|
Kung-Tung
Chen, Department of Genenal Education, Ming Hsin University of
Science and Technology, Hsinchu 304, Taiwan, China
Rong-Sen Yang, Department of Orthopaedics, College of
Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10043, Taiwan, China
Supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan,
NSC91-2413-H-159-001
Correspondence to: Dr. Rong-Sen Yang, Department of
Orthopaedics, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7 Chung-Shan
South Road, Taipei 10043, Taiwan, China.
yang@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
Telephone: +886-2-2312-3456 Ext 3958
Fax: +886-2-23936577
Received: 2003-10-16
Accepted: 2003-11-20
Abstract
AIM: This study investigated the effects of intense training on
lipid metabolism, bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) in
female athletes.
METHODS:
Sixty-six female subjects participated in this study, age ranging
from 18 to 55 years. The sample group included thirty-six athletic
subjects and the control group comprised thirty non-athletic
individuals. Five athletes competed with national level (5/36) and
nine non-athletic subjects (9/30) were postmenopausal women. The
assessment items included body composition, radius BMD, calcaneus
BMD, lung function, muscular endurance, renal and liver function,
bone marker assay and hormone status. All data were analysed, using
SPSS 10.0 software, and were presented as mean rank statistical
difference, using the Kurskal-Wallis (K-W) test. After that the
non-parameter statistics were used. Either K value or P value below
0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS:
Urine deoxypyridinoline/creatinine (Dpd/Cre) levels increased
significantly (5.93±2.31 vs 6.85±1.43, K<0.01),
sit-reach (29.30±9.48 cm vs 41.31±9.43 cm, K<0.001, P<0.001),
1 minute sit-ups with bended knees (1 min sit-ups) (17.60±9.34
count vs 30.00±10.38 count, K<0.001, P<0.001),
and vertical jump (25.27±6.63 cm vs 34.69±7.99 cm, K<0.001,
P<0.001) improved significantly in the athletes group. The
athletes group also had a significantly increased level of estriol
(E3) (0.14±0.13 pg/mL vs 0.07±0.04 pg/mL, K<0.01, P<0.01),
radius BMD (1.37±0.49 gm/cm2 vs 1.19±0.40 gm/cm2, K<0.05)
and calcaneus BMD (0.57±0.17 gm/cm2 vs -0.20±0.17 gm/cm2,
K<0.01, P<0.05) compared with those of the
controls. The high density lipoprotein (HDL) (65.00±14.02 mg/dL vs
52.26±4.84 mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.05) was
significantly lower in postmenopausal inactive athletes (5/36) than
premenopausal active athletes (31/36). On the other hand,
low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (98.35±23.84 mg/dL vs 131.00±21.63
mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.01), cholesterol (CHO)
(164.03±27.01 mg/dL vs 193.00±23.48 mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.05),
triglyceride (TG) (63.00±26.39 mg/dL vs 147.00± 87.21 mg/dL, K<0.01),
body fat % (BF%) (28.16±4.90% vs 34.84±4.44%, K<0.05, P<0.001)
and body mass index (BMI) (21.98±2.98 kg/m2 vs 26.42±5.01
kg/m2, K<0.05, P<0.001) were
significantly higher in postmenopausal inactive athletes (5/36) than
premenopausal active athletes (31/36). TG (90.22±39.82 mg/dL vs
147.00±87.21 mg/dL), CHO (186.44±24.90 mg/dL vs 193.00±23.48 mg/dL)
were higher, but the HDL was significantly lower (62.18±10.68 mg/dL
vs 52.26±4.84 mg/dL,P<0.05) in postmenopausal athletes
(5/36) group than in postmenopausal control group (9/30).
CONCLUSION:
Postmenopausal athletes (5/36) who no longer took competing
exercises had reduced levels of physical activity, faced increased
risk of cardiovascular disease compared to active athletes (31/36)
and the postmenopausal controls (9/30). We may thus concluded that
long term exercise effectively improves musculoskeletal fitness and
prevents BMD loss in female athletes.
Chen
KT, Yang RS. Effects of exercise on lipid metabolism and
musculoskeletal fitness in female athletes. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(1): 122-126
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/10/122.asp
INTRODUCTION
Weightlessness or immobilization, as experienced by astronauts
in space, is a well known cause of significant and rapid bone
mineral loss[1-24]. Furthermore sedentary individuals
generally have a lower bone mass than physically active individuals,
moderate exercise is known to increase skeletal mass[3].
The above effect is most obvious in sports that place a significant
stress on the skeleton. Investigations of athletes have identified
physical activity as a major determinant of bone mass in the general
population.
Physical
fitness significantly influences quality of life. In Taiwan, medical
care quality and public health environment have improved markedly
over recent decades. The incidence of fatal infectious diseases thus
has reduced significantly and the life span of Taiwanese has
enlongated. Simultaneously, the incidence of chronic diseases has
increased, yet people remain ignorant of the importance of exercise[1-5].
Exercising
for 20-60 min per day, three days per week, at moderate intensity
level of 3-6 Metabolic Equivalent units (METs) for most individuals
derives at least some health-related benefits, including improved
cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength and endurance,
flexibility and body composition, as well as associated
psychological benefits. Consequently, lifelong physical exercise is
recommended to optimize health-related benefits[2-8]. And
the influence of physical activity and exercise training on BMD in
females previously has been assessed in cross-sectional,
retrospective longitudinal and controlled trial studies[3-13].
Even
though no relationship about growth hormone and BMD was found. But
the effect of E3 significantly improved BMD by inhibiting bone
resorption, female athletes with low estradiol (E2) level take a
risk for increased lipid peroxidation following exercise[11-15].
Thus hormone status and lipid metabolism may play an important role
in the protection against cardiovascular disease, this physiological
response has implications for risks of heart disease. Longitudinal
information on associations between life style factors and
age-related bone loss remains quite controversial. Some studies have
found no relationship between bone loss and body composition or body
weight, while others have shown them to predict bone mass changes[3-16].
Therefore,
the purpose of this study was to explore the physiological function
of female athletes, including BMD, renal function, liver function,
hormone status, bone marker assay, lipid metabolism and muscle
biology related to the effectiveness of exercise intervention for
the health status of female athletes compared with controls.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Subjects
Sixty-six female subjects participated in this
investigation, with ages ranging between 18 and 55 yrs. The sample
group was the athlete group (n=36), while the control group
comprised non-athletic individuals (n=30). Inclusion criteria
were that the female athletes had participated in high-intensity
resistance or impact activities (e.g., basketball, dancing).
Exclusion criteria for both the subjects and the controls were that
the subjects had no major medical illnesses, including coronary
artery disease which could influence lipid metabolism, and were free
of other risk factors that are associated with influencing lipid
metabolism, such as smoking or ethanol intake or treatment within
the last two years with systemic gluco-mineralocorticoids,
anticonvulsants, bisphosphonates, oestrogen, or raloxifene. Five
athletes competed with national level (5/36) and nine non-athletic
subjects (9/30) were included in the analysis of postmenopausal
women. The parameters to be measured included body composition,
radius BMD and calcaneus BMD, lung function, muscular endurance,
renal function, liver function and hormone status.
Anthropometric
measurement of body composition
Anthropometric measurements were taken based on conventional
criteria. The measurement procedures of body weight (Wt) and body
height (Ht) were estimated to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.5 cm,
respectively. Finally BMI was calculated using the formula: BMI
(kg/m2)=Wt (kg)/Ht (m2).
Health
related fitness
They were tested using a modified Guthrie R test[6].
Health related fitness tests included vertical jump, 3 min steps,
sit-reach, hand grip and 1 min sit-ups items.
Lung
function
Respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function were
assessed by spirometry. The flow volume and respiratory muscle
forces were measured using a Fukuda, microspiro HI-501 model
spirometer.
Renal
and liver function
Sixty-six blood samples per subject were drawn from an
antecubital vein with the subjects in the seated position. Routine
complete blood counts (CBC) were taken using a Sysmex-E9000 (TOA
Electronic, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and renal and liver function tests
were performed using a Hitachi 7170 instrument (Hitachi Electronic,
Inc., Tokyo, Japan) by clinical chemistry laboratory staff at
Li-Shin Hospital, Taoyuan County, Taiwan.
Hormone
status
E2, E3, triiodothyronine (T3),
thyroxine (T4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH),
parathyroid hormone (PTH), cortisol and human growth hormone (HGH)
were assayed in basal conditions, using commercial radioimmunoassay
(RIA) and enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) Kits.
Bone
marker assay
Serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) activity was
measured using an EIA kit obtained from Metra Biosystems (Monutain
View, CA, USA). Urine Dpd level was measured using enzyme
immunoassay (Ciba-Corning ACS-180) kits purchased from Bayer
international (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA).
BMD
determination
Calcaneus site BMD was measured via speed of sound (SOS)
equipped for a bone mineral densitometry (Aloka Medical Ltd,
modelAOS-100, Tokyo, Japan) and all BMD values were also expressed
as a T-score, accurately reflecting the BMD. Distal site BMD was
measured using the osmometer DTX-100 (SPA, Single Photon
Absorptiometry, Osmometer, Rodovre, Denmark). The scanners were
calibrated daily against the standard calibration block supplied by
the manufacturer to control baseline drift.
Statistical
analysis
All data were analysed, using SPSS 10.0 software, and were
presented as mean rank statistical difference, using the Kurskal-Wallis
(K-W) test. After that the non-parameter statistics were be used.
The confidence interval was set at 95% and the significance level
used was K<0.05 (two sides). All statistical analyses were
carried out with SPSS statistical package. The Kruskal-Wallis test
does not use any information on the relative magnitude of each
observation when compared with every other observation in the
combined sample. This comparison is replaced in each observation by
its rank in the pool sample. The smallest observation is replaced by
its rank 1, the next smallest by rank 2, and so on, the largest by
its rank n. Since the test is an extension of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon
(M-W-W) test. Either K value or P value below 0.05 is considered
significant.
RESULTS
No difference in body composition
The thirty-six female athletes enrolled in this cross-
sectional study did not differ significantly in terms of BF, BF%,
BMI and resistance compared with the control group (Table 1).
Table
1 Body composition
of two groups
| Variables |
66
females |
K-Value |
| Control
group n=30 |
Athlete
group n=36 |
| mean
rank |
| Body
fat |
31.68 |
35.01 |
0.483 |
| BF% |
33.83 |
33.22 |
0.898 |
| BMI |
32.45 |
34.38 |
0.685 |
| Resistance |
34.95 |
32.29 |
0.575 |
Exercise
improvements muscular endurance in female athletes
These two different groups did not differ significantly in
muscular endurance. The hand grip (28.06±6.14 kg vs 26.85±5.73
kg), 3 min steps (55.32±6.90 count/min vs 57.82±7.21 count/min)
and vital capacity (86.86±15.98 L vs 88.23±12.05 L) in athlete
group were better than those in control group, but did differ
significantly in terms of sit- reach (29.3±9.48 cm vs 41.31±9.43
cm, K<0.001, P<0.001), 1 min sit-ups (17.60±9.34
count vs 30.00±10.38 count, K<0.001, P<0.001)
and vertical jump (25.27±6.63 cm vs 34.69±7.99 cm, K<0.001,
P<0.001) as listed in Table 2.
Table
2 Muscular strength
and endurance assessment among controls and athlete groups
| Group |
n |
Sit-reach |
1
min sit-ups |
Vertical
jump |
Hand
grip |
3
min steps |
Vital
capacity |
| Control
group (mean rank) |
30 |
22.18 |
22.05 |
22.23 |
31.27 |
29.60 |
30.58 |
| Athlete
group (mean rank) |
36 |
42.93ab |
43.04ab |
42.89ab |
35.36 |
36.75 |
35.93 |
aK<0.001
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. bP<0.001
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group.
Lipid
metabolism
Table 3 shows that the results were not significantly
different between both groups. But lipid metabolism including HDL
(59.36±12.23 mg/dL vs 63.23±13.83 mg/dL) and Hb (12.95±1.22 g/dL
vs 13.43±1.09 g/dL) in the athlete group was higher than in the
control group. However, LDL (105.93±30.76 mg/dL vs 102.89±25.92
mg/dL), TG (81.53±49.53 mg/dL vs 74.60±48.31 mg/dL) and CHO
(170.20±32.20 mg/dL vs 168.06±28.13 mg/dL) were lower in the
athlete group than those of the control group. Thus exercise could
improve the lipid metabolism, and it is good for health.
Table
3 No significant
differences in blood CHO and lipid variables between both groups
| Group |
n |
HDL |
LDL |
CHO |
TG |
Hb |
| Control
group(mean rank) |
30 |
31.92 |
34.65 |
34.92 |
35.02 |
28.75 |
| Athlete
group(mean rank) |
36 |
34.82 |
32.54 |
32.32 |
32.24 |
37.46 |
Table
4 Serum enzyme
activities related to renal and liver metabolism
| Group |
n |
ALP |
Cre |
ALB |
DBIL |
| Control
group (mean rank) |
30 |
27.07 |
27.88 |
27.77 |
27.65 |
| Athlete
group (mean rank) |
36 |
38.86ac |
38.18ab |
38.28a |
38.38a |
aK<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with control group. bP<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with control group. cP<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with control group.
Renal
and liver function
Table 4 shows that no difference between the data (data not
shown here) of the two groups in terms of blood enzymes such as
glutamic oxalocetic transminase (GOT), glutamic pyruvic transminase
(GPT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid (UA), total protein (TP),
globulin (GLO) and bilirubin (BIL). But the control group displayed
significantly lower alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (61.03±13.99 U/L vs
70.81±15.23 U/L, K<0.05, P<0.01), ALB (4.52±0.18
g/dL vs 4.62±0.27 g/dL, K<0.05), Cre (0.75±0.09 mg/dL vs
0.81±0.10 mg/dL, P<0.05, K<0.05) and direct
bilirubin (DBIL) (0.25±1.11 mg/dL vs 0.29±0.8 mg/dL, K<0.05)
than the athlete group.
Table
5 BMD, urine
electrolytes, blood electrolytes in two groups
| Group |
n |
Urine-Cre |
Blood-Ca |
BMD/radius |
BMD
/calcaneus |
Blood-Cl |
| Control
group (mean rank) |
30 |
26.87 |
42.42 |
28.38 |
26.23 |
45.90 |
| Athletes
group (mean rank) |
36 |
39.03ad |
26.07b |
37.76a |
39.56bd |
23.17c |
aK<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. bK<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. cK<0.001
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. dP<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group.
Table
6 Hormonal findings
in athletes with significance by non-parameter statistics test
compared with controls
| Group |
n |
Cortisol |
E3 |
T3 |
T4 |
PTH |
HGH |
| Control
group (mean rank) |
30 |
32.28 |
25.78 |
31.77 |
36.43 |
31.37 |
35.65 |
| Athletes
group (mean rank) |
36 |
34.51 |
39.93ab |
34.94 |
31.06 |
35.28 |
31.71 |
aK<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. bP<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group.
Table
7 Biochemical bone
turnover markers and BMD in athletes with significance by
non-parameter statistics test as compared with controls
| Group |
n |
Dpd |
Urine-Cre
(24 hrs) |
Dpd/Cre |
BAP |
BMD/radius |
BMD/Calcaneus |
| Control
group (mean rank) |
30 |
25.87 |
27.23 |
25.72 |
20.10 |
28.38 |
26.23 |
| Athletes
group (mean rank) |
36 |
39.86be |
38.72ad |
39.99b |
43.83cf |
37.76a |
39.56b |
aK<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. bK<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. cK<0.001
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. dP<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. eP<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group. fP<0.001
vs statistically significant when compared with control
group.
Table
8 Postmenopausal
female athlete lipid metabolism compared to premenopausal active
athletes
| Athletes
group |
n |
BF% |
BMI |
HDL |
LDL |
CHO |
TG |
Hb |
| Premenopausal
(mean rank) |
31 |
16.84 |
17.08 |
20.15 |
16.74 |
16.98 |
16.55 |
18.79 |
| Postmenopausal
(mean rank) |
5 |
28.60ac |
27.30be |
8.30ac |
29.40ad |
27.90ac |
30.60b |
16.70 |
aK<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with premenopausal
group. bK<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with premenopausal
group. cP<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with premenopausal
group. dP<0.01
vs statistically significant when compared with premenopausal
group. eP<0.001
vs statistically significant when compared with premenopausal
group.
Electrolytes
and BMD
According
to non-parameter statistical tests, both the radius BMD (1.37±0.49
gm/cm2 vs 1.19±0.40 gm/cm2, K<0.05)
and calcaneus BMD (0.57±0.17 gm/cm2 vs -0.20±0.17 gm/cm2,
K<0.01, P<0.05), increased significantly in the
athlete group compared with those of the control group. Moreover,
the athlete group's body electrolytes such as urine-Cre (132.22±72.30
mg/dL vs 166.83±62.52 mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.05),
blood calcium (Ca) (8.76±0.32 mg/dL vs 8.43±0.37 mg/dL, K<0.01)
and chloride (Cl) (99.94±2.41 meq/L vs 102.83±1.97 meq/L, K<0.001)
significantly decreased compared to the control group.
Hormone
status
HGH and T4 were lower in the athlete group than in the
control group (8.95±1.51 mg/dL
vs 9.38±1.51 mg/dL),
but cortisol (11.39±4.03 mg/dL
vs 10.75±3.42mg/dL),
E2 (88.82±66.42 pg/mL vs 80.56±63.10 pg/mL), T3 (112.07±13.52 ng/dL
vs 114.78±17.16 ng/dL) and PTH (39.07±16.97 pg/mL vs 34.70±11.66
pg/mL) levels were higher. Notably, E3 level (0.14±0.13 pg/mL vs
0.07±0.04 pg/mL, K<0.01, P<0.01) significantly
increased in the athlete group compared to those of the control
group.
Bone
marker assay and BMD
All biochemical and bone turnover markers, for example,
(67.97±39.67 nmol/mmol vs 102.63±46.97 nmol/mmol, K<0.01,
P<0.01), Dpd/Cre ratio (5.93±2.31 vs 6.85±1.43, K<0.01),
and BAP (14.04±3.31 mg/L
vs 20.93±6.17 mg/L,
K<0.001, P<0.001) significantly increased in the
female athlete group compared to those of the control group. The
athletes displayed positive correlation of regional radius BMD (K<0.05)
and calcaneus BMD (K<0.01, P<0.05) with these
results (Table 7).
Lipid
metabolism in postmenopausal athletes
Table 8 displays levels of LDL (98.35±23.84 mg/dL vs 131.00±21.63
mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.01), CHO (164.03±27.01 mg/dL
vs 193.00±23.48 mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.05), TG
(63.00 ±26.39 mg/dL vs 147.00±87.21 mg/dL, K<0.01), BF%
(28.16±4.90% vs 34.84±4.44%, K<0.05, P<0.001)
and BMI (21.98±2.98 kg/m2 vs 26.42±5.01 kg/m2,
K<0.05, P<0.001) increased in the postmenopausal
(5/36) inactive athletes group compared to the premenopausal (31/36)
active athletes. Then the level of HDL (65.00±14.02 mg/dL vs 52.26±4.84
mg/dL, K<0.05, P<0.05) markedly decreased in the
postmenopausal (5/36) inactive athletes.
Table
9 Lipid metabolism
of postmenopausal female athletes
| Postmenopausal
group |
n |
BMI |
HDL |
LDL |
CHO |
TG |
Hb |
| Control
group(mean rank) |
9 |
6.56 |
9.00 |
7.11 |
7.06 |
6.44 |
7.61 |
| Athletes
group(mean rank) |
5 |
9.20 |
4.80a |
8.20 |
8.30 |
9.40 |
7.30 |
aP<0.05
vs statistically significant when compared with postmenopausal
control group.
Lipid
metabolism in postmenopausal females
Results from this study show higher levels of TG (90.22±39.82 mg/dL
vs 147.00±87.21 mg/dL), CHO (186.44±24.90 mg/dL vs 193.00±23.48
mg/dL), but lower levels of HDL (62.18±10.68 mg/dL vs 52.26±4.84
mg/dL, P<0.05), Hb (13.82±0.88 g/dL vs 13.52±0.21 g/dL)
in postmenopausal athletes (5/36) group compared with the
postmenopausal control group (9/30). This implies that the effect is
a cardiovascular disease risk for postmenopausal retired female
athletes (Table 9).
DISCUSSION
The data in this study were expressed as mean x±s. Statistical
significance in the mean values was evaluated by the Student's t
test. But in our study, only sixty-six female subjects participated
in this investigation. Therefore, we use K-W test to analyze the
results of all tests. The Kruskal-Wallis test does not use any
information on the relative magnitude of each observation when
compared with every other observation in the combined sample. This
comparison is replaced in observation by its rank in the pool
sample. The smallest observation is replaced by its rank 1, the next
smallest by rank 2, and so on, the largest by its rank n. Since the
test is an extension of the M-W-W test. Either K value or P value
below 0.05 was considered significant.
Exercise
is important for maintaining skeletal health. However, the ability
of exercise to influence bone might not be entirely related to
hormone status. This study has shown that hormones and exercise
interact to influence bone adaptations, and thus raise E3
level related to increased BMD following exercise in female
athletes. For example, serum E2, cortisol, PTH and T3
levels in the athlete group were higher than those of the controls,
and the major finding of this study was that increased radius BMD (K<0.05)
and calcaneus BMD (K<0.01, P<0.05) were
significantly and positively related to serum E3 (K<0.01,
P<0.01) concentrations[10-12]. Therefore, a
clear understanding the interaction suggested by the present data
between E3 concentration and the adaptation of bone to
exercise is important, and provides an interaction through which the
estrogen receptors involved in the early response of bone cells
might increase their responsiveness to loading[11,12].
These
results indicate that physical exercise positively affects the
maintenance of radius BMD (K<0.05), calcaneus BMD (K<0.01,
P<0.05) in female athletes, thus increased E3
level can prevent BMD loss and possible risk of osteoporosis[12].
The athletes have higher levels of all the biomarkers than the
controls, including Dpd (K<0.01, P<0.01), urine-Cre
(K<0.05, P<0.05), Dpd/Cre ratio (K<0.005),
BAP (K<0.001, P<0.001) and lower levels of
blood-Ca (K<0.01), blood-Cl (K<0.001) these
results were associated with markedly increased radius BMD and
calcaneus BMD[13-22].
Further
studies are required to examine a larger population, and also to
consider the effects of BMD marker assay (for example insulin-like
growth factors).
Physical
inactivity has been designated by the American Heart Association as
a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Numerous
studies have examined individual morbidity and mortality from
cardiovascular disease. The results presented here indicate that
exercise can improve physiological characteristics, such the
lowering levels of serum CHO and TG in female athletes, all of which
may improve cardiovascular fitness and reduce morbidity and
mortality from cardiovascular disease[12-16,23-26].
But
the findings regarding the renal function, liver function and lipid
metabolism of retired female athletes were surprising. Enzyme
activity indicates that this group (5/36) may not have the same
health benefits from physical exercise as the control subjects.
Specifically, this group displayed decreased HDL (K<0.05, P<0.05),
Hb and increased LDL (K<0.05, P<0.01), CHO (K<0.05,
P<0.05), TG (K<0.01) compared to the
premenopausal active athletes (31/36). Postmenopausal retired female
athletes (5/36) engaged in less physical activity than previously,
displayed increase rates of liver and renal dysfunction, which
require further investigation[17,23-28].
An
understanding of the dyslipidemia and ensuing atherosclerosis has
implications for the pathophysiology of coronary heart disease (CHD).
Risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality is directly related to
concentration of plasma total CHO or LDL. Lipid lowering therapy has
been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in both high
risk individuals and patients with manifest CHD[17-22,24-28].
The present study has found that postmenopausal retired female
athletes (5/36) who were no longer engaged in strenuous physical
activity, they had a significantly higher BF% (K<0.05, P<0.001)
and BMI (K<0.05, P<0.001) compared to the active
female athletes (31/36) group, specifically, in lipid dysfunction
marker with the postmenopausal retired female athletes. Results from
this study show higher levels of TG, CHO, but lower levels of HDL,
Hb in athletes (5/36) group compared with the control group (9/30).
Then, five postmenopausal athletes (5/36), who had retired from
competition, and were engaged in less physical activity than
previously, had significantly higher BF%, BMI and lipid dysfunction
markers had a significantly decreased level of HDL (P<0.05)
compared to the controls (9/30). This suggest that the effect is a
cardiovascular disease risk for postmenopausal retired female
athletes.
Future
studies should recruit more numbers of female athletes, who have
retired from competition but still maintained high levels of
physical activity, and then compare this group with the low physical
activity group that serves as the control group. Lipid metabolism
related apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotypes with an allele specific
oligonucleotide (ASO) based microarray system may interact with
exercise training to affect their plasma lipid profiles. To clarify
the atherogenic risk of different lipoprotein phenotypes, the
relations among total CHO, LDL, HDL and CHD risk in older female
athletes should be investigated.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Li-Shin Hospital in Taoyuan County, Taiwan
that provided all laboratory tests in this study, which helped us to
complete the research subjects.
REFERENCES
1
Huuskonen J, Vaisanen SB, Kroger H, Jurvelin JS, Alhava E,
Rauramaa R. Regular physical exercise and bone mineral
density: a four-year controlled
randomized trial in middle-aged men. The DNASCO study. Osteoporos
Int
2001; 12: 349-355
2
Humphries B, Newton RU, Bronks R, Marshall S, McBride J,
Triplett MT, Hakkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Humphries N. Effect
of exercise intensity on bone
density, strength, and calcium turnover in older women. Med Sci
Sports Exerc
2000; 32: 1043-1050
3
Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HC, Kostense PJ, Twisk JW.
The effect of exercise training programs on bone
mass: a meta-analysis of published
controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int
1999;9:1-12
4
Karlsson MK. Skeletal effects of exercise in men. Calcif
Tissue Int 2001; 69: 196-199
5
Pettersson U, Nordstrom P, Lorentzon R. A comparison of bone
mineral density and muscle strength in young male
adults with different exercise level.
Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 64: 490-498
6
Guthrie R. The use of medical examinations for employment
purposes. J Law Med 2003; 11: 93-102
7
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, French DN. Resistance training for
health and performance. Curr Sports Med Rep
2002; 1: 165-171
8
Hendriksen IJ, Meeuwsen T. The effect of intermittent
training in hypobaric hypoxia on sea-level exercise: a cross-over
study in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol
2003; 88: 396-403
9
Williams CD, Dobridge JD, Meyer WR, Hackney AC. Effects of
the route of estrogen administration and exercise on
hormonal levels in postmenopausal
women. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 1118-1124
10
Leelawattana R, Ziambaras K, Roodman WJ, Lyss C, Wagner D,
Klug T, Armamento VR, Civitelli R. The oxidative
metabolism of estradiol conditions
postmenopausal bone density and bone loss. J Bone Miner Res
2000; 15: 2513-2520
11
Deschenes MR, Kraemer WJ. Performance and physiologic
adaptations to resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
2002; 81: S3-16
12
Hayashi T, Ito I, Kano H, Endo H, Iguchi A. Estriol (E3)
replacement improves endothelial function and bone mineral
density in very elderly women. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: 183-190
13
Hou MF, Lin SB, Yuan SS, Tsai LY, Tsai SM, Hsieh JS, Huang TJ.
Diagnostic value of urine deoxypyridinoline for
detecting bone metastases in breast
cancer patients. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2003; 33: 55-61
14
Miller CJ, Dunn EV, Thomas EJ, Sankarankutty M. Urinary free
deoxypyridinoline excretion in lactating and non-
lactating Arabic women of the United
Arab Emirates. Ann Clin Biochem 2003; 40: 394-397
15
Ormarsdottir S, Ljunggren O, Mallmin H, Olofsson H, Blum WF,
Loof L. Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors
and their binding proteins in
patients with chronic liver disease: Lack of correlation with bone
mineral density. Liver
2001; 21: 123-128
16
Wu LY, Yang TC, Kuo SW, Hsiao CF, Hung YJ, Hsieh CH, Tseng
HC, Hsieh AT, Chen TW, Chang JB, Pei D. Correlation
between bone mineral density and
plasma lipids in Taiwan. Endocrine Res 2003; 29: 317-319
17
Huang TH, Lin SC, Chang FL, Hsieh SS, Liu SH, Yang RS.
Effects of different exercise modes on mineralization,
structure, and biomechanical
properties of growing bone. J Appl Physiol 2003; 95: 300-307
18
Tsauo JY, Chien MY, Yang RS. Spinal performance and
functional impairment in postmenopausal women with
osteoporosis and osteopenia without
vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 456-460
19
Huang TH, Yang RS, Hsieh SS, Liu SH. Effects of caffeine and
exercise on the development of bone: a densitometric
and histomorphometric study in young
Wistar rats. Bone 2002; 30: 293-299
20
Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Zhou L, Longcope C, Econs MJ, Peacock M,
McClintock C, Johnston CC Jr. Bone loss at the femoral
neck in premenopausal white women:
effects of weight change and sex-hormone levels. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab
2002; 87: 1539-1543
21
Prestwood KM, Kenny AM, Kleppinger A, Kulldorff M. Ultralow-dose
micronized 17beta-estradiol and bone density and
bone metabolism in older women: a
randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 1042-1048
22
van den Beld AW, de Jong FH, Grobbee DE, Pols HA, Lamberts
SW. Measures of bioavailable serum testosterone and
estradiol and their relationships
with muscle strength, bone density, and body composition in elderly
men. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 3276-3282
23
Guichelaar MM, Malinchoc M, Sibonga J, Clarke BL, Hay JE.
Bone metabolism in advanced cholestatic liver disease:
analysis by bone histomorphometry.
Hepatology 2002; 36: 895-903
24
Fan JG, Zhong L, Xu ZJ, Tia LY, Ding XD, Li MS, Wang GL.
Effects of low-calorie diet on steatohepatitis in rats with
obesity and hyperlipidemia. World J
Gastroenterol 2003; 9: 2045-2049
25
Lu LG, Zeng MD, Li JQ, Hua J, Fan JG, Fan ZP, Qiu DK. Effects
of lipid on proliferation and activation of rat hepatic
stellate cells (I). World J
Gastroenterol 1998; 4: 497-499
26
Wakatsuki A, Okatani Y, Ikenoue N, Shinohara K, Watanabe K,
Fukaya T. Effect of lower dose of oral conjugated
equine estrogen on size and oxidative
susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein particles in
postmenopausal women.
Circulation 2003; 108: 808-813
27
Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Nielsen SB, Christiansen C. Does serum
cholesterol contribute to vertebral bone loss in
postmenopausal women? Bone 2003; 32:
8-14
28
Chen BY, Wei JG, Wang YC, Wang CM, Yu J, Yang XX. Effects of
cholesterol on the phenotype of rabbit bile duct
fibroblasts. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9: 351-355
Edited
by Wang
XL
| |