|
Zheng-Fen
Zhou,
Shi-Zhen Yuan, Associate Professor of Medicine, having 30 papers and books
published. Director of the Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated
Hospital of Kunming Medical College, and member and Secretary of Yunnan
Provincial Gastroenterology Society, won an Advanced Technology & Science
Prize, 153 Xichanglu. Kunming 650031 China.
Shi-Zhen Yuan, Gastroenterology Research Laboratory, Sun Yat Sen Memorial
Hospital, Sun Yat Sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510120 China.
Presented at the 2nd International Conference of Gastroenteropathy in (Chengdu)
in 1993.
Supported by: China Medical Board Grant.
Telephone: +86-781-5324888,
Ext 532(Office) 538(Home).
Received: 1995-4-20
Subject
headings nucleolus organizer region; colonic
neoplasms; prognosis
Zhou ZF,
Yuan SZ. Prognostic value of silvera2stained nucleolar organizer regions in
colorectal carcinoma.
China Nati J New Gastroenterol,1995;1(1):43-47
Abstract
AIM: Recently AgNOR
analysis has been regarded as a useful criterion for tumor diagnosis and
research. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of
AgNOR analysis in colorectal carcinomas.
METHODS:
Silver staining technique was applied to paraffin
embedded tumor tissue sections of 114 patients with colorectal carcinomas. The
number, morphology, size and distribution of AgNOR were counted and analysed.
RESULTS:
(1)The number of AgNOR in patients who died within
5 years (mean±SD:8.8±2.3
per nucleus, n=27) was significantly higher than that in those who
survived beyond 5 years after establishment of diagnosis (6.3±1.8,
n=30, P<0.001).
The number of large sized (>2μm)
and small sized (<1μm)
AgNOR in those who died (mean±SD:85.9±20.7,
661.7±250.5
in one hundred nuclei) was significantly higher than that in those who
survived(71.7±27.0,
398.3±225.4,
P=0.04, 0.00 respectively). Concentrated type of distribution in those
who died (10.2%) was significantly fewer than that in those who survived (31.4%,P=0.00).
Mixed type of distribution in those who died (25.7%) was significantly more than
that in those who survived (7.1%,P=0.00). (2) The number of Ag NOR also
related to other factor that affected prognosis of colorectal carcinoma, such as
age, histological type, depth of invasion and metastasis to lymph nodes.
CONCLUSION:
The AgNOR analysis is a novel and useful parameter
in the assessment of prognosis of colorectal carcinoma.
INTRODUCTION
Nucleolar organizer regions(NOR) are markers of rDNA and rDNA transcription.
It can provide information regarding gene regulation and control on cell
proliferation and differentiation[1],
and reflect the biological behavior of cancer cells. Recently, AgNOR analysis
has begun to be applied to the research for predicting cancer prognosis, but the
results were controversial and so far no study has been performed in Chinese
patients. In this study we try to explore the role of AgNOR quantitative
analysis in the prediction of colonic cancer prognosis and its relationship with
other prognostic factors.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Selection of specimens
One hundred and fourteen patients with colonic
cancers were examined, of which 6
0 were male, 54 female. Among them 11 were in age group of <29
(9.7%); 70 in age group of 30-59 (61.4%); and 33 in age group of over 60
(29.0%). In 44 cases cancers were located at sigmoid colon; 18 at ascending
colon; 14 at both descending colon and ileocaecum; 9 at transverse colon; 8 at
splenic flexur
e, and 7 at hepatic flexure of colon. In 57 cases, carcinomas invaded serosa;
27, beyond serosa; 25, invaded deep smooth muscles and 5, mucosa, submucosa and
shallow smooth muscles. Histological classification was graded in accordance
with the diagnosis standards[2]
as follows: 86 tubular adenomas (including
29 high, 36 moderate and 21 low differentiation), 6 undifferentiated adenomas, 5
signet ring cell adenomas, 12 mucoids adenomas, 2 papillary adenomas, and 3
polypoid adenomas. According to malignant degree they were classified[3]as
follows: 31 low malignant adenomas (including papillate adenomas, highly
differentiated aden
omas), 51 moderately malignant adenomas (including polypoid adenomas, moderately
differentiated adenomas and mucoid adenomas), 32 highly malignant adenomas
(including low differentiated adenomas, undifferentiated adenomas and signet
ring adenomas). According to operation findings and pathohistological data from
resected specimens, there were 56 cases who had no metastasis, 47 had, and 11
were unclear in the metastasis of lymponodi. Among the cases of lymphonodi
metastasis we studied 39 cases of primary and metastatic cancers using the AgNOR
technique in identical slides. 57 cases have been followed up over 5 years
, among whom 27 died and 30 survived. These preserved specimens of biopsy from
patients with colonic cancer were obtained between 1984-1991 from the Department
of Pathology, Sun Yat sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat Sen Medical University.
Methods
Preparation of AgNOR specimens. Tissues were
fixed in 10% formalin solution and processed to paraffin wax. Each paraffin
embedded block was cut into two 3μm
thick sections, one routinely processed haematoxylin and eosin stains and the
other submitted to AgNOR staining according to Ploton's modification one step
method[4].
Quantitative
analysis. Sections were examined in x20 x40, x100 immersion lens and x100 oil
immersion lens. Fields were selected at random. 100 cells were examined
continuously. Each nucleus was examined in four respects as follows:①The
number of nucleoli: Recording the nucleolar numbers and th
e AgNOR numbers besides nucleoli. A nucleolus was defined as an AgNOR dot and th
e mean number of AgNOR was calculated. ②Shape:
In each specimen, the number of AgNOR dots in 100 nuclei was counted in
accordance with the foll
owing standards: ①
Regular type: the shape of AgNOR dots was circular and the rim was more or less
smooth, ②Abnormal
type: AgNOR dots were bar shape rhomaus or strange and the diameter was longer
than 3μm.
③Size:
The size of AgNOR dots of each nucleolus was measured and classfied into 3
groups: Large(2μm),
medium (1μm)
and small (0-1μm),
and in each case 100 nuclei were counted and the mea
n was calculated by using C2 2n net type objective ruler (Shanghai Third Optical
Instrument Factory) measure size. ④Distribut
ion: In each specimen, the distribution of AgNOR dots of 100 nuclei was classifi
ed as follows:①Gathered
type: The regular dots were gathered at the center of nuclei. Generally, the
dots were less than 4 per nucleus. ②Scattered
type: The irregular dots scattered in nuclei like satellite, and the number of
dots exceeded 5 per nucleus. ③Type
of dots inside nucleolus: The different dots were gathered in nucleoli. ④Mixed
type: Having the characteristics of two types mentioned above.
Statistical analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) or
KrusKal and Wallis rank sum test (Htest) was employed to detect the differences
among groups. Meanwhile,
Student's
t test or Wilcoxon's
rank sum test was undertaken to compare the differences between two groups. For
paired designed data, either paired t test or Wilcoxon's
signed rank sum test was used.
RESULTS
AgNOR could be clearly recognized as black or
brown dots in nuclei or nucleoli after staining.
AgNOR
and sex
The mean number of AgNOR was 7.1±2.3
dots per nucleus in male colonic cancer g
roup and 6.9±2.1
dots per nucleus in female colonic cancer group (P>0.05).
AgNOR
and age
In the age groups of <29,
30-59 and over 60, the mean number of AgNOR was 8.5±2.3,
7.1±2.2,
and 6.4±1.8
dots per nucleus respectively. The number
of the age group of <29
was significantly higher than those of 30-59 and over 60 group (P<0.05),
and there was no difference between the latter two age groups (P>0.05).
AgNOR
and location of cancers
The mean number of AgNOR per nucleus was 6.6±1.8
at sigmoid colon, 7.6±2.2
at descending colon, 7.3±3.0
at splenic flexure of colon, 7.0±2.4
at transverse of colon, 6.7±1.3
at hepatic flexure of colon, 6.7±2.1
at ascending colon, and 8.5±2.9
at ileocaecum. There was no significant difference between these groups.
AgNOR
and infiltrative degree
The mean number of AgNOR of the colonic
cancers which had invaded different layers was as follows: mucosa 5.6±0.6,
submucosa and shallow smooth muscle, 5.3±0.9,
deep smooth muscle, 7.4±1.8,
serosa, and 8.2±2.9
in outer serosa. The number of AgNOR in which cancer had invaded mucosa,
submucosa and shallow smooth muscles was less than that in which cancer had
invaded serosa and outer serosa (P<0.05
for both). In comparison of that in the deep smooth muscle group with that in
serosa and outer serosa
groups, the differences were significant (P=0.00 for both), but no
difference was found among other groups(P>0.05).
AgNOR
and histological types
Different types of colonic cancers: The mean
number of AgNOR per nucleus was 6.6±1.9
in tubular adenomas, 6.5±0.9
in mucous adenomas, 11.9±1.3
in undifferentiated adenomas, 10.5±1.1
in signet ring cell adenomas, 5.7±0.5
in polypous adenomas and 6.3±0.2
in papillate adenomas The differences of AgNOR number per nucleus were
significant in comparison of tubular adenomas with signet ring cell adenomas and
undifferentiated adenomas group respectively (both P<0.01);
mucosa adenomas with signet ring cell adenomas and undifferentiated adenomas. No
difference was seen among other groups. For different degree of malignancy of
colonic cancer, the mean number of AgNOR per nucleus was 52±0.9
in low malignancy, 65±12
in moderate malignancy and 9.3±2.5
in high malignancy (P<0.01
for all).
AgNOR
and metastasis of lymphonodi
In the metastasis of lymphonodi positive
group, the number of AgNOR per nucleus was more than that of the lymphonodi
metastasis negative group (7.6±2.1
vs 6.4±2.0
P=0.00), and the AgNOR of the lymphonodi metastatic cancers were more
than those of the cancers in situ (8.1±2.1
vs 7.3±1.9,
P=0.00).
AgNOR
and clinical prognosis
The mean number of AgNOR in died group (8.8±2.3)
was significantly higher than that in survived group (P=0.00), and there
was no overlap bet
ween the range of AgNOR number in died or survived groups, while the
histological type was similar. The size and distribution of AgNOR but not the
shape were significantly different between two groups(Table 1-3, Figure 1-4).
Table
1 The number of AgNOR in died and survived groups
with different histologic types of colonic cancer mean±SD
(range)
|
Histologic
types
|
AgNOR numbers/nucleus
|
|
n
|
Survived group
|
n
|
Died group
|
|
Tubular adenoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
highly
differentiated
|
7
|
4.64±0.23
4.17-4.85
|
8
|
6.26±0.72
5.60-7.38
|
|
moderately
differentiated
|
11
|
5.94±0.92
4.33-7.10
|
7
|
8.44±0.84
7.47-9.55
|
|
low differentiated
|
4
|
7.65±0.74
6.72-8.37
|
6
|
11.23±0.74
10.89-12.71
|
|
Mucous
adenoma
|
5
|
6.33±0.66
5.70-7.29
|
3
|
7.75±0.39
7.42-7.94
|
|
Other
typesb
|
3
|
9.64±3.51
6.02-11.02
|
3
|
12.20±0.39
11.88-12.63
|
|
Totalc
|
30
|
6.29±1.83
4.17-11.02
|
27
|
8.76±2.29
5.60-12.63
|
bSurvived
group: 1 undifferentiated adenoma, 1 polypous adenoma and 1 signet ring cell
adenoma. Died group: 2 undifferentiated adenomas and 1 signet ring cell adenoma.
ct=4.5115, P=0.00, between two groups.
Table 2 The number of abnormal shape and giant AgNOR in died and survived
groups (mean±SD/100
nuclei)
|
Group
|
n
|
Abnormal shape AgNOR
|
Giant AgNOR
|
|
Survived
|
30
|
56.57±19.67a1
|
23.77±14.89a2
|
|
Died
|
27
|
67.00±24.12
|
31.37±16.15
|
a1t=1.7968,
P=0.08; a2t=1.8494, P=0.0698,
vs died group
Table 3 The size of AgNOR in died and survived groupsZ (mean±SD/100
nuclei)
|
Group
|
n
|
0μm
|
1μm
|
2μm
|
|
Survived
|
30
|
398.30±225.36
|
158.87±75.74
|
71.67±27.01
|
|
Died
|
27
|
661.70±250.52c
|
128.00±72.65a
|
85.89±20.70b
|
at=1.6347,
P=0.1078; bt=2.0958,
P=0.0407; ct=4.1973, P=0.0001; vs,survived group.
Figure
1 Moderately
differentiated tubular adenomas (alive case) 10×20,
10×100)
Figure 2 Moderately
differentiated tubular adenomas (death case). The AgNOR numbers, abnormal dots,
large and small dots and scattered and mixted types are significantly increased
compared with alive cases.(10×40,
10×100).
Figure 3 Moderately
differentiated tubular adenomas (primary
cancer of colon): 10×20,
10×100).
Figure 4 Moderately
differentiated tubular adenomas (lymphonodic metastasis). Compared with the
primary cancer, the AgNOR number, large and small dots and scattered type are
increased significantly (10×10,10×100)
DISCUSSION
In recent years, there have been substantial
studies on the relationship between AgNOR and prognosis of cancers. Several
studies on cancers of digestive system suggested that the number of AgNOR in
died group was significantly higher than that in survived group[5],
and that the number of AgNOR increased in the cases of invasion and metastasis
of cancer cells[6].
Griffiths[7]
observed 100 cases of
rectum adenomas and considered that there was no relation between AgNOR numbers
and prognosis, cell proliferation and cell DNA ploidy. Liu et al[8].
found that the number of AgNOR was significantly different between died group
and survived group in non Hodgkin's lymphoma, but there were overlaps between
two groups in a few cases. Eusebi et al[9].
found that the mean areas of AgNOR from breast cancer patients who survived
short term (<34
months) were larger than those who survived long term(>3
years) and no overlaps were observed between the two groups. Therefore, there
were controversial results in the AgNOR studies of cancer prognosis.
In this study we used AgNOR quantitative analysis to
access the prognosis of colonic cancer. The results showed: ①the
relationship between AgNOR and clinical prognosis was of value in clinical
practice: Compared with that in survived group, the number of AgNOR in died
group was significantly higher; meanwhile, the large and small dots increased;
the distance between two polarities was increased, with the increase of small
dots being most significant; the distribution of gathered type decreased while
the distribution of mixed type increased. These results suggested that besides
the difference in numbers, the size and distribution of AgNOR were significantly
different in two groups, and there was no overlap in the range of AgNOR numbers
between died and survived groups while histological type was identical. These
results were in accord with Eusebi's report. ②the
relationship between AgNOR and correlative factors of colonic cancer prognosis:
Some studies suggested that the histological types of colonic cancers played a
role in the survival rate. Our data showed that the number of AgNOR was
significantly different in different histological types of colonic cancers, and
the number of AgNOR increased with the degree of malignancy. These results
indicated that quantitive analysis of AgNOR could reflect the cell
proliferation, differentiation and degree of malignancy and that clinical course
process correlated well with survival.
Depth of invasion was one of the most important
factors in colonic cancer prognosis, and the prognosis was significantly
different between the groups with shallow invasion and those with deep muscle,
serosal or beyond serosal invasion. Our study showed that the number of AgNOR
per nucleus was significantly higher in the latter than that in the former.
These results also suggested that the number of AgNOR correlated with the
prognosis.
Lymph node
metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was an important factor in the prognosis of
colonic cancers. Bockmuhl et al[10].
found that the numbers of AgNOR in breast cancer with lymph node metastasis was
higher than that in breast cancer without lymph node metastasis. Kakeji et al[11].
also found that the number of AgNOR increased in gastric cancer when lymph node
metastasis occurred. Our study showed that the number of AgNOR in lymph node
metastasis positive group was higher than that in lymph node metastasis negative
group. The increase of AgNOR number in infiltrative and metastatic cancer cells
suggested that those cells were more biologically active, and the rRNA gene
duplication and transcription activity was much stronger. Therefore, the count
of AgNOR number contributed to the prediction of cancer cell invasion,
metastasis and relapse after operation. We also found the AgNOR number of lymph
node metastatic cancer was higher than that of primary cancer of colon. The
results were consistent with Ohno's[12]
results in the lung
cancer with metastasis of cartilaginous sarcoma. The phenomenon might correlate
with the aberrance of cancer. More efforts are needed to explore the mechanism
in colonic cancers. The prognosis of cancers located at rectum was poorer than
that located at colon, and the prognosis of cancers in ileocecum and ascending
colon was better than that in the other parts of colon. No difference among
other sites of colon was found[3].
However, our study showed that the number of AgNOR was not different in any
location of colonic cancers. These results suggested that the number of AgNOR
was not correlated with the site of colonic cancers.As to age, in the group
below 30 years the prognosis of colonic cancers was poorer than that in 30-59
years and over 60 years groups[3].
Our study showed that in below 30 years group, the number of AgNOR was higher
than that in 30-59 years and over 60 years groups. It suggested that the number
of AgNOR increased in the young people who had poorer prognosis.
AgNOR is a
marker of cell proliferation and rRNA transcription. Therefore, cancers with
higher number of AgNOR have more active proliferation of cells. These cancers
are exuberant, with more biological activity. The patient's
condition advanced faster and the prognosis of them was worse. In contrast, in
those cancer with lower AgNOR number the proliferation of cells was relatively
slow with good biological activity. The patients' condition was stable, and the
prognosis of patients was good. Moran[5]studied
the prognosis of advanced colonic cancers, and deemed that the traditional
clinical and pathological indexes were too difficult to use in prediction of
prognosis of colonic cancers. However, AgNOR were considered as reliable
prognostic indexes. Ofner[13]studied
the AgNOR and several other prognostic indexes of colonic cancer in post
operation patients and found that the value of AgNOR for predicting the
prognosis of colonic cancers was more reliable and more accurate than that of
the WHO classification system (UIC dividing terms, Jass classification and
Duke's classification). Our stud
y showed that AgNOR correlated well with clinical prognosis, age, histological
types, the degrees of invasion and lymphonodi metastasis. Between died and
survived groups with identical histological types no overlaps were observed. As
shown in the present study, AgNOR quantitative analysis is a new, useful and
reliable index for predicting the prognosis of colonic cancers. Especially, it
can be used for the pathologic diagnoses before and after operation of colonic
cancers. This analysis can also be used to direct the treatment, and to predict
the metastasis and the relapse of cancers. There are broad prospects for
applying the AgNOR quantitative analysis to clinical practice.
REFERENCES
1 Zhuang YH, Wang RN, Hu DY. The measurement of argyrophil
protein of nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) and the
role of
AgNORs, in the study of digestive tumor. Foreign Medicine (Bromch of Digestive),
1989;9(2):82-84
2 The Tumor Prevention Office of China. The tumor prevention
association of China. Diagnosis and treatment rules of
common
cancer in China. Section 3 Large Intestine Cancer. First Ed, Beijing: The People£§s
Health Publishing
House,1990;11-20
3 He MT. Current progress of pathology study on large
intestine cancer. J Clin Exp Pathol, 1985;2(3):50-54
4 Ploton D, Menager M, Jeannesson P, Himber G, Pigeon J, Adnet
Ja2J. Improvement in the staining and in the visualizaton
of the
aryrophilic proteins of the nucleolar organizer region at the optical level.
Histochem J, 1986;18(1):5-14
5 Moran K, Cooke, T, Forster G, Cillen P, Sheehan S, Dervan P.
Prognostic value of the nucleolar organizer regions and
ploidy
values in advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 1989;76(11):1152-1155
6 Chen L, Xiao YF, Eu KR. Value of nucleolar organizer
regiona2associated protein (AgNOR) in gastric lesions.
Tianjin
Med J , 1991;8():478-480
7 Griffiths AP, Butler CW, Roberts P, Dixon MF, Quike P.
Silvera2stained structure (Aga2BORs), their dependence on tissue
fixation
and absence of prognostic relevance in rectal adenocarcinoma. J Pathol,
1989;159(2):121-127
8 Lln JQ, Zhang SL, Li SY. AgNOR in nona2Hodgkin£§s
lymphomasa2Its prognostic importance and the value in
histological
classfication. J Clin Exp Pathol, 1991;7(3):192-197
9 Eusebi V, Cattani MG, Ceccarelli M, Lamcvec J. Prognostic
relevance of silvera2stained nucleolar proteins in sarcomatoid
carcinomas
of the breast. Ultrastruct Pathol, 1991;15(3):203-214
10 Bockmuhl U, Theissing, F, Dimmer V, Kunze KD. The impact of nucleolar
organizer regions for the lymph node spread
and
prognosis of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract,
1991;187(4):437-443
11 Kakeji Y, Korenaga D, Tsujitani S, Haraguchi M, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K.
Predictive value of kia267 and argyrophilic
nucleolar
orgainizer region staining for lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Cancer
Res, 1991;51(13):3503-3506
12 Ohno T, Tanaka T, Takeuchi S, Matsunaga T, Mori H. Silvera2stained
nucleolar organizer proteins in chondrosarcoma.
Virchows
Arch B Cell Pathol, 1991;60(3):207-211
13 Ofner D, Totsch M, Sandbichler P, Hallbrucker C, Margreiter R. Silver
stained nucleolar region proteins(Aga2NORs) as
a
predictor of prognosis in colonic cancer. J Pathol, 1990;162(1):43-49
| |