| |
Kazutaka Kurokohchi, Seishiro Watanabe, Tsutomu Masaki, Naoki
Hosomi, Yoshiaki Miyauchi, Takashi Himoto, Yasuhiko Kimura, Seiji
Nakai, Akihiro Deguchi, Hirohito Yoneyama, Shuhei Yoshida, Shigeki
Kuriyama, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kagawa
University School of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun,
Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
Correspondence to: Shigeki Kuriyama, Third Department of
Internal Medicine, Kagawa University School of Medicine, 1750-1
Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793,
Japan. skuriyam@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-878-91-2156
Fax: +81-878-91-2158
Received: 2004-08-17
Accepted: 2004-10-18
Abstract
Aim:
In the present study, the characteristics of PEI-RFA treatment were
further elucidated by analyzing the relationship between the volume
of coagulated necrosis and the energy requirement for ablation or
the amount of ethanol injected into HCC.
Methods:
The volume of coagulated necrosis, total energy requirement and
energy requirement for coagulation of per unit volume were examined
in the groups of PEI-RFA and RFA alone using the Cool-tip RF system.
Results:
The results showed that the volume of coagulated necrosis
induced was significantly larger in PEI-RFA group than in routine
RFA group, when the total energy administered was comparable in both
groups. In PEI-RFA, enlargement of coagulated necrosis was admitted
in 3 dimensions and the amount of energy requirement per unit volume
of coagulated necrosis was negatively correlated with the amount of
ethanol injected into HCC.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that, compared to RFA alone, PEI-RFA enables
to induce comparable coagulated necrosis with smaller energy
requirement, and that PEI-RFA is likely to be less invasive than RFA
alone irrespective of inducing enhanced coagulated necrosis. Thus,
simple prior injection of ethanol may make RFA treatment more
effective and less invasive for the treatment of patients with HCC.
© 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier
Inc. All rights reserved.
Key words: Combination therapy; Percutaneous ethanol
injection; Radiofrequency ablation; Energy requirement
Kurokohchi K, Watanabe S, Masaki T, Hosomi N, Miyauchi Y, Himoto T,
Kimura Y, Nakai S, Deguchi A, Yoneyama H, Yoshida S, Kuriyama S.
Comparation between combination therapy of percutaneous ethanol
injection and radiofrequency ablation and radiofrequency ablation
alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J
Gastroenterol
2005; 11(10): 1426-1432
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/11/1426.asp
INTRODUCTION
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most serious
problems worldwide. Although intensive efforts have been made for
the treatment of HCC, the mortality of patients with HCC is still
high. Tumor ablation technologies such as microwave, laser and radio
frequency have been shown to be reliable and effective for inducing
thermally-mediated coagulation necrosis for primary HCC[1-4]
and metastatic liver cancer[5,6].
Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) therapy, more frequently
performed in the past, is considered to be effective for the
treatment of patients with relatively small-sized encapsulated HCC
below 3 cm in the longest diameter. Recently, it has become possible
to obtain larger areas of coagulated necrosis by the innovation of
radiofrequency (RFA) technologies[7,8].
Much effort has been applied to enhance the therapeutic effects of
RFA by the combination of RFA with other modalities. For example,
combined use of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization[9-13]
or saline injection[14-17]
with RFA therapy was shown to be effective to enhance the coagulated
necrosis. We also developed a novel combination therapy of PEI and
RFA (PEI-RFA) and reported that this combination therapy could
induce wider coagulated necrosis without much efforts and adverse
effects. Furthermore, this therapy can be applied to the tumors that
are difficult to treat with RFA alone[18,19].
Furthermore, this enhancing effect for inducing the coagulated
necrosis has been experimentally confirmed using bovine liver[20].
Recently, we have reported that percutaneous ethanol and lipiodol
injection therapy (PELIT), considered to be a milder therapy than
RFA, was important as a supportive treatment modality for HCCs
especially for those lacking the vascularity or for patients with
severely impaired hepatic reserve and useful for the treatment of
HCCs that were difficult to treat with RFA alone[21].
After developing PEI-RFA treatment, we have experienced so far some
cases that were satisfactorily treated by use of relatively
low-power output control. Thus, in the present study, PEI-RFA
treatment was further characterized from the standpoint of the
energy requirement for total and unit volume ablation as well as of
the amount of ethanol injected, using the RF system with cool-tip
type electrodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
PEI-RFA was performed against 75 cases (53 males and 22
females; mean age of 69 years) with biopsy-proven HCC. The patients
were also diagnosed as having HCC by helical dynamic computed
tomography (CT). Among the total subjects, RFA alone was done in 15
patients and PEI-RFA was in 60. The characteristics of the subjects
are shown in Table 1. All of these studies were conducted with
informed consent at the time of the enrollment for this study.
Table 1
Characteristics of patients enrolled in the present study
| |
RFA
alone |
PEI-RFA |
| Total
number of patient |
15 |
60 |
| Male/Female |
10/5 |
45/15 |
| Age
(yr) |
|
|
| Mean |
63 |
69 |
| Range |
47-74 |
44-86 |
| Tumor
size (cm) |
|
|
| Mean |
2.5 |
3.0 |
| Range |
1.5-3.5 |
1.0-
8.0 |
| Injected
ethanol (mL) |
|
|
| Mean |
0 |
7.1 |
| Range |
0-0 |
0-37 |
| Child-Pugh
grade |
|
|
| A |
7 |
38 |
| B |
7 |
21 |
| C |
1 |
1 |
Equipments
and RFA procedures
PEI-RFA was performed under the real-time ultrasonography
(US) guidance with a 3.5-MHz sector probe (Power Vision 5000;
Toshiba Medical, Tokyo, Japan). RFA was performed by Cool-tip RF
System (RADIONICS, Burlington, USA)[22]
according to the method described in our previous manuscripts[18,19].
Briefly, a 17-gauge RFA needle with an electrode of 3 cm in length
was first inserted into the tumor, and then a 21-gauge PEI needle
was inserted into the tumor in the liver through the same hole of
the attachment beside the echo probe, and then pure ethanol was
slowly injected into the tumor till the whole area of tumor was
filled with the ethanol (Figure 1). Ethanol injection into the tumor
was ceased when resistance to the injection was felt. The volume of
injected ethanol was always kept below the double of estimated tumor
volume. The ablation was performed under the impedance control
and the power output was increased stepwise and the ablation was
terminated after the high echoic shadow sufficiently covered the
tumor margin.
Figure 1(PDF) Appearance of PEI-RFA treatment. A 17-gauge RFA needle with 2
or 3 cm electrode was first inserted into the tumor through the hole
of the attachment beside the echo probe, and then 21-gauge PEI
needle was inserted through the same hole. RFA was performed
immediately after injecting the ethanol into the tumor. The ablation
was performed under the impedance control. The amount of ethanol
injected into the tumors was always kept below the double of the
estimated tumor volume and the injection of ethanol was ceased if
resistance to the injection was felt.
Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy
The efficacy of the RFA was assessed by using helical
dynamic contrast-enhanced CT five to seven days after the treatment.
Tumor necrosis was considered to be complete if no enhancing areas
were observed based on images obtained during early and late phases
of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
Evaluation of energy requirement for ablation
Energy requirement needed for ablation was calculated as
follows: energy (J) = Watt (W) × duration of ablation (s). The
length of coagulated necrosis of the lesion was measured from the
late phase of helical dynamic CT. Approximation volume of whole
coagulated necrosis area and energy requirement for ablation per
unit volume were calculated as follows: whole coagulated volume (cm3)
= 4/3 × r1(cm)
× r2(cm)
× r3(cm);
(r1 =
longest diameter/2; r2
= shortest diameter/2; r3
= height/2) and energy requirement for coagulation per unit volume
(J/cm3
) = energy/whole coagulated necrosis.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Macintosh software StatView
II (Version 5.0). Regression analysis was used to calculate the
correlation coefficients and P values. Statistical
significance was accepted when P<0.05.
RESULTS
Comparison of the volume of coagulated area, and energy
requirement and the energy requirement for total and unit volume
coagulation in the groups of PEI-RFA and RFA alone
Seventy-five patients were divided randomly into two groups. One
group (60 patients) received PEI-RFA, while the other (15 patients)
RFA alone. All of these patients underwent RFA therapy by means of
the Cool-tip RF system. No major complications or adverse effects
were observed in both groups. The volume of coagulated necrosis
areas, the total amount of energy requirement and the energy
requirement for inducing coagulation of per unit volume in the
groups of PEI-RFA and RFA alone are shown in Table 2. The longest
and shortest diameters as well as the height of the coagulated
necrosis areas and the coagulated volume evaluated by dynamic
contrast-enhanced CT scan were significantly larger in cases treated
with PEI-RFA than in those treated with RFA alone. By contrast, the
total amount of energy requirement was comparable between groups.
Thus, the energy requirement for coagulation of per unit volume was
significantly smaller in PEI-RFA group compared to the group of RFA
alone. The energy requirement for coagulation of per unit volume in
PEI-RFA was approximately three-fourths of that in RFA alone.
Table
2 Comparison of the
volume of coagulated necrosis, total energy requirement and the
energy requirement for inducing coagulation of per unit volume in
the groups of PEI-RFA and RFA alone
| |
EtOH
(mL) |
L
(cm) |
S
(cm) |
H
(cm) |
V
(cm3) |
T-ENE
(J) |
T-ENE/V
(J/cm3) |
| RFA
alone (n
= 15) |
0±0 |
2.3±0.6 |
2.1±0.6 |
2.4±0.4 |
6.5±3.6 |
38
700±12549 |
010±11
124 |
| PEI-RFA
(n
= 60) |
6.9±6.6 |
4.2±1.2 |
3.5±1.0 |
4.0±1.1 |
34.0±29.3 |
53
828±28144 |
2
355±1 690 |
| P |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
0.0002 |
<0.0001 |
0.73 |
<0.0001 |
Sixty
patients with HCC were treated with PEI-RFA by Cool-tip RF System,
while 15 patients were treated with RFA alone using the same system.
After the treatment, the longest and shortest diameters and the
height of the coagulated necrosis were estimated by the
contrast-enhanced CT scan. Each abbreviation in the table is
expressing as follows: EtOH, the amount of ethanol; L, longest diameter; S,
shortest diameter; H, height; V, the volume of
coagulated necrosis; T-ENE, total energy requirement;
T-ENE/V, the energy requirement for inducing coagulation of per unit
volume. The coagulated necrosis in PEI-RFA group was enlarged in 3
dimensions compared with the roup of RFA alone, although the total energy requirement was
comparable between groups.
Comparative study of the coagulated necrosis and the energy
requirement for coagulation of per unit volume between PEI-RFA and
RFA groups
As shown in Table 3, the mean volume of ethanol injected in PEI-RFA
group was 6.9 mL. Therefore, 60 patients treated with PEI-RFA were
divided into two groups according to the amount of ethanol injected.
One group (high-EtOH group) consisted of 19 cases administered with
6.9 mL and more ethanol and the other (low-EtOH group) of 41 cases
less than 6.9 mL ethanol. Between these two groups, the total energy
requirement was also comparable as shown in Table 1. However, the
volume of coagulated necrosis was significantly larger in the high-EtOH
group than in the low-EtOH group. The volume of coagulated necrosis
in the high-EtOH group was 2.6 times larger than that in the low-EtOH
group. Accordingly, the energy requirement for coagulation per unit
volume in the high-EtOH group was significantly lower in the high-EtOH
group than in the low-EtOH group.
All cases treated with PEI-RFA were divided into
two groups. One was high-energy group and the other low-energy group
according to the mean amount of total energy requirement (53 828 J).
As shown in Table 4, in this classification, the amount of ethanol
injected was statistically comparable in both groups. The volume of
coagulated necrosis in the high-energy group was 1.8 times larger
than that in the low-energy group. The degree of the enhancing
effect was smaller compared to that in cases classified by the mean
amount of ethanol injected as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, the
energy requirement for coagulation of per unit volume was comparable
between groups.
Table
3
Comparative study of coagulated necrosis in the groups
classified according to the amount of ethanol injected in PEI-RFA
| |
EtOH
(mL) |
L
(cm) |
S
(cm) |
H
(cm) |
V
(cm3) |
T-ENE
(J) |
T-ENE/V
(J/cm3) |
| EtOH
<6.9 mL |
3.1±1.6 |
3.8±0.9 |
3.0±0.6 |
3.6±0.9 |
22.3±14.3 |
48
901±23219 |
2
796±1 752 |
| (n
= 41) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
| EtOH
>6.9 mL |
14.9±6.1 |
5.1±1.3 |
4.3±1.2 |
4.8±1.1 |
57.6±38.2 |
63
931±34744 |
1
460±1016 |
| (n
= 19) |
|
|
|
|
(2.6) |
|
|
| P |
<0.0001 |
0.0002 |
<0.0001 |
0.0003 |
<0.0001 |
0.11 |
0.0014 |
The
mean volume of ethanol injected in PEI-RFA was 6.9 mL. Therefore, 60
patients treated with PEI-RFA were divided into two groups according
to the amount of ethanol injected. One group (high EtOH group)
consisted of 19 cases administered with 6.9 mL and more ethanol, and
the other (low EtOH group) of 41 cases less than 6.9 mL
ethanol.
Each abbreviation in the table is expressing as follows: EtOH, the
amount of ethanol; L, longest diameter; S, shortest diameter; H,
height; V, the volume of coagulated necrosis; T-ENE, total energy
requirement; T-ENE/V, the energy requirement for inducing
coagulation of per unit volume. The volume of coagulated necrosis in
the high EtOH group was 2.6 times larger than that in the low EtOH
group, although the total energy requirement was comparable between
groups.
Table
4
Comparative study of coagulated necrosis in the groups
classified according to the total energy requirement in PEI-RFA
| |
EtOH
(mL) |
L
(cm) |
S
(cm) |
H
(cm) |
V
(cm3) |
T-ENE
(J) |
T-ENE/V(J/cm3) |
| T-ENE
<53828J |
5.8±5.8 |
3.6±0.8 |
3.2±0.8 |
3.6±1.0 |
24.6±17.3 |
32
003±12743 |
2
038±1638 |
| (n
= 32) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
| T-ENE
>53828 J |
8.1±7.3 |
4.8±1.2 |
3.8±1.2 |
4.4±1.2 |
44.0±36.4 |
77
884±19567 |
2
727±1687 |
| (n
= 28) |
|
|
|
|
(1.8) |
|
|
| P |
0.23 |
0.0002 |
0.04 |
0.0028 |
0.014 |
<0.0001 |
0.052 |
All
cases treated with PEI-RFA were divided into two groups. One was
high energy group and the other low energy group according to the
mean amount of total energy requirement (53828 Joule). Each
abbreviation in the table is expressing as follows: EtOH, the amount
of ethanol; L, longest diameter; S, shortest diameter; H, height; V,
the volume of coagulated necrosis; T-ENE, total energy requirement;
T-ENE/V, the energy requirement for
inducing coagulation of per unit volume. The amount of
ethanol injected was statistically comparable in both groups. The
volume of coagulated necrosis in the high energy group was 1.8 times
larger than that in the low energy group. The degree of the
enhancing effect was smaller compared with that in cases classified
by the mean amount of injected ethanol as shown in Table 3.
Furthermore, the energy requirement for coagulation of per unit
volume was comparable between groups.
Relationship between the amount of ethanol and the volume of
coagulated necrosis or the energy requirement for coagulation of per
unit volume
Relationship between the amount of ethanol injected and the volume
of coagulated necrosis or the energy requirement for coagulation of
per unit volume was analyzed in the total subjects treated with PEI-RFA
(60 cases). As shown in Figure 2, the amount of ethanol injected
into tumor significantly and positively correlated with the volume
of coagulated necrosis with high correlation coefficient (r =
0.71, P<0.0001). Then, the amount of ethanol injected
negatively, although weak, correlated with the energy requirement
for coagulation of per unit volume (r = -0.41, P =
0.014). These results suggest that, according to the amount of
ethanol injected into tumor, larger coagulated necrosis can be
obtained and less amount of energy is required for coagulation of
per unit volume.
Figure 2(PDF)
Relationship between the amount of ethanol injected and the
volume of coagulated necrosis or the energy requirement for inducing
per unit volume of coagulated necrosis in PEI-RFA. PEI-RFA was
performed on 60 patients with HCC. The ablation was done by using
the Cool-tip RF system. The amount of ethanol injected into tumors
positively correlated with the volume of coagulated necrosis (A:
r = 0.71, P<0.0001) and it negatively correlated with
the energy requirement for inducing per unit volume of coagulated
necrosis (B: r = -0.41, 0.014).
Relationship between the total required energy for ablation
and the volume of coagulated necrosis or the energy requirement for
coagulation of per unit volume
Relationship between the total required energy and the volume of the
coagulated necrosis or the energy requirement for coagulation of per
unit volume was analyzed in the total subjects treated with PEI-RFA
(60 cases). As shown in Figure 3, the total required energy
significantly and positively correlated with the volume of
coagulated necrosis (r = 0.47, P = 0.0013). However,
this correlation coefficient was smaller than that between the
amount of ethanol injected and the volume of coagulated necrosis.
Moreover, the total required energy and the energy requirement for
coagulation of per unit volume did not show significant correlation
(r = 0.35, P = 0.13).
Figure 3(PDF) Relationship between the amount of total energy requirement
and the volume of coagulated necrosis or the energy requirement for
inducing per unit volume of coagulated necrosis in PEI-RFA. PEI-RFA
was performed on 60 patients with HCC. The ablation was done by
using the Cool-tip RF system. The amount of total energy requirement
positively correlated with the volume of coagulated necrosis (r
= 0.47, P = 0.0013), whereas no significant correlation was
admitted between the total amount of energy requirement and the
energy requirement for inducing per unit volume of coagulated
necrosis (r = 0.35, P = 0.13) in PEI-RFA.
Representative cases with HCC treated with PEI-RFA
By analyzing the relationship between the energy requirement and the
amount of ethanol injected in PEI-RFA, two characteristic points
have been turned out: (1) PEI-RFA enables to induce wider coagulated
necrosis by increasing the amount of ethanol injected into tumor;
(2) PEI-RFA is able to obtain comparative therapeutic effects by
means of lower energy compared to RFA alone.
Four cases with HCC treated with PEI-RFA
expressing these characteristic points are shown in Figures 4, 5.
The large-sized HCCs (5 cm in diameter) of the first and second
cases were located in S7 (Figure 4A) and S1 regions (Figure 4C)
respectively. In the first case, RFA was performed at 30-100 W for
10 min after injecting 10 mL of ethanol homogeneously into the
tumor. The RFA electrode was reinserted into the tumor and the RFA
was performed for further 10 min. Contrast-enhanced CT after the
treatment showed the achievement of coagulated necrosis of 8 cm in
diameter and the ablated region covered the entire region of the
tumor including the safety margin (Figure 4B). In the second case,
contrast-enhanced CT showed the enhancement in the early vascular
phase of dynamic CT (Figure 4C). It was likely to be difficult to
treat with RFA under high power output, because the tumor was
surrounded by inferior vena cava, portal tract and aorta. Therefore,
PEI-RFA under a relatively low power output after injecting high
amount of ethanol was chosen as a treatment modality. After
injecting 19 mL of ethanol into the tumor, one session of RFA was
performed at 30 W for 12 min. Contrast-enhanced CT after the
treatment showed that the ablated region reached the most of the
entire region of the tumor in this case as well (Figure 4D).
The HCCs of the third and fourth cases are
located in S8 (Figure 5A) and S6 (Figure 5C) respectively and the
size of both HCCs was 1.5 cm in diameter. To obtain over 0.5 cm of
the safety margin area from the edge of the tumor, the coagulated
necrosis wider than 2.5 cm in diameter was required for the
ablation. In both cases, after injecting 2 mL of ethanol into the
tumors, RFA was performed at 40 W for 5 min. Although RFA was
performed under a relatively low power output and for a short time
period, dynamic CT after PEI-RFA in both cases indicated the
induction of coagulated necrosis larger than 2.5 cm in diameter
(Figure 5B, D). In the third case, the energy requirement for
coagulation of per unit volume was an extremely low level of 1244
(J/cm3),
a half-value of the mean in PEI-RFA group as shown in the Table 2.
Figure 4(PDF) Two cases with large-sized HCC treated with PEI-RFA are shown.
Contrast-enhanced CT before (A: delay phase, C: early vascular
phase) and after (B: delay phase, D: delay phase) PEI-RFA. Massive
HCCs of 5 cm in the longest diameter were located in the right lobe
of the liver in both cases. In the first case (A and B), RFA was
started at 30 W and the power output was increased stepwise to 100 W
every two min and the ablation was performed for 20 min. In the
second case (C and D), because the tumor was located close by blood
vessel such as inferior vena cava, portal tract and aorta, it was
likely to be difficult to treat with RFA under high power control.
After injecting 19 mL of ethanol into the tumor, one session of RFA
was performed at 30 W for 12 min. The massive tumor was completely
eliminated by PEI-RFA.
Figure 5(PDF) Two cases with small-sized HCCs treated with PEI-RFA under
low power output control are shown. Contrast-enhanced CT before (A,
C) and after (B, D) PEI-RFA. Small HCCs of 1.5 cm in the longest
diameter were located in the S8 region of the liver in both cases.
In both cases, RFA was performed at 40 W for 5 min. Though the
ablation was performed at relatively low power output for short
duration, the coagulated necrosis larger than 2.5 cm was induced
after the treatment.
DISCUSSION
RFA is a promising technique for local control of liver malignancy
such as primary hepatocellular carcinoma[4,23,24]
and metastatic liver cancers[25].
This technique has become the main stream of the treatment of
non-surgical treatment modalities in clinical settings[3].
In contrast to its efficacy, the region of coagulated necrosis
induced by RFA is still limited and tumors within 3 cm in diameter
are thought to be the good application sites of RFA therapy.
Underestimated complication was sometimes observed after RFA
treatment. To enhance the therapeutic effect of RFA, several
treatment modalities have been applied as additional treatments on
local treatment. It has been reported that combined use of
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization or saline injection therapy
with RFA enhanced the extent of induced coagulation[11-14,17,26,27].
Recently, Pawlik et al. have reported that resection combined
with RFA provides a surgical option to a group of patients with
unresectable liver metastases[28].
As one of the optional combination therapies, we have shown that the
injection of ethanol prior to RFA markedly increased the induced
coagulated necrosis in human[18,19]
and bovine livers[20].
In the present study, we further evaluated the usefulness of PEI-RFA
using the system equipped with a cool-tip type electrode, instead of
the system with an expandable type electrode. Especially, the
characteristics of PEI-RFA were assessed from the standpoint of
energy requirement for inducing the coagulated necrosis and the
amount of ethanol injected. In our previous manuscript, we have
shown that the longest and the shortest diameters as well as the
height of the coagulated necrosis areas, and the coagulated volume
evaluated by dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scan were significantly
larger in cases treated with PEI-RFA than in those treated with RFA
alone using the system equipped with an expandable type of electrode
(RITA-500PA)[18].
Similar enhancing effects of ethanol injection were observed in the
present study using the Cool-tip RF system. The volume of coagulated
necrosis in PEI-RFA was approximately four times larger than that in
RFA alone in the Cool-tip RF system. This degree of enhancement of
coagulated necrosis area was quite similar to that detected in the
system with the expandable type of electrode in our previous
manuscript[18].
These results suggest that injection of ethanol prior to RFA therapy
may equally enhance the volume of coagulated necrosis in 3
dimensions to the same extent regardless of types of RFA
instruments.
More importantly and interestingly, it should be noted that the
volume and diameters of coagulated necrosis were significantly
larger in PEI-RFA than in RFA alone, although the amount of total
energy requirement was comparable between groups. Thus, the energy
requirement for coagulation of per unit volume was significantly
lower in PEI-RFA than in RFA alone. The degree of enhancement of
coagulated necrosis was higher between the groups classified
according to the amount of injected ethanol than between those
classified according to the amount of total energy requirement. The
former was 2.6-times enhancement and the latter was 1.8 times.
Furthermore, the volume of coagulated necrosis showed a stronger
correlation with the amount of ethanol injected than the total
energy requirement (r = 0.71 vs 0.47) respectively.
While the amount of injected ethanol, negatively correlated with the
energy requirement for coagulation of per unit volume, the total
required energy did not show negative correlation with the energy
requirement for coagulation of per unit volume. Taken together,
these results clearly indicate that smaller energy is required in
PEI-RFA to induce comparable coagulated necrosis to RFA alone, and
the use of ethanol injection prior to RFA is likely to alter the RFA
therapy to a milder one for the treatment of patients with HCC.
These results may be one of the explanations that PEI-RFA is able to
induce wider coagulated necrosis compared to RFA alone under the
same power output condition.
Although it is possible to say that RFA is less
invasive compared to surgical treatment, we have experienced some
patients whose liver function tests declined after RFA treatment.
Furthermore, RFA treatment has sometimes been obliged to be ceased
due to the pain complained by patients during the treatment[29].
Therefore, it is very important to develop less invasive treatments
than those currently used. It is needless to say that less invasive
and more effective treatment is desirable for local control of HCC
in patients treated with RFA.
When thinking of the medical treatment, it should
be important to take both efficacy and the adverse reactions into
consideration. In this regard, PEI-RFA is thought to be a less
invasive and more effective treatment modality for local control of
hepatic malignancies than RFA alone. PEI-RFA is expected to
contribute to the local treatment of patients with hepatic
malignancy from the standpoint of not only the effectiveness but
also the reduction of adverse events.
REFERENCES
1
Nagata
Y, Hiraoka M, Akuta K, Abe M, Takahashi M, Jo S, Nishimura Y,
Masunaga S, Fukuda M, Imura
H. Radiofrequency thermotherapy for
malignant liver tumors. Cancer 1990; 65: 1730-1736
2
Allgaier HP, Deibert P, Zuber I, Olschewski M, Blum
HE. Percutaneous radiofrequency interstitial thermal ablation
of
small hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet
1999; 353: 1676-1677
3
Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Solbiati L, Livraghi T,
Tanabe KK, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Ablation of liver tumors
using percutaneous RF therapy. Am
J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1023-1028
4
Curley SA, Izzo F, Ellis LM, Nicholas Vauthey J.
Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular cancer in 110
patients
with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2000;
232: 381-391
5
Solbiati L, Goldberg SN, Ierace T, Livraghi T, Meloni
F, Dellanoce M, Sironi S, Gazelle GS. Hepatic
Metastases: Percutaneous
radio-frequency ablation with cooled-tip electrodes. Radiology 1997;
205: 367-372
6
Solbiati L, Lerace T, Goldberg SN, Sironi S, Livraghi
T, Fiocca R, Servadio G, Rizzatto G, Mueller PR, Del Maschio
A, Gazelle GS. Percutaneous US-guided
radio-frequency tissue ablation of liver metastases: Treatment and
follow-up
in 16 patients. Radiology 1997;
202: 195-203
7
Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F,
Solbiati L, Gazelle GS. Small hepatocellular carcinoma:
Treatment
with radio-frequency ablation versus
ethanol injection. Radiology 1999; 210: 655-661
8
Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Compton CC, Mueller PR,
Tanabe KK. Treatment of intrahepatic malignancy
with radiofrequency ablation:
Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Cancer 2000; 88:
2452-2463
9
Rossi S, Garbagnati F, Lencioni R, Allgaier HP,
Marchiano A, Fornari F, Quaretti P, Di Tolla G, Ambrosi C,
Mazzaferro
V, Blum HE, Bartolozzi C.
Percutaneous radio-frequency thermal ablation of nonresectable
hepatocellular carcinoma
after occlusion of tumor blood
supply. Radiology 2000; 217: 119-126
10
Buscarini L, Buscarini E, Di Stasi M, Quaretti P,
Zangrandl A. Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation
combined with transcatherter
arterial embolization in the treatment of large hepatocellular
carcinoma. Ultraschall
Med 1999; 20:
47-53
11
Yamasaki T, Kurokawa F, Shirahashi H, Kusano N,
Hironaka K, Okita K. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
therapy with combined
angiography and computed tomography assistance for patients with
hepatocellular
carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 91:
1342-1348
12
Koda M, Murawaki Y, Mitsuda A, Oyama K, Okamoto K,
Idobe Y, Suou T, Kawasaki H. Combination therapy
with transcatheter arterial
chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection compared with
percutaneous
ethanol injection alone for
patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92:
1516-1524
13
Kitamoto M, Imagawa M, Yamada H, Watanabe C, Sumioka
M, Satoh O, Shimamoto M, Kodama M, Kimura
S, Kishimoto K, Okamoto Y,
Fukuda Y, Dohi K. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of
small
hepatocellular carcinomas:
Comparison of the radiofrequency effect with and without
chemoembolization.
Am J Roentgenol
2003; 181: 997-1003
14
Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Monti F, Bizzini A, Lazzaroni
S, Meloni F, Pellicano S, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS.
Saline-enhanced radio-frequency
tissue ablation in the treatment of liver metastases. Radiology 1997;
202: 205-210
15
Honda N, Guo Q, Uchida H, Ohishi H, Hiasa Y.
Percutaneous hot saline injection therapy for hepatic tumors:
An alternative to percutaneous
ethanol injection therapy. Radiology 1994; 190: 53-57
16
Burdio F, Guemes A, Burdio JM, Navarro A, Sousa R,
Castiella T, Cruz I, Burzaco O, Guirao X, Lozano R. Large
hepatic ablation with bipolar
saline-enhanced radiofrequency: An experimental study in in vivo
porcine liver with a
novel approach. J Surg Res
2003; 110: 193-201
17
Hansler J, Frieser M, Schaber S, Kutschall C, Bernatik
T, Muller W, Becker D, Hahn EG, Strobel D.
Radiofrequency ablation of
hepatocellualar carcinoma with a saline solution perfusion device: A
pilot study. J Vasc
Interv Radiol 2003; 14:
575-580
18
Kurokohchi K, Watanabe S, Masaki T, Hosomi N, Funaki
T, Arima K, Yoshida S, Miyauchi Y, Kuriyama S. Combined
use of percutaneous ethanol
injection and radiofrequency ablation for the effective treatment
of
hepatocellular carcinoma. Int
J Oncol 2002; 21: 841-846
19
Kurokohchi K, Watanabe S, Masaki T, Hosomi N, Funaki
T, Arima K, Yoshida S, Nakai S, Murota M, Miyauchi
Y, Kuriyama S. Combination
therapy of percutaneous ethanol injection and radiofrequency
ablation against
hepatocellular carcinomas
difficult to treat. Int J Oncol 2002; 21: 611-615
20
Watanabe S, Kurokohchi K, Masaki T, Miyauchi Y, Funaki
T, Inoue H, Himoto T, Kita Y, Uchida N, Touge T,
Tatsukawa T, Kuriyama S.
Enlargement of thermal ablation zone by the combination of ethanol
injection
and radiofrequency ablation in
excised bovine liver. Int J Oncol 2004; 24: 279-284
21
Kurokohchi K, Masaki T, Miyauchi Y, Funaki T, Yoneyama
H, Miyoshi H, Yoshida S, Himoto T, Morishita A, Uchida
N, Watanabe S, Kuriyama S.
Percutaneous ethanol and lipiodol injection therapy (PELIT) for
hepatocellular carcinoma.
Int J Oncol 2003; 24:
381-387
22
Francica G, Marone G. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous
treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by
radiofrequency hyperthermia
with a ‘cool-tip needle’. A prelininary clinical experience. Eur
J Ultrasound 1999; 9: 145-153
23
Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Comon CC, Mueller PR, Tanabe
KK. Treatement of intrahepatic malignancy
with radiofrequency ablation:
Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Cancer 2000; 88:
2452-2463
24
Jiang HC, Liu LX, Piao DX, Xu J, Zheng M, Zhu AL, Qi
SY, Zhang WH, Wu LF. Clinical short-term results of
radiofrequency ablation in
liver cancers. World J Gastroenterol 2002; 8: 624-630
25
Curley SA, Izzo F, Delrio P, Ellis LM, Granchi J,
Vallone P, Fiore F, Pignata S, Daniele B, Cremona F.
Radiofrequency ablation of
unresectable primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: Results in
123 patients.
Ann Surg 1999; 230:
1-8
26
Yasuda S, Ito H, Yoshikawa M, Shinozaki M, Goto N,
Fujimoto H, Nasu K, Uno T, Itami J, Isobe K, Shigematsu N,
Ebara M, Saisho H. Radiotherapy
for large hepatocellular carcinoma combined with transcatheter
arterial
embolization and percutaneous
ethanol injection therapy. Int J Oncol 1999; 15:
467-473
27
Okano H, Shiraki K, Inoue H, Ito T, Yamanaka T,
Deguchi M, Sugimoto K, Sakai T, Ohmori S, Murata K, Takase
K, Nakano T. Combining
trascatheter arterial chemoembolization with percutaneous ethanol
injection therapy for
small size hepatocellular
carcinoma. Int J Oncol 2001; 19: 909-912
28
Pawlik TM, Izzo F, Cohen DS, Morris JS, Curley SA.
Combined resection and radiofrequency ablation for
advanced hepatic malignancies:
Results in 172 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:
1059-1069
29
Curley SA, Marra P, Beaty K, Elliis LM, Vauthey JN,
Abdalla EK, Scaife C, Raut C, Wolff R, Choi H, Loyer E, Vallone
P, Fiore F, Scordino F, De Rosa
V, Orlando R, Pignata S, Daniele B, Izzo F. Early and late
complications
after radiofrequency ablation
of malignant liver tumors in 608 patients. Ann Surg 2004;
239: 450-458
Edited by Guo SY
Language Editor Elsevier HK
| |