ting-Ting Li and Li-Na Zhao
Correspondence to: Zhi-Guo Liu, M.D., Ph.D., Institute of
Gastroenterology, 15 West Changle Road, Xijing Hospital Xi'an
710032, Shaanxi Province, China. liuzhiguo@fmmu.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-29-83375229 Fax: +86-29-82539041
Received: 2004-07-23 Accepted: 2004-10-20
Abstract
Infection with human papillomaviruses is strongly associated with
the development of multiple cancers including esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma. The HPV E6 gene is essential for the oncogenic
potential of HPV. The regulation of apoptosis by oncogene has been
related to carcinogenesis closely; therefore, the modulation of E6
on cellular apoptosis has become a hot research topic recently.
Inactivation of the pro-apoptotic tumor suppressor p53 by E6 is an
important mechanism by which E6 promotes cell growth; it is expected
that inactivation of p53 by E6 should lead to a reduction in
cellular apoptosis, numerous studies showed that E6 could in fact
sensitize cells to apoptosis. The molecular basis for apoptosis
modulation by E6 is poorly understood. In this article, we will
present an overview of observations and current understanding of
molecular basis for E6-induced apoptosis.
Ó2005
The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Key words: HPV; E6;
Apoptosis; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Li TT, Zhao LN, Liu ZG, Han Y, Fan DM. Regulation of apoptosis by
the papillomavirus E6 oncogene. World J Gastroenterol 2005;
11(7): 931-937
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/11/931.asp
INTRODUCTION
Papillomaviruses are small DNA viruses that infect various
epithelial tissues. Papillomaviruses replicate in the stratified
layers of skin and mucosa, and usually give rise to benign lesions
such as warts or papillomas. Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) can be
classified as either high-risk or low-risk type on the basis of
their clinical associations. The high-risk HPV types, of which type
16 (HPV-16) is the most prevalent type, are commonly associated with
lesions that can progress to high-grade
intraepithelial neoplasia and ultimately to carcinoma, while the
low-risk HPV types, such as HPV-6 and -11, are found associated
primarily with benign lesions, which rarely progress to cancer[1].
A subgroup of low risk HPV types, including HPV-5 and -8, are
frequently detected in skin cancers that develop from multiple flat
warts when combined with certain physical and chemical carcinogens[2].
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS AND THE
DEVELOPMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
Squamous cell cancer of Esophagus is the pathological type that is
most closely associated with HPV infection in gastrointestinal
malignancies. Syrjanen group found condyloma-like lesions in the
specimens of esophageal cancer in 1982, which links HPV infection to
esophageal cancer for the first time[3]. This finding was
soon substantiated by the demonstration of HPV structural proteins
in these lesions using immunohistochemistry[4]. Numerous
reports have been published since then. However, there is a wide
variation on HPV infection rates among different studies, ranging
from 0% to 88%, which make it still hard to consolidate the role of
HPV (Table 1). This variation seems to be influenced by methodology
of detection, pathological grading, geographic distribution and
genetic sensitivity to HPV infection. Even though different opinions
do exist, a large portion of them strongly suggest a causal role for
HPV in esophageal carcinogenesis, or at least consider HPV as a
possible contributor in those HPV prevalent areas such as China and
South Africa.
Table 1
Detection of human papillomavirus in esophageal squamous cell
carcinomas1
|
Area
or Country
|
HPV
positive |
Dectection
method |
Reference |
| % |
n |
| Germany |
0 |
0/23 |
PCR |
[90] |
| Japan |
0 |
0/4 |
IHC |
[91] |
| Italy |
4.4 |
2/45 |
PCR |
[92] |
| United States |
4.5 |
1/22 |
PCR |
[93] |
| Belgium |
4.8 |
1/21 |
PCR |
[94] |
| Linxian,
China |
6.7 |
2/32 |
PCR |
[95] |
| Japan |
16 |
12/75 |
PCR |
[96] |
| Northern
China |
16.8 |
17/101 |
PCR |
[97] |
| Northern
China |
16.9 |
118/700 |
ISH |
[6] |
| Cixian, China |
20.3 |
26/128 |
PCR |
[98] |
| Hungary |
39 |
32/82 |
PCR |
[99] |
| Japan |
42 |
20/48 |
PCR |
[100] |
| South Africa |
46 |
23/50 |
PCR |
[101] |
| Italy |
47 |
8/17 |
PCR |
[102] |
| Anyang, China |
63.3 |
19/30 |
PCR |
[103] |
| Shanxi and Anyang,
China |
64 |
31/48 |
PCR |
[7] |
| Guangdong, China |
65.5 |
96/176 |
PCR |
[104] |
| Beijing,
China |
70 |
28/40 |
ISH |
[105] |
| Northern
India |
74 |
20/27 |
PCR |
[106] |
| Beijing,
China |
83.3 |
15/18 |
PCR |
[107] |
| Mexico |
88 |
20/23 |
PCR |
[14] |
The
incidence of esophageal cancer in Anyang area is one of the highest
in China, with a mortality rate of 132´105,
significantly higher than the one of 52´105
in neighboring area. A 132-case survey in this area showed that the
infection rate of HPV-16 is much higher than neighboring area, 1.9
fold by PCR (72% vs 37%) and 2.2 fold by immunohistochemisty
(49% vs 22%), and the infection of HPV is closely related
with the degree of dysplasia[5-26]. Compared to normal
adjacent tissues, samples from esophageal carcinoma showed
significantly higher infection rate for HPV[13,20].The
most frequently detected types of HPV in esophageal cancer are
HPV-16 and -18[27].
Some indirect or direct evidences have been shown
recently to further substantiate the causal role of HPV. When the
genomes of HPV-16 and -18 without E1 and E2 were transfected
transiently into esophageal cancer cell, these viral genomes
replicated in the absence of E1 and E2, which suggest specific host
nuclear factors in esophageal squamous epithelial cells may support
HPV replication[28]. Other researchers have reported that
E6 gene can actually associate with the nuclear matrix of esophageal
carcinoma cell. Evidence from animal studies showed that persistent
papillomatosis and carcinomas in cattle can be experimentally
reproduced with bovine papillomavirus 4 (BPV 4) infections in these
animals. Up to 96% of the cancer-bearing animals have concomitant
papillomas, and the progression from benign papilloma to carcinomas
could be clearly identified[29]. Recently an immortal
esophageal cell line was established by transferring HPV 18E6E7 into
fetal esophageal epithelium; this cell line showed gradual change
from preimmortal, immortal, precancerous to malignantly transformed
stages upon prolonged cultivation without any co-carcinogens, which
provided valuable direct proof on the role of HPV in carcinogenesis
process of esophageal carcinoma[30,31].
The major role of HPV might be in the early stage
of carcinogenesis since it has been shown in several studies that
compared to esophagitis, precancerous leisions showed more HPV
infection (96% vs 26%), while in advanced esophageal cancer
specimens, the positive rate leveled off a little (88%)[25].
The hypothesis might be that HPV play its role in near-normal
differentiating cells; this differentiating status is needed for HPV
to replicate and when these cells acquire malignant phenotype
changes step by step, the differentiation process is reversed. At
this stage, HPV will have to face hostile environments to replicate.
This may also explain the wide variation on positive rates when
detecting HPV in esophageal cancer specimens since the pathological
grading may vary greatly. In this aspect, the relation of HPV with
esophageal cancer is somehow like the one of HBV with hepatocellular
carcinoma. In benign tissue of infected liver such as cirrhosis,
HBeAg and HBcAg were easily detected, but after malignant changes
happened following virus infection, it became much harder to detect[32].
Multiple factors besides HPV are considered in
carcinogenesis of esophageal cancer, such as some chemicals (nitrosamines,
mycotoxins, cigarette smoke, excessive alcohol intake), nutritional
deficiencies and physical factors (hot food), thus making it very
hard to clearly characterize the significance of HPV in esophageal
cancer. More insights will be needed to fully demonstrate the
mechanisms involved. Before that it might be hard to draw a final
conclusion on the causal role of HPV in esophageal carcinogenesis.
The
transforming properties of high-risk HPVs primarily reside in two
genes, E6 and E7, which are consistently expressed in HPV-positive
cervical cancers and cancer-derived cell lines[33]. The
sustained expression of E6 and E7 is essential to maintain the
transformed state of HPV-positive cells[34]. Independent
of E7, E6 exhibits important biological activities. The modulation
of E6 in apoptosis will be the focus of this review. However, due to
the technical difficulty to establish a normal esophageal
keratinocyte cell line, most studies were carried out in
keratinocytes from foreskin or skin, or even in unrelated cell
types.
PILLOMAVIRUS E6 PROTEINS
The papillomavirus E6s are relatively small proteins. For example,
HPV-16 E6 protein is a small protein of 151 amino acids (Figure 1).
E6 proteins from different HPV types or among the animal and human
papillomaviruses show moderate amino acid homology. The common
feature of most E6 proteins is the presence of four putative
Cys-X-X-Cys motifs that are capable of binding zinc[35-37].
The importance of Cys-X-X-Cys motifs for E6 proteins has been
implicated in functions such as transcriptional activation,
transformation, immortalization, and association with cellular
proteins[37-42]. There is a PDZ-binding motif in
high-risk HPV's E6
that is important for association with PDZ containing proteins[43,44].
A phosphorylation site for protein kinase A on E6 has also been
identified[45].
Figure
1(PDF) Sequence of HPV-16 E6 protein.
Single-letter designations are used to represent the amino acids.
The sequence is arranged into a zinc finger configuration. The amino
acid residues (121KKQR124) essential for nuclear import and the PDZ
domain-binding motif (148ETQL151) are marked. T149 is a putative
phosphorylation site for protein kinase A.
Localization
of E6 has been controversial and complex, partly due to its very low
level in the cells. Nevertheless, E6 proteins have been localized to
the nuclear, cytoplasmic, and non-nuclear membrane (including Golgi
membrane) fractions in a variety of cells[46,47]. A
recent study showed that HPV-18 E6 localization is an actively
controlled process[47]. Nuclear entry of HPV-16 E6 was
shown to occur via several pathways[48]. Some recent
studies also revealed differences in cellular localization between
E6 proteins from high-risk and low-risk HPVs[47].
Non-specific
double-stranded DNA-binding by E6 has been observed in vitro[37,49].
Sequence-specifically binding to the HPV long control region has
also been described for HPV-16 E6[50]. Recently, specific
recognition of Holiday junctions by E6 from high-risk HPVs was
demonstrated[51,52].
The oncogenic activities of E6 have been
demonstrated in multiple biological assays. These include
immortalization of primary human epithelial cells, transformation of
established mouse fibroblasts, transcriptional activation,
resistance to terminal differentiation of human keratinocytes,
modulation of apoptosis, and tumorigenesis in animals[53].
Some recent studies showed that E6 played an essential role in HPV
life cycle[54]. Although E6, along with E7, efficiently
immortalizes primary human epithelial cells, is not sufficient in
induction of human cell transformation; additional alterations are
required for the cells to be fully transformed[55].
Association
of E6 with p53 is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase E6AP that leads
to the degradation of p53 by the ubiquitination pathway[56,57].
One of the most important p53- induced gene product is the universal
cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21Waf1/Cip1[58].
Notably, posttranscriptional down regulation of p21 by E6 has also
been reported in several normal cell types[59].
Consistent with these observations, differential expression of p53
and p21 in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions infected with
HPV has also been observed[60]. E6 also has functions
independent of inactivating p53 and has been shown to interact with
multiple additional cellular proteins[53]. These include
the pro-apoptotic protein Bak, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, and
the DNA repair protein MGMT and XRCC1[61,62].
MODULATION OF APOPTOSIS BY E6
Apoptosis is a genetically programed process of cellular destruction
that is indispensable for the normal development and homeostasis of
multi-cellular organisms[63].
Apoptosis is characterized by plasma membrane blebbing,
condensation, and fragmentation of cells and nuclei, degradation of
chromosomal DNA into nucleosomal units[64]. Apoptosis
serves to eliminate cells that are no longer required or potentially
dangerous, such as radiation-damaged, aberrantly growing due to
oncogene activation, and virally infected cells. Regulation of
apoptosis is very important in terms of pathogenesis of diseases.
Inappropriate occurrence of apoptosis results in neurodegenerative
diseases and AIDS, while the failure of appropriate apoptosis
contributes to autoimmune diseases and cancer. Many viral proteins
have been found to modulate apoptosis[65]. Both pro- and
anti-apoptotic activities for papillomavirus E6 have been described.
While the anti-apoptotic function of E6 can be attributed in part to
its ability to degrade p53, little is known regarding how E6
sensitizes cells to apoptosis.
INDUCTION AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION OF APOPTOTIC PATHWAYS
The apoptotic signal may originate endogenously, for example, from
DNA damage, uncoordinated induction of cell cycle, or disruption of
the cellular metabolism. This pathway involves the mitochondria and
more specifically cytochrome c, the protein localized in the inner
mitochondrial membrane and the inter-membrane space[66].
During apoptosis, cytochrome c is released in the cytosol and
together with Apaf-1, activates procaspase 9. Activated caspase 9
then cleaves and activates the executioner caspase 3, an event that
leads to the cleavage of other death substrates, cellular and
nuclear morphological changes, and ultimately to cell death[67].
Apoptotic signals can also be triggered externally once the suitable
surface death receptors are ligated. For example, the Fas
(CD95/APO-1) receptor transduces apoptotic signals upon
cross-linking with the Fas ligand (FasL). FasL binding triggers
trimerization of the Fas receptor and recruitment on the cytoplasmic
death domain DD of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), which
includes the adaptor FADD and pro-caspase 8 as crucial physiological
death effectors. Coupling of pro-caspase 8 to Fas results in
proteolytic activation of caspase 8. Two pathways have been shown
for the signal transduction downstream of caspase 8, which are used
in different cell types (types I and II)[68]. In type I cells,
caspase 8 directly activates procaspase 3; in type II cells, caspase
8 cleaves Bid, a proapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family[69,70]. The
cleaved Bid translocates to the mitochondria and stimulates the
release of cytochrome c (Figure 2).
Figure 2(PDF)
Modulation of apoptosis by E6.
The pathways of cell
proliferation and apoptosis are tightly coupled. Inappropriate
proliferation of somatic cells may trigger apoptosis. Activation of
p53 by DNA damage induces either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis[71].
The cytostatic effect of p53 is largely mediated by transcriptional
activation of p21, whereas the apoptotic effect is mediated by
transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic genes including BAX and
PUMA[72,73]. Compared to many normal tissues, cancer cells are
highly sensitized to apoptotic signals, and survive only because
they have acquired lesions such as loss of p53 that prevent or
impede cell death[71]. Much effort has gone into determining the
effects of p53 inactivation on the response of cancer cells to the
therapeutic agents. The results have been conflicting, with some
studies indicating enhanced sensitivity and others indicating
increased resistance[74]. For example, one study showed that the
p53-deficient cells were sensitized to the effects of DNA-damaging
agents as a result of the failure to induce expression of p21, while
resistant to the effects of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil; p21
was shown to inhibit Cdc2-associated apoptosis[75]. Inappropriate
activation of Cdc2 has been implicated or shown to be required for
apoptotic cell death[76,77]. In some other systems, however,
inactivation of Cdc2 increased the level of apoptosis[78]. The
discrepancy regarding Cdc2's contribution
to cell death or survival probably depends on phosphorylation of its
downstream targets including BAD and survivin[79-81].
So far, numerous
studies addressing the role of E6 in apoptosis have been reported
(Figure 2). Since different systems have been used, conflicting and
sometimes confusing results have been obtained. As cell types could
affect experimental results, we will first focus on apoptosis
modulation by E6 in its natural host cells, the keratinocytes or
keratinocytes-derived cancer cells. Some interesting observation
made in other cell types will be discussed in the third section. For
additional information, please see other related reviews[82].
E6 MODULATION OF
APOPTOSIS IN HPV NATURAL HOST CELLS
In primary human
foreskin keratinocytes, expression of HPV 16 E6 slightly increased
spontaneous apoptosis[83,84]. After induction with chemotherapeutic
agents such as cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin C, enhanced
sensitivity in E6 expressing cells was observed[85]. In contrast, E6
inhibited apoptosis during serum- and calcium-induced
differentiation of human foreskin keratinocytes[86]. E6 expression
correlated with prolonged expression of Bcl-2, reduced elevation of
Bax, and loss of p53[86]. While the role of Bcl-2 and Bax in this
process remains to be determined, p53 inactivation or E6BP binding
do not appear to be essential[87]. Furthermore, co-expression of E6
abrogated E7-mediated apoptosis by TNF[84].
In human
keratinocytes immortalized by E6, low levels of apoptosis as
compared to the non-immortalized control cells were observed after
CD95 (Fas) agonist treatment[88]. Interestingly, in addition to p53
and p21, protein levels of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Flip
were reduced. Proteosomal inhibition increased the susceptibility of
E6 expressing cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis. But it remains to be
determined whether this sensitization is due to increased protein
levels of E6, p53, or some other molecules. In another study, E6
reduced UVC-, mitomycin C, and serum starvation-induced apoptosis in
the immortalized human keratinocytes (HaCaT) bearing mutated alleles
of p53[89,90].
Expression of HPV-16
E6 in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells where the endogenous HPV-18 E6
and E7 transcription were repressed, slightly increased the number
of apoptotic cells after prolonged incubation[91]. However,
expression of E6 to allow E7 to induce apoptosis is implicated in
this study. Similarly, intracellular targeting of HPV-16 E6 by
E6-binding polypeptide resulted in apoptosis of HPV-16-positive
cervical cancer cells[92]. In contrast, HPV-16 E6 expression in
cervical carcinoma C33A cells leads to atractyloside-induced
apoptosis[93]. C33A cells do not contain HPV but express mutant p53.
In summary,
expression of E6 in primary human keratinocytes or keratinocyte-derived
cells consistently induces low level of spontaneous apoptosis.
Depending on the agents used, E6 could either sensitize or inhibit
keratinocytes to apoptosis after treatment with chemotherapeutic
agents.
MODULATION OF
PROGRAMED CELL DEATH BY E6 IN OTHER SYSTEMS
Numerous studies
have been conducted to explore the function of E6 or p53 using cells
unrelated to keratinocytes. Different cell types, reagents, and
assays were employed. The results are quite inconsistent and
sometimes confusing. It is impossible to discuss every report in
this review. For this reason, only some representative studies
considered to be of special interest will be discussed.
Some early studies
showed that E6 inhibited E7-induced apoptosis through
p53-independent mechanism in the developing lens of transgenic mice[94,95]. Similarly, E6 could functionally substitute the
insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in inhibiting staurosporine-induced
apoptosis in mouse fibroblast, including p53-null cells[96].
Expressing of E6 in human foreskin fibroblasts also inhibited
caspase 3 activation after treatment with thiol-containing
antioxidant penicillamine[97]. HPV-18 E6 protected cancer cells from
Bak-induced apoptosis[98]. E6 of both cutaneous and genital HPVs
promoted proteolytic degradation of Bak[61,98]. The role of Bak in
UV-induced apoptosis in skin cancer has also been implicated[61].
Several studies have
examined the sensitivity of cells expressing E6 to TNF. HPV-16 E6
was shown to bind TNF receptor 1 (TNF R1) and protect cells from TNF-induced
apoptosis in mouse fibroblasts and human histiocyte/monocyte and
osteosarcoma cells[62,99]. E6 binding to TNF R1 probably interfered
with formation of the death-inducing signaling complex and thus with
transduction of apoptotic signals. However, E6 did not appear to
have much effect on TNF susceptibility in human keratinocytes[84,88]. In contrast, in human ovarian and colon cancer
cells, HPV-16 E6 enhanced susceptibility to TNF-induced apoptosis[100]. This effect of E6 appeared to be p53-independent but
may involve down-regulation of NF-kappa B. Notably, the BPV-1 E6
oncoprotein sensitized cells to TNF-induced apoptosis[101]. This
BPV-1 E6-induced sensitization to apoptosis is distinct from its
transforming activity[102]. Interestingly, expression of HPV-16 E6
sensitized murine fibrosarcoma L929 cells to TNF-induced necrosis
instead of apoptosis[103]. The E6-enhanced cytolysis correlated with
an increase in reactive oxygen species level and was independent of
p53 and caspases[103].
In human diploid
fibroblasts, expression of HPV-16 E6 resulted in an inhibition of
oxidant-induced apoptosis as compared to vector control within 24 h
but a sensitization after prolonged incubation[104], indicating that
time point at which cell death is measured also contributes to the
outcomes. Dying E6 cells exhibited a G2/M phase distribution with
elevated cyclin B/Cdc2 levels and activity. The death of E6 cells
has some features of oncosis. It remains to be determined to what
extent the elevated cyclin B/Cdc2 activity contributes to the cell
death in E6-expressing cells. Notably, Normal human fibroblasts
expressing HPV-16 E6 showed increased cytotoxicity to taxol[105].
Mutational analysis indicated that reduced levels of p53 correlated
with increased G2/M phase arrest and taxol-induced apoptosis[105].
Adriamycin and cisplatin-treated human foreskin fibroblasts
expressing E6 also were arrested at G2 with increased cyclin B/Cdc2
kinase activity but no apoptosis[106]. Apparently, activation of
cyclin B/Cdc2 kinase in G2/M arrested cells is not by itself
sufficient to trigger cell death. E6 expressing cells could also die
at other cell cycle stages. For example, when treated with cisplatin,
normal human foreskin fibroblasts expressing HPV-16 E6 showed
increased cytotoxicity associated with delayed progression through S
phase[107].
CONCLUSIONS
Progress has been
made on observations of E6 regulation of apoptosis. However, the
precise mechanism by which E6 modulates apoptosis remains to be
explored. In particular, we know little about how E6 sensitizes
cells to apoptosis independently of p53. Few studies have addressed
the functions of low-risk HPV E6s on cell proliferation and
apoptosis. Future studies should also establish the role of more
than twenty E6-interacting proteins identified during the past
decade. Understanding the mechanism by which E6 regulates apoptosis
will certainly help us fully demonstrate the significance of HPV in
the etiology of esophageal cancer and possibly have some therapeutic
significance.
REFERENCES
1
Schlecht NF, Kulaga S, Robitaille J, Ferreira S,
Santos M, Miyamura RA, Duarte-Franco E, Rohan TE, Ferenczy A,
Villa LL, Franco EL. Persistent human
papillomavirus infection as a predictor of cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia.
JAMA 2001;286:
3106-3114
2 Pfister
H. Human papillomaviruses and skin cancer. Semin Cancer Biol
1992; 3: 263-271
3 Syrjanen
KJ. Histological changes identical to those of condylomatous
lesions found in esophageal squamous
cell carcinomas. Arch
Geschwulstforsch 1982; 52: 283-292
4 Winkler
B, Capo V, Reumann W, Ma A, La Porta R, Reilly S, Green PM,
Richart RM, Crum CP. Human papillomavirus
infection of the esophagus. A
clinicopathologic study with demonstration of papillomavirus antigen
by
the immunoperoxidase technique.
Cancer 1985; 55: 149-155
5 Awerkiew
S, Bollschweiler E, Metzger R, Schneider PM, Holscher AH,
Pfister H. Esophageal cancer in Germany
is associated with
Epstein-Barr-virus but not with papillomaviruses. Med Microbiol
Immunol 2003; 192: 137-140
6 Kuwano
H, Sumiyoshi K, Sonoda K, Kitamura K, Toh Y, Nakashima H,
Sugimachi K. Pathogenesis of
esophageal squamous cell
carcinoma with lymphoid stroma.
Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48: 458-461
7 Talamini
G, Capelli P, Zamboni G, Mastromauro M, Pasetto M, Castagnini A,
Angelini G, Bassi C, Scarpa A. Alcohol,
smoking and papillomavirus infection
as risk factors for esophageal squamous-cell papilloma and
esophageal
squamous-cell carcinoma
in Italy. Int J Cancer 2000; 86: 874-878
8 Kamath
AM, Wu TT, Heitmiller R, Daniel R, Shah KV. Investigation of the
association of esophageal carcinoma
with human papillomaviruses.
Dis Esophagus 2000; 13: 122-124
9 Lambot
MA, Haot J, Peny MO, Fayt I, Noel JC. Evaluation of the role of
human papillomavirus in oesophageal
squamous cell carcinoma in
Belgium. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2000; 63: 154-156
10 Peixoto
Guimaraes D, Hsin Lu S, Snijders P, Wilmotte R, Herrero R,
Lenoir G, Montesano R, Meijer CJ,
Walboomers J, Hainaut P.
Absence of association between HPV DNA, TP53 codon 72 polymorphism,
and risk
of oesophageal cancer in a
high-risk area of China. Cancer Lett 2001; 162:
231-235
11 Kawaguchi
H, Ohno S, Araki K, Miyazaki M, Saeki H, Watanabe M, Tanaka S,
Sugimachi K. p53 polymorphism in
human papillomavirus-associated
esophageal cancer. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 2753-2755
12 Chang
F, Syrjanen S, Shen Q, Cintorino M, Santopietro R, Tosi P,
Syrjanen K. Evaluation of HPV, CMV, HSV and EBV
in esophageal squamous cell
carcinomas from a high-incidence area of China. Anticancer Res
2000; 20: 3935-3940
13 Chang
F, Syrjanen S, Shen Q, Cintorino M, Santopietro R, Tosi P,
Syrjanen K. Human papillomavirus involvement
in esophageal carcinogenesis in
the high-incidence area of China. A study of 700 cases by screening
and type-specific
in situ hybridization.
Scand J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 123-130
14 Liu
YL, Li XM, Jin GL, Yan X, Yang JZ, Wang JL, Li YH, Wang FR,
Zhang XH. HPV detection and FHIT expression
in esophageal squamous
carcinoma from high incidence area in Cixian County. Aizheng 2003;
22: 492-495
15 Szentirmay
Z, Szanto I, Balint I, Polus K, Remenar E, Tamas L, Szentkuti G,
Melegh Z, Nagy P, Kasler M.
Causal association between
human papilloma virus infection and head and neck and esophageal
squamous
cell carcinoma. Magy Onkol 2002;
46: 35-41
16 Hasegawa
M, Ohoka I, Yamazaki K, Hanami K, Sugano I, Nagao T, Asoh A,
Wada N, Nagao K, Ishida Y. Expression
of p21/WAF-1, status of
apoptosis and p53 mutation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
with HPV infection.
Pathol Int 2002; 52:
442-450
17 Matsha
T, Erasmus R, Kafuko AB, Mugwanya D, Stepien A, Parker MI. Human
papillomavirus associated
with oesophageal cancer. J
Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 587-590
18 Astori
G, Merluzzi S, Arzese A, Brosolo P, de Pretis G, Maieron R,
Pipan C, Botta GA. Detection of human
papillomavirus DNA and p53 gene
mutations in esophageal cancer samples and adjacent normal mucosa.
Digestion 2001; 64:
9-14
19 Lu Z,
Chen K, Guo M. Detection of HPV in human esophageal cancer in
high-incidence area and its correlation with
p53 expression. Zhonghua
Zhongliu Zazhi 2001; 23: 220-223
20 Zhou
XB, Guo M, Quan LP, Zhang W, Lu ZM, Wang QH, Ke Y, Xu NZ.
Detection of human papillomavirus in
Chinese esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma and its adjacent normal epithelium. World J
Gastroenterol
2003; 9: 1170-1173
21 Shen
ZY, Hu SP, Lu LC, Tang CZ, Kuang ZS, Zhong SP, Zeng Y. Detection
of human papillomavirus in
esophageal carcinoma. J Med
Virol 2002; 68: 412-416
22 Xu WG,
Zhang LJ, Lu ZM, Li JY, Ke Y, Xu GW. Detection of human
papillomavirus type 16 E6 mRNA in carcinomas
of upper digestive tract.
Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi 2003; 83: 1910-1914
23 Sobti
RC, Kochar J, Singh K, Bhasin D, Capalash N. Telomerase
activation and incidence of HPV in
human gastrointestinal tumors
in North Indian population. Mol Cell Biochem 2001;217:
51-56
24 Xu CL,
Qian XL, Zhou XS, Zhao QZ, Li YC. Expression of HPV16-E6 and E7
oncoproteins in squamous cell
carcinoma tissues of esophageal
cancer and non-cancer tissues. Aizheng 2004; 23:
165-168
25 Acevedo-Nuno
E, Gonzalez-Ojeda A, Vazquez-Camacho G, Balderas-Pena Luz MA,
Moreno-Villa H,
Montoya-Fuentes H. Human
papillomavirus DNA and protein in tissue samples of oesophageal
cancer,
Barrett’s oesophagus and
oesophagitis. Anticancer Res 2004; 24: 1319-1323
26 Li T,
Lu ZM, Chen KN, Guo M, Xing HP, Mei Q, Yang HH, Lechner JF, Ke Y.
Human papillomavirus type 16 is an
important infectious factor in
the high incidence of esophageal cancer in Anyang area of China.
Carcinogenesis
2001; 22: 929-934
27 Syrjanen
KJ. HPV infections and oesophageal cancer. J Clin Pathol
2002; 55: 721-728
28 Togawa
K, Rustgi AK. Human papillomavirus-16 and -18 replication in
esophagus squamous cancer cell lines does
not require heterologous E1 and
E2 proteins. J Med Virol 1995; 45: 435-438
29 Jarrett
WF, McNeil PE, Grimshaw WT, Selman IE, McIntyre WI. High
incidence area of cattle cancer with a
possible interaction between an
environmental carcinogen and a papilloma virus. Nature 1978; 274:
215-217
30 Shen
Z, Cen S, Shen J, Cai W, Xu J, Teng Z, Hu Z, Zeng Y.Study of
immortalization and malignant transformation
of human embryonic esophageal
epithelial cells induced by HPV18 E6E7.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000;
126: 589-594
31 Shen
ZY, Xu LY, Li EM, Cai WJ, Shen J, Chen MH, Cen S, Tsao SW, Zeng
Y. The multistage process of carcinogenesis
in human esophageal epithelial
cells induced by human papillomavirus. Oncol Rep 2004; 11:
647-654
32 Omata
M, Mori J, Yokosuka O, Iwama S, Ito Y, Okuda K. Hepatitis B
virus antigens in liver tissue in
hepatocellular carcinoma and
advanced chronic liver disease-relationship to liver cell dysplasia.
Liver 1982; 2:
125-132
33 Schwarz
E, Freese UK, Gissmann L, Mayer W, Roggenbuck B, Stremlau A, zur
Hausen H. Structure and transcription
of human papillomavirus
sequences in cervical carcinoma cells. Nature 1985; 314:
111-114
34 Alvarez-Salas
LM, Cullinan AE, Siwkowski A, Hampel A, DiPaolo JA. Inhibition
of HPV-16 E6/E7 immortalization
of normal keratinocytes by
hairpin ribozymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:
1189-1194
35 Barbosa
MS, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Papillomavirus polypeptides E6 and E7
are zinc-binding proteins.
J Virol 1989; 63:
1404-1407
36 Grossman
SR, Laimins LA. E6 protein of human papillomavirus type 18 binds
zinc. Oncogene 1989; 4: 1089-1093
37 Kanda
T, Watanabe S, Zanma S, Sato H, Furuno A, Yoshiike K. Human
papillomavirus type 16 E6 proteins with
glycine substitution for
cysteine in the metal-binding motif. Virology 1991; 185:
536-543
38 Vousden
KH, Androphy EJ, Schiller JT, Lowy DR. Mutational analysis of
bovine papillomavirus E6 gene.
J Virol 1989;63:
2340-2342
39 Lamberti
C, Morrissey LC, Grossman SR, Androphy EJ. Transcriptional
activation by the papillomavirus E6 zinc
finger oncoprotein. EMBO J 1990;
9: 1907-1913
40 Foster
SA, Demers GW, Etscheid BG, Galloway DA. The ability of human
papillomavirus E6 proteins to target p53
for degradation in vivo
correlates with their ability to abrogate actinomycin D-induced
growth arrest.
J Virol 1994; 68: 5698-5705
41
Dalal S, Gao Q, Androphy EJ, Band V. Mutational
analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 demonstrates that
p53
degradation is necessary for immortalization of mammary epithelial
cells. J Virol 1996; 70: 683-688
42
Ned R, Allen S, Vande Pol S. Transformation by bovine
papillomavirus type 1 E6 is independent of
transcriptional
activation by E6. J Viol 1997; 71: 4866-4870
43
Nguyen ML, Nguyen MM, Lee D, Griep AE, Lambert PF. The
PDZ ligand domain of the human papillomavirus type
16 E6 protein is
required for E6’s induction of epithelial hyperplasia in vivo.
J Virol 2003; 77: 6957-6964
44
Watson RA, Thomas M, Banks L, Roberts S. Activity of
the human papillomavirus E6 PDZ-binding motif correlates
with an
enhanced morphological transformation of immortalized human
keratinocytes.
J Cell Sci 2003; 116(Pt 24): 4925-4934
45
Kuhne C, Gardiol D, Guarnaccia C, Amenitsch H, Banks
L. Differential regulation of human papillomavirus E6 by
protein
kinase A: Conditional degradation of human discs large protein by
oncogenic E6. Oncogene
2000; 19: 5884-5891
46
Androphy EJ, Hubbert NL, Schiller JT, Lowy DR.
Identification of the HPV-16 E6 protein from transformed mouse
cells
and human cervical carcinoma cell lines. EMBO J 1987; 6:
989-992
47
Guccione E, Massimi P, Bernat A, Banks L. Comparative
analysis of the intracellular location of the high- and
low-risk
human papillomavirus oncoproteins. Virology 2002; 293:
20-25
48
Le Roux LG, Moroianu J. Nuclear entry of high-risk
human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncoprotein occurs via
several
pathways. J Virol 2003; 77: 2330-2337
49
Mallon RG, Wojciechowicz D, Defendi V. DNA-binding
activity of papillomavirus proteins.
J Virol 1987; 61:
1655-1660
50 Kammer C, Warthorst U, Torrez-Martinez N, Wheeler CM,
Pfister H. Sequence analysis of the long control region
of human
papillomavirus type 16 variants and functional consequences for P97
promoter activity.
J Gen Virol 2000; 81(Pt 8):
1975-1981
51 Nomine Y, Charbonnier S, Ristriani T, Stier G, Masson
M, Cavusoglu N, Van Dorsselaer A, Weiss E, Kieffer B,
Trave G.
Domain substructure of HPV E6 oncoprotein: Biophysical
characterization of the E6 C-terminal
DNA-binding domain.Biochemistry
2003; 42: 4909-4917
52
Ristriani T, Masson M, Nomine Y, Laurent C, Lefevre JF,
Weiss E, Trave G. HPV oncoprotein E6 is a
structure-dependent
DNA-binding protein that recognizes four-way junctions. J Mol
Biol 2000; 296: 1189-1203
53
Mantovani F, Banks L. The human papillomavirus E6
protein and its contribution to malignant progression.
Oncogene
2001; 20: 7874-7887
54
Flores ER, Allen-Hoffmann BL, Lee D, Lambert PF. The
human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncogene is required for
the
productive stage of the viral life cycle. J Virol 2000; 74:
6622-6631
55
Munger K, Howley PM. Human papillomavirus
immortalization and transformation functions.
Virus Res 2002;
89: 213-228
56
Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Howley PM. A cellular
protein mediates association of p53 with the E6 oncoprotein
of human
papillomavirus types 16 or 18. EMBO J 1991; 10:
4129-4135
57
Scheffner M, Huibregtse JM, Vierstra RD, Howley PM.
The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as
a ubiquitin-protein
ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell 1993; 75:
495-505
58
El-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons
R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW,
Vogelstein B. WAF1, a
potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 1993; 75:
817-825
59
Burkhart BA, Alcorta DA, Chiao C, Isaacs JS, Barrett
JC. Two posttranscriptional pathways that
regulate
p21(Cip1/Waf1/Sdi1) are identified by HPV16-E6 interaction and
correlate with life span and
cellular senescence. Exp Cell Res
1999; 247: 168-175
60
Giannoudis A, Herrington CS. Differential expression
of p53 and p21 in low grade cervical squamous
intraepithelial
lesions infected with low, intermediate, and high risk human
papillomaviruses.
Cancer 2000; 89: 1300-1307
61
Jackson S, Harwood C, Thomas M, Banks L, Storey A.
Role of Bak in UV-induced apoptosis in skin cancer
and abrogation by
HPV E6 proteins. Genes Dev 2000; 14: 3065-3073
62
Filippova M, Song H, Connolly JL, Dermody TS, Duerksen-Hughes
PJ. The human papillomavirus 16 E6 protein binds
to tumor necrosis
factor (TNF) R1 and protects cells from TNF-induced apoptosis.
J
Biol Chem 2002; 277: 21730-21739
63
Nagata S. Apoptosis by death factor. Cell 1997;
88: 355-365
64
Wyllie AH, Golstein P. More than one way to go.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 11-13
65
Irusta PM, Chen YB, Hardwick JM. Viral modulators of
cell death provide new links to old pathways.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2003; 15: 700-705
66
Van Cruchten S, Van Den Broeck W. Morphological and
biochemical aspects of apoptosis, oncosis and necrosis.
Anat
Histol Embryol 2002; 31: 214-223
67
Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad
M, Alnemri ES, Wang X. Cytochrome c and
dATP-dependent formation of
Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade.
Cell 1997; 91: 479-489
68
Scaffidi C, Fulda S, Srinivasan A, Friesen C, Li F,
Tomaselli KJ, Debatin KM, Krammer PH, Peter ME.
Two CD95 (APO-1/Fas)
signaling pathways. EMBO J 1998; 17: 1675-1687
69
Luo X, Budihardjo I, Zou H, Slaughter C, Wang X. Bid,
a Bcl2 interacting protein, mediates cytochrome c release
from
mitochondria in response to activation of cell surface death
receptors. Cell 1998; 94: 481-490
70
Li H, Zhu H, Xu CJ, Yuan J. Cleavage of BID by caspase
8 mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas pathway
of apoptosis.
Cell 1998; 94: 491-501
71
Vousden KH, Lu X. Live or let die: The cell’s
response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 594-604
72
Miyashita T, Reed JC. Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct
transcriptional activator of the human bax gene.
Cell 1995; 80:
293-299
73
Nakano K, Vousden KH. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene,
is induced by p53. Mol Cell 2001; 7: 683-694
74
Blandino G, Levine AJ, Oren M. Mutant p53 gain of
function: Differential effects of different p53 mutants on
resistance
of cultured cells to chemotherapy. Oncogene 1999; 18:
477-485
75
Bunz F, Hwang PM, Torrance C, Waldman T, Zhang Y,
Dillehay L, Williams J, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW,
Vogelstein B.
Disruption of p53 in human cancer cells alters the responses to
therapeutic agents.
J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 263-269
76
Shi L, Nishioka WK, Th’ng J, Bradbury EM, Litchfield
DW, Greenberg AH. Premature p34cdc2 activation required
for
apoptosis. Science 1994; 263: 1143-1145
77
Tan M, Jing T, Lan KH, Neal CL, Li P, Lee S, Fang D,
Nagata Y, Liu J, Arlinghaus R, Hung MC, Yu D. Phosphorylation
on
tyrosine-15 of p34(Cdc2) by ErbB2 inhibits p34(Cdc2) activation and
is involved in resistance to
taxol-induced apoptosis. Mol Cell
2002; 9: 993-1004
78
Badie C, Itzhaki JE, Sullivan MJ, Carpenter AJ, Porter
AC. Repression of CDK1 and other genes with CDE and
CHR promoter
elements during DNA damage-induced G(2)/M arrest in human cells.
Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 2358-2366
79
O’Connor DS, Grossman D, Plescia J, Li F, Zhang H,
Villa A, Tognin S, Marchisio PC, Altieri DC. Regulation of
apoptosis
at cell division by p34cdc2 phosphorylation of survivin. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 13103-13107
80
Wall NR, O’Connor DS, Plescia J, Pommier Y, Altieri
DC. Suppression of survivin phosphorylation on Thr34 by
flavopiridol
enhances tumor cell apoptosis. Cancer Res 2003; 63:
230-235
81
Konishi Y, Lehtinen M, Donovan N, Bonni A. Cdc2
phosphorylation of BAD links the cell cycle to the cell death
machinery. Mol Cell 2002; 9: 1005-1016
82
Finzer P, Aguilar-Lemarroy A, Rosl F. The role of
human papillomavirus oncoproteins E6 and E7 in apoptosis.
Cancer
Lett 2002; 188: 15-24
83
Iglesias M, Yen K, Gaiotti D, Hildesheim A, Stoler MH,
Woodworth CD. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7
protein sensitizes
cervical keratinocytes to apoptosis and release of
interleukin-1alpha.
Oncogene 1998; 17: 1195-1205
84
Stoppler H, Stoppler MC, Johnson E, Simbulan-Rosenthal
CM, Smulson ME, Iyer S, Rosenthal DS, Schlegel R.
The E7 protein of
human papillomavirus type 16 sensitizes primary human keratinocytes
to apoptosis.
Oncogene 1998; 17: 1207-1214
85
Liu Y, McKalip A, Herman B. Human papillomavirus type
16 E6 and HPV-16 E6/E7 sensitize human keratinocytes
to apoptosis
induced by chemotherapeutic agents: Roles of p53 and caspase
activation.
J Cell Biochem 2000; 78: 334-349
86
Alfandari J, Shnitman Magal S, Jackman A, Schlegel R,
Gonen P, Sherman L. HPV16 E6 oncoprotein inhibits
apoptosis induced
during serum-calcium differentiation of foreskin human keratinocytes.
Virology 1999; 257: 383-396
87
Sherman L, Itzhaki H, Jackman A, Chen JJ, Koval D,
Schlegel R. Inhibition of serum- and calcium-induced
terminal
differentiation of human keratinocytes by HPV 16 E6: Study of the
association with p53 degradation, inhibition
of p53 transactivation,
and binding to E6BP. Virology 2002; 292: 309-320
88
Aguilar-Lemarroy A, Gariglio P, Whitaker NJ, Eichhorst
ST, zur Hausen H, Krammer PH, Rosl F. Restoration of
p53 expression
sensitizes human papillomavirus type 16 immortalized human
keratinocytes to CD95-mediated
apoptosis. Oncogene 2002; 21:
165-175
89
Magal SS, Jackman A, Pei XF, Schlegel R, Sherman L.
Induction of apoptosis in human keratinocytes containing
mutated p53
alleles and its inhibition by both the E6 and E7 oncoproteins.
Int J Cancer 1998; 75: 96-104
90
Mythily DV, Krishna S, Tergaonkar V. Pleiotropic
effects of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncogene expression
in
human epithelial cell lines. J Gen Virol 1999; 80(Pt
7): 1707-1713
91
DeFilippis RA, Goodwin EC, Wu L, DiMaio D. Endogenous
human papillomavirus E6 and E7 proteins
differentially regulate
proliferation, senescence, and apoptosis in HeLa cervical carcinoma
cells.
J Virol 2003; 77: 1551-1563
92
Butz K, Denk C, Ullmann A, Scheffner M, Hoppe-Seyler
E. Induction of apoptosis in human papillomaviruspositive
cancer
cells by peptide aptamers targeting the viral E6 oncoprotein.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 6693-6697
93
Brown J, Higo H, McKalip A, Herman B. Human
papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E6 sensitizes cells to
atractyloside-induced
apoptosis: Role of p53, ICE-like proteases and the mitochondrial
permeability transition.
J Cell Biochem 1997; 66:
245-255
94
Pan H, Griep AE. Altered cell cycle regulation in the
lens of HPV-16 E6 or E7 transgenic mice: Implications for
tumor
suppressor gene function in development. Genes Dev 1994; 8:
1285-1299
95
Pan H, Griep AE. Temporally distinct patterns of
p53-dependent and p53-independent apoptosis during mouse
lens
development. Genes Dev 1995; 9: 2157-2169
96
Steller MA, Zou Z, Schiller JT, Baserga R.
Transformation by human papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7: Role of
the
insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Cancer Res 1996; 56:
5087-5091
97
Havre PA, O’Reilly S, McCormick JJ, Brash DE.
Transformed and tumor-derived human cells exhibit
preferential
sensitivity to the thiol antioxidants, N-acetyl cysteine and
penicillamine. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 1443-1449
98
Thomas M, Banks L. Inhibition of Bak-induced apoptosis
by HPV-18 E6. Oncogene 1998; 17: 2943-2954
99
Duerksen Hughes PJ, Yang J, Schwartz SB. HPV 16 E6
blocks TNF-mediated apoptosis in mouse fibroblast LM
cells.
Virology 1999; 264: 55-65
100
Vikhanskaya F, Falugi C, Valente P, Russo P. Human
papillomavirus type 16 E6-enhanced susceptibility to
apoptosis
induced by TNF in A2780 human ovarian cancer cell line. Int J
Cancer 2002; 97: 732-739
101
Rapp L, Liu Y, Hong Y, Androphy EJ, Chen JJ. The
bovine papillomavirus type 1 E6 oncoprotein sensitizes cells to
tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 1999;18:
607-615
102
Liu Z, Liu Y, Hong Y, Rapp L, Androphy EJ, Chen JJ.
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 E6-induced sensitization to apoptosis
is distinct from its transforming activity. Virology 2002; 295:
230-237
103
Liu Y, Tergaonkar V, Krishna S, Androphy EJ. Human
papillomavirus type 16 E6-enhanced susceptibility of L929 cells
to
tumor necrosis factor alpha correlates with increased accumulation
of reactive oxygen species.
J Biol Chem 1999;274:
24819-24827
104
Chen X, Shen B, Xia L, Khaletzkiy A, Chu D, Wong JY,
Li JJ. Activation of nuclear factor kappaB in radioresistance
of
TP53-inactive human keratinocytes. Cancer Res 2002; 62:
1213-1221
105
Wahl AF, Donaldson KL, Fairchild C, Lee FY, Foster SA,
Demers GW, Galloway DA. Loss of normal p53 function
confers
sensitization to taxol by increasing G2/M arrest and apoptosis.
Nat Med 1996; 2: 72-79
106
Passalaris TM, Benanti JA, Gewin L, Kiyono T, Galloway
DA. The G(2) checkpoint is maintained by
redundant pathways. Mol
Cell Biol 1999; 19: 5872-5881
107
Hawkins DS, Demers GW, Galloway DA. Inactivation of
p53 enhances sensitivity to multiple
chemotherapeutic agents.Cancer
Res 1996; 56: 892-898
| |