|
Tao
Wang, Yi Wang, Meng-Chao Wu, Zheng-Feng Yin, Department of
Molecular Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai
200438, China
Xin-Yuan Guan, Department of Clinical Oncology, The
University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China, No. 30171046
Correspondence to: Dr. Yi Wang, Department of Molecular
Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, 225 Changhai Road,
Shanghai 200438, China. yiwang6151@yahoo.com
Telephone: +86-21-25070754
Fax: +86-21-25070859
Received: 2003-06-06
Accepted: 2003-08-16
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the mechanism and significance of NF-kB
activation regulated by hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) in
hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS:
The expression levels of HBx, p65, IkB-a and ubiquitin were detected by
immunohistochemistry in HCC tissue microarrays (TMA) respectively,
and IkB-a was detected by Western blot in HCC and
corresponding liver tissues.
RESULTS:
The percentage of informative TMA samples was 98.8% in 186 cases
with a total of 367 samples. Compared with corresponding liver
tissues (60.0%), the HBx expression was obviously decreased in HBV-associated
HCC (47.9%, u=2.24, P<0.05). On the contrary, the
expressions of p65 (20.6% vs 45.3%, u=4.85, P<0.01)
and ubiquitin (8.9% vs 59.0%, u=9.68, P<0.01) were
notably elevated in HCC. In addition, IkB-a had a tendency to go up. Importantly, positive
relativity was observed between HBx and p65 (x2=10.26, P<0.01),
p65 and IkB-a (x2=16.86, P<0.01), IkB-a and ubiquitin (x2=8.90, P<0.01)
in HCC, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
Both active and non-active forms of NF-kB
are increased in HBV-associated HCC. Variant HBx is the major cause
of the enhancement of NF-kB
activity. The activation always proceeds in nucleus and the
proteasome complexes play an important role in the activation.
Wang
T, Wang Y, Wu MC, Guan XY, Yin ZF. Activating mechanism of
transcriptor NF-kappaB regulated by hepatitis B virus X protein in
hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol
2004; 10(3):356-360
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/10/356.asp
INTRODUCTION
Hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor with a poor prognosis.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been shown to be linked
epidemiologically to the HCC development and about eighty percent of
the tumors in China are induced by HBV. As a unique non-structure
protein, hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) performs a variety of
biological functions, such as gene transactivation[1],
interaction with p53[2], interference with host DNA
repair[3], repression of physiological proteolysis[4],
modulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis[5,6],
induction of malignant cell migration[7,8]. These
functions may play an important role in the initiation and
development of HCC associated with HBV infection. NF-kB,
a crucial transcriptor, takes part in almost all aspects of cell
regulation, including immune cell activation, stress response,
proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and oncogenic
transformation. Currently, more attentions have been paid to the
carcinogenesis of HBx transactiving NF-kB[9].
However, the active state of NF-kB
in HCC has been seldom studied. As a new high-throughput technology
introduced in 1999, tissue microarray (TMA) is worthy of
popularization. In our study, the expression levels of HBx, p65, IkB-a and ubiquitin were detected by
immunohistochemistry on TMA respectively, as well as IkB-a was detected by Western blot, in order to
investigate the mechanism and significance of HBx activating NF-kB.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Tissue samples
Paraffin specimens were prepared from operatively-resected
HCC and non-HCC counterparts between 1997 and 2000, including 171
cases of serum HBV-positive HCC, 10 cases of serum HBV-negative HCC
and their corresponding liver tissues, 5 cases of normal control
liver tissues (Table 1). In addition, 24 couples of fresh HCC and
its corresponding liver tissues were collected between March and
October in 2001, stored at -80 °C until experiment.
Tissue
microarray construction
All
formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded HCC tissues used in this study
were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). The
H&E-stained sections were carefully diagnosed, and the
representative regions of the tumor and its corresponding liver
tissue for microarray were defined as well. HCC TMA was constructed
according to the procedure described by Kononen et al[10].
Briefly, core tissue specimens, 0.6 mm in diameter, were taken from
selected regions of individual donor blocks and precisely arrayed
into recipient paraffin blocks (45 mm×22 mm) using a tissue-arraying instrument (Beecher Instruments, Silver
Spring, MD, USA). After construction, the recipient paraffin block
was incubated at 37 °C for one hour and the surface of the block was smoothed.
Five-micrometer consecutive sections of this TMA block were
cut with a microtome. The presence and morphology of tumor and liver
tissues on arrayed samples were identified by H&E stained
sections.
Immunohistochemistry
TMA
section was deparaffinized through xylene and dehydrated with graded
alcohol. Endogenous peroxidase was then blocked with 0.3% H202
diluted in methanol for 30 min at room temperature. Antigen
retrieval was performed by treating the slide in citrate buffer in a
microwave for 10 min. The slide was incubated in a moist chamber
with HBx mouse monoclonal antibody (1:100; Chemicon, USA), p65 mouse
monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, USA), IkB-a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, USA)
and ubiquitin rabbit polyclonal antibody (Neomarkers, USA) at 4 °C overnight respectively. After a brief wash in PBS, the slide
was treated with goat anti-mouse antibody and goat anti-rabbit
antibody (EnVisionTM +Kits, DAKO, Denmark), respectively, for 45 min
at 37 °C. After a brief wash in PBS, the slide was developed in 0.05%
freshly prepared diaminobenzedine solution (DAB, Sigma, St. Louis,
MO) for 8 min, and then counterstained with hematoxylin. More than
5% cells stained were identified as a positive result.
Western
blot
Western blot was carried out based on the protocol of
molecular clone[11]. Briefly, frozen tissues were lysed
in a single eradicator buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L pH 8.0
Tris-HCl, 0.02% natriumazid, 1 ug/ml aprotinin, 100 ug/ml PMSF, 1%
Triton X-100) and quantified by BCA method. The samples were boiled,
loaded, separated on 12% SDS gel electrophoresis, transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane, and reacted with IkB-a rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1 000, Santa
Cruz, USA). At last, the membrane was exposed several minutes after
ECL substrate incubation.
Statistical
analysis
HBx,
p65, IkB-a, ubiquitin expression differences between HBV-associated
HCC and corresponding liver tissues were analyzed statistically
using u test. The relativity between HBx, IkB-a, p65, ubiquitin was analyzed statistically
using x2 test or adjusted x2 test.
RESULTS
Tissue microarray
In this study, two HCC TMA blocks were constructed which
contained a total of 181 cases with 367 samples. One thousand four
hundred fifty-one informative samples were totally detected by
immunohistochemistry on arrays and the observed ratio was up to
98.8% (1 451/1 468 samples). HE-stained sections showed that the
morphology of tissues and cells could be seen clearly. The HCC array
HE-stained sections and several types of the tumor are shown in
Figure 1.
Figure
1 Overview of HCC
TMA. A: TMA
overview of H&E-staining section, B:
HCC morphology on TMA stained by H&E.
Figure
2 Expressions and
locations of HBx, p65, IkB-a
and ubiquitin in HCC detected by immunohistochemistry,
EnVision ×200.
A: HBx expression
in cytoplasm, B:
p65 immunostaining in cytoplasm and nuclei, C:
IkB-a
distribution in cytoplasm and nuclei, D:
ubiquitin location in nuclei.
Table
1
Clinicopathologic information of patients used in TMA
| Group |
HBV |
Sex |
Age |
Diameter |
Grade |
Cirrhosis |
| Total |
Positive |
Negative |
Man |
Female |
meanąSD
(year) |
meanąSD
(cm) |
II |
III |
IV |
Yes |
No |
| HCC |
181 |
171 |
10 |
158 |
23 |
49.3ą10.6 |
7.2ą3.5 |
28 |
141 |
12 |
166 |
15 |
| Normal |
5 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
42.4ą9.6 |
9.3ą5.8 |
|
|
|
0 |
5 |
Table
2
Expressions of HBx, p65, IkB-a
and ubiquitin in HCC and corresponding liver tissues
| Group |
HBx |
p65 |
IkB-a |
Ubiquitin |
| Total |
Positive |
% |
Total |
Positive |
% |
Total |
Positive |
% |
Total |
Positive |
% |
| HCC |
169 |
81 |
47.9 |
170 |
77 |
45.3 |
170 |
124 |
72.9 |
166 |
98 |
59.0 |
| Control |
170 |
102 |
60.0 |
170 |
35 |
20.6 |
171 |
116 |
67.0 |
168 |
15 |
8.9 |
| Statistics |
u=2.24a |
u=4.85b |
u=1.19 |
u=9.68b |
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01.
Table
3
Relativity analysis between HBx, IkB-a,
p65 and ubiquitin in HCC and corresponding liver tissues
|
|
HBx |
P65 |
Ubiquitin |
|
|
Negative |
Positive |
Negative |
Positive |
Negative |
Positive |
| HBx |
Negative |
|
|
58(52) |
30(16) |
39(57) |
46(8) |
|
Positive |
|
|
33(83) |
47(19) |
28(95) |
52(7) |
| Statistics |
|
|
|
x2=10.26b(0.60) |
x2=2.02(1.44) |
| IkB-a |
Negative |
29(21) |
17(34) |
36(46) |
9(9) |
26(50) |
17(4) |
|
Positive |
59(47) |
63(68) |
56(89) |
68(26) |
42(103) |
80(11) |
| Statistics |
|
x2=2.28(0.11) |
x2=16.86b(1.02) |
x2=8.90b(0.04) |
bP<0.01,
vs Corresponding liver tissue.
Expression
differences of four proteins in HCC and corresponding liver tissues
The expression of HBx was restricted exclusively to
cytoplasmic location in both HCC and liver tissues. The positive
immunostainings of p65 and IkB-a were seen only in cytoplasm of liver tissues,
but in both cytoplasm and nuclei of HCC. The positive signal of
ubiquitin was distributed predominantly in cytoplasm of liver
tissues and in nuclei of HCC (Figure 2).
In serum HBV-positive cases, the HBx expressions in HCC
(81/169, 47.9%) were significantly decreased as compared with the
corresponding liver tissues (102/170, 60.0%, P<0.05). On
the contrary, the expressions of p65 and ubiquitin were notably
elevated in HCC (45.3%, 59.0% respectively) as compared with
corresponding liver tissues (20.6%, 8.9% respectively, P<0.01).
The positive rate of immunostaining reaction of IkB-a in HCC and corresponding liver tissues was
72.9% and 67% respectively. The difference was not significant,
though the staining in HCC was more intense (Table 2).
In serum HBV-negative cases, the expressions of HBx, p65, IkB-a, ubiquitin in HCC were detected in 2/10 cases,
5/9 cases, 7/9 cases and 5/10 cases respectively. In corresponding
liver tissues, their expressions were detected in 2/10 cases, 2/9
cases, 7/9 cases and 2/10 cases respectively.
In five normal liver tissues, all expressions of HBx, p65 and
ubiquitin were negative, whereas, IkB-a was demonstrated to be weakly positive.
Western
blot of IkB-a
Compared
with corresponding liver tissues, elevated levels of IkB-a were detected in 10 HCC cases, decreased in 1
case. In the other 13 couples of HCC and corresponding liver
tissues, no obvious difference of expression was detected (Figure
3).
Figure
3(PDF) IkB-a expression levels detected by Western blot. IkB-a levels were elevated in 3 cases of HCC
compared with their corresponding liver tissues.
Relativity
analysis between HBx, IkB-a, p65 and ubiquitin
x2 test showed that no relativity existed between
HBx, IkB-a, p65 and ubiquitin in corresponding liver
tissues, but a positive relativity was observed between HBx and p65,
p65 and IkB-a, IkB-a and ubiquitin in HCC (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
TMA is a new technology first introduced in 1999. It contains
hundreds or even thousands of small tissue samples arranged into a
grid for rapid, cost efficient and high-throughput analysis. TMA has
been used widely in gene or protein expression analysis, antibody
screening, tissue specificity detection of proteins, phenotype
versus genotype analysis, RNA or DNA in situ-hybridization[10,12,13].
Based on TMA, we studied the expressions of HBx, NF-kB,
IkB-a, ubiquitin and their interrelationship in HCC.
The result of HBx expression detection in HBV-associated HCC
showed that HBx expression was reduced in cancer tissue as compared
with the corresponding liver tissue. The result might be ascribed to
the existing form of HBV in tumor tissue. Many researches indicated
that integration was the major form of HBV in HCC, so the viral
copies were far less than that in non-tumor tissues where free virus
prevails[14]. The expression of HBx in samples with serum
HBV-negative implicated quite a few patients were once infected with
HBV. Moreover, the cytoplasmic location of HBx was consistent with
the previous reports[15].
NF-kB
plays a vital role in almost all aspects of cell regulation such as
immune cell activation, proliferation, apoptosis, stress response,
differentiation and oncogenic transformation. Activated NF-kB
can mediate the expression of a large (more than 150) and diverse
set of inflammatory and immune response mediators. It has been
considered as a central regulator of cellular responses and played a
pivotal role both at the stage of initiation and perpetuation of
chronic inflammation[16-19]. NF-kB
is sequestered in the cytosol of unstimulated cells via non-covalent
interactions with a class of inhibitor proteins, called IkBs.
Signals that induce NF-kB
activity cause the phosphorylation of IkBs,
their dissociation and subsequent ubiquitination and degradation in
26S proteasome complex, allowing NF-kB
proteins to enter the nucleus and induce gene expression by binding kB
site in DNA. As one of the NF-kB
activation products, IkB-a could induce NF-kB
export from the nucleus by reuniting NF-kB
and terminating associated gene activation. The negative feedback
loop could keep NF-kB
sensitivity to signals by returning rapidly to baseline activity[20-22].
Because p65 is one of the most common members in NF-kB
family, and IkB-a is the most important inhibitor, detection of
p65 and IkB-a expression can reflect the state of NF-kB
metabolism. In our test, low expression rate of p65 and weakly
positive expression of IkB-a represented the nonactive state of NF-kB
in non-cancerous tissues, but the activation enhancement of NF-kB
in HCC was in accord with the previous reports[23,24].
The expression of IkB-a in HCC and its corresponding liver tissue has
not been reported yet. In our study, no statistical difference was
found in positive rates between HCC and its corresponding liver
tissue, the discrimination of immunostaining intensity was scented.
Furthermore, Western blot validated the concentration augmentation
of IkB-a in HCC, while in the meantime, molecular
weight alteration was not observed. The results illustrated that IkB-a regulation gave priority to quantity change in
HCC. The location of p65 and IkB-a represented the activation or non-activation
form of NF-kB.
Quite a few cytoplasm locations of p65 and IkB-a observed in our test accounted for the
non-activated NF-kB
increase in HCC, which contradicted with cytoplasm decrease of p65
and IkB-a observed in vivo system[25]. We
ascribed the contradiction of NF-kB
metabolism to the persistence in HCC and the transience in vivo
system. The lasting activation of NF-kB
can automatically regulate the production of IkB-a and possibly even p65 or p50. A great deal of
non-activated NF-kB
repertory is in favor of lasting activation of NF-kB.
IkB-a proteolysis is by the ubiquitin-proteasome
pathway, but the exact locality is still not clear. Birbach et al
expatiated IkB-a shuttle mechanism between cytoplasm and
nucleus[26]. It is recognized now that besides IkB-a, up-stream kinases such as NIK and MAPKK can
shuttle between cytoplasm and nucleus. The present study is the
first to show the distribution and expression of ubiquitin in HCC.
The results of nuclear location of ubiquitin and its relativity with
IkB-a indicated the proteolysis of IkB-a was processed in tumor cell nuclei. Of course,
another likelihood was that transcription of ubiquitin would be
promoted after NF-kB
activation[27]. There is no relativity between ubiquitin
and HBx, so whether the proteolysis of HBx passes through non-ubiquitin
pathway or not remains to be determined.
Positive relativity between HBx and p65 in HCC indicated that
HBx existed in tumor tissues was one cause of inducing NF-kB
activation. It has been found in some studies that HBx mutation was
common in HCC compared with corresponding liver tissues[28].
Frequent types of HBx mutation were COOH-terminal truncation and
hotspot mutations in certain amino acids[29-31]. COOH-terminally
truncated HBx is encoded by truncated X gene, which usually derives
from HBV integrated into host genome. Base mutation and frame-shift
are the other causes. Usually, it was considered that HBx activated
NF-kB
relied on its transactivation domains, and COOH-terminal
transactivation domain was important to its transactivation function[32,33].
In our study, NF-kB
activation was elevated in HCC with a low HBx expression compared
with corresponding liver tissues. Therefore, the results implied
that HBx might activate NF-kB
by other unknown mechanisms but not its transactivation ability. One
likeness was that C-terminally truncated HBx lost its ability to
suppress proteasome complex and facilitated IkB-a degradation and NF-kB
activation[4]. The high percentage of ubiquitin
expressions in HCC (59.0%) from our results in part supports the
opinion. The detailed mechanism of NF-kB
activation in HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma remains to be
further studied.
In conclusion, NF-kB
activation induced by HBx could not only facilitate infected cell
survival and HBV escape from immune clearance, but also promote
liver cell malignant transformation and tumor cell advantageous
growth[34]. Variant HBx plays an important role in
potentiating NF-kB
activation.
REFERENCES
1
Caselmann WH. Trans-activation of cellular genes by hepatitis
B virus proteins: a possible mechanism of
hepatocarcinogenesis. Adv Virus Res
1996; 47: 253-302
2
Lee SG, Rho HM. Transcriptional repression of the human p53
gene by hepatitis B viral X protein. Oncogene
2000; 19: 468-471
3
Jia L, Wang XW, Harris CC. Hepatitis B virus X protein
inhibits nucleotide excision repair. Int J Cancer
1999; 80: 875-879
4
Fischer M, Runkel L, Schaller H. HBx protein of hepatitis B
virus interacts with the C-terminal portion of a novel human
proteasome alpha-subunit.
Virus Genes 1995; 10: 99-102
5
Huo TI, Wang XW, Forgues M, Wu CG, Spillare EA, Giannini C,
Brechot C, Harris CC. Hepatitis B virus X mutants derived
from human hepatocellular carcinoma
retain the ability to abrogate p53-induced apoptosis. Oncogene
2001; 20: 3620-3628
6
Schuster R, Hildt E, Chang SF, Terradillos O, Pollicino T,
Lanford R, Gerlich WH, Will H, Schaefer S. Conserved
transactivating and pro-apoptotic
functions of hepadnaviral X protein in ortho- and avihepadnaviruses.
Oncogene
2002; 21: 6606-6613
7
Lara-Pezzi E, Gomez-Gaviro MV, Galvez BG, Mira E, Iniguez MA,
Fresno M, Martinez AC, Arroyo AG, Lopez-Cabrera M.
The hepatitis B virus X protein
promotes tumor cell invasion by inducing membrane-type matrix
metalloproteinase-1
and cyclooxygenase-2 expression. J
Clin Invest 2002; 110: 1831-1838
8
Lara-Pezzi E, Serrador JM, Montoya MC, Zamora D, Yanez-Mo M,
Carretero M, Furthmayr H, Sanchez-Madrid F,
Lopez-Cabrera M. The hepatitis B
virus X protein (HBx) induces a migratory phenotype in a
CD44-dependent manner:
possible role of HBx in invasion and
metastasis. Hepatology 2001; 33: 1270-1281
9
Chirillo P, Falco M, Puri PL, Artini M, Balsano C, Levrero M,
Natoli G. Hepatitis B virus pX activates NF-kappa
B-dependent transcription through a
Raf-independent pathway. J Virol 1996; 70: 641-646
10
Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P,
Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi
OP. Tissue microarrays for
high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med
1998; 4: 844-847
11
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T.
Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nded. New York: Cold
Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press 1989
12
Zhang DH, Salto-Tellez M, Chiu LL, Shen L, Koay ES. Tissue
microarray study for classification of breast tumors. Life
Sci 2003; 73: 3189-3199
13 Bubendorf L, Kononen
J, Koivisto P, Schraml P, Moch H, Gasser TC, Willi N, Mihatsch MJ,
Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP.
Survey of gene amplifications during
prostate cancer progression by high-throughput fluorescence in situ
hybridization
on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res
1999; 59: 803-806
14
Wang Y, Wu MC, Sham JS, Tai LS, Fang Y, Wu WQ, Xie D, Guan XY.
Different expression of hepatitis B surface antigen
between hepatocellular carcinoma and
its surrounding liver tissue, studied using a tissue microarray. J
Pathol
2002; 197: 610-616
15
Majano P, Lara-Pezzi E, Lopez-Cabrera M, Apolinario A,
Moreno-Otero R, Garcia-Monzon C. Hepatitis B virus X protein
transactivates inducible nitric oxide
synthase gene promoter through the proximal nuclear factor kappaB-binding
site:
evidence that cytoplasmic location of
X protein is essential for gene transactivation. Hepatology 2001;
34: 1218-1224
16
Pahl HL. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-KappaB
trandcription factors. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6853-6866
17
Li X, Stark GR. NFkappaB-dependent signaling pathways. Exp
Hematol 2002; 30: 285-296
18
Karin M, Delhase M. The I kappa B kinase (IKK) and NF-kappa
B: key elements of proinflammatory signalling. Semin
Immunol 2000; 12: 85-98
19
Jobin C, Sartor RB. The I kappa B/NF-kappa B system: a key
determinant of mucosalinflammation and protection. Am J
Physiol Cell Physiol 2000; 278:
C451-462
20
Baldwin AS Jr. The NF-kappa B and I kappa B proteins: new
discoveries and insights. Annu Rev Immunol
1996; 14: 649-683
21
Baeuerle PA, Baltimore D. NF-kappa B: ten years after. Cell
1996; 87: 13-20
22
Brown K, Gerstberger S, Carlson L, Franzoso G, Siebenlist U.
Control of I kappa B-alpha proteolysis by site-specific,
signal-induced phosphorylation.
Science 1995; 267: 1485-1488
23
Tai DI, Tsai SL, Chang YH, Huang SN, Chen TC, Chang KS, Liaw
YF. Constitutive activation of nuclear factor kappaB in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer
2000; 89: 2274-2281
24
Guo SP, Wang WL, Zhai YQ, Zhao YL. Expression of nuclear
factor-kappa B in hepatocellular carcinoma and its relation
with the X protein of hepatitis B
virus. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7:340-344
25
Rice NR, Ernst MK. In vivo control of NF-KappaB activation by
I Kappa B alpha. EMBO J 1993; 12: 4685-4695
26
Birbach A, Gold P, Binder BR, Hofer E, de Martin R, Schmid
JA. Signaling molecules of the NF-kappaB pathway shuttle
constitutively between cytoplasm and
nucleus. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 10842-10851
27
Wu CG, Forgues M, Siddique S, Farnsworth J, Valerie K, Wang
XW. SAGE transcript profiles of normal primary human
hepatocytes expressing oncogenic
hepatitis B virus X protein. FASEB J 2002; 16: 1665-1667
28
Poussin K, Dienes H, Sirma H, Urban S, Beaugrand M, Franco D,
Schirmacher P, Brechot C, Paterlini-Brechot P.
Expression of mutated hepatitis B
virus X genes in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1999;
80: 497-505
29
Lin X, Ma ZM, Yao X, Zhang YP, Wen YM. Replication efficiency
and sequence analysis of full-length hepatitis B virus
isolates from hepatocellular
carcinoma tissues. Int J Cancer 2002; 102: 487-491
30
Hsia CC, Nakashima Y, Tabor E. Deletion mutants of the
hepatitis B virus X gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 241:
726-729
31
Hsia CC, Yuwen H, Tabor E. Hot-spot mutations in hepatitis B
virus X gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet
1996; 348: 625-626
32
Kim H, Lee YH, Won J, Yun Y. Through induction of
juxtaposition and tyrosine kinase activity of Jak1, X-gene product
of
hepatitis B virus stimulates Ras and
the transcriptional activation through AP-1, NF-kappaB, and SRE
enhancers.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 286:
886-894
33
Tu H, Bonura C, Giannini C, Mouly H, Soussan P, Kew M,
Paterlini-Brechot P, Brechot C, Kremsdorf D. Biological impact
of natural COOH-terminal deletions of
hepatitis B virus X protein in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues.
Cancer Res
2001; 61: 7803-7810
34
Barkett M, Gilmore TD. Control of apoptosis by Rel/NF-kappaB
transcription factors. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6910-6924
Edited
by Xu
JY and Wang XL
| |