|
Xiu-Sheng He,
Ying-Hui Rong, Qi Su, Qiao Luo, Dong-Mei He, Yan-Lan Li, Yan Chen,
Oncology Institute, Nanhua University, Hengyang 421001, Hunan
Province, China
Supported by the Grant From the Education Committee of Hunan
Province, No. 97B095, No. 01B016 and the grant from the Health
Bureau of Hunan Province, No. 9301, the Key Programs during the 8th
5-Year Plan Period, the Bureau of Health, Hunan Province, China
Correspondence to: Dr. Qi Su, Institute of Oncology, Nanhua
University, Changsheng Xilu, Hengyang 421001, Hunan Province, China.
suqil@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-734-8281075
Fax: +86-734-8281547
Received: 2003-11-26
Accepted: 2004-02-18
Abstract
Aim: To analyze
the correlation between the protein expression of p16 and Rb
genes in gastric carcinoma (GC), to investigate the role of p16
gene in invasion and lymph node metastasis of GC, and to examine the
deletion and mutation in exon 2 of p16 gene in GC.
Methods: The
protein expression of p16 and Rb genes was examined by
streptavidin-peroxidase conjugated method (S-P) in normal gastric
mucosa, dysplastic gastric mucosa and GC. The deletion and mutation
of p16 gene were examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
and polymerase chain reaction single strand conformation
polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) respectively in normal gastric mucosa and
GC.
Results: The
positive rates of P16 and Rb protein expression respectively were
96% (77/80) and 99% (79/80) in normal gastric mucosa, 92% (45/50)
and 80% (40/50) in dysplastic gastric mucosa, 48% (58/122) and 60%
(73/122) in GC. The positive rates of P16 and Rb protein expression
in GC were significantly lower than that in normal gastric mucosa
and dysplastic gastric mucosa (P<0.05). The positive rate
of P16 protein expression in mucoid carcinoma (10%, 1/10) was
significantly lower than that in poorly differentiated carcinoma
(51%, 21/41), undifferentiated carcinoma (58%, 15/26) and signet
ring cell carcinoma (62%, 10/16) (P<0.05). The positive
rates of P16 protein in 30 cases of paired primary and lymph node
metastatic GC were 47% (14/30) and 17% (5/30) respectively, being
significantly lower in the later than in the former (P<0.05).
There was no mutation in exon 2 of p16 gene in the 25 freshly
resected primary GCs. But five cases in the 25 freshly resected
primary GCs displayed deletion in exon 2 of p16 gene. The
positive rate of both P16 and Rb proteins was 16% (14/90), and the
negative rate of both P16 and Rb proteins was 8% (7/90) in 90 GCs.
The rate of positive P16 protein with negative Rb protein was 33%
(30/90). The rate of negative P16 protein with positive Rb protein
was 43% (39/90). There was reverse correlation between P16 and Rb
expression in 90 GCs (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The
loss protein expression of p16 and Rb genes is related
to GC. The loss expression of P16 protein is related to the
histopathologic subtypes and lymph node metastasis of GC. Expression
of P16 and Rb proteins in GC is reversely correlated. The deletion
but not mutation in exon 2 of p16 gene may be involved in GC.
ã 2005
The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Key words: p16 gene; Gastric carcinoma
He XS, Rong YH, Su Q, Luo Q, He DM, Li YL, Chen Y. Expression of p16
gene and Rb protein in gastric carcinoma and their
clinicopathological significance. World J Gastroenterol
2005; 11(15): 2218-2223
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/11/2218.asp
INTRODUCTION
It is now widely accepted that carcinogenesis and progression of
human Gastric carcinoma are related to the activation of proto-oncogenes
and/or the inactivation of anti-oncogenes, and they are the results
of genetic alteration accumulation. The p16 and Rb
genes are tumor suppressor genes and participate in regulating the
proliferation of normal cell negatively[1,2].
There were abnormal expressions of P16 and Rb proteins in a variety
of cancer cell lines and primary tumors, such as osteosarcoma cell
lines, renal cancer cell lines, lung cancer, brain tumor, esophageal
cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma[3]
and leukemogenesis[4].
In recent years, studies have revealed homozygous deletion and
mutation of p16 gene, predominantly in exon 2, in various
malignant tumors[5].
The frequency of p16 gene deletion and mutation is up to 75%
in all kinds of human neoplasm, higher than that of the well-known p53
gene[1].
GC is one of the most common malignant tumors in China[6].
As with many other tumors, development of GC also involves multiple
genes and stages, including some oncogenes and antioncogenes.
However, till now, its carcinogenic molecular mechanism is not well
clarified. In this paper, S-P immunohistochemical staining was used
to detect the expression of P16 and Rb proteins in GC, dysplastic
gastric mucosa and normal gastric mucosa. PCR and PCR-SSCP methods
were used to detect deletion and mutation in exon 2 of p16 gene.
We aimed at investigating the role of P16 protein in the
carcinogenesis, progression, histologic types as well as biological
behaviors of GC, to find a new marker for early diagnosis of GC, to
discover the role of deletion and mutation in exon 2 of p16
gene in the carcinogenesis and progression of GC, and also to
analyze the correlation of P16 and Rb proteins expression in GC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens and treatment
All specimens were confirmed by pathological examination.
Paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were collected from the pathology
department and freshly resected specimens were collected from the
surgery department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua
University, among which there were 50 cases of dysplastic gastric
mucosa, 80 cases of normal gastric mucosa (including 25 freshly
resected specimens far away from cancer) and 122 GC (including 25
freshly resected specimens). In the 122 cases of GC, 29 were
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 41 poorly-differentiated
adenocarcinoma, 26 undifferentiated carcinoma, 16 signet ring cell
carcinoma and 10 mucoid carcinoma. There were 81 men and 41 women,
including 22 aged below 40 years, 69 aged from 41 to 59 years, and
31 older than 60 years (range 15-79, mean 56 years). Superficial
muscles were invaded in 50 cases, deep muscles and the full layer in
72 cases. Sixty-nine cases had lymph node metastasis. The other 53
cases had no lymph node metastasis. Thirty cases of primary cancer
and lymph node metastatic cancer respectively, were randomly
selected and compared. According to Borrmann's
classification[7],
15 GCs were type I, 43 type II 47 type III and 17 type IV. The 25
freshly resected specimens, each containing cancer, cancer adjacent
tissues and normal mucosa far away from cancer, were cut into 2-4
blocks under sterile conditions. Each block was 2-3 mm3
in size and stored at -70 ℃
for PCR and PCR-SSCP analyses. The rest of the tissues were fixed in
100 mL/L neutral formalin, resected, dehydrated, cleaned and
paraffin-embedded. All paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into
sequential slices at 5 mm thickness and mounted on to the glass
slides that had been processed by poly-lys previously.
Reagents and instruments
Rabbit-anti-human P16 protein polyclonal antibody,
rabbit-anti-human Rb protein polyclonal antibody,
streptavidin-peroxidase immunozator kit (S-P kit), and DAB were all
purchased from Maxim Company, USA. Protease K (Merk, USA), SmaI,
agarose gel, propylene acrylamide, N-N-sulmethyl
bipropylene acrylamide, ammonium persulfate, xylene nitrile,
bromophenol blue were purchased from Shanghai Sangon Company. PCR
primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon. Primer sequences in
exon 2 of p16 gene: sense 5-TCT GAC CAT TCT GTT CTC TC-3, antisense
5-CTC AGC TTT GGA AGC TCT CA-3, were used for PCR and PCR-SSCP. The
fragment length of amplification was 384 bp. Primer sequences of b-actin
served as an internal control for PCR: sense 5-GCG GGG CGC CCC AGG
CAC CA-3, antisense 5-CTC CTT AAT GTC ACG CAC GAT TTC-3. The
fragment length of amplification was 548 bp. Experimental
instruments included ultra low refrigerator of -70 ℃
(Japan), rotary sector (Germany), microscope (Japan), type 480 DNA
amplificatory (PE, USA), type 901 ultraviolet spectrophotometer (PE,
USA), type DYB vertical electrophoresis and various kinds of
centrifuges (Liuyi, Beijing).
Methods
S-P immunohistochemical staining
According to the specification of S-P kit:
paraffin-embedded tissue slices were deparaffinized and hydrated for
20 min, endogenous peroxidase was blocked for 10 min, first antibody
was added (rabbit-anti-human P16 protein polyclonal antibody or
rabbit-anti-human Rb protein polyclonal antibody) for 8 h at 4 ℃,
bridge antibody was added for 15 min, enzyme labeled S-P reagents
were added for 10 min, and was colored with DAB for 5 min, nucleolus
was stained with hematoxylin for 3 min, dehydrated for 15 min,
cleaned for 10 min, later was covered and observed under a
microscope.
Genomic DNA extraction[8]
Frozen tissue of 0.5 g was put
into liquid nitrogen and powdered immediately, followed by addition
of 10× buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1
mol/L EDTA, pH 8.0, 5 g/L SDS) in 37 ℃
water for 1 h. At the same time, protease K was added to the mixture
at a final concentration of 100 mg/L in 50 ℃
water for 3 h. After the mixtures were dissolved completely, the
mixtures were reacted with 20 mg/L Rnase in 37 ℃
water for 1 h. It was mixed with saturated phony and bugged slightly
for 10 min, then centrifuged and supernatant was extracted, and
transferred to a cleaned plastic tube. The above processes were
repeated thrice. The supernatant was added with 1/10 volume 3 mol/L
NaAc and 2-2.5 times cold ethyl, and centrifuged. DNA was
precipitated, ethyl removed. DNA was washed by 700 mL/L ethyl and
centrifuged thrice, dried, resolved with TE and stored at -20 ℃
for use.
PCR amplification PCR
was performed according to the reference[8]
in 50 mL
reaction mixture containing 0.1 mg
of DNA template, 200 mmol/L
each of dCTP, dATP, dGTP, dTTP, 0.25 mmol/L
primer, PCR buffer (10 mmol/L
Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 1.5 mmol/L
MgCl2,
50 mmol/L KCl,
100 mg/L gelatin).
Then the reaction mixture was pre-denatured at 95 ℃
for 5 min and added with 1.5 mL
of Taq DNA polymerase and 75 mL
of mineral oil. These samples were subjected to 30 amplification
cycles, each consisting of denaturation at 95 ℃
for 1 min, primer annealing at 60 ℃
for 1 min, and extension at 72 ℃
for 1 min. Finally, the samples were subjected to a further
extension at 72 ℃
for 5 min. A 5 mL
of PCR product was electrophoresed on agarose gel (20 g/L), then
observed and photographed under ultraviolet light. No products of
PCR amplification suggested loss of homozygosis of p16 gene.
PCR-SSCP analysis[8]
A 5 mL
of PCR product digested by SmaI was mixed with 5 mL
of denatured dissolution (950 mL/L formamide, 20 mmol/L EDTA, 0.05%
bromophenol blue, 0.5 g/L xylene nitrile) and denatured at 95 ℃
for 5 min, and then cooled on ice. Solution processed as above was
added to the gel containing 80 g/L polypropylene acrylamide,
vertically electrophoresed at 100 V for 4 h. The gel stained with
silver was fixed in 100 mL/L alcohol for 10 min, oxidized in 100 g/L
nitric acid for 3 min, drip washed for 1 min with double distilled
water, stained in 12 mmol/L silver nitric acid for 20 min, again
drip washed for 1 min with double distilled water, showed
appropriately colored in 0.028 moL anhydrous sodium carbonate and
0.19 mL/L formalin, reduction response was ended by 100 mL/L glacial
acetic acid, drip washed with double distilled water. The results
were analyzed and photographed. The abnormal traces found in
PCR-SSCP were considered gene mutation.
Immunohistochemical determination
The brown-yellow staining of nucleus or nucleus and
cytoplasm was considered positive; (-) indicates no positively
stained cell or only plasma stained or the number of nuclear stained
positive cells less than 1; (+) indicates the cells stained weakly
or the number of stained cells less than 25%; (++) indicates the
cells stained moderately or the stained cells about 26-50%; (+++)
indicates cells stained strongly or the number of stained cells more
than 50%. Positive nuclear staining in more than two cells (under
high power microscope) was considered to be positive. No folding,
and edging-effect fields were chosen during calculation of 100 cells
per five fields. The assessment was performed by two observers. P16
protein expression in positively confirmed cervical carcinoma served
as positive control. The first antibody was replaced with PBS for
negative control.
Statistical analysis
c2
test was used to analyze the data. P value less than 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Expression of P16 protein in GC
P16 protein expression could only be seen in particular
adenoepithelial cells. We did not find positive staining in mucosal
epithelial cells, matrix fibrocytes, lymphocytes and smooth myocytes.
The positive rate of P16 protein expression was 96% (77/80) in
normal gastric mucosa (Figure 1A) and 90% (45/50) in dysplastic
gastric mucosa (Figure 1B). There was no significant difference in
these mucosa. But in GC, the positive rate of P16 protein expression
was 48% (58/122) (Figures 1C-F), lower than that in normal and
dysplastic mucosa (P<0.05, Table 1). The positive rate of
P16 protein expression was 38%, 51%, 58%, 62% and 10% in
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, poorly-differentiated
adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, signet ring cell
carcinoma and mucoid carcinoma, respectively. The P16 protein
expression in mucoid carcinoma was significantly lower than that in
signet ring cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma and
poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma (P<0.05, Table 2).
The positive rate of P16 protein expression was 48% (24/50) in GC
with superficial muscle layer invasion and 47% (34/72) in GC with
deep muscle and full layer invasion. There was no apparent relevance
between P16 protein expression and the depth of invasion (Table 2).
In 30 cases of paired primary and lymph node metastatic GC, the rate
of P16 protein expression in lymph node metastatic cancer (17%,
5/30) was significantly lower than that of primary cancer (47%,
14/30) (P<0.05, Table 3).
Table 1 P16
protein expression, p16 gene mutation and deletion in GC
| Histologic
types |
n |
P16
protein |
p16
gene |
| – |
+ |
++ |
+++ |
Positive
rate (%) |
Mutation |
Deletion |
| Normal
gastric mucosaa |
80 |
3 |
41 |
20 |
16 |
96 |
0/25 |
0/25 |
| Dysplastic
gastric mucosaa |
50 |
5 |
12 |
19 |
14 |
92 |
0/25 |
0/25 |
| GC |
122 |
64 |
13 |
20 |
25 |
48 |
0/25 |
5/25 |
aP<0.05
vs GC.
Table
2 P16 protein
expression in various histologic types of GC
| Histologic
types |
n |
Positive |
Negative
rate
(%) |
Positive |
| Well-differentiated
adenocarcinomaa |
29 |
11 |
18 |
38 |
| Poorly-differentiated
adenocarcinomaa |
41 |
21 |
20 |
51 |
| Undifferentiated
carcinomaa |
26 |
15 |
11 |
58 |
| Signet
ring cell carcinomaa |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62 |
| Mucoid
carcinoma |
10 |
1 |
9 |
10 |
aP<0.05
vs mucoid carcinoma.
Table
3 P16 protein
expression in primary GC and lymph node metasatic GC
| Types |
n |
Positive |
Positive
rate (%) |
| Primary
GCa |
30 |
14 |
47 |
| Lymph
node metasatic GC |
30 |
5 |
17 |
aP<0.05
vs lymph node metasatic GC.
Figure 1 Immunohistochemical staining of P16 protein expression. Arrow
shows positive cell. A:
Normal gastric mucosa SP ×400; B:
dysplastic gastric mucosa SP ×400; C:
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma SP ×400; D:
poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma SP ×400; E:
undifferentiated carcinoma SP ×200; F:
undifferentiated carcinoma SP ×400.
Deletion and mutation in exon 2 of p16 gene in GC
Among 25 freshly resected GCs, there were seven
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 13 poorly-differentiated
adenocarcinoma, three undifferentiated carcinoma, one signet ring
cell carcinoma and one mucoid carcinoma. Cancer adjacent tissue and
normal gastric mucosa were taken at the same time. The PCR
amplification showed no product in one case of well-differentiated
adenocarcinoma, one case of poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma and
one case of mucoid carcinoma. Few products found in one case of
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and one case of
poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma. But the remaining 20 cases of
GC, cancer adjacent gastric mucosa and normal gastric mucosa showed
products of PCR amplification. All experiments were repeated thrice.
The results were identical. No product of PCR amplification could
indicate the loss of homozygosis of p16 gene, few products of
PCR amplification showed possible loss of heterozygosis or
homozygosis of p16 gene contaminated with normal mucosa
(Figure 2). Four of these five cases showed negative expression for
P16 protein and one case showed weak expression detected with
immunohistochemical staining. No gene mutation was observed by
PCR-SSCP analysis after the PCR amplification products were cut with
SmaI (Figure 3 and Table 1).
Figure 2
(PDF) PCR
amplification products in exon 2 of p16 gene. Lanes 1-3, 5-6,
8-10: GC; Lane 4 : normal gastric mucosa; Lane 7: cancer adjacent
tissue; Lane M: marker; Few PCR products in lane 3 and no PCR
product in lane 5.
Figure
3
(PDF) Exon 2 of p16 gene analyzed by SSCP, Lanes 2, 3,
5, 6, 7: GC; Lane 4: cancer adjacent tissue; Lane 1: normal gastric
mucosa. No electrophoresis band in lane 3; weak electrophoresis band
in lane 5; no abnormal electrophoresis band in all lanes.
Expression of Rb protein in GC
The positive rate of Rb protein expression in normal gastric mucosa
was 99% (79/80), 80% (40/50) in dysplastic gastric mucosa, and 60%
(73/122) in GC (Figure 4). The positive rate of Rb protein
expression in GC was significantly lower than that in normal gastric
mucosa and dysplastic mucosa (P<0.05, Table 4). There was
no significant difference between the normal gastric mucosa and
dysplastic gastric mucosa (P>0.05, Table 4).
Figure 4 Rb
protein expression in undifferentiated carcinoma, SP×200.
Table 4 Rb
protein expression in GC
| Types |
n |
Negative |
Positive |
Positive
rate (%) |
| – |
+ |
++ |
+++ |
| Normal
gastric mucosaa |
80 |
1 |
10 |
20 |
49 |
99 |
| Dysplastic
gastric mucosaa |
50 |
10 |
8 |
17 |
15 |
80 |
| GC |
122 |
49 |
17 |
30 |
26 |
60 |
aP<0.05
vs GC.
Correlation between the expression of P16 and Rb proteins in GC
Ninety paired GCs were selected from 122 cases of GC to make a
comparison analysis. The positive expression of both P16 and Rb
proteins was 16% (14/90), the negative expression of both P16 and Rb
proteins was 8% (7/90). The positive expression of P16 with negative
expression of Rb was 33% (30/90). The negative expression of P16
with positive expression of Rb was 43% (39/90). The results
suggested negative correlation between P16 and Rb proteins
expression in GC (P<0.05, Table 5).
Table 5 Correlation
between expression of P16 and Rb proteins in GC
| |
n |
Positive
Rb |
Negative
Rb |
| |
n |
(%) |
n |
(%) |
| Positive
P16a |
44 |
14 |
16 |
30 |
33 |
| Negative
P16 |
46 |
39 |
43 |
7 |
8 |
aP<0.05
vs negative P16.
DISCUSSION
The development of human cancers including GC is a multi-step
process and phenotypic changes during cancer progression reflect the
sequential accumulation of genetic alterations in cells[9].
Both p16 and Rb genes are tumor suppressor genes. They
play important roles in the regulation of the cell cycle. The
proteins of these two genes, P16 and pRb respectively, inhibit cell
progression from G1
to S phase[1,2].
Dephosphorylation retinoblastoma protein (Rb) inactivates the
transcription factors such as E2F1, an important factor for the
transition from G1
to S phase, thereby arrests cells in G0/G1
phase, resulting in suppressed cell division and proliferation. When
Rb protein is phosphorylated, several transcription factors are
released, which induce the cell from G1
to S phase rapidly, resulting in excessive proliferation of cell.
P16 has been shown to exert its function through inhibition of
cyclin-dependent kinase 4(CDK4) mediated phosphorylation of pRb.
Functional loss of p16 might result in nonregulation of CDK4
activity, leading to persistent pRb phosphorylation and uncontrolled
cellular proliferation[1,2].
Abnormalities of p16 and Rb genes are frequent
molecular events in human cancer[10-13].
Some investigations demonstrated increased cell cycle arrest, growth
inhibition and apoptosis after adenovirus-mediated transduction of p16
gene in gliomas, lung, pancreas, liver, head and neck tumor cell
lines[1,2].
All these findings indicate that p16 and Rb are
important tumor suppressor genes.
In human GC, loss of p16 expression is
common. Our result showed that the positive rate of P16 protein
expression in GC was remarkably lower than that in dysplastic
gastric mucosa and normal gastric mucosa. This is in accordance with
observations by others[1-3].
These results indicated that P16 loss expression was
characteristically associated with tumor progression in GC. Several
other studies have shown that re-expression of p16 in various
tumor cell lines was sufficient to cause arrest of the cells in G1
phase[14,15].
In our study, there was no significant difference between the normal
mucosa and the dysplastic mucosa of stomach in P16 protein
expression. Interestingly, the expression quantity of P16 protein
increased from normal mucosa to precancerous lesions and GC. Nguyen et
al.[16],
found that the level of p16 mRNA in part of prostate
carcinoma was higher than that in prostate tissues. They also showed
that P16 protein expression increased with the progression of the
pathologic lesion. This change might inhibit cell proliferation. Our
results showed that the positive rate of P16 protein expression was
significantly lower in mucoid carcinoma than that in
poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma and
signet cell carcinoma. It suggested that the alteration of p16
gene was different between various histologic types of GC. The
discrepancy of P16 protein expression also existed between various
histologic types of lung cancer, esophageal cancer and gliomas[10,17].
In our investigation, P16 protein expression was not significantly
related to sex, age, the depth of invasion and Borrmann's
classification. However,
decreased expression of p16 was found more frequently in
lymph node metasatic GC than in primary GC. It was demonstrated that
the loss of expression of P16 protein contributed to tumor
progression with lymph node metastasis, which is in agreement with
previous reports[6].
Some studies indicated that the loss of p16 expression was
associated with aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis of several
tumors[18].
The positive expression of P16 protein could merely be observed in
partial adeno-epithelial cells of normal and dysplastic gastric
mucosa, and were weakly positive or undetectable in gastric mucosa
epithelium cells, interstitial lymphocytes, fibroblasts and smooth
muscle cells, which were contrary to some published reports[19].
Nevertheless, P16 protein expression was undetectable in neoplasmic
stroma[20],
normal lung tissue[21]
and normal urethral epithelium cells[19].
This might attribute to a paucity of P16 molecule in G0/G1
phase cells[22]
or a short half-life of P16 protein[23].
Some studies have shown that deletion and
mutation of p16 gene are important mechanisms responsible for
the dysfunction of tumor suppressor genes[24].
In our present study, deletion in exon 2 of p16 gene was
detected in five GC tissues. But PCR amplification products appeared
in the rest of the 20 cases of GC, normal gastric mucosa and cancer
adjacent gastric mucosa, suggesting an association between deletion
of p16 gene and GC. Previous studies have shown that deletion
of p16 gene is associated with the degree of differentiation
and metastasis of GC. Our observation failed to demonstrate the
similar trend. It was likely that only exon 2 was examined due to
inadequate specimens or other unknown factors. The mutation of p16
gene was not found by SSCP analysis of digestion product of PCR
amplification. The results revealed that point mutation of p16
gene was rare during gastric carcinogenesis. It coincides with
previous findings[25,26].
It was also implied that the frequency of p16 gene deletion
was lower than that of loss of P16 protein expression. Some other
uncertain mechanisms might exist in the regulation of p16
gene expression. Many studies suggested that hypermethylation of p16
gene was the major process for its inactivation in GC and an
important mechanism in gastric carcinogenesis[27].
Further studies are needed to prove this.
Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the
positive rate of pRb was significantly lower in GC than in normal
gastric mucosa and dysplastic gastric mucosa. The result indicated
GC carcinogenesis was probably related with the loss of pRb
expression, which was consistent with other reports[28].
Serrano et al.[1],
have proposed that physiological inactivation of Rb during G1
phase leads to increased p16 expression in order to limit
CDK4 activity. Genetic inactivation of Rb would also
stimulate cell to increase p16 expression in an ultimately
unnecessary attempt to inhibit CDK4. This negative feedback model
predicts that Rb-negative tumors would have high levels of p16,
while Rb-positive tumors might require decreased amounts of
functional p16 in order to achieve a level of CDK4 activity
sufficient for Rb inactivation. Shapiro et al.[21],
also confirmed the inverse reciprocity between Rb
inactivation and p16 expression in lung cancer. We therefore
sought to determine whether there was a specific correlation between
p16 gene and Rb gene in GC. We analyzed the
relationship between P16 and pRb expression in GC. The result
indicated that there was not only loss of P16 and Rb proteins
expression, but also negative correlation between P16 and Rb
expression in human GC which is consistent with others[29].
These support the hypothesis that p16 and Rb genes
adjust with each other by negative feedback in cell cycle regulation
and indicate that the alteration of p16 and Rb gene
expression may be involved in carcinogenesis and progression of
human GC.
REFERENCES
1
Serrano M, Hannon GJ, Beach D. A new regulatory motif
in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin
D/CDK4. Nature 1993; 366:
704-707
2
Kamb A, Gruis NA, Weaver-Feldhaus J, Liu Q, Harshman
K, Tavtigian SV, Stockert E, Day RS 3rd, Johnson BE,
Skolnick MH. A cell cycle regulator
potentially involved in genesis of many tumor types. Science
1994; 264: 436-440
3
Peng CY, Chen TC, Hung SP, Chen MF, Yeh CT, Tsai SL,
Chu CM, Liaw YF. Genetic alterations of INK4alpha/ARF
locus and p53 in human hepatocellular
carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2002; 22: 1256-1271
4
Mitani K. Molecular mechanisms in leukemogenesis. Gan
To Kagaku Ryoho 2002; 29: 1107-1112
5
Sasaki S, Kitagawa Y, Sekido Y, Minna JD, Kuwano H,
Yokota J, Kohno T. Molecular processes of
chromosome 9p21 deletions in human
cancers. Oncogene 2003; 22: 3792-3798
6 He XS,
Su Q, Chen ZC, He XT, Che SY. Expression, Mutation and Deletion
of p16 Gene in gastric carcinoma.
Aizheng 2001; 20:
468-473
7 Borrman
R. Geschwulste
des Magens und Duodenums. In Henke F. Lubarsch O. eds: Handbuch der
Speziellen
Pathologischen Anatomie und Histologie. Berlin Julius Springer
1926: 864-871
8 Sambrook
J, Frisch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual
2nded, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Press
1989
9
Yasui W, Yokozaki H, Fujimoto J, Naka K, Kuniyasu H,
Tahara E. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in
multistep
carcinogenesis of the stomach. J Gastroenterol 2000; 12(35
Suppl): 111-115
10
Kratzke RA, Greatens TM, Rubins JB, Maddaus MA,
Niewoehner DE, Niehans GA, Geradts J. Rb and
p16INK4a
expression in resected non-small cell lung tumors. Cancer Res
1996; 56: 3415-3420
11
Jarrard DF, Modder J, Fadden P, Fu V, Sebree L, Heisey
D, Schwarze SR, Friedl A. Alterations in the p16/pRb cell
cycle
checkpoint occur commonly in primary and metastatic human prostate
cancer. Cancer Lett 2002; 185: 191-199
12
Mobley SR, Liu TJ, Hudson JM, Clayman GL. In vitro
growth suppression by adenoviral transduction of p21 and p16
in
squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a research model for
combination gene therapy. Arch
Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 1998; 124: 88-92
13
Tsujie M, Yamamoto H, Tomita N, Sugita Y, Ohue M,
Sakita I, Tamaki Y, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Inoue M, Matsuura
N,
Monden T, Shiozaki H, Monden M. Expression of tumor suppressor gene
p16(INK4) products in primary gastric
cancer.
Oncology 2000; 58: 126-136
14
Arap W, Nishikawa R, Furnari FB, Cavenee WK, Huang HJ.
Replacement of the p16/CDKN2 gene suppresses
human
glioma cell growth. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 1351-1354
15
Frizelle SP, Grim J, Zhou J, Gupta P, Curiel DT,
Geradts J, Kratzke RA. Re-expression of p16INK4a in mesothelioma
cells
results in cell cycle arrest, cell death, tumor suppression and
tumor regression. Oncogene 1998; 16: 3087-3095
16
Nguyen TT, Nguyen CT, Gonzales FA, Nichols PW, Yu MC,
Jones PA. Analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitor
expression and methylation patterns in human prostate cancers.
Prostate 2000; 43: 233-242
17
Nishikawa R, Furnari FB, Lin H, Arap W, Berger MS,
Cavenee WK, Su Huang HJ. Loss of p16INK4 expression is
frequent
in high grade gliomas. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 1941-1945
18
Kawabuchi B, Moriyama S, Hironaka M, Fujii T, Koike M,
Moriyama H, Nishimura Y, Mizuno S, Fukayama M.
p16
inactivation in small-sized lung adenocarcinoma: its association
with poor prognosis. Int J Cancer 1999; 84:
49-53
19
Reznikoff CA, Yeager TR, Belair CD, Savelieva E,
Puthenveettil JA, Stadler WM. Elevated P16 at senescence and
loss
of P16
at immortalization in human papillomavirus 16E6, but not E7,
transformed human uroepithelial cells. Cancer
Res
1996; 56: 2886-2890
20
Geradts J, Hruban RH, Schutte M, Kern SE, Maynard R.
Immunohistochemical p16INK4a analysis of archival tumors
with
deletion, hypermethylation, or mutation of the CDKN2/MTS1 gene. A
comparison of four commercial antibodies.
Appl
Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2000; 8: 71-79
21
Shapiro GI, Edwards CD, Kobzik L, Godleski J, Richards
W, Sugarbaker DJ, Rollins BJ. Reciprocal Rb inactivation
and
p16INK4 expression in primary lung cancers and cell lines. Cancer
Res 1995; 55: 505-509
22
Tam SW, Shay JW, Pagano M. Differential expression and
cell cycle regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4
inhibitor
P16 INK4. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 5816-5820
23
Shapiro GI, Park JE, Edwards CD, Mao L, Merlo A,
Sidransky D, Ewen ME, Rollins BJ. Multiple mechanisms of
p16INK4A
inactivation in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res
1995; 55: 6200-6209
24
Giroux MA, Audrezet MP, Metges JP, Lozac'h
P, Volant A, Nousbaum JB, Labat
JP, Gouerou H, Ferec C,
Robaszkiewicz
M.Infrequent p16/CDKN2 alterations in squamous cell carcinoma of the
oesophagus. Eur J
Gastroenterol
Hepatol 2002; 14: 15-18
25
Gunther T, Schneider-Stock R, Pross M, Manger T,
Malfertheiner P, Lippert H, Roessner A. Alterations of
the
p16/MTS1-tumor suppressor gene in gastric cancer. Pathol Res
Pract 1998; 194: 809-813
26
Sakata K, Tamura G, Maesawa C, Suzuki Y, Terashima M,
Satoh K, Eda Y, Suzuki A, Sekiyama S, Satodate R. Loss
of
heterozygosity on the short arm of chromosome 9 without p16 gene
mutation in gastric carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer
Res
1995; 86: 333-335
27
Ficorella C, Cannita K, Ricevuto E, Toniato E, Fusco
C, Sinopoli NT, De Galitiis F, Di Rocco ZC, Porzio G, Frati L,
Gulino
A,
Martinotti S, Marchetti P. P16 hypermethylation contributes to the
characterization of gene inactivation profiles
in
primary gastric cancer. Oncol Rep 2003; 10: 169-173
28
Ogawa M, Maeda K, Chung YS, Onoda N, Kato Y, Nakata B,
Sowa M. Correlation between expression of RB protein
and
prognosis of gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1996; 23(Suppl
2): 148-150
29
Lee WA, Woo DK, Kim YI, Kim WH. p53, p16 and RB
expression in adenosquamous and squamous cell carcinomas
of the
stomach. Pathol Res Pract 1999; 195: 747-752
Science Editor Kumar M and Zhu LH Language Editor
Elsevier HK
| |